Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryNCT04849676
Neurofeedback to Improve Spasticity After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing visual neurofeedback in people with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
After incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), many people still have control over their upper and/or lower limbs, but secondary conditions such as spasticity impair the function they have left. Spasticity includes increased reflex response and muscle tone, and is often painful. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- visual neurofeedback
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 31 Aug 2021to Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged above 18
- Incomplete injury to the spinal cord, resulting in ASIA level C or D SCI
- Injury occurred no more than six months prior to participation in the study
- Injury level C3 to C7
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
- Spasticity equivalent of MAS level 1+ and above
Show all 28Show fewer
- Aged above 18
- Incomplete injury to the spinal cord, resulting in ASIA level C or D SCI
- Injury occurred more than one year prior to participation in the study
- Injury level C3 to C7
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
- Spasticity equivalent of MAS level 1+ and above
- Live in Greater Glasgow and Clyde area
- Aged above 18
- Incomplete injury to the spinal cord, resulting in ASIA level C or D SCI
- Injury occurred no more than six months prior to participation in the study
- Injury level T1 to L1
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
- Ability to walk > 10 meters (assisted or unassisted), if ASIA level D
- Spasticity equivalent of MAS level 1+ and above
- Aged above 18
- Incomplete injury to the spinal cord, resulting in ASIA level C or D SCI
- Injury occurred more than one year prior to participation in the study
- Injury level T1 to L1
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
- Ability to walk > 10 meters (assisted or unassisted), if ASIA level D
- Spasticity equivalent of MAS level 1+ and above
- Live in Greater Glasgow and Clyde area
Who cannot join
- Participation in any other neurofeedback intervention group
- Inability to understand the task
- Self-reported neurological disorders e.g. previously confirmed peripheral nerve injury or brain injury
- General poor health due to secondary consequences of injury
- Conditions contra-indicative of neurostimulator usage (implanted devices, sensitive skin sores in the upper and lower extremities, pregnancy, severe autonomic dysreflexia)
- History of epilepsy
Show all 17Show fewer
- Inability to sit for 1.5 hours
- Inability to speak and/or understand English
- Participation in any other neurofeedback intervention group
- Inability to understand the task
- Self-reported neurological disorders e.g. previously confirmed peripheral nerve injury or brain injury
- General poor health due to secondary consequences of injury
- Conditions contra-indicative of neurostimulator usage (implanted devices, sensitive skin sores in the upper and lower extremities, pregnancy, severe autonomic dysreflexia)
- History of epilepsy
- Inability to sit for 1.5 hours
- Inability to speak and/or understand English
- Live outside Greater Glasgow and Clyde area
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injurie Unit
Glasgow, Glasgow City, G51 4TF
Mariel Purcell, MBChB BA, 01412012536, Margaret.Purcell@ggc.scot.nhs.uk
Aleksandra Vuckovic, PhD, 07906441955, Aleksandra.Vuckovic@glasgow.ac.uk
About this study
Official title: Exploring the Effects of Neurofeedback on Spasticity and Motor Function in Individuals With Subacute and Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
After incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), many people still have control over their upper and/or lower limbs, but secondary conditions such as spasticity impair the function they have left. Spasticity includes increased reflex response and muscle tone, and is often painful. In this study we want to test a rehabilitation therapy to reduce spasticity after iSCI and improve participants' control over their extremities. The study involves recording participants' brain signals (EEG) and displaying them on a computer, so that they learn to control specific features derived from their brain waves. This is called neurofeedback (NF). Two studies conducted in our group that explored NF effect on central neuropathic pain in iSCI reported as incidental finding a decrease in spasms, muscle tightness and foot drop.
The effect of NF is immediate and lasts up to 24 hours. In this study, we will explore systematically the short- and medium-term effect of NF on a larger number of iSCI, to inform a potential randomized clinical trial.
Read more
Gaining control over one's brain activity requires practice and 80-90% people eventually learn the skill. Each participant will therefore attend five sessions of NF taking no longer than two hours each.
20 participants will be recruited and assigned to either upper or lower limb spasticity groups. This will allow us to determine if the mechanism of NF differs between arms and legs. Participants will be further grouped into sub-acute and chronic groups, depending on the time since injury, to pinpoint at what stage post-injury NF is the most effective.
All groups will receive the same number of NF sessions. The primary outcome of this study is the change in spasticity of the hand or leg, as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes include use of arm/leg, quality of life, and the relation between functional improvement and EEG changes. Outcomes will be compared before/after each session, and before/after the whole intervention period, both inter- and intra-group.
Read the detailed description
The proposed study is a pilot exploratory study. It will be carried out on 20 chronic and sub-acute incomplete spinal cord injury participants who will receive five sessions of neurofeedback treatment, over two weeks. The duration and number of sessions is based on previous studies in which participants learned neurofeedback strategies after two practice sessions.
People who decide to take part will be assigned to one of the following groups: subacute lower limb (sLL), subacute upper limb (sUL), chronic lower limb (cLL) or chronic - upper limb (cUL). We will use existing clinical American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) testing information to assess the level and completeness of injury, i.e. we will gain this information from patient notes following assessment performed by the healthcare professional.
The groups will undergo similar therapy sessions. The intervention comprises the same task - neurofeedback, or modulation of brain oscillations. However, the location of modulation will differ between UL and LL groups because different parts of the brain are responsible for arm and leg function. Participants in the subacute groups (sUL, sLL) will attend two additional assessments as their baseline condition might change from week to week. Due to the nature of exploratory studies, the assessments presented for each group are necessary to determine accurately the effect of neurofeedback on motor function. Therefore, assessments presented for each session are compulsory.
The subjects will receive the intervention therapy independent of any routine therapy session at Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit (QENSIU). The sessions will occur within the same 2-hour time window, as much as possible, to prevent normal diurnal variation in biophysical parameters (brain signatures, spasms).
Recruitment: The total number of patients admitted to the QENSIU with incomplete injury in 2019-20 was 105, comprising 69 cervical level (C1-C8), 22 thoracic level (T1-T12) and 13 lumbar level (L1-L5) with a mean length of stay of 38 days (5 weeks). The out-patient activity of the Unit: in 2019-20, 1551 individuals returned for post-discharge management of their injury and 70 new outpatients were accepted.
The total number of patients graded with an ASIA impairment level C or D in 2019/20 was: C = 29, D = 63, indicating that we should be able to recruit 10 participants with subacute SCI and 10 with chronic SCI over a period of 2 years. This number would allow us to perform non-parametric statistical analysis and to collect data that would inform power analysis for a future randomised controlled trail.
Patients will be identified and approached by their clinical consultants (Co-Investigator Dr. Mariel Purcell). Prior to participating, patients will be given information sheets and consent forms to sign. Should the participant themselves be physically unable to sign, a witnessed proxy will do so on the patient's behalf.
Assessments:
All participants will be assessed before, during and after the therapy as detailed below.
- Pre- and post-therapy assessments Subacute SCI groups (sUL, sLL) will undergo two assessments before and two after the therapy period. The first and last assessments will take place one week before starting and one week after completing the NF sessions, respectively, to monitor changes in their baseline condition. Chronic participants (cUL, cLL) are considered stable, therefore only one pre- and one post-therapy assessment are needed. These will take place on the days of the first and last NF session, respectively. The pre-treatment and post-treatment assessments are identical and include the following tests: Everyone:
- Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) grades the resistance of the muscle while the researcher moves the tested limb to full extension. Upper and lower limbs will be tested for both groups, to verify whether NF only affects spasticity in the targeted limbs, or its effect is general.
- Perceived Spasticity level (SCI-SET): participants assess the impact of spasticity during the past 7 days on 35 different items from -3 (extremely problematic) to +3 (extremely helpful).
- Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) questionnaire with the emphasis on the set of questions relevant for the use of the arms or legs.
- Diary of spastic episodes - all participants will keep a diary of daily spastic episodes starting a week before and ending a week after treatment. Lower limb groups (sLL and cLL) tests:
- Instrumented Pendulum test for lower limb to evaluate the level of thigh spasticity. A digital goniometer is placed on the participant's knee and the lower leg is dropped from a resting horizontal position, to observe the number and size of oscillations performed before stopping.
- Ten-meter walking test (10MWT) to assess the initial level of locomotion of the participant, and the impact of spasticity on walking. A motion recording device will be used to evaluate walking symmetry while the participant walks 10m in a straight line. The test may be video recorded in participants who consent to this option. This test only applies to participants who can walk (with or without assistance). Upper limb groups (sUL and cUL) tests:
- Grip strength (GS) test to measure the muscle strength of the hand and forearm with the help of a dynamometer. The participant will squeeze the dynamometer three times with each hand. GS only applies to participants who are able to flex their hand.
- Instrumented Pendulum test for upper limb (elbow), similar to (e).
- Hand grip - the participant will be asked to close and open their fist. A motion recording device will be used to evaluate hand function. This will be video recorded in participants who consent to it. Hand grip motion recording only applies to participants who are able to flex their hand.
- Therapy The participants will receive 5 sessions of neurofeedback, delivered over two weeks. Interim assessments will be carried out at the beginning and end of each session.
2.1 Intervention One intervention session comprises five trials of visual neurofeedback, lasting 5 minutes each. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen in the form of three bars that represent brain features, and will focus on modulating the central bar (alpha wave). The side bars are used to reduce signal noise from blinking and movement. All participants will perform the same task.
2.2 Interim assessments During the first two sessions, the participants can explore different strategies to control their brain activity. Changes in spasticity are expected after the third session, therefore the last three interim assessments include additional tests. Interim assessments for the first two sessions will take 35 minutes in total. Assessments performed during the last three sessions will take 70 minutes in total. Overall, sessions 3, 4 and 5 will take up to 2 hours each, including comfort breaks.
- Baseline brain activity (EEG) will be recorded before and after each session. (everyone)
- Recording of participants opening and closing their fist (sUL and cUL groups) before and after each session, using the motion sensing device.
- 10-meter walking test (sLL and cLL groups) before and after each session. The test will be recorded using a motion sensing device.
- Instrumented pendulum test (everyone) before and after the last three sessions, performed using a motion sensing device.
- Modified Ashworth scale (everyone) before and after each session on selected upper or lower limb joints.
- Brief Visual Analog Scale (VAS) self-assessment of performance and mental strategies after each session. (everyone)
- Motor evoked potential (MEP) before and after the last three sessions, to determine the effect of the therapy on the descending path from the brain to the spinal cord. To obtain the MEP, a magnetic coil will be held above the participant's head and magnetic pulses will be applied. (everyone)
All equipment used in this study that is in direct contact with participants has medical device grade Certificate Europe (CE) mark.
EEG will be recorded with a g.Tech biosignal USB amplifier (Guger Technologies, Austria) which enables on-line EEG measurement, signal analysis and visualisation of EEG signals on a computer screen.
In summary, the first two sessions comprising the intervention and tests will take approximately 1 hour, and the last three sessions, which include additional assessments will last 2 hours, including comfort breaks. The five sessions will be completed within 2 weeks.
During the first assessment, patients will get advice and assistance from researchers when completing the questionnaires. For the second assessment they will be able to fill them out at home on their own.
- Conditions
- Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- visual neurofeedback
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
visual neurofeedbackOther
Neurofeedback is a neuromodulatory intervention that does not require applying external stimuli. It relies on displaying participants' brain activity in real time, with the aim of modifying it. Electrical activity (EEG) will be recorded from participants and displayed in real time on a computer screen, in the form of three bars. They will be asked to increase the middle bar, while keeping the side bars low.
The intervention requires training to achieve voluntary control of the targeted brain activity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Upper limb subacute spinal cord injury (sUL) | Experimental | Intervention: neurofeedback. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen.
Diagnostic Tests:
Modified Ashworth Scale grading muscle resistance to movement (all limbs tested)
Perceived Spasticity level questionnaire on impact of spasticity
Spinal Cord Independence Measure questionnaire on level of independence of patients
Diary of spastic episodes
Grip strength - measure of hand and forearm muscle strength using dynamometer
Instrumented Pendulum test - oscillations when forearm is dropped from a resting position
Hand grip - closing and opening the fist recorded with Kinect (Microsoft) device
EEG recording in relaxed state with bioamplifier g.usbamp (Guger Technologies, Austria)
Brief Visual Analog Scale self-assessment of performance and mental strategies
Motor evoked potential - effect of therapy on the descending path from brain to spinal cord with a transcranial magnetic stimulator (200-2, Magstim Co Ltd) Receives: Other: visual neurofeedback |
| Upper limb chronic spinal cord injury (sUL) | Experimental | Intervention: neurofeedback. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen.
Diagnostic Tests:
Modified Ashworth Scale grading muscle resistance to movement (all limbs tested)
Perceived Spasticity level questionnaire on impact of spasticity
Spinal Cord Independence Measure questionnaire on level of independence of patients
Diary of spastic episodes
Grip strength - measure of hand and forearm muscle strength using dynamometer
Instrumented Pendulum test - oscillations when forearm is dropped from a resting position
Hand grip - closing and opening the fist recorded with Kinect (Microsoft) device
EEG recording in relaxed state with bioamplifier g.usbamp (Guger Technologies, Austria)
Brief Visual Analog Scale self-assessment of performance and mental strategies
Motor evoked potential - effect of therapy on the descending path from brain to spinal cord with a transcranial magnetic stimulator (200-2, Magstim Co Ltd) Receives: Other: visual neurofeedback |
| Lower limb subacute spinal cord injury (sLL) | Experimental | Intervention: neurofeedback. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen.
Diagnostic Tests:
Modified Ashworth Scale grading muscle resistance to movement (all limbs tested)
Perceived Spasticity level questionnaire on impact of spasticity
Spinal Cord Independence Measure questionnaire on level of independence of patients
Diary of spastic episodes
Instrumented Pendulum test - oscillations when lower leg is dropped from a resting position
10m walking test - patient walks 10 meters in a straight line, recorded with Kinect (Microsoft) device
EEG recording in relaxed state with bioamplifier g.usbamp (Guger Technologies, Austria)
Brief Visual Analog Scale self-assessment of performance and mental strategies
Motor evoked potential - effect of therapy on the descending path from brain to spinal cord with a transcranial magnetic stimulator (200-2, Magstim Co Ltd) Receives: Other: visual neurofeedback |
| Lower limb chronic spinal cord injury (cLL) | Experimental | Intervention: neurofeedback. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen.
Diagnostic Tests:
Modified Ashworth Scale grading muscle resistance to movement (all limbs tested)
Perceived Spasticity level questionnaire on impact of spasticity
Spinal Cord Independence Measure questionnaire on level of independence of patients
Diary of spastic episodes
Instrumented Pendulum test - oscillations when lower leg is dropped from a resting position
10m walking test - patient walks 10 meters in a straight line, recorded with Kinect (Microsoft) device
EEG recording in relaxed state with bioamplifier g.usbamp (Guger Technologies, Austria)
Brief Visual Analog Scale self-assessment of performance and mental strategies
Motor evoked potential - effect of therapy on the descending path from brain to spinal cord with a transcranial magnetic stimulator (200-2, Magstim Co Ltd) Receives: Other: visual neurofeedback |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Modified Ashworth Scale
Improvements in spasticity in the upper or lower limb (UL, LL groups) after neurofeedback sessions
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Functional improvements
Quantitative assessment of any functional improvements in the arms or legs
Measured: 4 weeks
Participant experience
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of participant experience and changes in quality of life
Measured: 1 hour; after the last experimental session
Correlation between EEG activity and functional improvements
To understand the relation between change in brain signatures as a result of neurofeedback, and improvements in arm or leg function, with the aim of describing neurofeedback mechanisms.
Measured: one day to one month after the last experimental session, off line quantitative analysis
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2021
- Study start31 Aug 2021
- Primary completionMay 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mariel Purcell, MD, Principal investigator, NHS Greater Galsgow and Clyde
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04849676
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GN20NE696
- Other IDs
- 288894
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Shared on request
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exploring the Effects of Neurofeedback on Spasticity and Motor Function in Individuals With Subacute and Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04849676
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GN20NE696
- Conditions
- Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
After incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), many people still have control over their upper and/or lower limbs, but secondary conditions such as spasticity impair the function they have left. Spasticity includes increased reflex response and muscle tone, and is often painful. In this study we want to test a rehabilitation therapy to reduce spasticity after iSCI and improve participants' control over their extremities. The study involves recording participants' brain signals (EEG) and displaying them on a computer, so that they learn to control specific features derived from their brain waves. This is called neurofeedback (NF). Two studies conducted in our group that explored NF effect on central neuropathic pain in iSCI reported as incidental finding a decrease in spasms, muscle tightness and foot drop.
The effect of NF is immediate and lasts up to 24 hours. In this study, we will explore systematically the short- and medium-term effect of NF on a larger number of iSCI, to inform a potential randomized clinical trial.
Gaining control over one's brain activity requires practice and 80-90% people eventually learn the skill. Each participant will therefore attend five sessions of NF taking no longer than two hours each.
20 participants will be recruited and assigned to either upper or lower limb spasticity groups. This will allow us to determine if the mechanism of NF differs between arms and legs. Participants will be further grouped into sub-acute and chronic groups, depending on the time since injury, to pinpoint at what stage post-injury NF is the most effective.
All groups will receive the same number of NF sessions. The primary outcome of this study is the change in spasticity of the hand or leg, as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes include use of arm/leg, quality of life, and the relation between functional improvement and EEG changes. Outcomes will be compared before/after each session, and before/after the whole intervention period, both inter- and intra-group.
Detailed description
The proposed study is a pilot exploratory study. It will be carried out on 20 chronic and sub-acute incomplete spinal cord injury participants who will receive five sessions of neurofeedback treatment, over two weeks. The duration and number of sessions is based on previous studies in which participants learned neurofeedback strategies after two practice sessions.
People who decide to take part will be assigned to one of the following groups: subacute lower limb (sLL), subacute upper limb (sUL), chronic lower limb (cLL) or chronic - upper limb (cUL). We will use existing clinical American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) testing information to assess the level and completeness of injury, i.e. we will gain this information from patient notes following assessment performed by the healthcare professional.
The groups will undergo similar therapy sessions. The intervention comprises the same task - neurofeedback, or modulation of brain oscillations. However, the location of modulation will differ between UL and LL groups because different parts of the brain are responsible for arm and leg function. Participants in the subacute groups (sUL, sLL) will attend two additional assessments as their baseline condition might change from week to week. Due to the nature of exploratory studies, the assessments presented for each group are necessary to determine accurately the effect of neurofeedback on motor function. Therefore, assessments presented for each session are compulsory.
The subjects will receive the intervention therapy independent of any routine therapy session at Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit (QENSIU). The sessions will occur within the same 2-hour time window, as much as possible, to prevent normal diurnal variation in biophysical parameters (brain signatures, spasms).
Recruitment: The total number of patients admitted to the QENSIU with incomplete injury in 2019-20 was 105, comprising 69 cervical level (C1-C8), 22 thoracic level (T1-T12) and 13 lumbar level (L1-L5) with a mean length of stay of 38 days (5 weeks). The out-patient activity of the Unit: in 2019-20, 1551 individuals returned for post-discharge management of their injury and 70 new outpatients were accepted.
The total number of patients graded with an ASIA impairment level C or D in 2019/20 was: C = 29, D = 63, indicating that we should be able to recruit 10 participants with subacute SCI and 10 with chronic SCI over a period of 2 years. This number would allow us to perform non-parametric statistical analysis and to collect data that would inform power analysis for a future randomised controlled trail.
Patients will be identified and approached by their clinical consultants (Co-Investigator Dr. Mariel Purcell). Prior to participating, patients will be given information sheets and consent forms to sign. Should the participant themselves be physically unable to sign, a witnessed proxy will do so on the patient's behalf.
Assessments:
All participants will be assessed before, during and after the therapy as detailed below.
- Pre- and post-therapy assessments Subacute SCI groups (sUL, sLL) will undergo two assessments before and two after the therapy period. The first and last assessments will take place one week before starting and one week after completing the NF sessions, respectively, to monitor changes in their baseline condition. Chronic participants (cUL, cLL) are considered stable, therefore only one pre- and one post-therapy assessment are needed. These will take place on the days of the first and last NF session, respectively. The pre-treatment and post-treatment assessments are identical and include the following tests: Everyone:
- Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) grades the resistance of the muscle while the researcher moves the tested limb to full extension. Upper and lower limbs will be tested for both groups, to verify whether NF only affects spasticity in the targeted limbs, or its effect is general.
- Perceived Spasticity level (SCI-SET): participants assess the impact of spasticity during the past 7 days on 35 different items from -3 (extremely problematic) to +3 (extremely helpful).
- Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) questionnaire with the emphasis on the set of questions relevant for the use of the arms or legs.
- Diary of spastic episodes - all participants will keep a diary of daily spastic episodes starting a week before and ending a week after treatment. Lower limb groups (sLL and cLL) tests:
- Instrumented Pendulum test for lower limb to evaluate the level of thigh spasticity. A digital goniometer is placed on the participant's knee and the lower leg is dropped from a resting horizontal position, to observe the number and size of oscillations performed before stopping.
- Ten-meter walking test (10MWT) to assess the initial level of locomotion of the participant, and the impact of spasticity on walking. A motion recording device will be used to evaluate walking symmetry while the participant walks 10m in a straight line. The test may be video recorded in participants who consent to this option. This test only applies to participants who can walk (with or without assistance). Upper limb groups (sUL and cUL) tests:
- Grip strength (GS) test to measure the muscle strength of the hand and forearm with the help of a dynamometer. The participant will squeeze the dynamometer three times with each hand. GS only applies to participants who are able to flex their hand.
- Instrumented Pendulum test for upper limb (elbow), similar to (e).
- Hand grip - the participant will be asked to close and open their fist. A motion recording device will be used to evaluate hand function. This will be video recorded in participants who consent to it. Hand grip motion recording only applies to participants who are able to flex their hand.
- Therapy The participants will receive 5 sessions of neurofeedback, delivered over two weeks. Interim assessments will be carried out at the beginning and end of each session.
2.1 Intervention One intervention session comprises five trials of visual neurofeedback, lasting 5 minutes each. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen in the form of three bars that represent brain features, and will focus on modulating the central bar (alpha wave). The side bars are used to reduce signal noise from blinking and movement. All participants will perform the same task.
2.2 Interim assessments During the first two sessions, the participants can explore different strategies to control their brain activity. Changes in spasticity are expected after the third session, therefore the last three interim assessments include additional tests. Interim assessments for the first two sessions will take 35 minutes in total. Assessments performed during the last three sessions will take 70 minutes in total. Overall, sessions 3, 4 and 5 will take up to 2 hours each, including comfort breaks.
- Baseline brain activity (EEG) will be recorded before and after each session. (everyone)
- Recording of participants opening and closing their fist (sUL and cUL groups) before and after each session, using the motion sensing device.
- 10-meter walking test (sLL and cLL groups) before and after each session. The test will be recorded using a motion sensing device.
- Instrumented pendulum test (everyone) before and after the last three sessions, performed using a motion sensing device.
- Modified Ashworth scale (everyone) before and after each session on selected upper or lower limb joints.
- Brief Visual Analog Scale (VAS) self-assessment of performance and mental strategies after each session. (everyone)
- Motor evoked potential (MEP) before and after the last three sessions, to determine the effect of the therapy on the descending path from the brain to the spinal cord. To obtain the MEP, a magnetic coil will be held above the participant's head and magnetic pulses will be applied. (everyone)
All equipment used in this study that is in direct contact with participants has medical device grade Certificate Europe (CE) mark.
EEG will be recorded with a g.Tech biosignal USB amplifier (Guger Technologies, Austria) which enables on-line EEG measurement, signal analysis and visualisation of EEG signals on a computer screen.
In summary, the first two sessions comprising the intervention and tests will take approximately 1 hour, and the last three sessions, which include additional assessments will last 2 hours, including comfort breaks. The five sessions will be completed within 2 weeks.
During the first assessment, patients will get advice and assistance from researchers when completing the questionnaires. For the second assessment they will be able to fill them out at home on their own.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Upper limb subacute spinal cord injury (sUL) | Experimental | Other: visual neurofeedbackIntervention: neurofeedback. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen. Diagnostic Tests: Modified Ashworth Scale grading muscle resistance to movement (all limbs tested) Perceived Spasticity level questionnaire on impact of spasticity Spinal Cord Independence Measure questionnaire on level of independence of patients Diary of spastic episodes Grip strength - measure of hand and forearm muscle strength using dynamometer Instrumented Pendulum test - oscillations when forearm is dropped from a resting position Hand grip - closing and opening the fist recorded with Kinect (Microsoft) device EEG recording in relaxed state with bioamplifier g.usbamp (Guger Technologies, Austria) Brief Visual Analog Scale self-assessment of performance and mental strategies Motor evoked potential - effect of therapy on the descending path from brain to spinal cord with a transcranial magnetic stimulator (200-2, Magstim Co Ltd) |
| Upper limb chronic spinal cord injury (sUL) | Experimental | Other: visual neurofeedbackIntervention: neurofeedback. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen. Diagnostic Tests: Modified Ashworth Scale grading muscle resistance to movement (all limbs tested) Perceived Spasticity level questionnaire on impact of spasticity Spinal Cord Independence Measure questionnaire on level of independence of patients Diary of spastic episodes Grip strength - measure of hand and forearm muscle strength using dynamometer Instrumented Pendulum test - oscillations when forearm is dropped from a resting position Hand grip - closing and opening the fist recorded with Kinect (Microsoft) device EEG recording in relaxed state with bioamplifier g.usbamp (Guger Technologies, Austria) Brief Visual Analog Scale self-assessment of performance and mental strategies Motor evoked potential - effect of therapy on the descending path from brain to spinal cord with a transcranial magnetic stimulator (200-2, Magstim Co Ltd) |
| Lower limb subacute spinal cord injury (sLL) | Experimental | Other: visual neurofeedbackIntervention: neurofeedback. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen. Diagnostic Tests: Modified Ashworth Scale grading muscle resistance to movement (all limbs tested) Perceived Spasticity level questionnaire on impact of spasticity Spinal Cord Independence Measure questionnaire on level of independence of patients Diary of spastic episodes Instrumented Pendulum test - oscillations when lower leg is dropped from a resting position 10m walking test - patient walks 10 meters in a straight line, recorded with Kinect (Microsoft) device EEG recording in relaxed state with bioamplifier g.usbamp (Guger Technologies, Austria) Brief Visual Analog Scale self-assessment of performance and mental strategies Motor evoked potential - effect of therapy on the descending path from brain to spinal cord with a transcranial magnetic stimulator (200-2, Magstim Co Ltd) |
| Lower limb chronic spinal cord injury (cLL) | Experimental | Other: visual neurofeedbackIntervention: neurofeedback. Participants will receive visual feedback on a screen. Diagnostic Tests: Modified Ashworth Scale grading muscle resistance to movement (all limbs tested) Perceived Spasticity level questionnaire on impact of spasticity Spinal Cord Independence Measure questionnaire on level of independence of patients Diary of spastic episodes Instrumented Pendulum test - oscillations when lower leg is dropped from a resting position 10m walking test - patient walks 10 meters in a straight line, recorded with Kinect (Microsoft) device EEG recording in relaxed state with bioamplifier g.usbamp (Guger Technologies, Austria) Brief Visual Analog Scale self-assessment of performance and mental strategies Motor evoked potential - effect of therapy on the descending path from brain to spinal cord with a transcranial magnetic stimulator (200-2, Magstim Co Ltd) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Aged above 18
- Incomplete injury to the spinal cord, resulting in ASIA level C or D SCI
- Injury occurred no more than six months prior to participation in the study
- Injury level C3 to C7
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Participation in any other neurofeedback intervention group
- Inability to understand the task
- Self-reported neurological disorders e.g. previously confirmed peripheral nerve injury or brain injury
- General poor health due to secondary consequences of injury
- Conditions contra-indicative of neurostimulator usage (implanted devices, sensitive skin sores in the upper and lower extremities, pregnancy, severe autonomic dysreflexia)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| visual neurofeedbackNeurofeedback is a neuromodulatory intervention that does not require applying external stimuli. It relies on displaying participants' brain activity in real time, with the aim of modifying it. Electrical activity (EEG) will be recorded from participants and displayed in real time on a computer screen, in the form of three bars. They will be asked to increase the middle bar, while keeping the side bars low. The intervention requires training to achieve voluntary control of the targeted brain activity. | Other | Lower limb chronic spinal cord injury (cLL), Lower limb subacute spinal cord injury (sLL), Upper limb chronic spinal cord injury (sUL), Upper limb subacute spinal cord injury (sUL) |
Primary outcome
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: 4 weeks
Improvements in spasticity in the upper or lower limb (UL, LL groups) after neurofeedback sessions
3 secondary outcomes
Functional improvements
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant experience
Time frame: 1 hour; after the last experimental session
Correlation between EEG activity and functional improvements
Time frame: one day to one month after the last experimental session, off line quantitative analysis
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Shared on request
Related trials for Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Implant for Walking After Incomplete SCI
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Gait
Enrolling by invitation
NeuroSuitUp: Neurorehabilitation Through Synergistic Man-machine Interfaces
Spinal Cord Injuries
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation in Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injuries (Complete and Incomplete), Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Recruiting
Evaluating Long-term Use of a Pediatric Robotic Exoskeleton (P.REX/Agilik) to Improve Gait in Children With Movement Disorders
Cerebral Palsy, Muscular Dystrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mariel Purcell, MD principal investigator
NHS Greater Galsgow and Clyde
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing visual neurofeedback in people with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 28 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aleksandra Vuckovic, PhD (07906441955, Aleksandra.Vuckovic@glasgow.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Modified Ashworth Scale (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2022.