PreeclampsiaPREMETNCT04855513
Prevention of Pre-eclampsia Using Metformin: a Randomized Control Trial
A study testing Metformin in people with Preeclampsia and Preeclampsia Severe, run by Hamad Medical Corporation at 1 site in Qatar.
Trial summary
This is an open label, randomized control trial (RCT) in which high risk for pre-eclampsia pregnant subjects will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group (metformin 1 gm twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) versus control group (aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) that… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Preeclampsia, Preeclampsia Severe, High Risk Pregnancy
- What is being tested?
- Metformin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 414 participants
- Where
- 1 siteQatar
- Study dates
- 24 Mar 2022to 30 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed pregnancy
- Gestational age < 12+0 weeks
- Live fetus at time of booking ultrasound scan (between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks of gestation)
- To be considered as high risk of preeclampsia
Who cannot join
- Age under 18 years
- Hyperemesis gravidarum
- Unable to sign the consent form
- Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
- Early gestational diabetes
- Auto-immune disease
Show all 12Show fewer
- Fetal abnormality identified at time of scanning (between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks of gestation)
- Bleeding disorder
- Peptic ulcer
- Hypersensitivity to aspirin or metformin
- Long use of NSAIDS before initiation of intervention
- Contraindication to metformin or aspirin and participation in another concurrent trial.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Mariam Maducolil, MD contact
Qatar1 site
Women Wellness and Research Center
Doha, 3050
Jyothi Lakshmi, MSc, +97431152937, jyothilakshmij84@gmail.com
Mariam Maducolil, MD, +97433938513, MMaducolil@hamad.qa
About this study
This is an open label, randomized control trial (RCT) in which high risk for pre-eclampsia pregnant subjects will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group (metformin 1 gm twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) versus control group (aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) that will be administered between 11 to 13 weeks of gestation until delivery . Only women at high risk of pre-eclampsia as defined by the ACOG practice bulletin will be included (see inclusion criteria). Patient assignment will not be blinded as control group will not be given a placebo; the data will be analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Enrolled subjects will be followed throughout pregnancy and up to 30 days post-delivery (as per hospital practice).
Read the detailed description
Preeclampsia (PET) is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality . Its pathophysiology is poorly understood. Consequently, there are no efficient preventive and treatment modality. PET is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality including prolonged hospitalization and is a major contributor to a large proportion of iatrogenic preterm birth. Women who suffer from PET are at a greater risk of hypertensive and cardiovascular diseases in later life and more likely to suffer from premature death. Since the only treatment for PET is delivery, a logical approach to reducing the incidence and therefore consequences is prevention. For this to be effective those at risk have to be identified and any timely interventions introduced.
Amongst the risk factors are maternal age, obesity, medical disorders such as antiphospholipid syndrome, hypertensive disorders, renal diseases diabetes mellitus and previous PET. A history of PET increases the risk of recurrence 7 fold and this is compounded by GA at delivery for the affected pregnancy . Moreover, both chronic hypertension and pre-existing diabetes increase the risk of PET which is further enhanced by the degree of glycemic control. Interestingly maternal and paternal history of diabetes and hypertension have been associated with increased risk of PET. Additionally, maternal age > 40 years and pregnancy interval > 10 years increases the risk of PET by two to three folds respectively .A BMI > 35 increases the risk of PET by 4 folds in both multiparous and nulliparous women. Moreover, assisted reproduction techniques and multiple gestation have also been associated with increased risk of PET. A combination of diabetes and obesity, which has a high prevalence in Qatar, significantly increases the risk of PET. Despite these risk factors only a fraction of those with at high risk eventually develop PET as the current criteria for prediction is not specific.
Various measures to predict, prevent and treat pre-eclampsia have been investigated and tried by several groups/researchers. However, these have not been very successful, primarily because PET is a disease of theories with an unclear primary pathophysiology and thus no clear target for either these predictive tools or interventions. Evidence, however, does suggest that in patients at risk of developing PET there is inadequate trophoblastic invasion, placental hypo-perfusion, and endothelial cell activation . This the basis for the most widely noninvasive clinical tool of Doppler velocimetry of the uterine artery; but again, this has a poor sensitivity. An imbalance in pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PIGF) (decreased) and antiangiogenic factors such as soluble FMSlike tyrosine kinase -1 (sFlt-1) (increased) has been implicated for the inadequate remodeling of spiral arteries (which is essential for the maintenance of a normal placental perfusion) in women who develop PET.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important signaling protein in health and diseases such as cancer, kidney diseases and PET . The VEGF family is composed of five members and three tyrosine kinase receptors. The signaling proteins are: VEGFA, VEGFB,VEGFC, VEGFD and placental growth factor (PlGF) (reviewed in (20)). The receptor tyrosine kinase consists of VEGFR1 (also known as Flt-1), VEGFR2 and VEGF3, with different binding capacity to VEGF proteins . A soluble Fms like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) a truncated form of VEGFR1, has also been identified which lacks the VEGFR1 cytosolic domain. In addition to ligand binding, VEGFR has been shown to be activated through non-ligand binding and mechanical forces. VEGF proteins are upregulated under hypoxic conditions such as PET, growth factor signaling and by hormones such as estrogen .PET is characterized by a hypoxic environment, resulting in considerable changes in maternal leukocyte gene expression, altered expression of the VEGF signaling pathway and AMPactivated protein kinase (AMPK) and secretion of sFlt-1 into the maternal circulation.VEGF including PIGF has been identified as a crucial in the signaling pathway for angiogenesis and vasculogenesis during placental development .Indeed, deletion of a single VEGF allele in mice resulted in embryonic lethality due to immature angiogenesis. The invasion of maternal spiral arteries by cytotrophoblasts is vital for adequate oxygen and nutrient supply . This process is believed to be mediated by binding of VEGF and PIGF to Flt-1 . Further, fetal DNA variants at the Flt-1 region has been associated with PET and reported recently . However, the pathophysiology of PET is still unclear and understanding of its molecular mechanism is warranted. A decreased level of VEGF and PIGF free form has been observed that has been attributed to their blockade by the increased level of sFlt-1 in pre-eclamptic women . Indeed, the introduction of sFlt-1 to a pregnant rat led to hypertension and proteinuria similar to that seen in PET women . Furthermore, an altered ratio of serum PIGF/sFlt-1 has been found to be associated with PET diagnosis and disease severity . Indeed, there is now a drive to use this ratio in screening women at risk of PET but most of the data were generated in late pregnancy rather than in early pregnancy - a time when interventions have been shown to have maximum impact . It would seem from this greater understanding of the underlying physiological changes in women that develop PET that any interventions that have the potential to alter this milieu are more likely to be successful .Very recently a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, that randomly assigned pregnant women without diabetes who had a body-mass index of more than 35 to receive metformin, at a dose of 3.0 g per day, or placebo (225 women in each group) from 12 to 18 weeks of gestation until delivery showed a significant reduction in the incidence of PET in those who received metformin . Since metformin is now frequently prescribed to obese type II diabetic women and gestational diabetics with poor glycemic control on diet, it is hypothesized in those at risk of PET, metformin will not only reduce the incidence of PET but will modify the PIGF/s-Flt-1 ratio in favor of normal pregnancies.
- Conditions
- Preeclampsia, Preeclampsia Severe, High Risk Pregnancy, Eclampsia
- Being tested
- Metformin
- Keywords
- Metformin
- Medical subject headings
- Pre-Eclampsia, Eclampsia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MetforminDrug
Also called Glucophage
Metformin is a medication used for treatment of diabetes. In this study it will be used to explore is potential role in prevention of preeclampsia. The drug will start before 12 week of pregnancy and continue till delivery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| standard care | No intervention | The control group will receive standard care treatment including aspirin according to ACOG guidelines. The control group estimated number of enrollment is 207 patients. |
| Metformin | Experimental | The intervention group will be give metformin 500 mg orally three times daily in addition to standard of care. The estimated number to be enrolled are 207 patients. Receives: Drug: Metformin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of PET
To compare the incidence of PET between the metformin group (intervention group) versus control group
Measured: Through study completion period (3 years)
Evaluating PIGF/sFlt-1 as a prognostic marker in PET in Qatar
Comparing PIGF/sFlt-1 ratio in both groups before and after developing PET
Measured: Through study completion period (3 years)
Secondary outcomes (2)
PIGF/sFlt-1 as a prognostic marker in PET patients
Comparing PIGF/sFlt-1 ratio in PET patients who received metformin versus PET patient in the standard care group
Measured: Through study completion period (3 years)
Maternal outcomes
Comparing gestational age at PET onset, gestation age at delivery and PET severity between study groups
Measured: Through study completion period (3 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2021
- Study start24 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion24 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (63)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PreeclampsiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A randomized control trial into two groups using block randomization based on predefined criteria
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 414 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hamad Medical Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sidra Medicine
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mahmoud Mohamed, MSc, Principal investigator, Hamad Medical CorporationJustin Konje, MD, PhD, Study chair, Hamad Medical CorporationMohamed Bashir, MD, Study director, Hamad Medical CorporationDamien Chausabel, PhD, Study director, Sidra MedicineBara Al Jarrah, BSE, Study director, Hamad Medical Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04855513
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRGC-04-JI-17-164
- Acronym
- PREMET
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG; High Risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016 Apr 19;353:i1753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1753.
PubMed 27094586Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):565. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.E0. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
PubMed 15743856Mostello D, Kallogjeri D, Tungsiripat R, Leet T. Recurrence of preeclampsia: effects of gestational age at delivery of the first pregnancy, body mass index, paternity, and interval between births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;199(1):55.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.058. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
PubMed 18280450Chappell LC, Enye S, Seed P, Briley AL, Poston L, Shennan AH. Adverse perinatal outcomes and risk factors for preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension. 2008 Apr;51(4):1002-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.107565. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
PubMed 18259010Sibai BM, Caritis S, Hauth J, Lindheimer M, VanDorsten JP, MacPherson C, Klebanoff M, Landon M, Miodovnik M, Paul R, Meis P, Dombrowski M, Thurnau G, Roberts J, McNellis D. Risks of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Feb;182(2):364-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70225-0.
PubMed 10694338Qiu C, Williams MA, Leisenring WM, Sorensen TK, Frederick IO, Dempsey JC, Luthy DA. Family history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in relation to preeclampsia risk. Hypertension. 2003 Mar;41(3):408-13. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000056996.25503.F5. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
PubMed 12623936Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;87(6):917-22. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00045-2.
PubMed 8649698Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. The interval between pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 3;346(1):33-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011379.
PubMed 11778000Wang Z, Wang P, Liu H, He X, Zhang J, Yan H, Xu D, Wang B. Maternal adiposity as an independent risk factor for pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Obes Rev. 2013 Jun;14(6):508-21. doi: 10.1111/obr.12025. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
PubMed 23530552Skupski DW, Nelson S, Kowalik A, Polaneczky M, Smith-Levitin M, Hutson JM, Rosenwaks Z. Multiple gestations from in vitro fertilization: successful implantation alone is not associated with subsequent preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):1029-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)80047-0.
PubMed 8885770Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L, Romero R. Pre-eclampsia part 2: prediction, prevention and management. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014 Sep;10(9):531-40. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.103. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
PubMed 25003612Walsh SW. What causes endothelial cell activation in preeclamptic women? Am J Pathol. 2006 Oct;169(4):1104-6. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060713. No abstract available.
PubMed 17003470Goldman-Wohl D, Yagel S. Regulation of trophoblast invasion: from normal implantation to pre-eclampsia. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002 Feb 22;187(1-2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(01)00687-6.
PubMed 11988332Gathiram P, Moodley J. Pre-eclampsia: its pathogenesis and pathophysiolgy. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016 Mar-Apr;27(2):71-8. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-009.
PubMed 27213853Nagar T, Sharma D, Choudhary M, Khoiwal S, Nagar RP, Pandita A. The Role of Uterine and Umbilical Arterial Doppler in High-risk Pregnancy: A Prospective Observational Study from India. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2015 Apr 15;9:1-5. doi: 10.4137/CMRH.S24048. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25922590
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevention of Pre-eclampsia Using Metformin: a Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04855513
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREMET / IRGC-04-JI-17-164
- Conditions
- Preeclampsia, Preeclampsia Severe, High Risk Pregnancy, Eclampsia
- Keywords
- Metformin
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 414 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hamad Medical CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sidra Medicine
- Study start
- 24 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 24 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an open label, randomized control trial (RCT) in which high risk for pre-eclampsia pregnant subjects will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group (metformin 1 gm twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) versus control group (aspirin 100 mg per day and standard of care) that will be administered between 11 to 13 weeks of gestation until delivery . Only women at high risk of pre-eclampsia as defined by the ACOG practice bulletin will be included (see inclusion criteria). Patient assignment will not be blinded as control group will not be given a placebo; the data will be analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Enrolled subjects will be followed throughout pregnancy and up to 30 days post-delivery (as per hospital practice).
Detailed description
Preeclampsia (PET) is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality . Its pathophysiology is poorly understood. Consequently, there are no efficient preventive and treatment modality. PET is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality including prolonged hospitalization and is a major contributor to a large proportion of iatrogenic preterm birth. Women who suffer from PET are at a greater risk of hypertensive and cardiovascular diseases in later life and more likely to suffer from premature death. Since the only treatment for PET is delivery, a logical approach to reducing the incidence and therefore consequences is prevention. For this to be effective those at risk have to be identified and any timely interventions introduced.
Amongst the risk factors are maternal age, obesity, medical disorders such as antiphospholipid syndrome, hypertensive disorders, renal diseases diabetes mellitus and previous PET. A history of PET increases the risk of recurrence 7 fold and this is compounded by GA at delivery for the affected pregnancy . Moreover, both chronic hypertension and pre-existing diabetes increase the risk of PET which is further enhanced by the degree of glycemic control. Interestingly maternal and paternal history of diabetes and hypertension have been associated with increased risk of PET. Additionally, maternal age > 40 years and pregnancy interval > 10 years increases the risk of PET by two to three folds respectively .A BMI > 35 increases the risk of PET by 4 folds in both multiparous and nulliparous women. Moreover, assisted reproduction techniques and multiple gestation have also been associated with increased risk of PET. A combination of diabetes and obesity, which has a high prevalence in Qatar, significantly increases the risk of PET. Despite these risk factors only a fraction of those with at high risk eventually develop PET as the current criteria for prediction is not specific.
Various measures to predict, prevent and treat pre-eclampsia have been investigated and tried by several groups/researchers. However, these have not been very successful, primarily because PET is a disease of theories with an unclear primary pathophysiology and thus no clear target for either these predictive tools or interventions. Evidence, however, does suggest that in patients at risk of developing PET there is inadequate trophoblastic invasion, placental hypo-perfusion, and endothelial cell activation . This the basis for the most widely noninvasive clinical tool of Doppler velocimetry of the uterine artery; but again, this has a poor sensitivity. An imbalance in pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PIGF) (decreased) and antiangiogenic factors such as soluble FMSlike tyrosine kinase -1 (sFlt-1) (increased) has been implicated for the inadequate remodeling of spiral arteries (which is essential for the maintenance of a normal placental perfusion) in women who develop PET.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important signaling protein in health and diseases such as cancer, kidney diseases and PET . The VEGF family is composed of five members and three tyrosine kinase receptors. The signaling proteins are: VEGFA, VEGFB,VEGFC, VEGFD and placental growth factor (PlGF) (reviewed in (20)). The receptor tyrosine kinase consists of VEGFR1 (also known as Flt-1), VEGFR2 and VEGF3, with different binding capacity to VEGF proteins . A soluble Fms like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) a truncated form of VEGFR1, has also been identified which lacks the VEGFR1 cytosolic domain. In addition to ligand binding, VEGFR has been shown to be activated through non-ligand binding and mechanical forces. VEGF proteins are upregulated under hypoxic conditions such as PET, growth factor signaling and by hormones such as estrogen .PET is characterized by a hypoxic environment, resulting in considerable changes in maternal leukocyte gene expression, altered expression of the VEGF signaling pathway and AMPactivated protein kinase (AMPK) and secretion of sFlt-1 into the maternal circulation.VEGF including PIGF has been identified as a crucial in the signaling pathway for angiogenesis and vasculogenesis during placental development .Indeed, deletion of a single VEGF allele in mice resulted in embryonic lethality due to immature angiogenesis. The invasion of maternal spiral arteries by cytotrophoblasts is vital for adequate oxygen and nutrient supply . This process is believed to be mediated by binding of VEGF and PIGF to Flt-1 . Further, fetal DNA variants at the Flt-1 region has been associated with PET and reported recently . However, the pathophysiology of PET is still unclear and understanding of its molecular mechanism is warranted. A decreased level of VEGF and PIGF free form has been observed that has been attributed to their blockade by the increased level of sFlt-1 in pre-eclamptic women . Indeed, the introduction of sFlt-1 to a pregnant rat led to hypertension and proteinuria similar to that seen in PET women . Furthermore, an altered ratio of serum PIGF/sFlt-1 has been found to be associated with PET diagnosis and disease severity . Indeed, there is now a drive to use this ratio in screening women at risk of PET but most of the data were generated in late pregnancy rather than in early pregnancy - a time when interventions have been shown to have maximum impact . It would seem from this greater understanding of the underlying physiological changes in women that develop PET that any interventions that have the potential to alter this milieu are more likely to be successful .Very recently a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, that randomly assigned pregnant women without diabetes who had a body-mass index of more than 35 to receive metformin, at a dose of 3.0 g per day, or placebo (225 women in each group) from 12 to 18 weeks of gestation until delivery showed a significant reduction in the incidence of PET in those who received metformin . Since metformin is now frequently prescribed to obese type II diabetic women and gestational diabetics with poor glycemic control on diet, it is hypothesized in those at risk of PET, metformin will not only reduce the incidence of PET but will modify the PIGF/s-Flt-1 ratio in favor of normal pregnancies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A randomized control trial into two groups using block randomization based on predefined criteria
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| standard care | No intervention | –The control group will receive standard care treatment including aspirin according to ACOG guidelines. The control group estimated number of enrollment is 207 patients. |
| Metformin | Experimental | Drug: MetforminThe intervention group will be give metformin 500 mg orally three times daily in addition to standard of care. The estimated number to be enrolled are 207 patients. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Confirmed pregnancy
- Gestational age < 12+0 weeks
- Live fetus at time of booking ultrasound scan (between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks of gestation)
- To be considered as high risk of preeclampsia
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Age under 18 years
- Hyperemesis gravidarum
- Unable to sign the consent form
- Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
- Early gestational diabetes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MetforminAlso: GlucophageMetformin is a medication used for treatment of diabetes. In this study it will be used to explore is potential role in prevention of preeclampsia. The drug will start before 12 week of pregnancy and continue till delivery | Drug | Metformin |
Primary outcome
Incidence of PET
Time frame: Through study completion period (3 years)
To compare the incidence of PET between the metformin group (intervention group) versus control group
Evaluating PIGF/sFlt-1 as a prognostic marker in PET in Qatar
Time frame: Through study completion period (3 years)
Comparing PIGF/sFlt-1 ratio in both groups before and after developing PET
2 secondary outcomes
PIGF/sFlt-1 as a prognostic marker in PET patients
Time frame: Through study completion period (3 years)
Maternal outcomes
Time frame: Through study completion period (3 years)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Mar 2022.
- Background: PubMed 27094586Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG; High Risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016 Apr 19;353:i1753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1753.
- Background: PubMed 15743856Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):565. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.E0. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
- Background: PubMed 18280450Mostello D, Kallogjeri D, Tungsiripat R, Leet T. Recurrence of preeclampsia: effects of gestational age at delivery of the first pregnancy, body mass index, paternity, and interval between births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;199(1):55.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.058. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 18259010Chappell LC, Enye S, Seed P, Briley AL, Poston L, Shennan AH. Adverse perinatal outcomes and risk factors for preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension. 2008 Apr;51(4):1002-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.107565. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
- Background: PubMed 10694338Sibai BM, Caritis S, Hauth J, Lindheimer M, VanDorsten JP, MacPherson C, Klebanoff M, Landon M, Miodovnik M, Paul R, Meis P, Dombrowski M, Thurnau G, Roberts J, McNellis D. Risks of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Feb;182(2):364-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70225-0.
- Background: PubMed 12623936Qiu C, Williams MA, Leisenring WM, Sorensen TK, Frederick IO, Dempsey JC, Luthy DA. Family history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in relation to preeclampsia risk. Hypertension. 2003 Mar;41(3):408-13. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000056996.25503.F5. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
- Background: PubMed 8649698Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;87(6):917-22. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00045-2.
- Background: PubMed 11778000Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. The interval between pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 3;346(1):33-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011379.
- Background: PubMed 23530552Wang Z, Wang P, Liu H, He X, Zhang J, Yan H, Xu D, Wang B. Maternal adiposity as an independent risk factor for pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Obes Rev. 2013 Jun;14(6):508-21. doi: 10.1111/obr.12025. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 8885770Skupski DW, Nelson S, Kowalik A, Polaneczky M, Smith-Levitin M, Hutson JM, Rosenwaks Z. Multiple gestations from in vitro fertilization: successful implantation alone is not associated with subsequent preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):1029-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)80047-0.
- Background: PubMed 25003612Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L, Romero R. Pre-eclampsia part 2: prediction, prevention and management. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014 Sep;10(9):531-40. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.103. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
- Background: PubMed 17003470Walsh SW. What causes endothelial cell activation in preeclamptic women? Am J Pathol. 2006 Oct;169(4):1104-6. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060713. No abstract available.
- Maternal, Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review ProgrammeLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Preeclampsia
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Antidepressant Therapy for Improved Blood Vessel Health After Preeclampsia
Preeclampsia, Endothelial Function
Recruiting
Community Health Worker Support to Lower Blood Pressure After a Pregnancy With High Blood Pressure
Pregnancy-Associated Hypertension, Gestational Hypertension
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Sensitivity of Angiotensin II Type II Receptors in Women Following Preeclampsia
Preeclampsia Postpartum
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Daily Aspirin Treatment After Preeclampsia
Preeclampsia
RecruitingPhase 4
Effectiveness of Two Aspirin Doses for Prevention of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: ASPIRIN TRIAL
Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mariam Maducolil, MD contact
Mahmoud Mohamed, MSc principal investigator
Hamad Medical Corporation
Justin Konje, MD, PhD study chair
Hamad Medical Corporation
Mohamed Bashir, MD study director
Hamad Medical Corporation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Metformin in people with Preeclampsia and Preeclampsia Severe, run by Hamad Medical Corporation at 1 site in Qatar.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Qatar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jyothi Lakshmi, MSc (+97431152937, jyothilakshmij84@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of PET (time frame: Through study completion period (3 years)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04855513, which also lists 63 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2022.