Physical ActivityNCT04890756
The Greek Version of Modified Baecke Questionnaire
An observational study of Physical Activity, run by University of Thessaly.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to translate and investigate the validity and reliability of the modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (mBQ) in the Greek adult population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 59 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physical Activity
- What is being tested?
- observational
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2015to 25 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Healthy
Who may be able to join
- age above 18
- Greek native speakers
- Greek inhabitants
- sufficient cognitive functioning.
Who cannot join
- poor health status,
- diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases
- cardiac pacemaker,
- medication that prevents exercise activity
- neurological disorders with effect on the lower body
- musculoskeletal disorders or injuries on the lower body in the last 3 months
- PAR-Q health risk assessment form
About this study
Official title: Validity and Reliability of the Greek Version of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire
The purpose of this study was to translate and investigate the validity and reliability of the modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (mBQ) in the Greek adult population.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study was to translate and investigate the validity and reliability of the modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (mBQ) in the Greek adult population. The cross-cultural adaptation of the mBQ was performed according to official guidelines.The reliability was determined by filling out the mBQ, two times, one week apart. For validation, the scores between the mBQ and the IPAQ were compared and the correlation between mBQ and VO2max and between mBQ and interview (METS) were assessed.
- Conditions
- Physical Activity
- Being tested
- observational
- Keywords
- validation, reliability, adaptation, questionnaire, Greek version, Baecke
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
observationalOther
The reliability was determined (n=100) by filling out the mBQ, two times, one week apart (test-retest).
For validation (n=45), the scores between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire were compared and the correlation between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and VO2max(via Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test) and between mBQ and interview (via METS) were assessed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Group | 100 Healthy Adults Receives: Other: observational | |
| Validity Group | 45 Healthy Adults Receives: Other: observational |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reliability
The reliability was determined by filling out the modified Baecke Questionnaire, two times, one week apart (test-Retest).
Tool: Modified Baecke Questionnaire (test-retest)
Measured: one week apart
Validity
For validation, the scores between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were compared and the correlation between Modified Baecke Questionnaire and VO2max (via Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test) and between modified Baecke Questionnaire and interview (via METS) were assessed.
Tools:
- International Physical Activity
- Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test Questionnaires (VO2max)
- Interview (METS)
2)
Measured: 1) IPAQ ( Time Frame: 30 min) 2) Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test (Time Frame: 20 min) 3) Interview (Time Frame: 45 min) 4)Modified Baecke Questionnaire (Time Frame: 30 min)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2021
- Study start1 Oct 2015
- Primary completion20 Jul 2016
- Study completion25 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Physical ActivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ThessalyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Thessaly
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vasiliki Stefanouli, University of Thessaly
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04890756
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- cepr_lab
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 18 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: GDPR protected
Publications
Stefanouli V, Kapreli E, Anastasiadi E, Nakastsis A, Strimpakos N. Validity and reliability of the Greek version of modified Baecke questionnaire. Public Health. 2022 Feb;203:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.017. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
PubMed 35032916
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validity and Reliability of the Greek Version of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04890756
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- cepr_lab
- Conditions
- Physical Activity
- Keywords
- validation, reliability, adaptation, questionnaire, Greek version, Baecke
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ThessalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to translate and investigate the validity and reliability of the modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (mBQ) in the Greek adult population.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study was to translate and investigate the validity and reliability of the modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (mBQ) in the Greek adult population. The cross-cultural adaptation of the mBQ was performed according to official guidelines.The reliability was determined by filling out the mBQ, two times, one week apart. For validation, the scores between the mBQ and the IPAQ were compared and the correlation between mBQ and VO2max and between mBQ and interview (METS) were assessed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Group | – | Other: observational100 Healthy Adults |
| Validity Group | – | Other: observational45 Healthy Adults |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 59 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Healthy
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age above 18
- Greek native speakers
- Greek inhabitants
- sufficient cognitive functioning.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- poor health status,
- diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases
- cardiac pacemaker,
- medication that prevents exercise activity
- neurological disorders with effect on the lower body
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| observationalThe reliability was determined (n=100) by filling out the mBQ, two times, one week apart (test-retest). For validation (n=45), the scores between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire were compared and the correlation between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and VO2max(via Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test) and between mBQ and interview (via METS) were assessed. | Other | Reliability Group, Validity Group |
Primary outcome
Reliability
Time frame: one week apart
The reliability was determined by filling out the modified Baecke Questionnaire, two times, one week apart (test-Retest). Tool: Modified Baecke Questionnaire (test-retest)
Validity
Time frame: 1) IPAQ ( Time Frame: 30 min) 2) Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test (Time Frame: 20 min) 3) Interview (Time Frame: 45 min) 4)Modified Baecke Questionnaire (Time Frame: 30 min)
For validation, the scores between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were compared and the correlation between Modified Baecke Questionnaire and VO2max (via Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test) and between modified Baecke Questionnaire and interview (via METS) were assessed. Tools: 1. International Physical Activity 2. Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test Questionnaires (VO2max) 3. Interview (METS) 2)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35032916Stefanouli V, Kapreli E, Anastasiadi E, Nakastsis A, Strimpakos N. Validity and reliability of the Greek version of modified Baecke questionnaire. Public Health. 2022 Feb;203:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.017. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. GDPR protected
Related trials for Physical Activity
Recruiting
Inspiratory Muscle Training and Diaphragmatic Breathing in GAD
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
Recruiting
Preserving Muscle Mass During Incretin-Induced Weight Loss
Obesity (BMI > 35)
Not yet recruiting
Foot Drop Rehabilitation and Mobility in Chronic Stroke
Stroke
Enrolling by invitation
Partial Enteral Nutrition as Therapeutic Augmentation of Advanced Pharmacological Therapy in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease
Crohn's Disease, Active
Recruiting
Comparing Myofascial Exercise and Trigger Point Therapy for Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Non-specific Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Physical Activity, run by University of Thessaly.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reliability (time frame: one week apart). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04890756, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2021.