AzTrials
AzTrials

Acne VulgarisPhase 2NCT04856917

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Participants With Acne Vulgaris

A Phase 2 study testing Imsidolimab in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Vanda Pharmaceuticals at 15 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab in Participants with Acne Vulgaris Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 45 years
Conditions the study is for
Acne Vulgaris
What is being tested?
Imsidolimab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
123 participants
Where
15 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
15 May 2021to 29 Mar 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of moderate to severe facial AV
  • Facial IGA) score of 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe)
  • At least 20 and no more than 100 inflammatory lesions on the face
  • No more than 100 non-inflammatory lesions on the face.
  • No more than 5 nodules (≥5 millimeter [mm]) on the face

Who cannot join

  • A participant with acne fulminans or conglobate or secondary acne will be excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 2 countries.

15 sites in 2 countries

United States14 sites
  • Site 10-103

    Austin, Texas, 78759

  • Site 10-102

    College Station, Texas, 77845

  • Site 10-104

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Site 10-111

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Site 10-114

    Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913

  • Site 10-105

    Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 37130

  • Site 10-109

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70119

  • Site 10-112

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70119

  • Site 10-110

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Site 10-101

    San Antonio, Texas, 78213

  • Site 10-106

    Sherman Oaks, California, 91403

  • Site 10-113

    Sweetwater, Florida, 33172

  • Site 10-108

    Tampa, Florida, 33607

  • Site 10-107

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • Site 10-115

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2J1C4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Participants With Acne Vulgaris

Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab in Participants with Acne Vulgaris

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imsidolimab in adolescent and adult participants with acne vulgaris (AV). This study also will characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of imsidolimab and explore the immune response to imsidolimab in participants with AV.

Conditions
Acne Vulgaris
Being tested
Imsidolimab, Placebo
Keywords
LI-36 Receptor, Interleukin 36, Imsidolimab
Medical subject headings
Acne Vulgaris

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ImsidolimabDrug

    Also called ANB019

    Humanized Monoclonal Antibody

  • PlaceboBiological

    Placebo

Study groups in NCT04856917
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Imsidolimab 400/200 mgExperimentalParticipants received imsidolimab 400 milligrams (mg) by subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1, followed by 200 mg on Days 29 and 57.
Receives: Drug: Imsidolimab
Imsidolimab 200/100 mgExperimentalParticipants received imsidolimab 200 mg by SC injection on Day 1, followed by 100 mg on Days 29 and 57.
Receives: Drug: Imsidolimab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received imsidolimab matching placebo by SC injection on Days 1, 29, and 57.
Receives: Biological: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12

    The number of facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 20

    The number of facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 20

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    The number of facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 20

  3. Change From Baseline in Facial Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    The number of facial non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, and chin was counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  4. Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Non-Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    The number of facial non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, and chin was counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  5. Change From Baseline in Total Facial Lesion (Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesions) Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    The number of facial inflammatory (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesions on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in Total Facial Lesion (Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesions) Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    The number of facial inflammatory (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesions on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  7. Change From Baseline in Facial Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    The Facial IGA was a global assessment that was used to assess the current state of acne vulgaris (AV) on the face at each visit. It is a 5-point morphological assessment ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

    Clear (0): clear skin with no inflammatory or non-inflammatory lesions

    Almost Clear (1): A few scattered comedowns and a few small papules

    Mild (2): Easily recognizable; less than half the surface is involved. some comedowns and some papules and pustules

    Moderate (3): More than half of the surface is involved. Many comedowns, papules, and pustules. One nodule may be present

    Severe (4): Entire surface is involved. Covered with comedowns, numerous papules and pustules. Few nodules may be present.

    The Facial IGA was an overall global evaluation that was performed at an arm's length distance from the participant and must be performed before the acne lesion count.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Facial IGA of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least a 2-grade Decrease From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    The Facial IGA was a global assessment that was used to assess the current state of AV on the face at each visit. It is a 5-point morphological assessment ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

    Clear (0): clear skin with no inflammatory or non-inflammatory lesions

    Almost Clear (1): A few scattered comedowns and a few small papules

    Mild (2): Easily recognizable; less than half the surface is involved. some comedowns and some papules and pustules

    Moderate (3): More than half of the surface is involved. Many comedowns, papules, and pustules. One nodule may be present

    Severe (4): Entire surface is involved. Covered with comedowns, numerous papules and pustules. Few nodules may be present.

    The Facial IGA was an overall global evaluation that was performed at an arm's length distance from the participant and must be performed before the acne lesion count.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  9. Percentage of Participants in Each Response Category for the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    PGI- S was a single-item question, which asks the participant to rate the current severity of AV. The response options were:

    Clear Skin (1)

    Mild (2)

    Moderate (3)

    Severe (4)

    Higher score indicated more severity.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  10. Percentage of Participants in Each Response Category for the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    PGI-C was a single-item, self-administered questionnaire, which asked the participant to rate the change in their symptom severity. Scores ranged from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse).

    Very much better (1)

    Much better (2)

    A little better (3)

    No change (4)

    A little worse (5)

    Much worse (6)

    Very much worse (7)

    Higher score indicated more severity.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  11. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index Questionnaire (DLQI) Total Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    DLQI was a simple 10-question validated questionnaire, each question was scored from 0 (not relevant/not at all) to 3 (very much). The DLQI total score ranged from 0 (no effect on participant's life) to 30 (extremely large effect on participant's life). The aim of this participant-reported questionnaire was to measure how much the skin condition had affected the participant's quality of life. The DLQI was administered to participants ≥ 16 years of age. Participants were administered the same questionnaire during the entire study based on their age at Day 1.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  12. Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

    CDLQI was a simple 10-question validated questionnaire, each question was scored from 0 (not relevant/not at all) to 3 (very much). The CDLQI total score ranged from 0 (no effect on participant's life) to 30 (extremely large effect on participant's life). The aim of this participant-reported questionnaire was to measure how much the skin condition had affected the participant's quality of life. The CDLQI was administered to participants < 16 years of age. Participants were administered the same questionnaire during the entire study based on their age at Day 1.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

  13. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study treatment that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE was considered "serious" if it resulted in death, life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect, other important medical events. TEAE was defined as a new event that occurred during or after first dose of study treatment or any event present at baseline that worsens in either intensity or frequency after first dose of study treatment.

    Measured: First dose of study drug until end of study (up to 20 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Apr 2021
  2. Study start15 May 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion29 Mar 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
123 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04856917
Sponsor's protocol ID
ANB019-209
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
20 Apr 2021
Last updated
22 Sep 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Imsidolimab in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Vanda Pharmaceuticals at 15 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in