Breast Cancer FemaleRADIO-SLEEPNCT04879264
Sleep Disorders Prior to and During a Course of Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
A study testing self-rating scale for severity of sleep disorders and self-rating scale for distress caused by sleep disorders in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The main goal of the study is to evaluate sleep disorders in breast cancer patients prior to and during a course of radiotherapy in terms of severity of sleep disorders, distress for the patients and use of sleeping drugs, in order to evaluate the potential effect of habituation to radiotherapy during the course of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Female
- What is being tested?
- self-rating scale for severity of sleep disorders and self-rating scale for distress caused by sleep disorders
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2021to 5 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female patient with histologically proven breast cancer
- Indication for radiotherapy
- Sleep disorders (i.e. at least 2 points on the sleep disorder self-rating scale)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2
- Age ≥18 years
- Written informed consent
- Capacity of the patient to contract
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy, Lactation
- Expected non-compliance (patient unable to use the seizure diary)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck, 23562
About this study
Official title: Sleep Disorders Prior to and During a Course of Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer and the Potential Impact of Smartphones
The main goal of the study is to evaluate sleep disorders in breast cancer patients prior to and during a course of radiotherapy in terms of severity of sleep disorders, distress for the patients and use of sleeping drugs, in order to evaluate the potential effect of habituation to radiotherapy during the course of treatment and generate hypotheses thereof.
The patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire prior to radiotherapy, after 5 and 15 fractions of radiotherapy, and at the end of radiotherapy. The questionnaire includes questions regarding symptoms, distress, sleep disorders and sleeping drugs. In addition, a questionnaire regarding the use of smartphones / tablets will be completed prior to radiotherapy.
Forty-eight patients with documented start of radiotherapy and with a documented completed questionnaire at baseline and at least one completed questionnaire after start of radiotherapy should be subjected to statistical analysis. Assuming that 5% of patients do not fulfil these requirements, a total of 51 patients should be enrolled to this study.
Read the detailed description
The majority of breast cancer patients receive adjuvant radiotherapy, either following breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. The situation that a patient needs to be irradiated may cause distress due to a sense of menace in view of the technology, fear of the exposure to radiation and fear of radiation-related adverse effects. These fears and other factors may lead to sleep disorders.
In a previous the study, cancer patients reported the most sleep disorders prior to and at the beginning of radiotherapy. The patients appeared to develop coping strategies during the treatment. In another study, an increase of insomnia was observed during the course of radiotherapy due to treatment-related side effects. In general, very little is known about the prevalence of sleep disorders prior and during a radiotherapy course. This study mainly aims to evaluate the course of sleep disorders during radiotherapy for breast cancer.
To assess the rate of patients with decrease of sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy compared to baseline, defined as
- Decrease of severity of sleep disorders by at least 2 points on a patient self-rating scale (0=no problems; 10=maximum problems) or
- Decrease of distress caused by sleep disorders by at least 2 points on a patient self-rating scale (0=no distress; 10=maximum distress) or
- Reduction of the dose of sleeping drugs by at least 25%.
The required sample size of N=51 (including drop-outs) is set at the maximum that is deemed achievable in this study within the timeframe of the study given the size of the target population. However, with this sample size a one-sample binomial test with a one-sided significance level of 2.5% has a power of 80% to yield statistical significance if the rate of patients with decrease of sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy compared to baseline is 25% (rate under the alternative hypothesis) and assuming that a decrease of only 10% or less has to be judged as a random, non-causal change in this uncontrolled study setting (null hypothesis). The latter rate was chosen after respective discussions with experts.
The focus of the statistical analysis is descriptive and exploratory in nature. If statistical tests are applied beyond the prespecified statistical hypothesis testing for the primary study endpoint, they are to be interpreted on an exploratory perspective. All data recorded in the case report forms describing the study population (demographic and clinical characteristics, at baseline) will be analyzed descriptively. Categorical data will be presented in tables with frequencies and percentages. Continuous data will be summarized with at least the following: frequency (n), median, quartiles, mean, standard deviation (standard error), minimum and maximum. Number of patients with protocol deviations during the study and listings describing the deviations will be provided. Sleep disorders at baseline and during the course of radiotherapy will be rated using two patient self-reporting scales (sleep disorders and distress) and the intake of sleeping drugs.
To evaluate the rate of patients with decrease of sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy compared to baseline, the dichotomized composite endpoint is considered. The point estimate of the rate of decrease and the associated 95% confidence interval will be presented. To test whether the rate of decrease is significantly greater than 10%, the one-sided binomial test at a one-sided 2.5% significance level will be applied.
To further assess the potential impact of other relevant factors on the primary study endpoint stratified analyses will be conducted. The associated factors of particular importance are sleeping disorders at baseline (≤ median score on sleep disorder self-rating scale vs.> median score) and the use of smartphones at bedtime (≤ median score vs. > median score). Furthermore, a logistic regression model including sleep disorder rating scale at baseline (≤ median score on sleep order self-rating scale vs.> median score), the use of smartphones / tablets at bedtime (≤ median score vs. > median score) and other factors, namely age, type of breast surgery, systemic anticancer treatment, body mass index, co-morbidity will be fitted to identify potentially relevant prognostic factors for the decrease of sleep disorders. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (Wald χ2) will be derived thereof.
In addition, each component of the primary composite endpoint will be subjected to statistical analyses to evaluate the sleep disorders during the course of the study using descriptive statistical methods. These analyses allow for detailed assessment of the scales over time taking into account potential decrease as well potential increase in sleep orders. For graphical visualization Spaghetti-plots and Box-Whisker diagrams will be provided. Moreover, the change from baseline values will be considered and subjected to descriptive analyses. Friedman tests and Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney tests may be applied for comparison of study visits. Cumulative distribution plots of changes from baseline at each visit will be presented; these plots will display a continuous change from baseline on the x-axis and the cumulative percentage of patients experiencing that change on the y-axis. The above mentioned analyses will be further stratified by sleeping disorders at baseline (≤ median score on sleep disorder self-rating scale vs.> median score) and the use of smartphones at bedtime (≤ median score vs. > median score). For further exploratory analysis, the rates of patients experiencing any sleep disorders (yes/no) at each time will be estimated together with their associated confidence intervals; these analyses will also be stratified by sleeping disorders at baseline and the use of smartphones at bedtime.
The recruitment of all 51 patients (48 patients plus 5% drop-outs) should be completed within 4.5 months. The radiotherapy period will be 3-6.5 weeks. This equals a total running time for the study of approximately 6 months.The recruitment of all 51 patients (48 patients plus 5% drop-outs) should be completed within 4.5 months. The radiotherapy period will be 3-6.5 weeks. This equals a total running time for the study of approximately 6 months.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Female
- Being tested
- self-rating scale for severity of sleep disorders, self-rating scale for distress caused by sleep disorders
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer, Radiotherapy, Sleep Disorders
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Sleep Wake Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
self-rating scale for severity of sleep disordersDiagnostic test
Participants report the severity of their sleep disorders on a self-rating scale form 0-10 (0=no sleep disorders, 10= maximum sleep disorders).
self-rating scale for distress caused by sleep disordersDiagnostic test
Participants report their distress caused by sleep disorders on a self-rating scale form 0-10 (0=no distress, 10= maximum distress).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients irradiated for breast cancer | Experimental | Participants with breast cancer who receive adjuvant radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. Receives: Diagnostic Test: self-rating scale for severity of sleep disorders; Diagnostic Test: self-rating scale for distress caused by sleep disorders |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Decreased Sleep Disorders
Sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy (assessed after 15 fractions) will be compared to sleep disorders at baseline (prior to radiotherapy).
Measured: 3 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Decreased Sleep Disorders
Sleep disorders will be assessed at the end of radiotherapy and compared to baseline.
Measured: 3 - 6.5 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2021
- Study start1 Jun 2021
- Primary completion16 Nov 2021
- Study completion5 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Zealand University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof Dirk Rades, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
- Investigators
- Dirk Rades, MD, Study chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04879264
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RADIO-SLEEP
- Acronym
- RADIO-SLEEP
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 4 May 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rades D, Narvaez CA, Dziggel L, Janssen S, Olbrich D, Tvilsted S, Kjaer TW. A prospective interventional study investigating sleep disorders prior to and during adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):1349. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09084-w.
PubMed 34930172
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sleep Disorders Prior to and During a Course of Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer and the Potential Impact of Smartphones
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04879264
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RADIO-SLEEP / RADIO-SLEEP
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Female
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer, Radiotherapy, Sleep Disorders
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Zealand University Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main goal of the study is to evaluate sleep disorders in breast cancer patients prior to and during a course of radiotherapy in terms of severity of sleep disorders, distress for the patients and use of sleeping drugs, in order to evaluate the potential effect of habituation to radiotherapy during the course of treatment and generate hypotheses thereof.
The patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire prior to radiotherapy, after 5 and 15 fractions of radiotherapy, and at the end of radiotherapy. The questionnaire includes questions regarding symptoms, distress, sleep disorders and sleeping drugs. In addition, a questionnaire regarding the use of smartphones / tablets will be completed prior to radiotherapy.
Forty-eight patients with documented start of radiotherapy and with a documented completed questionnaire at baseline and at least one completed questionnaire after start of radiotherapy should be subjected to statistical analysis. Assuming that 5% of patients do not fulfil these requirements, a total of 51 patients should be enrolled to this study.
Detailed description
The majority of breast cancer patients receive adjuvant radiotherapy, either following breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. The situation that a patient needs to be irradiated may cause distress due to a sense of menace in view of the technology, fear of the exposure to radiation and fear of radiation-related adverse effects. These fears and other factors may lead to sleep disorders.
In a previous the study, cancer patients reported the most sleep disorders prior to and at the beginning of radiotherapy. The patients appeared to develop coping strategies during the treatment. In another study, an increase of insomnia was observed during the course of radiotherapy due to treatment-related side effects. In general, very little is known about the prevalence of sleep disorders prior and during a radiotherapy course. This study mainly aims to evaluate the course of sleep disorders during radiotherapy for breast cancer.
To assess the rate of patients with decrease of sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy compared to baseline, defined as
- Decrease of severity of sleep disorders by at least 2 points on a patient self-rating scale (0=no problems; 10=maximum problems) or
- Decrease of distress caused by sleep disorders by at least 2 points on a patient self-rating scale (0=no distress; 10=maximum distress) or
- Reduction of the dose of sleeping drugs by at least 25%.
The required sample size of N=51 (including drop-outs) is set at the maximum that is deemed achievable in this study within the timeframe of the study given the size of the target population. However, with this sample size a one-sample binomial test with a one-sided significance level of 2.5% has a power of 80% to yield statistical significance if the rate of patients with decrease of sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy compared to baseline is 25% (rate under the alternative hypothesis) and assuming that a decrease of only 10% or less has to be judged as a random, non-causal change in this uncontrolled study setting (null hypothesis). The latter rate was chosen after respective discussions with experts.
The focus of the statistical analysis is descriptive and exploratory in nature. If statistical tests are applied beyond the prespecified statistical hypothesis testing for the primary study endpoint, they are to be interpreted on an exploratory perspective. All data recorded in the case report forms describing the study population (demographic and clinical characteristics, at baseline) will be analyzed descriptively. Categorical data will be presented in tables with frequencies and percentages. Continuous data will be summarized with at least the following: frequency (n), median, quartiles, mean, standard deviation (standard error), minimum and maximum. Number of patients with protocol deviations during the study and listings describing the deviations will be provided. Sleep disorders at baseline and during the course of radiotherapy will be rated using two patient self-reporting scales (sleep disorders and distress) and the intake of sleeping drugs.
To evaluate the rate of patients with decrease of sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy compared to baseline, the dichotomized composite endpoint is considered. The point estimate of the rate of decrease and the associated 95% confidence interval will be presented. To test whether the rate of decrease is significantly greater than 10%, the one-sided binomial test at a one-sided 2.5% significance level will be applied.
To further assess the potential impact of other relevant factors on the primary study endpoint stratified analyses will be conducted. The associated factors of particular importance are sleeping disorders at baseline (≤ median score on sleep disorder self-rating scale vs.> median score) and the use of smartphones at bedtime (≤ median score vs. > median score). Furthermore, a logistic regression model including sleep disorder rating scale at baseline (≤ median score on sleep order self-rating scale vs.> median score), the use of smartphones / tablets at bedtime (≤ median score vs. > median score) and other factors, namely age, type of breast surgery, systemic anticancer treatment, body mass index, co-morbidity will be fitted to identify potentially relevant prognostic factors for the decrease of sleep disorders. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (Wald χ2) will be derived thereof.
In addition, each component of the primary composite endpoint will be subjected to statistical analyses to evaluate the sleep disorders during the course of the study using descriptive statistical methods. These analyses allow for detailed assessment of the scales over time taking into account potential decrease as well potential increase in sleep orders. For graphical visualization Spaghetti-plots and Box-Whisker diagrams will be provided. Moreover, the change from baseline values will be considered and subjected to descriptive analyses. Friedman tests and Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney tests may be applied for comparison of study visits. Cumulative distribution plots of changes from baseline at each visit will be presented; these plots will display a continuous change from baseline on the x-axis and the cumulative percentage of patients experiencing that change on the y-axis. The above mentioned analyses will be further stratified by sleeping disorders at baseline (≤ median score on sleep disorder self-rating scale vs.> median score) and the use of smartphones at bedtime (≤ median score vs. > median score). For further exploratory analysis, the rates of patients experiencing any sleep disorders (yes/no) at each time will be estimated together with their associated confidence intervals; these analyses will also be stratified by sleeping disorders at baseline and the use of smartphones at bedtime.
The recruitment of all 51 patients (48 patients plus 5% drop-outs) should be completed within 4.5 months. The radiotherapy period will be 3-6.5 weeks. This equals a total running time for the study of approximately 6 months.The recruitment of all 51 patients (48 patients plus 5% drop-outs) should be completed within 4.5 months. The radiotherapy period will be 3-6.5 weeks. This equals a total running time for the study of approximately 6 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients irradiated for breast cancer | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: self-rating scale for severity of sleep disorders, Diagnostic Test: self-rating scale for distress caused by sleep disordersParticipants with breast cancer who receive adjuvant radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Female patient with histologically proven breast cancer
- Indication for radiotherapy
- Sleep disorders (i.e. at least 2 points on the sleep disorder self-rating scale)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2
- Age ≥18 years
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnancy, Lactation
- Expected non-compliance (patient unable to use the seizure diary)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| self-rating scale for severity of sleep disordersParticipants report the severity of their sleep disorders on a self-rating scale form 0-10 (0=no sleep disorders, 10= maximum sleep disorders). | Diagnostic test | Patients irradiated for breast cancer |
| self-rating scale for distress caused by sleep disordersParticipants report their distress caused by sleep disorders on a self-rating scale form 0-10 (0=no distress, 10= maximum distress). | Diagnostic test | Patients irradiated for breast cancer |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Decreased Sleep Disorders
Time frame: 3 weeks
Sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy (assessed after 15 fractions) will be compared to sleep disorders at baseline (prior to radiotherapy).
1 secondary outcome
Number of Participants With Decreased Sleep Disorders
Time frame: 3 - 6.5 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34930172Rades D, Narvaez CA, Dziggel L, Janssen S, Olbrich D, Tvilsted S, Kjaer TW. A prospective interventional study investigating sleep disorders prior to and during adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):1349. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09084-w.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer Female
Recruiting
Decision Support for Chemoprevention
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Geriatric Oncology Assessment and Coping Skills Training for Older Women on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive, Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of XL309 (ISM3091) Alone and in Combination in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of CG-7321 Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dirk Rades, MD study chair
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing self-rating scale for severity of sleep disorders and self-rating scale for distress caused by sleep disorders in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Decreased Sleep Disorders (time frame: 3 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04879264, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2025.