AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT04865666

Examining the Real-World Effectiveness of the Movr App

A study testing movr mHealth App in people with Healthy, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this 8-week pilot pragmatic randomized controlled trial was to examine the real-world impact of movr on functional movement, flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular fitness. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
movr mHealth App
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
25 Sep 2019to 14 Feb 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Ability to read and write English
  • Owned a mobile device that could download applications from the App Store or Google Play

Who cannot join

  • Previously used the movr app
  • Had any contraindications to exercise based on the Get Active Questionnaire

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Diabetes Prevention Research Group Laboratory

    Kelowna, British Columbia, V1V1V7

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Examining the Real-World Effectiveness of the Movr mHealth Application: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

The objective of this 8-week pilot pragmatic randomized controlled trial was to examine the real-world impact of movr on functional movement, flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular fitness.

Read the detailed description

Thousands of mobile apps available for download are geared towards health and fitness, yet limited research has evaluated the real-world effectiveness of such apps. The movr app is an mHealth app designed to enhance physical functioning by prescribing functional movement training based on individualized movement assessments. movr's influence on functional movement and physical fitness (flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular fitness) has not yet been established empirically. Thus, the objective of this 8-week pilot pragmatic randomized controlled trial was to examine the real-world impact of movr on functional movement, flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular fitness.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
movr mHealth App
Keywords
mHealth, functional movement, flexibility, strength, cardiovascular fitness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • movr mHealth AppDevice

    The exercises prescribed through the movr app were accompanied with videos, images, and detailed instructions on how to complete them. These exercises consisted of basic movement and mobility patterns and are designed to promote functional movement. Participants were instructed to complete a total of four 'Minis' and two workout 'Builder' sessions per week. Workout Builders are designed to be longer exercise sessions tailored to the user's desired exercise time (15, 30, 45 or 60 min), equipment available (TRX Band, kettlebell, chin-up bar, dumbbells, foam roller, or none), target body region (lower, upper, or whole body), and specific exercise goal ('get sweaty,' 'build strength,' or 'develop mobility'). Version 3.6 of the movr app was used at the start of data collection and was updated to Version 4.1 over the course of the trial. No significant changes were made to the app or to the exercise prescription functionality throughout those updates.

Study groups in NCT04865666
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
movr App GroupExperimentalParticipants were instructed to maintain their usual physical activity, diet, and sleep behavior for the 8-week intervention period and to avoid any specialized exercise training for that time period, but they were also asked to use the movr app to supplement their current activity.
Receives: Device: movr mHealth App
Waitlist Control GroupNo interventionParticipants were instructed to maintain their usual physical activity, diet, and sleep behavior over the 8-week study period and to avoid any specialized exercise training for that time period. Following the 8-week study period, individuals in the control group were permitted to download and use the movr app if they chose to.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in functional movement screen (FMS) at 8-week follow-up

    The 100-point version of the functional movement screen (FMS) was used to identify individual movement patterns. The FMS is a screening tool to assess full body movement patterns and consists of seven core movement tests (deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, active straight-leg raise, shoulder flexibility, trunk stability push-up, and quadruped rotary stability). The seven FMS movement screens were performed by each participant and recorded using a portable observation lab (Noldus) with two video cameras (one shot on a sagittal plane [side] view and the other from a frontal plane [front/back] view). The standardized FMS verbal instructions were provided by the researcher. The video-based testing was completed to minimize participant burden during lab visits and to blind participants to their FMS scores for each of the movements. Scoring of the FMS was completed at a later time using the video recordings.

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change from baseline in flexibility at 8-week follow-up

    The shoulder reach flexibility test was used to assess upper body flexibility and the sit and reach, active straight-leg raise (ASLR), and the half-kneeling dorsiflexion tests were used to assess lower body flexibility. For the shoulder reach test, a soft tape measure was used to measure the distance between participants' closed fists, and for the ASLR, range of motion in degrees were measured on each leg using a digital inclinometer (Metriks, Canada). For each of the flexibility tests (excluding sit and reach), scores from the left and right side (arm or leg) were summed and total scores are reported. A lower measurement score on the shoulder flexibility test indicates greater flexibility, while higher scores on the sit and reach, ASLR, and half-kneeling dorsiflexion tests indicate greater flexibility.

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

  2. Change from baseline in muscular endurance at 8-week follow-up

    A push-up test was used to determine the maximal number of successive push-up repetitions that participants could complete until failure. The test protocols followed the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) recommendations, including use of a modified push-up protocol for all women in the study.

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

  3. Change from baseline in handgrip strength at 8-week follow-up

    Handgrip strength was assessed using a maximal voluntary contraction of an isometric handgrip squeeze using a Smedley spring handgrip dynamometer (BASELINE®). Scores from the left and right hand were summed and total scores are reported.

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

  4. Change from baseline in lower body power at 8-week follow-up

    A countermovement jump (CMJ) was conducted using the My Jump 2 mobile app on an iPhone 8 to assess lower body power. The validity and reliability of the My Jump 2 has been established previously.

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

  5. Change from baseline in cardiovascular fitness at 8-week follow-up

    Participants performed an incremental maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) test on a cycle ergometer (Lode Excalibur Sport). The resistance on the cycle ergometer was automatically increased (1W every 3 s for women, 1W every 2 s for men) until participants reached volitional exhaustion or could no longer maintain a pedal cadence of at least 50 rpm. A metabolic cart with an online gas collection system (Parvo Medics, TrueOne 2400) was used to collect expired gas samples continuously and V̇O2max was calculated using the mean of the highest average oxygen consumption over a 30-s period (in mL·kg-1·min-1).

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

  6. Changes from baseline in health locus of control at 8-week follow-up

    Form B of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale was used to measure health locus of control

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

  7. Changes from baseline in perceptions of health at 8-week follow-up

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey was used to assess perceptions of health status

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

  8. Changes from baseline in physical activity enjoyment at 8-week follow-up

    Enjoyment of physical activity completed over the past week was measured pre- and post-intervention using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). This scale has 18 items that participants rated on a 7-point bipolar scale (from 1 to 7).

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

  9. Changes from baseline in well-being, enjoyment, satisfaction with physical functioning at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8-week follow-up

    The Subjective Exercise Experiences Scale (SEES) was used to measure participants' positive well-being, psychological distress and fatigue. The single-item Exercise Enjoyment Scale (EES) was used to measure exercise enjoyment. A 5-item measure of satisfaction with physical functioning was used assess participants' satisfaction with their (1) overall physical functioning, (2) cardiovascular fitness, (3) muscle strength, (4) flexibility, and (5) balance. This set of questions was administered at the end of each week throughout the 8-week intervention period as well as pre- and post-intervention in the form of an email that included a Qualtrics link to the survey

    Measured: Baseline and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8-week follow-up

  10. Semi-structured interviews completed at baseline and 8-week follow-up

    At the very beginning of Visit 1 and at the end of Visit 2, a random sub-sample of 15 participants from the movr group participated in semi-structured interviews that were recorded using an audio recording device (Sony ICD PX333 Digital Voice Recorder). Interview questions addressed general beliefs about fitness mobile apps and perceptions of fitness and physical functioning, individual experiences with using the movr app, how exercise perceptions may change from before to after using the movr app, and how to optimize future design and delivery of the movr app

    Measured: Baseline and 8-week follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Apr 2021
  2. Study start25 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion14 Feb 2020
  4. Study completion14 Feb 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04865666
Sponsor's protocol ID
H19-01915
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
26 Apr 2021
Last updated
29 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Stork MJ, Bell EG, Jung ME. Examining the Impact of a Mobile Health App on Functional Movement and Physical Fitness: Pilot Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 28;9(5):e24076. doi: 10.2196/24076.

    PubMed 34047704

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing movr mHealth App in people with Healthy, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in functional movement screen (FMS) at 8-week follow-up (time frame: Baseline and 8-week follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04865666, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in