Lumbar Disc HerniationNCT04885140
Effect of Feedback Health Education on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation
A study testing Feedback-based health education and Routine health education in people with Lumbar Disc Herniation, run by Tianjin Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Aims and Objective: A theoretical model based on guided postoperative rehabilitation with feedback was developed for patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion to explore the effects of feedback-based health education. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- What is being tested?
- Feedback-based health education and Routine health education
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2019to 4 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation Disease
- Must be able to Cooperate with research
Who cannot join
- Lumbar malignant tumors, lumbar tuberculosis and osteoporosis
- People with mental system diseases.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Feedback Health Education on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Cluster Randomized Trials
Aims and Objective: A theoretical model based on guided postoperative rehabilitation with feedback was developed for patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion to explore the effects of feedback-based health education. Patients were assessed in terms of disease knowledge, general self-efficacy, medical behaviour, and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). During postoperative rehabilitation, nursing staff provided health education regarding lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion.
Read the detailed description
Grouping method For the surgical treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. The age of the included patients was greater than or equal to 18 years. Patients were cluster randomized by a coin toss into an experimental group that underwent spine surgery and a control group; 38 cases were included in each group for a total of 76 cases, and patients were assigned to the experimental and control groups in a 1:1 ratio, ensuring balance between groups. During implementation of the intervention, 1 patient in the control group voluntarily requested to withdraw from the study midway through the study, and the loss to follow-up rate was 2.6%. Finally, a total of 75 patients were included in this study, including 38 in the experimental group and 37 in the control group.
3 Test group
(1) Implementation of the feedback method includes information transmission, patient feedback, clarification and correction, and confirmation of understanding
① Conveying health information Medical terms were transformed into plain language so that patients could easily understand the health education content. The feedback method was used to explain the pathogenesis of LDH as protrusion or degeneration of the collodium supporting the lumbar spine and rupture of the cartilage protecting the lumbar spine. The protruding collodium compresses the nerve root, leading to pain in the back and leg.
- Patient feedback After a health message was delivered, the patient was asked to repeat the information back in his own words with the following question: To make sure I'm clear, could you repeat the pathogenesis for me? ③ Educator clarification and correction If the patient had mastered the relevant information, the health education session was ended. If the patient understood some or no information, the steps were repeated, and the educator continued to explain the concept to the patient but changed the way he or she expressed it. ④ Checking understanding Finally, open questions such as the following were used to confirm the patient's understanding: Do you have any other questions? The patients were then given a chance to sort out the health information. (2) Patients in the test group received health education according to the feedback method, and the intervention contents and time were as follows: ① One day before surgery: Health education team members provided bedside one-on-one education for patients, 15-20 min per session, twice a day. Health education manuals and other tools were used to explain information related to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, including the pathogenesis of LDH, clinical manifestations, the significance of relevant examinations, the principle of surgical treatment, and the importance of exercising according to the guidance of doctors, to the patient. The main problem before LDH was pain in the waist and legs, so the patients were advised to take medication and taught how to take neurotropin, mecobalamine, Celebrex and other drugs.
- One week after surgery: One-on-one education on rehabilitation exercise was conducted for the patients by the health education team members, 15-20 min per session, twice a day.
Day of surgery: The main concerns of the patients were wound pain and axial rolling. After returning to the ward, the patients were taught about pain and the correct use of the analgesic pump.
One week after surgery: The main concerns of the patients were waist circumference and methods of rehabilitation exercise. Patients were instructed to perform straight leg raising exercises, ankle pump exercises and quad contraction exercises, 10~20 times/session, 3 sessions/day. If the patient understood the relevant knowledge and completed the rehabilitation exercise, the patient was affirmed and encouraged in the form of award certificates, and the "Best Cooperation Award", "Best Progress Award", "Most Confidence Award", "Three Good Fellow Award", etc., were used to enhance the patient's self-confidence, sense of honour and sense of achievement in rehabilitation exercise. In terms of discharge guidance, patients were told to go home and continue to perform functional exercise.
③ Two to four weeks after surgery: The main concerns of patients were functional exercise and daily life activities. The health education group members guided the patients through functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Each intervention lasted 20-30 min. The patients interacted once through WeChatB1, and their questions were answered at any time. Patients were instructed to perform head lifting training in the prone position, a wood rolling exercise, walking training (waist-assisted) and supine hip flexion and knee flexion exercises, 5-10 min/session, 3 sessions/day. Patients were required to sign in after receiving new exercises and give feedback. Patients were required to "send a video of themselves performing functional exercise to the group", and the health education team members corrected any incorrect movement or frequency, answered their questions, and confirmed whether they understood until they had fully mastered the correct methods for the functional exercise. WeChat pushed small pieces of information twice via a link.
④ Five to 12 weeks after surgery: the main concerns of patients were functional exercise methods, such as five-point support, and other matters needing attention. The health education group members guided patients through the functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Each intervention lasted 20~30 min, and WeChat was used for both sessions.
4 Control group: The patients underwent routine health education.
- Conditions
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Being tested
- Feedback-based health education, Routine health education
- Keywords
- Feedback method, Health education, Functional exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Health Education
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Feedback-based health educationBehavioural
This study was approved by the Tianjin Hospital Ethics Committee, (2019082).The CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to cluster-randomised trials checklist.(Campbell et al., 2012) was used to guide reporting outcomes (File S1).Specific measures have been listed above.
Routine health educationBehavioural
Routine health education was given to the patients, and the content of health education was the same as that of the experimental group, including the introduction of the disease, clinical manifestations, significance of examination, therapeutic principles of operative methods, psychological nursing, and postoperative rehabilitation exercise, etc. To verify the effect of health education by feedback method.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Feedback-based health education health education and Routine health education | Experimental | Feedback-based health education:(1) Implementation of the feedback method includes information transmission, patient feedback, clarification and correction, and confirmation of understanding.① One day before surgery: Health education team members provided bedside one-on-one education for patients, 15-20 min per session, twice a day.
② One week after surgery: One-on-one education on rehabilitation exercise was conducted for the patients by the health education team members, 15-20 min per session, twice a day.
③ Two to four weeks after surgery: The health education group members guided the patients through functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Each intervention lasted 20-30 min. The patients interacted once through WeChatB1, and their questions were answered at any time.
④ Five to 12 weeks after surgery: The health education group members guided patients through the functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Receives: Behavioral: Feedback-based health education |
| Routine health education | Experimental | Routine health education:
Routine health education was given to the patients, and the content of health education was the same as that of the experimental group, including the introduction of the disease, clinical manifestations, significance of examination, therapeutic principles of operative methods, psychological nursing, and postoperative rehabilitation exercise, etc. To verify the effect of health education by feedback method. Receives: Behavioral: Routine health education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
General data
The content includes general demographic and sociological data such as gender, age and education level, as well as basic information of diseases.
Measured: Day 1
LDH knowledge questionnaire
LDH knowledge questionnaire was prepared by Shi Yixin, with a total of 12 items. The questionnaire was scored by Likert 5, The minimum value is 1 point and the full score being 60 points. The higher the score, the better the patient's knowledge mastery. The content validity of knowledge questionnaire was 0.96 and Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.80.
Measured: Day 1 to week 12
General Self-Efficacy Scale
In this study, Wang Caikang translated Chinese version of scale general self-efficacy scale consists of 10 entries, beliefs about individual when facing difficulties or problems, adopt Likert level 4 score, each item from "completely incorrect" to "completely correct" respectively in 1 ~ 4 points, The minimum value is 1 point and the maximum value is 40 points, the higher the score shows that the higher the self-efficacy of the patients. The content validity of the scale was 0.87 and Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.83.
Measured: Day 1 to week 12
Questionnaire on the compliance behaviour of LDH patients
The questionnaire on compliance behavior of LDH patients was prepared by Shi Yixin, a researcher. The contents of the questionnaire included functional exercise, activities, diet, daily living, review, etc.The questionnaire adopts Likert 5 score, The minimum value is 1 point and the maximum value is 90 points. The higher the score, the better the compliance behavior of patients. The content validity of the questionnaire is 0.98, and Cronbach's α coefficient is 0.84.
Measured: Day 1 to week 12
Oswestry disability index (ODI) scale
This scale is widely used in China and internationally, and in the field of spinal medicine, it is recognized as the gold standard for evaluating curative effects and function . The scale was compiled in 1980 by Fairbank and colleagues and has been revised since ; it was first used in China after it was adapted by Zheng Guangxin . The scale is used to evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment and is an important reference index in patients with lumbar disease.
Measured: Day 1 to week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2021
- Study start1 Mar 2019
- Primary completion30 Jan 2020
- Study completion4 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lumbar Disc HerniationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The methods were based on previous research on the feedback method of health education. A cluster randomized controlled trial design was used. From March 2019 to January 2020, patients who underwent spinal surgery at Tianjin Hospital were enrolled, and 76 met the inclusion criteria for lumbar disc disease (lumbar disc herniation, LDH). Patients were divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 38 patients in each group. Feedback-based health education was conducted for the experimental group, and routine health education was provided for the control group.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tianjin Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fan Rong, Tianjin Hospital
- Investigators
- Fan Rong Fan Rong, master, Principal investigator, Tianjin Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04885140
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Jiangsu College of Nursing
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 13 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Baretich M. National Quality Forum releases recommendations for safe practices. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2010 Jul-Aug;44(4):334-5. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-44.4.334. No abstract available.
PubMed 20715962
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Feedback Health Education on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Cluster Randomized Trials
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04885140
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Jiangsu College of Nursing
- Conditions
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Keywords
- Feedback method, Health education, Functional exercise
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tianjin HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aims and Objective: A theoretical model based on guided postoperative rehabilitation with feedback was developed for patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion to explore the effects of feedback-based health education. Patients were assessed in terms of disease knowledge, general self-efficacy, medical behaviour, and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). During postoperative rehabilitation, nursing staff provided health education regarding lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion.
Detailed description
Grouping method For the surgical treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. The age of the included patients was greater than or equal to 18 years. Patients were cluster randomized by a coin toss into an experimental group that underwent spine surgery and a control group; 38 cases were included in each group for a total of 76 cases, and patients were assigned to the experimental and control groups in a 1:1 ratio, ensuring balance between groups. During implementation of the intervention, 1 patient in the control group voluntarily requested to withdraw from the study midway through the study, and the loss to follow-up rate was 2.6%. Finally, a total of 75 patients were included in this study, including 38 in the experimental group and 37 in the control group.
3 Test group
(1) Implementation of the feedback method includes information transmission, patient feedback, clarification and correction, and confirmation of understanding
① Conveying health information Medical terms were transformed into plain language so that patients could easily understand the health education content. The feedback method was used to explain the pathogenesis of LDH as protrusion or degeneration of the collodium supporting the lumbar spine and rupture of the cartilage protecting the lumbar spine. The protruding collodium compresses the nerve root, leading to pain in the back and leg.
- Patient feedback After a health message was delivered, the patient was asked to repeat the information back in his own words with the following question: To make sure I'm clear, could you repeat the pathogenesis for me? ③ Educator clarification and correction If the patient had mastered the relevant information, the health education session was ended. If the patient understood some or no information, the steps were repeated, and the educator continued to explain the concept to the patient but changed the way he or she expressed it. ④ Checking understanding Finally, open questions such as the following were used to confirm the patient's understanding: Do you have any other questions? The patients were then given a chance to sort out the health information. (2) Patients in the test group received health education according to the feedback method, and the intervention contents and time were as follows: ① One day before surgery: Health education team members provided bedside one-on-one education for patients, 15-20 min per session, twice a day. Health education manuals and other tools were used to explain information related to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, including the pathogenesis of LDH, clinical manifestations, the significance of relevant examinations, the principle of surgical treatment, and the importance of exercising according to the guidance of doctors, to the patient. The main problem before LDH was pain in the waist and legs, so the patients were advised to take medication and taught how to take neurotropin, mecobalamine, Celebrex and other drugs.
- One week after surgery: One-on-one education on rehabilitation exercise was conducted for the patients by the health education team members, 15-20 min per session, twice a day.
Day of surgery: The main concerns of the patients were wound pain and axial rolling. After returning to the ward, the patients were taught about pain and the correct use of the analgesic pump.
One week after surgery: The main concerns of the patients were waist circumference and methods of rehabilitation exercise. Patients were instructed to perform straight leg raising exercises, ankle pump exercises and quad contraction exercises, 10~20 times/session, 3 sessions/day. If the patient understood the relevant knowledge and completed the rehabilitation exercise, the patient was affirmed and encouraged in the form of award certificates, and the "Best Cooperation Award", "Best Progress Award", "Most Confidence Award", "Three Good Fellow Award", etc., were used to enhance the patient's self-confidence, sense of honour and sense of achievement in rehabilitation exercise. In terms of discharge guidance, patients were told to go home and continue to perform functional exercise.
③ Two to four weeks after surgery: The main concerns of patients were functional exercise and daily life activities. The health education group members guided the patients through functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Each intervention lasted 20-30 min. The patients interacted once through WeChatB1, and their questions were answered at any time. Patients were instructed to perform head lifting training in the prone position, a wood rolling exercise, walking training (waist-assisted) and supine hip flexion and knee flexion exercises, 5-10 min/session, 3 sessions/day. Patients were required to sign in after receiving new exercises and give feedback. Patients were required to "send a video of themselves performing functional exercise to the group", and the health education team members corrected any incorrect movement or frequency, answered their questions, and confirmed whether they understood until they had fully mastered the correct methods for the functional exercise. WeChat pushed small pieces of information twice via a link.
④ Five to 12 weeks after surgery: the main concerns of patients were functional exercise methods, such as five-point support, and other matters needing attention. The health education group members guided patients through the functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Each intervention lasted 20~30 min, and WeChat was used for both sessions.
4 Control group: The patients underwent routine health education.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The methods were based on previous research on the feedback method of health education. A cluster randomized controlled trial design was used. From March 2019 to January 2020, patients who underwent spinal surgery at Tianjin Hospital were enrolled, and 76 met the inclusion criteria for lumbar disc disease (lumbar disc herniation, LDH). Patients were divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 38 patients in each group. Feedback-based health education was conducted for the experimental group, and routine health education was provided for the control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Feedback-based health education health education and Routine health education | Experimental | Behavioral: Feedback-based health educationFeedback-based health education:(1) Implementation of the feedback method includes information transmission, patient feedback, clarification and correction, and confirmation of understanding.① One day before surgery: Health education team members provided bedside one-on-one education for patients, 15-20 min per session, twice a day. ② One week after surgery: One-on-one education on rehabilitation exercise was conducted for the patients by the health education team members, 15-20 min per session, twice a day. ③ Two to four weeks after surgery: The health education group members guided the patients through functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Each intervention lasted 20-30 min. The patients interacted once through WeChatB1, and their questions were answered at any time. ④ Five to 12 weeks after surgery: The health education group members guided patients through the functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. |
| Routine health education | Experimental | Behavioral: Routine health educationRoutine health education: Routine health education was given to the patients, and the content of health education was the same as that of the experimental group, including the introduction of the disease, clinical manifestations, significance of examination, therapeutic principles of operative methods, psychological nursing, and postoperative rehabilitation exercise, etc. To verify the effect of health education by feedback method. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation Disease
- Must be able to Cooperate with research
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Lumbar malignant tumors, lumbar tuberculosis and osteoporosis
- People with mental system diseases.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Feedback-based health educationThis study was approved by the Tianjin Hospital Ethics Committee, (2019082).The CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to cluster-randomised trials checklist.(Campbell et al., 2012) was used to guide reporting outcomes (File S1).Specific measures have been listed above. | Behavioural | Feedback-based health education health education and Routine health education |
| Routine health educationRoutine health education was given to the patients, and the content of health education was the same as that of the experimental group, including the introduction of the disease, clinical manifestations, significance of examination, therapeutic principles of operative methods, psychological nursing, and postoperative rehabilitation exercise, etc. To verify the effect of health education by feedback method. | Behavioural | Routine health education |
Primary outcome
General data
Time frame: Day 1
The content includes general demographic and sociological data such as gender, age and education level, as well as basic information of diseases.
LDH knowledge questionnaire
Time frame: Day 1 to week 12
LDH knowledge questionnaire was prepared by Shi Yixin, with a total of 12 items. The questionnaire was scored by Likert 5, The minimum value is 1 point and the full score being 60 points. The higher the score, the better the patient's knowledge mastery. The content validity of knowledge questionnaire was 0.96 and Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.80.
General Self-Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Day 1 to week 12
In this study, Wang Caikang translated Chinese version of scale general self-efficacy scale consists of 10 entries, beliefs about individual when facing difficulties or problems, adopt Likert level 4 score, each item from "completely incorrect" to "completely correct" respectively in 1 ~ 4 points, The minimum value is 1 point and the maximum value is 40 points, the higher the score shows that the higher the self-efficacy of the patients. The content validity of the scale was 0.87 and Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.83.
Questionnaire on the compliance behaviour of LDH patients
Time frame: Day 1 to week 12
The questionnaire on compliance behavior of LDH patients was prepared by Shi Yixin, a researcher. The contents of the questionnaire included functional exercise, activities, diet, daily living, review, etc.The questionnaire adopts Likert 5 score, The minimum value is 1 point and the maximum value is 90 points. The higher the score, the better the compliance behavior of patients. The content validity of the questionnaire is 0.98, and Cronbach's α coefficient is 0.84.
Oswestry disability index (ODI) scale
Time frame: Day 1 to week 12
This scale is widely used in China and internationally, and in the field of spinal medicine, it is recognized as the gold standard for evaluating curative effects and function . The scale was compiled in 1980 by Fairbank and colleagues and has been revised since ; it was first used in China after it was adapted by Zheng Guangxin . The scale is used to evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment and is an important reference index in patients with lumbar disease.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 20715962Baretich M. National Quality Forum releases recommendations for safe practices. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2010 Jul-Aug;44(4):334-5. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-44.4.334. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Cortical Surface Functional Changes After Lever Positioning Manipulation for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Spinal Mobilization With and Without Clinical Pilates in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniationc Herniation
Disc Herniation
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intradiscal Ozone/Oxygen Injection for Treatment of Contained Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Selective Nerve Root Block Versus Sham to Reduce Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
H-Reflex-Guided Direction-Sensitive Exercise Versus Standard Extension Exercise for Functional Recovery in Patients With Lumbar Disc Prolapse
Lumber Disc Prolapse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fan Rong Fan Rong, master principal investigator
Tianjin Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Feedback-based health education and Routine health education in people with Lumbar Disc Herniation, run by Tianjin Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
General data (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04885140, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2021.