Pancreatic NeoplasmNCT04843956
Comparison of EUS-FNB Biopsy Techniques of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
A study testing Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy in people with Pancreatic Neoplasm, run by Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
Patients with a diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions evidenced by imaging studies (CT, MRI) and who undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy will be selected. Biopsies will be taken using modified tip needles (FNB) three different methods (capillary by suction, capillary without suction and wet suction). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 41 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 8 Jan 2020to 30 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Over 18 years old
- Any gender.
- Patients with solid pancreatic lesions evidenced by CT or MRI who do not have a histopathological diagnosis.
Who cannot join
- That no lesion in the pancreas is identified by EUS.
- Pancreatic lesions with a cystic component.
- Alteration of coagulation parameters (INR> 1.5, Platelets <50,000 / mm3) or having taken antiplatelet agents or oral anticoagulants one week prior to the biopsy.
- History of acute pancreatitis in the last 4 weeks.
- Pregnant
- Refusal or inability to sign informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Mexico1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Héctor Miguel Delgado Cortes
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Héctor Miguel Delgado Cortés, 4423395099, hectorm.delgado@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Comparación de Tres técnicas de Biopsia Guiada Por Endosonografia de Lesiones sólidas pancreáticas
Patients with a diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions evidenced by imaging studies (CT, MRI) and who undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy will be selected. Biopsies will be taken using modified tip needles (FNB) three different methods (capillary by suction, capillary without suction and wet suction).
From the results obtained from the pathology service, 3 variables will be assessed; Cellularity, blood contamination and suitability for a diagnosis.
Read the detailed description
EUS-BAAF procedure The procedure will be performed with a linear echoendoscope (PENTAX 3.8 EG-3870 UTK) and a HITACHI HI VISION Avius ultrasound processor, after deep sedation by the anesthesiology service. BAF Acquire # 22 needles (Boston Scientific, Malborough, MA) will be used. 3 passes will be made to the tumor, each pass will consist of 10-15 movements of the needle back and forth in a fan within the solid lesion, under complete ultrasound control (ESGE 2017- Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 22 (2012) 155 -167). Doppler will be used to avoid any vascular structure in the path of the needle.
The passes will be in three different ways to compare.
- Capillary with suction (puncture with gradual withdrawal of the stylet, applying dry suction with a 10 ml air vacuum syringe after removing the stylet)
- Capillary without suction (puncture with removal of the stylet gradually, without suction after removing the stylet)
- Moist suction (Before the puncture, the stylet is removed from the needle and irrigated with 1-2 ml saline solution to replace the air column with liquid, then the solid lesion is punctured and suction is placed with a vacuum syringe of 10 ml of air)
The quality of the biopsy will be evaluated by the pathologist independently and without knowing how the sample was obtained.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Neoplasm
- Being tested
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsyDiagnostic test
Also called Pancreatic biopsy
Capillary with suction (puncture with gradual withdrawal of the stylet, applying dry suction with a 10 ml air vacuum syringe after removing the stylet)
Capillary without suction (puncture with removal of the stylet gradually, without suction after removing the stylet)
wet suction (Prior to puncture, the stylet is removed from the needle and irrigated with 1-2 ml saline solution to replace the air column with liquid, then the solid lesion is punctured and suction is placed with a 10 ml vacuum syringe of air)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with solid pancreatic lesions | Experimental | Patients who will undergo endoscopic ultrasound biopsy. Samples of at least 3 passes will be obtained, each pass obtained with a different technique (capillary with suction, capillary without suction and wet suction) Receives: Diagnostic Test: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of the sample in relation to the technique
Establish if there is a difference in the quality of the sample in relation to the technique used to obtain it
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Sample contamination relative to technique
Establish if there is a difference in the contamination of the sample, in relation to the technique used to obtain it
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2021
- Study start8 Jan 2020
- Primary completion30 Apr 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. med. Hector Eloy Tamez Perez, Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04843956
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GA19-00014
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No individual data sharing plan
Publications
Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, Choi HJ, Choi MH, Kim DC, Lee TH, Cha SW, Cho YD, Park SH. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Endoscopy. 2014 Dec;46(12):1056-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377558. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
PubMed 25098611Crino SF, Manfrin E, Scarpa A, Baldaque-Silva F, Carrara S, De Nucci G, Di Mitri R, Gines A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Itoi T, Kitano M, Nguyen NQ, Deprez PH, Poley JW, Shami VM, Tarantino I, Larghi A. EUS-FNB with or without on-site evaluation for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (FROSENOR): Protocol for a multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Jun;51(6):901-906. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
PubMed 30975612Bor R, Vasas B, Fabian A, Balint A, Farkas K, Milassin A, Czako L, Rutka M, Molnar T, Szucs M, Tiszlavicz L, Kaizer L, Hamar S, Szepes Z. Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0921-9.
PubMed 30626331Aadam AA, Oh YS, Shidham VB, Khan A, Hunt B, Rao N, Zhang Y, Tarima S, Dua KS. Eliminating the Residual Negative Pressure in the Endoscopic Ultrasound Aspirating Needle Enhances Cytology Yield of Pancreas Masses. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Mar;61(3):890-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3860-0. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
PubMed 26346997Lee JK, Choi JH, Lee KH, Kim KM, Shin JU, Lee JK, Lee KT, Jang KT. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 May;77(5):745-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
PubMed 23433878Kudo T, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, Inoue H, Katanuma A, Kawakubo K, Ishiwatari H, Doi S, Yamada R, Maguchi H, Isayama H, Mitsuhashi T, Sakamoto N; Japan EUS-FNA Negative Pressure Suction Study Group. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):1030-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
PubMed 24890422Bansal RK, Choudhary NS, Puri R, Patle SK, Bhagat S, Nasa M, Bhasin A, Sarin H, Guleria M, Sud R. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration by capillary action, suction, and no suction methods: a randomized blinded study. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Oct;5(10):E980-E984. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-116383. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
PubMed 28983505Li H, Li W, Zhou QY, Fan B. Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0207. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010207.
PubMed 29595661Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S, Deprez P, Gines A, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono P, Barthet M, Bastos P, Fornelli A, Napoleon B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seicean A, Larghi A, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):989-1006. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119219. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
PubMed 28898917Ge PS, Wani S, Watson RR, Sedarat A, Kim S, Marshall C, Wilson RH, Makker J, Mohamadnejad M, Komanduri S, Muthusamy VR. Per-Pass Performance Characteristics of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Malignant Solid Pancreatic Masses in a Large Multicenter Cohort. Pancreas. 2018 Mar;47(3):296-301. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001003.
PubMed 29401169
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparación de Tres técnicas de Biopsia Guiada Por Endosonografia de Lesiones sólidas pancreáticas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04843956
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GA19-00014
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Neoplasm
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. GonzalezUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with a diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions evidenced by imaging studies (CT, MRI) and who undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy will be selected. Biopsies will be taken using modified tip needles (FNB) three different methods (capillary by suction, capillary without suction and wet suction).
From the results obtained from the pathology service, 3 variables will be assessed; Cellularity, blood contamination and suitability for a diagnosis.
Detailed description
EUS-BAAF procedure The procedure will be performed with a linear echoendoscope (PENTAX 3.8 EG-3870 UTK) and a HITACHI HI VISION Avius ultrasound processor, after deep sedation by the anesthesiology service. BAF Acquire # 22 needles (Boston Scientific, Malborough, MA) will be used. 3 passes will be made to the tumor, each pass will consist of 10-15 movements of the needle back and forth in a fan within the solid lesion, under complete ultrasound control (ESGE 2017- Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 22 (2012) 155 -167). Doppler will be used to avoid any vascular structure in the path of the needle.
The passes will be in three different ways to compare.
- Capillary with suction (puncture with gradual withdrawal of the stylet, applying dry suction with a 10 ml air vacuum syringe after removing the stylet)
- Capillary without suction (puncture with removal of the stylet gradually, without suction after removing the stylet)
- Moist suction (Before the puncture, the stylet is removed from the needle and irrigated with 1-2 ml saline solution to replace the air column with liquid, then the solid lesion is punctured and suction is placed with a vacuum syringe of 10 ml of air)
The quality of the biopsy will be evaluated by the pathologist independently and without knowing how the sample was obtained.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with solid pancreatic lesions | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsyPatients who will undergo endoscopic ultrasound biopsy. Samples of at least 3 passes will be obtained, each pass obtained with a different technique (capillary with suction, capillary without suction and wet suction) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Over 18 years old
- Any gender.
- Patients with solid pancreatic lesions evidenced by CT or MRI who do not have a histopathological diagnosis.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- That no lesion in the pancreas is identified by EUS.
- Pancreatic lesions with a cystic component.
- Alteration of coagulation parameters (INR> 1.5, Platelets <50,000 / mm3) or having taken antiplatelet agents or oral anticoagulants one week prior to the biopsy.
- History of acute pancreatitis in the last 4 weeks.
- Pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsyAlso: Pancreatic biopsyCapillary with suction (puncture with gradual withdrawal of the stylet, applying dry suction with a 10 ml air vacuum syringe after removing the stylet) Capillary without suction (puncture with removal of the stylet gradually, without suction after removing the stylet) wet suction (Prior to puncture, the stylet is removed from the needle and irrigated with 1-2 ml saline solution to replace the air column with liquid, then the solid lesion is punctured and suction is placed with a 10 ml vacuum syringe of air) | Diagnostic test | Patients with solid pancreatic lesions |
Primary outcome
Quality of the sample in relation to the technique
Time frame: 18 months
Establish if there is a difference in the quality of the sample in relation to the technique used to obtain it
1 secondary outcome
Sample contamination relative to technique
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 25098611Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, Choi HJ, Choi MH, Kim DC, Lee TH, Cha SW, Cho YD, Park SH. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Endoscopy. 2014 Dec;46(12):1056-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377558. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
- Background: PubMed 30975612Crino SF, Manfrin E, Scarpa A, Baldaque-Silva F, Carrara S, De Nucci G, Di Mitri R, Gines A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Itoi T, Kitano M, Nguyen NQ, Deprez PH, Poley JW, Shami VM, Tarantino I, Larghi A. EUS-FNB with or without on-site evaluation for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (FROSENOR): Protocol for a multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Jun;51(6):901-906. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
- Background: PubMed 30626331Bor R, Vasas B, Fabian A, Balint A, Farkas K, Milassin A, Czako L, Rutka M, Molnar T, Szucs M, Tiszlavicz L, Kaizer L, Hamar S, Szepes Z. Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0921-9.
- Background: PubMed 26346997Aadam AA, Oh YS, Shidham VB, Khan A, Hunt B, Rao N, Zhang Y, Tarima S, Dua KS. Eliminating the Residual Negative Pressure in the Endoscopic Ultrasound Aspirating Needle Enhances Cytology Yield of Pancreas Masses. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Mar;61(3):890-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3860-0. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
- Background: PubMed 23433878Lee JK, Choi JH, Lee KH, Kim KM, Shin JU, Lee JK, Lee KT, Jang KT. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 May;77(5):745-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
- Background: PubMed 24890422Kudo T, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, Inoue H, Katanuma A, Kawakubo K, Ishiwatari H, Doi S, Yamada R, Maguchi H, Isayama H, Mitsuhashi T, Sakamoto N; Japan EUS-FNA Negative Pressure Suction Study Group. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):1030-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 28983505Bansal RK, Choudhary NS, Puri R, Patle SK, Bhagat S, Nasa M, Bhasin A, Sarin H, Guleria M, Sud R. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration by capillary action, suction, and no suction methods: a randomized blinded study. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Oct;5(10):E980-E984. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-116383. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
- Background: PubMed 29595661Li H, Li W, Zhou QY, Fan B. Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0207. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010207.
- Background: PubMed 28898917Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S, Deprez P, Gines A, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono P, Barthet M, Bastos P, Fornelli A, Napoleon B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seicean A, Larghi A, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):989-1006. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119219. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 29401169Ge PS, Wani S, Watson RR, Sedarat A, Kim S, Marshall C, Wilson RH, Makker J, Mohamadnejad M, Komanduri S, Muthusamy VR. Per-Pass Performance Characteristics of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Malignant Solid Pancreatic Masses in a Large Multicenter Cohort. Pancreas. 2018 Mar;47(3):296-301. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001003.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No individual data sharing plan
Related trials for Pancreatic Neoplasm
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy in people with Pancreatic Neoplasm, run by Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hector Miguel Delgado Cortes, M.D (+524423395099, hectorm.delgado@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of the sample in relation to the technique (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04843956, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2021.