Feeding BehaviorNCT04835155
The Effect of The Premature Infant Oral Motorınterventıon on Suckıng Capacıty in Preterm Infants
A study testing Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) in people with Feeding Behavior and Premature Birth, run by Hasan Kalyoncu University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
ABSTRACT Objective: To test the effect of the Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) at 29-30 weeks post-menstrual age on the development of oral-motor function and sucking capacity. Study Design: This study was a single-blind randomized controlled experimental design. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 29 to 30 weeks
- Conditions the study is for
- Feeding Behavior, Premature Birth, Sucking Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 May 2019to 15 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 29 to 30 weeks
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Eligibilty was determined by the neonatologist based on the following inclusion criteria:
- babies born at 26-30 weeks PMA,
- stable clinical condition,
- vital signs stable for at least 24 hours,
- able to have PIOMI by the 29th or 30th week PMA,
- required respiratory support limited to an oxyhood, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and/or nasal cannula up to 2L flow,
Show all 10Show fewer
- APGAR scores at 1- and 5-minutes of 4 and above,
- any race or ethnicity,
- intraventricular hemmorhage limited to level 1 or 2; and
- had no birth defects including facial anomolies that would impact feeding.
Who cannot join
- Whose gestational age at birth was less than 26 weeks,
- had congenital disorder or birth trauma,
- had NEC,
- had RDS,
- were diagnosed with severe asphyxia,
- had intraventricular bleeding,
Show all 12Show fewer
- had Newborn Withdrawal Syndrome,
- had Fetal Alcohol Syndrome,
- were receiving ventilator support,
- were receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation,
- developed any complications during the follow-up period in the intervention group, whose balance status deteriorated,
- whose written and verbal permissions were obtained from their parents.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Hasan Kalyoncu University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing
Gaziantep, Şahinbey, 27412
About this study
Official title: Faculty Member at Hasan Kalyoncu University
ABSTRACT Objective: To test the effect of the Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) at 29-30 weeks post-menstrual age on the development of oral-motor function and sucking capacity.
Study Design: This study was a single-blind randomized controlled experimental design. The sample consisted of 60 preterm babies from two Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Gaziantep, Turkey between May 2019 and March 2020, with 30 each in the control and experimental groups. The PIOMI was applied to the experimental group for five minutes a day for 14 consecutive days. Sucking capacity, growth, feeding outcomes, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were measured. The Yakut Manometer Measuring Suction Power (PCT/TR2019/050678) was developed specifically for this study and tested for the first time.
Read the detailed description
METHODS The data were obtained for 11 months between May 2019 and March 2020 in the NICUs of two different hospitals in the Gaziantep province of Turkey using a single-blind randomized controlled experimental design.
Eligibilty was determined by the neonatologist based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) babies born at 26-30 weeks PMA, 2) stable clinical condition, 3) vital signs stable for at least 24 hours, 4) able to have PIOMI by the 29th or 30th week PMA, 5) required respiratory support limited to an oxyhood, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and/or nasal cannula up to 2L flow, 6) APGAR scores at 1- and 5-minutes of 4 and above, 7) any race or ethnicity, 8) intraventricular hemmorhage limited to level 1 or 2; and 9) had no birth defects including facial anomolies that would impact feeding.
Sample The sample consisted of a total of 60 preterm infants all born after 26 weeks PMA with 30 each in the experimental and control group. Subjects were enrolled when they reached 29 or 30 weeks PMA and met inclusion criteria, and whose parents gave written consent.
Random assignment to groups was performed by a research assistant, who was not involved in the research but worked in the same unit as the researchers, using the online software at https://www.randomizer.org. The primary nurses were blinded to groups, and the parents stepped out during therapy to assist in blinding.
Two subjects were lost during the research period. Subject number 15 in the experimental group died on the 11th day after enrollment of causes unrelated to the intervention. Subject number 31 in the control group was intubated on the 7th day after enrollment thus became ineligable. After a subject dropped out, the next subject enrolled replaced that subject and the study was continued with the same sample size.
Data Collection Tools The data were recorded on a Data Collection Form, a Follow-up Form for Daily Procedures Applied to the Infant, a Sucking Capacity Monitoring Form. The outcome measurements required preterm baby bottles and pacifiers, measuring tape for growth measurements, a scale, a bottle and pacifier sterilization machine, a labeling machine, and preterm baby silicone bottle nipples. Sucking capacity was measured by the Yakut Manometer Measuring Suction Power (Figure 1), a pressure manometer embedded into a silicone nipple developed specifically for this study by Prof. Dr. Yavuz Yakut (International Patent Number PCT/TR2019/050678). The PIOMI intervention required a stopwatch and infant monitors and no other equipment.
Ethical Approval Approval for this research was obtained and dated 9.03.2019 from Hasan Kalyoncu University Faculty of Health Sciences, Research Ethics Committee(2019/29). To ensure correct performance of the PIOMI, the researcher trained with Dr. Brenda Lessen Knoll, the founder of PIOMI, and competency was evaluated via review of a video-recording of the researcher doing PIOMI on a preterm baby (with written consent from the parents) using the Reliability Rating Tool (13) to ensure intervention fidelity. Written permission was received from Dr. Yakut to use his manometer for measuring sucking power in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all subjects.
Test-Retest Reliability of the Manometer Measuring Suction Power To asses the reliability of the newly developed Yakut Manometer Measuring Suction Power it was tested on 10 preterm babies who had transitioned to full oral feedings and who had written consent from the parents and who were approved by a neonatologist. Each baby sucked on the manometer nipple for a minimum of one minute of successful sucking on two separate occcasions with a 5-minute interval in between. During both measurements, the highest value the infant could reach within the first minute after the baby began to suck was documented. The average sucking power at the 1st measure was 102±22.38 mmHg, and 104.5±13.83 mmHg at the 2nd measure. The test re-test reliability coefficient between the two applications was calculated by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (2.1) and found to be 0.912. An ICC value of 0.75 indicates good reliability, and above .90 is excellent (33). The obtained ICC value of above 0.90 showed that the manometer was suitable / acceptable for use in clinical measurements (34).
Application Phase The PIOMI was applied only by the trained researcher, and blind to the nursing staff in charge of care and feeding. No information about the PIOMI was shared with the general staff working in the NICU, and it was performed in the absence of the mothers, although no formal curtain was used for additional blinding. Day 1 of the study was considered the 1st day that the babies received PIOMI. The researcher applied PIOMI to the experimental group for 5 minutes per day for 14 consecutive days, 15-20 minutes before a sheduled feeding at either the 09:00 or 12:00 feeding. On the first day, the baseline sucking capacity of babies in both groups was measured before any intervention. On the following 8th, 11th and 14th days, the measures of sucking capacity were repeated and followed by oral feeding trials. Growth measures were collected on the 1st and 14th days and the day of disharge (CONSORT Flow Diagram). A separate manometer nipple was used for each baby and labeled with names and surnames. Before each use, the bottle nipple was sterilized with a bottle and pacifier sterilization machine. Routine hand-washing was excercised before and after any patient or equipment contact. Babies were monitored during both the PIOMI application and the evaluation of the sucking capacity for any negative physiological/ behavioral cues of intolerance (apnea, bradycardia, desaturation below 90%, crying, tachycardia, facial color change). If one negative cue was observed, the procedure was suspended until the baby returned to normal, and was documented. The intervention would then be conitnued the following day.
- Conditions
- Feeding Behavior, Premature Birth, Sucking Behavior
- Being tested
- Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI)
- Keywords
- Preterm Infant, Sucking Capacity, Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention, Feeding, Oral Stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Feeding Behavior, Premature Birth, Sucking Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI)Procedure or surgery
The Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI), developed by Dr. Brenda Lessen Knoll, was chosen for this study because it is the only oral motor program designed specifically for preterm babies as young as 29 weeks post menstrual age (PMA) and is the only program with a standardized training method and published intervention fidelity. The 5 minute therapy offers assisted movement to activate muscle contraction and movement against resistance to build strength in the perioral structures. The PIOMI has 8 steps where a provider uses a pinky finger to provide gentle stroking and pressure on the cheeks, lips, tongue, gums and palate to strengthen the oral sensory-motor functions and improve feeding efficiency. PIOMI ends with 2 minutes of NNS. NNS and oral stimulation have been found to mature the oral motor sensory system, and improve not only bottle feeding, but also breastfeeding.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| experimental group | Experimental | The researcher applied Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention to the experimental group for 5 minutes per day for 14 consecutive days, 15-20 minutes before a sheduled feeding at either the 09:00 or 12:00 feeding. On the first day, the baseline sucking capacity of babies in experimental group was measured before any intervention. On the following 8th, 11th and 14th days, the measures of sucking capacity were repeated and followed by oral feeding trials. Growth measures were collected on the 1st and 14th days and the day of disharge. Receives: Procedure: Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) |
| control grup | No intervention | The researcher did not apply any intervention. On the first day, the baseline sucking capacity of babies in control group was measured before any intervention. On the following 8th, 11th and 14th days, the measures of sucking capacity were repeated and followed by oral feeding trials. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Baby's sucking power
The suction power of the baby was measured in mmHg with the Manometer measuring the Sucking Power.
Measured: The sucking power of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.
Baby's sucking before releasing the bottle
The baby's sucking time without leaving the bottle was calculated in seconds.
Measured: The sucking time without leaving the bottle of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.
Baby's total sucking time
The baby's total sucking time was calculated in seconds.
Measured: The total sucking time of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.
Baby's sucking amount
The baby's sucking amount was calculated in milliliters.
Measured: The sucking amount of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Baby's body weight
Baby's body weight was measured in grams. height and head circumference.
Measured: The baby's body weight was measured for up to 40 weeks.
Baby's height
Baby's height was measured in centimeters.
Measured: Baby's height was measured for up to 40 weeks.
Baby's head circumference
Head circumference of the baby was measured in centimeters.
Measured: Baby's head circumference was measured for up to 40 weeks.
First day of oral feeding time
From the day the baby was included in the study, the day he sucked his mother was calculated. The average was calculated as 31 days in the experimental group and 41 days in the control group.
Measured: The day when the baby was able to have the first oral feeding was measured up to 40 weeks.
Discharge time
The total number of days the baby stayed in the hospital from the day he was included in the study was calculated.
Measured: Up to 40 weeks were measured on the day of discharge.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2021
- Study start1 May 2019
- Primary completion30 Mar 2020
- Study completion15 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Feeding BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Sample The sample consisted of a total of 60 preterm infants all born after 26 weeks PMA with 30 each in the experimental and control group. Subjects were enrolled when they reached 29 or 30 weeks PMA and met inclusion criteria, and whose parents gave written consent. Random assignment to groups was performed by a research assistant, who was not involved in the research but worked in the same unit as the researchers, using the online software at https://www.randomizer.org. The primary nurses were blinded to groups, and the parents stepped out during therapy to assist in blinding.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hasan Kalyoncu University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Selver Güler, Hasan Kalyoncu University
- Investigators
- Selver GÜLER, PhD, Principal investigator, https://www.hku.edu.tr/
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04835155
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hasan Kalyoncu University
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: We plan to share it after it is ready for publication.
Publications
Tian X, Yi LJ, Zhang L, Zhou JG, Ma L, Ou YX, Shuai T, Zeng Z, Song GM. Oral Motor Intervention Improved the Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants: Evidence Based on a Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(31):e1310. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001310.
PubMed 26252313Lessen Knoll BS, Daramas T, Drake V. Randomized Controlled Trial of a Prefeeding Oral Motor Therapy and Its Effect on Feeding Improvement in a Thai NICU. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Mar;48(2):176-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
PubMed 30721652Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2002 Aug;141(2):230-6. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.125731.
PubMed 12183719Lessen BS. Effect of the premature infant oral motor intervention on feeding progression and length of stay in preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Apr;11(2):129-39. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3182115a2a.
PubMed 21730902Lessen BS, Morello CA, Williams LJ. Establishing Intervention Fidelity of an Oral Motor Intervention for Preterm Infants. Neonatal Netw. 2015;34(2):72-82. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.34.2.72.
PubMed 26803089Kamitsuka MD, Nervik PA, Nielsen SL, Clark RH. Incidence of Nasogastric and Gastrostomy Tube at Discharge Is Reduced after Implementing an Oral Feeding Protocol in Premature (< 30 weeks) Infants. Am J Perinatol. 2017 May;34(6):606-613. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601443. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
PubMed 28376549Li XL, Liu Y, Liu M, Yang CY, Yang QZ. Early Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention Improved Oral Feeding and Prognosis by Promoting Neurodevelopment. Am J Perinatol. 2020 May;37(6):626-632. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685448. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
PubMed 31013539Ghomi H, Yadegari F, Soleimani F, Knoll BL, Noroozi M, Mazouri A. The effects of premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI) on oral feeding of preterm infants: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;120:202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
PubMed 30851536
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Faculty Member at Hasan Kalyoncu University
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04835155
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hasan Kalyoncu University
- Conditions
- Feeding Behavior, Premature Birth, Sucking Behavior
- Keywords
- Preterm Infant, Sucking Capacity, Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention, Feeding, Oral Stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ABSTRACT Objective: To test the effect of the Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) at 29-30 weeks post-menstrual age on the development of oral-motor function and sucking capacity.
Study Design: This study was a single-blind randomized controlled experimental design. The sample consisted of 60 preterm babies from two Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Gaziantep, Turkey between May 2019 and March 2020, with 30 each in the control and experimental groups. The PIOMI was applied to the experimental group for five minutes a day for 14 consecutive days. Sucking capacity, growth, feeding outcomes, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were measured. The Yakut Manometer Measuring Suction Power (PCT/TR2019/050678) was developed specifically for this study and tested for the first time.
Detailed description
METHODS The data were obtained for 11 months between May 2019 and March 2020 in the NICUs of two different hospitals in the Gaziantep province of Turkey using a single-blind randomized controlled experimental design.
Eligibilty was determined by the neonatologist based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) babies born at 26-30 weeks PMA, 2) stable clinical condition, 3) vital signs stable for at least 24 hours, 4) able to have PIOMI by the 29th or 30th week PMA, 5) required respiratory support limited to an oxyhood, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and/or nasal cannula up to 2L flow, 6) APGAR scores at 1- and 5-minutes of 4 and above, 7) any race or ethnicity, 8) intraventricular hemmorhage limited to level 1 or 2; and 9) had no birth defects including facial anomolies that would impact feeding.
Sample The sample consisted of a total of 60 preterm infants all born after 26 weeks PMA with 30 each in the experimental and control group. Subjects were enrolled when they reached 29 or 30 weeks PMA and met inclusion criteria, and whose parents gave written consent.
Random assignment to groups was performed by a research assistant, who was not involved in the research but worked in the same unit as the researchers, using the online software at https://www.randomizer.org. The primary nurses were blinded to groups, and the parents stepped out during therapy to assist in blinding.
Two subjects were lost during the research period. Subject number 15 in the experimental group died on the 11th day after enrollment of causes unrelated to the intervention. Subject number 31 in the control group was intubated on the 7th day after enrollment thus became ineligable. After a subject dropped out, the next subject enrolled replaced that subject and the study was continued with the same sample size.
Data Collection Tools The data were recorded on a Data Collection Form, a Follow-up Form for Daily Procedures Applied to the Infant, a Sucking Capacity Monitoring Form. The outcome measurements required preterm baby bottles and pacifiers, measuring tape for growth measurements, a scale, a bottle and pacifier sterilization machine, a labeling machine, and preterm baby silicone bottle nipples. Sucking capacity was measured by the Yakut Manometer Measuring Suction Power (Figure 1), a pressure manometer embedded into a silicone nipple developed specifically for this study by Prof. Dr. Yavuz Yakut (International Patent Number PCT/TR2019/050678). The PIOMI intervention required a stopwatch and infant monitors and no other equipment.
Ethical Approval Approval for this research was obtained and dated 9.03.2019 from Hasan Kalyoncu University Faculty of Health Sciences, Research Ethics Committee(2019/29). To ensure correct performance of the PIOMI, the researcher trained with Dr. Brenda Lessen Knoll, the founder of PIOMI, and competency was evaluated via review of a video-recording of the researcher doing PIOMI on a preterm baby (with written consent from the parents) using the Reliability Rating Tool (13) to ensure intervention fidelity. Written permission was received from Dr. Yakut to use his manometer for measuring sucking power in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all subjects.
Test-Retest Reliability of the Manometer Measuring Suction Power To asses the reliability of the newly developed Yakut Manometer Measuring Suction Power it was tested on 10 preterm babies who had transitioned to full oral feedings and who had written consent from the parents and who were approved by a neonatologist. Each baby sucked on the manometer nipple for a minimum of one minute of successful sucking on two separate occcasions with a 5-minute interval in between. During both measurements, the highest value the infant could reach within the first minute after the baby began to suck was documented. The average sucking power at the 1st measure was 102±22.38 mmHg, and 104.5±13.83 mmHg at the 2nd measure. The test re-test reliability coefficient between the two applications was calculated by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (2.1) and found to be 0.912. An ICC value of 0.75 indicates good reliability, and above .90 is excellent (33). The obtained ICC value of above 0.90 showed that the manometer was suitable / acceptable for use in clinical measurements (34).
Application Phase The PIOMI was applied only by the trained researcher, and blind to the nursing staff in charge of care and feeding. No information about the PIOMI was shared with the general staff working in the NICU, and it was performed in the absence of the mothers, although no formal curtain was used for additional blinding. Day 1 of the study was considered the 1st day that the babies received PIOMI. The researcher applied PIOMI to the experimental group for 5 minutes per day for 14 consecutive days, 15-20 minutes before a sheduled feeding at either the 09:00 or 12:00 feeding. On the first day, the baseline sucking capacity of babies in both groups was measured before any intervention. On the following 8th, 11th and 14th days, the measures of sucking capacity were repeated and followed by oral feeding trials. Growth measures were collected on the 1st and 14th days and the day of disharge (CONSORT Flow Diagram). A separate manometer nipple was used for each baby and labeled with names and surnames. Before each use, the bottle nipple was sterilized with a bottle and pacifier sterilization machine. Routine hand-washing was excercised before and after any patient or equipment contact. Babies were monitored during both the PIOMI application and the evaluation of the sucking capacity for any negative physiological/ behavioral cues of intolerance (apnea, bradycardia, desaturation below 90%, crying, tachycardia, facial color change). If one negative cue was observed, the procedure was suspended until the baby returned to normal, and was documented. The intervention would then be conitnued the following day.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Sample The sample consisted of a total of 60 preterm infants all born after 26 weeks PMA with 30 each in the experimental and control group. Subjects were enrolled when they reached 29 or 30 weeks PMA and met inclusion criteria, and whose parents gave written consent. Random assignment to groups was performed by a research assistant, who was not involved in the research but worked in the same unit as the researchers, using the online software at https://www.randomizer.org. The primary nurses were blinded to groups, and the parents stepped out during therapy to assist in blinding.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| experimental group | Experimental | Procedure: Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI)The researcher applied Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention to the experimental group for 5 minutes per day for 14 consecutive days, 15-20 minutes before a sheduled feeding at either the 09:00 or 12:00 feeding. On the first day, the baseline sucking capacity of babies in experimental group was measured before any intervention. On the following 8th, 11th and 14th days, the measures of sucking capacity were repeated and followed by oral feeding trials. Growth measures were collected on the 1st and 14th days and the day of disharge. |
| control grup | No intervention | –The researcher did not apply any intervention. On the first day, the baseline sucking capacity of babies in control group was measured before any intervention. On the following 8th, 11th and 14th days, the measures of sucking capacity were repeated and followed by oral feeding trials. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 29 to 30 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- babies born at 26-30 weeks PMA,
- stable clinical condition,
- vital signs stable for at least 24 hours,
- able to have PIOMI by the 29th or 30th week PMA,
- required respiratory support limited to an oxyhood, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and/or nasal cannula up to 2L flow,
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Whose gestational age at birth was less than 26 weeks,
- had congenital disorder or birth trauma,
- had NEC,
- had RDS,
- were diagnosed with severe asphyxia,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI)The Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI), developed by Dr. Brenda Lessen Knoll, was chosen for this study because it is the only oral motor program designed specifically for preterm babies as young as 29 weeks post menstrual age (PMA) and is the only program with a standardized training method and published intervention fidelity. The 5 minute therapy offers assisted movement to activate muscle contraction and movement against resistance to build strength in the perioral structures. The PIOMI has 8 steps where a provider uses a pinky finger to provide gentle stroking and pressure on the cheeks, lips, tongue, gums and palate to strengthen the oral sensory-motor functions and improve feeding efficiency. PIOMI ends with 2 minutes of NNS. NNS and oral stimulation have been found to mature the oral motor sensory system, and improve not only bottle feeding, but also breastfeeding. | Procedure or surgery | experimental group |
Primary outcome
Baby's sucking power
Time frame: The sucking power of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.
The suction power of the baby was measured in mmHg with the Manometer measuring the Sucking Power.
Baby's sucking before releasing the bottle
Time frame: The sucking time without leaving the bottle of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.
The baby's sucking time without leaving the bottle was calculated in seconds.
Baby's total sucking time
Time frame: The total sucking time of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.
The baby's total sucking time was calculated in seconds.
Baby's sucking amount
Time frame: The sucking amount of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.
The baby's sucking amount was calculated in milliliters.
5 secondary outcomes
Baby's body weight
Time frame: The baby's body weight was measured for up to 40 weeks.
Baby's height
Time frame: Baby's height was measured for up to 40 weeks.
Baby's head circumference
Time frame: Baby's head circumference was measured for up to 40 weeks.
First day of oral feeding time
Time frame: The day when the baby was able to have the first oral feeding was measured up to 40 weeks.
Discharge time
Time frame: Up to 40 weeks were measured on the day of discharge.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 26252313Tian X, Yi LJ, Zhang L, Zhou JG, Ma L, Ou YX, Shuai T, Zeng Z, Song GM. Oral Motor Intervention Improved the Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants: Evidence Based on a Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(31):e1310. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001310.
- Results publication: PubMed 30721652Lessen Knoll BS, Daramas T, Drake V. Randomized Controlled Trial of a Prefeeding Oral Motor Therapy and Its Effect on Feeding Improvement in a Thai NICU. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Mar;48(2):176-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 12183719Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2002 Aug;141(2):230-6. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.125731.
- Results publication: PubMed 21730902Lessen BS. Effect of the premature infant oral motor intervention on feeding progression and length of stay in preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Apr;11(2):129-39. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3182115a2a.
- Results publication: PubMed 26803089Lessen BS, Morello CA, Williams LJ. Establishing Intervention Fidelity of an Oral Motor Intervention for Preterm Infants. Neonatal Netw. 2015;34(2):72-82. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.34.2.72.
- Results publication: PubMed 28376549Kamitsuka MD, Nervik PA, Nielsen SL, Clark RH. Incidence of Nasogastric and Gastrostomy Tube at Discharge Is Reduced after Implementing an Oral Feeding Protocol in Premature (< 30 weeks) Infants. Am J Perinatol. 2017 May;34(6):606-613. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601443. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 31013539Li XL, Liu Y, Liu M, Yang CY, Yang QZ. Early Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention Improved Oral Feeding and Prognosis by Promoting Neurodevelopment. Am J Perinatol. 2020 May;37(6):626-632. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685448. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 30851536Ghomi H, Yadegari F, Soleimani F, Knoll BL, Noroozi M, Mazouri A. The effects of premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI) on oral feeding of preterm infants: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;120:202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
- Oral motor intervention improved the oral feeding in preterm infants: Evidence based on a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Effect of the premature infant oral motor intervention on feeding progression and length of stay in preterm infants.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Incidence of nasogastric and gastrostomy tube at discharge is reduced after implementing an oral feeding protocol in preterm (\<30 weeks) infants.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Early premature infant Oral motor intervention improved oral feeding and prognosis by promoting neurodevelopment.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. We plan to share it after it is ready for publication.
Related trials for Feeding Behavior
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of a 10-week Multicomponent Intervention Combined With Parent Education on Binge Eating Behavior in Children and Adolescents
Binge Eating Disorder, Binge Eating
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Environmental Comfort and Oral Motor Stimulation on Comfort and Oral Feeding Readiness in Preterm Infants
Prematurity, Feeding Behaviors
Recruiting
Momentary Coping Prompts and Hair Steroids in College Students
Emotional Regulation, Alcohol Drinking in College
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Selver GÜLER, PhD principal investigator
https://www.hku.edu.tr/
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) in people with Feeding Behavior and Premature Birth, run by Hasan Kalyoncu University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Baby's sucking power (time frame: The sucking power of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04835155, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2021.