AzTrials
AzTrials

PreeclampsiaPREMETNCT04855513

Prevention of Pre-eclampsia Using Metformin: a Randomized Control Trial

A study testing Metformin in people with Preeclampsia and Preeclampsia Severe, run by Hamad Medical Corporation at 1 site in Qatar.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an open label, randomized control trial (RCT) in which high risk for pre-eclampsia pregnant subjects will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group (metformin 1 gm twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) versus control group (aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) that… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
What is being tested?
Metformin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
414 participants
Where
1 siteQatar
Study dates
24 Mar 2022to 30 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Confirmed pregnancy
  • Gestational age < 12+0 weeks
  • Live fetus at time of booking ultrasound scan (between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks of gestation)
  • To be considered as high risk of preeclampsia

Who cannot join

  • Age under 18 years
  • Hyperemesis gravidarum
  • Unable to sign the consent form
  • Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Early gestational diabetes
  • Auto-immune disease
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Fetal abnormality identified at time of scanning (between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks of gestation)
  • Bleeding disorder
  • Peptic ulcer
  • Hypersensitivity to aspirin or metformin
  • Long use of NSAIDS before initiation of intervention
  • Contraindication to metformin or aspirin and participation in another concurrent trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jyothi Lakshmi, MSc contact

+97431152937

jyothilakshmij84@gmail.com

Mariam Maducolil, MD contact

MMaducolil@hamad.qa

Qatar1 site
  • Women Wellness and Research Center

    Doha, 3050

    Jyothi Lakshmi, MSc, +97431152937, jyothilakshmij84@gmail.com

    Mariam Maducolil, MD, +97433938513, MMaducolil@hamad.qa

Other trials in Qatar

About this study

This is an open label, randomized control trial (RCT) in which high risk for pre-eclampsia pregnant subjects will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group (metformin 1 gm twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) versus control group (aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) that will be administered between 11 to 13 weeks of gestation until delivery . Only women at high risk of pre-eclampsia as defined by the ACOG practice bulletin will be included (see inclusion criteria). Patient assignment will not be blinded as control group will not be given a placebo; the data will be analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Enrolled subjects will be followed throughout pregnancy and up to 30 days post-delivery (as per hospital practice).

Read the detailed description

Preeclampsia (PET) is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality . Its pathophysiology is poorly understood. Consequently, there are no efficient preventive and treatment modality. PET is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality including prolonged hospitalization and is a major contributor to a large proportion of iatrogenic preterm birth. Women who suffer from PET are at a greater risk of hypertensive and cardiovascular diseases in later life and more likely to suffer from premature death. Since the only treatment for PET is delivery, a logical approach to reducing the incidence and therefore consequences is prevention. For this to be effective those at risk have to be identified and any timely interventions introduced.

Amongst the risk factors are maternal age, obesity, medical disorders such as antiphospholipid syndrome, hypertensive disorders, renal diseases diabetes mellitus and previous PET. A history of PET increases the risk of recurrence 7 fold and this is compounded by GA at delivery for the affected pregnancy . Moreover, both chronic hypertension and pre-existing diabetes increase the risk of PET which is further enhanced by the degree of glycemic control. Interestingly maternal and paternal history of diabetes and hypertension have been associated with increased risk of PET. Additionally, maternal age > 40 years and pregnancy interval > 10 years increases the risk of PET by two to three folds respectively .A BMI > 35 increases the risk of PET by 4 folds in both multiparous and nulliparous women. Moreover, assisted reproduction techniques and multiple gestation have also been associated with increased risk of PET. A combination of diabetes and obesity, which has a high prevalence in Qatar, significantly increases the risk of PET. Despite these risk factors only a fraction of those with at high risk eventually develop PET as the current criteria for prediction is not specific.

Various measures to predict, prevent and treat pre-eclampsia have been investigated and tried by several groups/researchers. However, these have not been very successful, primarily because PET is a disease of theories with an unclear primary pathophysiology and thus no clear target for either these predictive tools or interventions. Evidence, however, does suggest that in patients at risk of developing PET there is inadequate trophoblastic invasion, placental hypo-perfusion, and endothelial cell activation . This the basis for the most widely noninvasive clinical tool of Doppler velocimetry of the uterine artery; but again, this has a poor sensitivity. An imbalance in pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PIGF) (decreased) and antiangiogenic factors such as soluble FMSlike tyrosine kinase -1 (sFlt-1) (increased) has been implicated for the inadequate remodeling of spiral arteries (which is essential for the maintenance of a normal placental perfusion) in women who develop PET.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important signaling protein in health and diseases such as cancer, kidney diseases and PET . The VEGF family is composed of five members and three tyrosine kinase receptors. The signaling proteins are: VEGFA, VEGFB,VEGFC, VEGFD and placental growth factor (PlGF) (reviewed in (20)). The receptor tyrosine kinase consists of VEGFR1 (also known as Flt-1), VEGFR2 and VEGF3, with different binding capacity to VEGF proteins . A soluble Fms like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) a truncated form of VEGFR1, has also been identified which lacks the VEGFR1 cytosolic domain. In addition to ligand binding, VEGFR has been shown to be activated through non-ligand binding and mechanical forces. VEGF proteins are upregulated under hypoxic conditions such as PET, growth factor signaling and by hormones such as estrogen .PET is characterized by a hypoxic environment, resulting in considerable changes in maternal leukocyte gene expression, altered expression of the VEGF signaling pathway and AMPactivated protein kinase (AMPK) and secretion of sFlt-1 into the maternal circulation.VEGF including PIGF has been identified as a crucial in the signaling pathway for angiogenesis and vasculogenesis during placental development .Indeed, deletion of a single VEGF allele in mice resulted in embryonic lethality due to immature angiogenesis. The invasion of maternal spiral arteries by cytotrophoblasts is vital for adequate oxygen and nutrient supply . This process is believed to be mediated by binding of VEGF and PIGF to Flt-1 . Further, fetal DNA variants at the Flt-1 region has been associated with PET and reported recently . However, the pathophysiology of PET is still unclear and understanding of its molecular mechanism is warranted. A decreased level of VEGF and PIGF free form has been observed that has been attributed to their blockade by the increased level of sFlt-1 in pre-eclamptic women . Indeed, the introduction of sFlt-1 to a pregnant rat led to hypertension and proteinuria similar to that seen in PET women . Furthermore, an altered ratio of serum PIGF/sFlt-1 has been found to be associated with PET diagnosis and disease severity . Indeed, there is now a drive to use this ratio in screening women at risk of PET but most of the data were generated in late pregnancy rather than in early pregnancy - a time when interventions have been shown to have maximum impact . It would seem from this greater understanding of the underlying physiological changes in women that develop PET that any interventions that have the potential to alter this milieu are more likely to be successful .Very recently a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, that randomly assigned pregnant women without diabetes who had a body-mass index of more than 35 to receive metformin, at a dose of 3.0 g per day, or placebo (225 women in each group) from 12 to 18 weeks of gestation until delivery showed a significant reduction in the incidence of PET in those who received metformin . Since metformin is now frequently prescribed to obese type II diabetic women and gestational diabetics with poor glycemic control on diet, it is hypothesized in those at risk of PET, metformin will not only reduce the incidence of PET but will modify the PIGF/s-Flt-1 ratio in favor of normal pregnancies.

Being tested
Metformin
Keywords
Metformin
Medical subject headings
Pre-Eclampsia, Eclampsia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MetforminDrug

    Also called Glucophage

    Metformin is a medication used for treatment of diabetes. In this study it will be used to explore is potential role in prevention of preeclampsia. The drug will start before 12 week of pregnancy and continue till delivery

Study groups in NCT04855513
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
standard careNo interventionThe control group will receive standard care treatment including aspirin according to ACOG guidelines. The control group estimated number of enrollment is 207 patients.
MetforminExperimentalThe intervention group will be give metformin 500 mg orally three times daily in addition to standard of care. The estimated number to be enrolled are 207 patients.
Receives: Drug: Metformin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of PET

    To compare the incidence of PET between the metformin group (intervention group) versus control group

    Measured: Through study completion period (3 years)

  2. Evaluating PIGF/sFlt-1 as a prognostic marker in PET in Qatar

    Comparing PIGF/sFlt-1 ratio in both groups before and after developing PET

    Measured: Through study completion period (3 years)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. PIGF/sFlt-1 as a prognostic marker in PET patients

    Comparing PIGF/sFlt-1 ratio in PET patients who received metformin versus PET patient in the standard care group

    Measured: Through study completion period (3 years)

  2. Maternal outcomes

    Comparing gestational age at PET onset, gestation age at delivery and PET severity between study groups

    Measured: Through study completion period (3 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2021
  2. Study start24 Mar 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion24 Apr 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A randomized control trial into two groups using block randomization based on predefined criteria
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
414 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04855513
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRGC-04-JI-17-164
Acronym
PREMET
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
19 Apr 2021
Last updated
29 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG; High Risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016 Apr 19;353:i1753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1753.

    PubMed 27094586
  • Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):565. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.E0. Epub 2005 Mar 2.

    PubMed 15743856
  • Mostello D, Kallogjeri D, Tungsiripat R, Leet T. Recurrence of preeclampsia: effects of gestational age at delivery of the first pregnancy, body mass index, paternity, and interval between births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;199(1):55.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.058. Epub 2008 Feb 15.

    PubMed 18280450
  • Chappell LC, Enye S, Seed P, Briley AL, Poston L, Shennan AH. Adverse perinatal outcomes and risk factors for preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension. 2008 Apr;51(4):1002-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.107565. Epub 2008 Feb 7.

    PubMed 18259010
  • Sibai BM, Caritis S, Hauth J, Lindheimer M, VanDorsten JP, MacPherson C, Klebanoff M, Landon M, Miodovnik M, Paul R, Meis P, Dombrowski M, Thurnau G, Roberts J, McNellis D. Risks of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Feb;182(2):364-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70225-0.

    PubMed 10694338
  • Qiu C, Williams MA, Leisenring WM, Sorensen TK, Frederick IO, Dempsey JC, Luthy DA. Family history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in relation to preeclampsia risk. Hypertension. 2003 Mar;41(3):408-13. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000056996.25503.F5. Epub 2003 Feb 17.

    PubMed 12623936
  • Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;87(6):917-22. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00045-2.

    PubMed 8649698
  • Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. The interval between pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 3;346(1):33-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011379.

    PubMed 11778000
  • Wang Z, Wang P, Liu H, He X, Zhang J, Yan H, Xu D, Wang B. Maternal adiposity as an independent risk factor for pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Obes Rev. 2013 Jun;14(6):508-21. doi: 10.1111/obr.12025. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

    PubMed 23530552
  • Skupski DW, Nelson S, Kowalik A, Polaneczky M, Smith-Levitin M, Hutson JM, Rosenwaks Z. Multiple gestations from in vitro fertilization: successful implantation alone is not associated with subsequent preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):1029-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)80047-0.

    PubMed 8885770
  • Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L, Romero R. Pre-eclampsia part 2: prediction, prevention and management. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014 Sep;10(9):531-40. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.103. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

    PubMed 25003612
  • Walsh SW. What causes endothelial cell activation in preeclamptic women? Am J Pathol. 2006 Oct;169(4):1104-6. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060713. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17003470
  • Goldman-Wohl D, Yagel S. Regulation of trophoblast invasion: from normal implantation to pre-eclampsia. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002 Feb 22;187(1-2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(01)00687-6.

    PubMed 11988332
  • Gathiram P, Moodley J. Pre-eclampsia: its pathogenesis and pathophysiolgy. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016 Mar-Apr;27(2):71-8. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-009.

    PubMed 27213853
  • Nagar T, Sharma D, Choudhary M, Khoiwal S, Nagar RP, Pandita A. The Role of Uterine and Umbilical Arterial Doppler in High-risk Pregnancy: A Prospective Observational Study from India. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2015 Apr 15;9:1-5. doi: 10.4137/CMRH.S24048. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25922590

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Metformin in people with Preeclampsia and Preeclampsia Severe, run by Hamad Medical Corporation at 1 site in Qatar.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Qatar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jyothi Lakshmi, MSc (+97431152937, jyothilakshmij84@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of PET (time frame: Through study completion period (3 years)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04855513, which also lists 63 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in