Low Back PainNCT04879394
Pain Sensitivity and Psychological Profile of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients
A study testing Hypnosis in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Minho at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
This study aims to characterize pain sensitivity and psychological profile of CLBP patients in comparison with pain free adults, and explore their predictive role on hypnosis outcomes, an effective intervention for pain control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Hypnosis
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 16 May 2022to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- persistent or recurrent low back pain lasting over 3 months
Who cannot join
- pain due to other causes (e.g. fibromyalgia, fracture)
- back surgery in the previous 6 months or planned in the following 6 months
- debilitating organic, psychiatric or neurological conditions (e.g. cancer, schizophrenia, dementia)
- disability compensation or litigation related to CLBP
- unavailability to commit to the hypnosis sessions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Portugal1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital de Braga
Braga, 4710
Joana Reis, +351 253 027 249
About this study
Official title: Pain Sensitivity and Psychological Profile of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: Implications for a Personalized Treatment Approach
This study aims to characterize pain sensitivity and psychological profile of CLBP patients in comparison with pain free adults, and explore their predictive role on hypnosis outcomes, an effective intervention for pain control.
Read the detailed description
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a very prevalent condition, associated with high disability and financial costs. Pain sensitization and psychological status have been associated with symptom severity and treatment outcomes, but their prognostic value is not yet well established.
This is a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial, with an experimental (hypnosis) and one control group (standard care), and 5 assessment points: baseline, post intervention, 1, 3 and 6 months follow-up. Participants will be 160 CLBP patients and 50 pain free adults, assessed on sociodemographic, clinical, pain, disability, psychophysical (Quantitative Sensory Testing) and psychological variables.
This work will contribute to a better knowledge of the mechanisms underlying CLBP and of the patient characteristics that can predict treatment outcomes after hypnosis. The findings have the potential to improve patient-targeted treatment approaches.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Hypnosis
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HypnosisOther
4 weekly hypnosis sessions, aiming at pain control and distress management. The 90 min. sessions will be conducted in group format by a doctorate-level psychologist trained in hypnosis. Contents will be detailed on hypnosis protocols to ensure standardization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis | Experimental | 4 weekly hypnosis sessions, aiming at pain control and distress management. The 90 min. sessions will be conducted in group format by a doctorate-level psychologist trained in hypnosis. Contents will be detailed on hypnosis protocols to ensure standardization. Receives: Other: Hypnosis |
| Control | No intervention | Receives standard care as usual. Assessments will be made in the same time points as experimental group, but without undergoing intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity at 1 week as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Pain intensity assessed by NRS
Measured: 1 week post-intervention
Pain intensity at 1 month as assessed by NRS
Pain intensity assessed by NRS
Measured: 1 month post-intervention
Pain intensity at 3 months as assessed by NRS
Pain intensity assessed by NRS
Measured: 3 months post-intervention
Pain intensity at 6 months as assessed by NRS
Pain intensity assessed by NRS
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (24)
Pain interference at 1 week as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Pain interference assessed by the BPI
Measured: 1 week post-intervention
Pain interference at 1 month as assessed by the BPI
Pain interference assessed by the BPI
Measured: 1 month post-intervention
Pain interference at 3 months as assessed by the BPI
Pain interference assessed by the BPI
Measured: 3 months post-intervention
Pain interference at 6 months as assessed by the BPI
Pain interference assessed by the BPI
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Functionality at 1 week as assessed by the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI)
Functionality assessed by the ODI
Measured: 1 week post-intervention
Functionality at 1 month as assessed by the ODI
Functionality as assessed by the ODI
Measured: 1 month post-intervention
Functionality at 3 months as assessed by the ODI
Functionality assessed by the ODI
Measured: 3 months post-intervention
Functionality at 6 months as assessed by the ODI
Functionality assessed by the ODI
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Quality of life at 1 week as assessed by the EuroQol Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Quality of life assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Measured: 1 week post-intervention
Quality of life at 1 month as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Quality of life assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Measured: 1 month post-intervention
Quality of life at 3 months as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Quality of life assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Measured: 3 months post-intervention
Quality of life at 6 months as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Quality of life assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Emotional distress at 1 week as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Emotional distress assessed by HADS
Measured: 1 week post-intervention
Emotional distress at 1 month as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Emotional distress assessed by HADS
Measured: 1 month post-intervention
Emotional distress at 3 months as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Emotional distress assessed by HADS
Measured: 3 months post-intervention
Emotional distress at 6 months as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Emotional distress assessed by HADS
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Optimism at 1 week as assessed by the Life Orientation Test (LOT)
Optimism assessed by LOT
Measured: 1 week post-intervention
Optimism at 1 month as assessed by LOT
Optimism assessed by LOT
Measured: 1 month post-intervention
Optimism at 3 months as assessed by LOT
Optimism assessed by LOT
Measured: 3 months post-intervention
Optimism at 6 months as assessed by LOT
Optimism assessed by LOT
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Pain catastrophizing at 1 week as assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Pain catastrophizing assessed by PCS
Measured: 1 week post-intervention
Pain catastrophizing at 1 month as assessed by PCS
Pain catastrophizing assessed by PCS
Measured: 1 month post-intervention
Pain catastrophizing at 3 months as assessed by PCS
Pain catastrophizing assessed by PCS
Measured: 3 months post-intervention
Pain catastrophizing at 6 months as assessed by PCS
Pain catastrophizing assessed by PCS
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2021
- Study start16 May 2022
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Minho
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital de Braga, Clinical Academic Center (2CA-Braga)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Patrícia Ribeiro Pinto, University of Minho
- Investigators
- Patrícia R Pinto, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Minho
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04879394
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2CA2019
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 4 May 2021
- Last updated
- 25 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pain Sensitivity and Psychological Profile of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: Implications for a Personalized Treatment Approach
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04879394
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2CA2019
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MinhoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital de Braga, Clinical Academic Center (2CA-Braga)
- Study start
- 16 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to characterize pain sensitivity and psychological profile of CLBP patients in comparison with pain free adults, and explore their predictive role on hypnosis outcomes, an effective intervention for pain control.
Detailed description
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a very prevalent condition, associated with high disability and financial costs. Pain sensitization and psychological status have been associated with symptom severity and treatment outcomes, but their prognostic value is not yet well established.
This is a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial, with an experimental (hypnosis) and one control group (standard care), and 5 assessment points: baseline, post intervention, 1, 3 and 6 months follow-up. Participants will be 160 CLBP patients and 50 pain free adults, assessed on sociodemographic, clinical, pain, disability, psychophysical (Quantitative Sensory Testing) and psychological variables.
This work will contribute to a better knowledge of the mechanisms underlying CLBP and of the patient characteristics that can predict treatment outcomes after hypnosis. The findings have the potential to improve patient-targeted treatment approaches.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis | Experimental | Other: Hypnosis4 weekly hypnosis sessions, aiming at pain control and distress management. The 90 min. sessions will be conducted in group format by a doctorate-level psychologist trained in hypnosis. Contents will be detailed on hypnosis protocols to ensure standardization. |
| Control | No intervention | –Receives standard care as usual. Assessments will be made in the same time points as experimental group, but without undergoing intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- persistent or recurrent low back pain lasting over 3 months
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- pain due to other causes (e.g. fibromyalgia, fracture)
- back surgery in the previous 6 months or planned in the following 6 months
- debilitating organic, psychiatric or neurological conditions (e.g. cancer, schizophrenia, dementia)
- disability compensation or litigation related to CLBP
- unavailability to commit to the hypnosis sessions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis4 weekly hypnosis sessions, aiming at pain control and distress management. The 90 min. sessions will be conducted in group format by a doctorate-level psychologist trained in hypnosis. Contents will be detailed on hypnosis protocols to ensure standardization. | Other | Hypnosis |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity at 1 week as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: 1 week post-intervention
Pain intensity assessed by NRS
Pain intensity at 1 month as assessed by NRS
Time frame: 1 month post-intervention
Pain intensity assessed by NRS
Pain intensity at 3 months as assessed by NRS
Time frame: 3 months post-intervention
Pain intensity assessed by NRS
Pain intensity at 6 months as assessed by NRS
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Pain intensity assessed by NRS
24 secondary outcomes
Pain interference at 1 week as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time frame: 1 week post-intervention
Pain interference at 1 month as assessed by the BPI
Time frame: 1 month post-intervention
Pain interference at 3 months as assessed by the BPI
Time frame: 3 months post-intervention
Pain interference at 6 months as assessed by the BPI
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Functionality at 1 week as assessed by the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI)
Time frame: 1 week post-intervention
Functionality at 1 month as assessed by the ODI
Time frame: 1 month post-intervention
Functionality at 3 months as assessed by the ODI
Time frame: 3 months post-intervention
Functionality at 6 months as assessed by the ODI
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Quality of life at 1 week as assessed by the EuroQol Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: 1 week post-intervention
Quality of life at 1 month as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: 1 month post-intervention
Quality of life at 3 months as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: 3 months post-intervention
Quality of life at 6 months as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Emotional distress at 1 week as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: 1 week post-intervention
Emotional distress at 1 month as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: 1 month post-intervention
Emotional distress at 3 months as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: 3 months post-intervention
Emotional distress at 6 months as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Optimism at 1 week as assessed by the Life Orientation Test (LOT)
Time frame: 1 week post-intervention
Optimism at 1 month as assessed by LOT
Time frame: 1 month post-intervention
Optimism at 3 months as assessed by LOT
Time frame: 3 months post-intervention
Optimism at 6 months as assessed by LOT
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Pain catastrophizing at 1 week as assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time frame: 1 week post-intervention
Pain catastrophizing at 1 month as assessed by PCS
Time frame: 1 month post-intervention
Pain catastrophizing at 3 months as assessed by PCS
Time frame: 3 months post-intervention
Pain catastrophizing at 6 months as assessed by PCS
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 May 2022.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patrícia R Pinto, PhD principal investigator
University of Minho
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hypnosis in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Minho at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Patrícia R Pinto, PhD (00351253604926, patipinto@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity at 1 week as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (time frame: 1 week post-intervention). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2022.