AzTrials
AzTrials

Myofascial PainBBTI_PSR_21NCT04897581

BBTI vs PSR in Musculoskeletal Orofacial Pain Adults

A study testing Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, BBTI and Physical Self-Regulation, PSR in people with Myofascial Pain and Myalgia, run by Ian Boggero, PhD at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This clinical study aims to compare the efficacy of two brief psychological interventions: Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBIT) and Physical Self-Regulation or (PSR) delivered over telehealth for the management of chronic musculoskeletal orofacial pain conditions (local myalgia, myofascial pain, centrally… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Myofascial Pain, Myalgia
What is being tested?
Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, BBTI and Physical Self-Regulation, PSR
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
19 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Oct 2021to 23 May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • present with a score on Insomnia Severity Index > 15
  • have a primary diagnosis of chronic (onset more than 3 months before) MSK pain (myofascial pain and/or local myalgia and/or centrally mediated myalgia) from a board-certified orofacial pain specialist at UK Orofacial Pain Clinic
  • maintain a stable medication regime in previous month and during the intervention
  • older than 18 years old
  • able to understand English
  • willing to participate to telehealth intervention
  • have internet access and an email address
  • present with total STOP BANG score < 5

Who cannot join

  • less than 18 years old
  • unable to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Establishing the Effectiveness of BBTI vs. PSR on Sleep and Pain Parameters in Adults With Musculoskeletal Orofacial Pain

This clinical study aims to compare the efficacy of two brief psychological interventions: Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBIT) and Physical Self-Regulation or (PSR) delivered over telehealth for the management of chronic musculoskeletal orofacial pain conditions (local myalgia, myofascial pain, centrally mediated myalgia) in a tertiary orofacial pain clinic. It is hypothesized that both interventions will produce beneficial changes and exploratory analysis will aim to establish which intervention -if any- is better for each specific outcome.

Read the detailed description

New patients who come into the orofacial pain clinic are evaluated by a dental resident and given an orofacial pain diagnosis. If this primary diagnosis involves masticatory myofascial pain, local myalgia, or centrally-mediated myalgia, and if patients self-report poor sleep, they will be introduced to the study. An initial evaluation for PSR and BBTI will be scheduled over telehealth. If willing and eligible to participate, at the end of this first evaluation, they will be provided with an informed consent form and be randomly assigned to three sessions of PSR or three sessions of BBTI. After providing an e-consent, they will be sent a questionnaire battery on REDCap to assess their outcomes at pre-intervention. A REDCap daily questionnaire will be sent every day (morning and evening) starting one week before session 1 of the intervention, until two weeks after the last session. Moreover, to a small group of patients randomly selected, an actigraphy watch will be mailed. Two weeks after the last session of the intervention, a REDCap questionnaire will be sent to assess their outcomes at post-intervention. As per the current clinical protocol, all participants will be offered both interventions; only data from the first intervention will be utilized for the current study. All PSR and BBTI sessions will be conducted via telehealth using a HIPAA-compliant zoom account.

Being tested
Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, BBTI, Physical Self-Regulation, PSR
Keywords
local myalgia, centrally-mediated myalgia, masticatory pain, sleep, insomnia, behavioral therapy, self-regulation, depression, anxiety, fatigue
Medical subject headings
Myalgia, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Self-Control, Depression, Anxiety Disorders, Fatigue

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, BBTIBehavioural

    BBTI includes sleep hygiene, stimulus control, and sleep restriction, and is administered in three 50-minute sessions over telehealth by psychologic team.

  • Physical Self-Regulation, PSRBehavioural

    PSR is conducted over telehealth and consists of three 50-minute sessions focused on jaw relaxation exercises, proprioceptive awareness training, and diaphragmatic breathing entrainment.

Study groups in NCT04897581
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, BBTIExperimentalParticipants in this group will receive 3 sessions of BBTI over telehealth.
Receives: Behavioral: Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, BBTI
Physical Self-Regulation, PSRExperimentalParticipants in this group will receive 3 sessions of PSR over telehealth.
Receives: Behavioral: Physical Self-Regulation, PSR

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Self-report Insomnia Symptoms

    Insomnia symptomatology will be assessed via the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The ISI includes seven items (sleep-onset, sleep maintenance, early morning awakening, satisfaction with current sleep pattern, interference with daily functioning, impairment attributed to sleep problems, distress caused by sleep problems), related to the prior 2 weeks on a five-point Likers scale (0= no problem, 4 = severe problem). The total score ranges from 0 to 28, with 28 indicating severe insomnia. The cut-off for the present study is 15. The ISI has good internal consistency and is demonstrated to be sensitive to changes in sleep of older adults following behavioral treatment for insomnia. Clinical improvement is defined as a reduction of ISI below the cut-off of 15.

    Measured: At pre-intervention (1 week before starting with the intervention) and post-intervention (2 weeks after the last session of the intervention)

  2. Change in Self-report Average Pain Intensity

    The average pain intensity will be assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on a 10-point scale, where 0 coincides with "no pain" and 10 coincides with "worse pain ever felt".

    Measured: At pre-intervention (1 week before starting with the intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after the last session of the intervention)

  3. Change in Self-report Quality of Life

    The overall quality of life will be assessed with 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), a 12-item questionnaire designed to measure general health by addressing eight domains: limitations in social, physical, usual role activities because of physical health and emotional problems; bodily pain; general mental health; vitality; general health perceptions. SF-12 has been shown to reflect change over time like the long form SF-36 and to demonstrate good reliability and validity . Studies have addressed the impact of orofacial pain and sleep problems on health-related quality of life.

    The average score of the US population is set at 50. A score below this cut-off identifies a poor self-report quality of life.

    Measured: At pre-intervention (1 week before starting with the intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after the last session of the intervention)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change in Self-report Sleep Quality

    The sleep quality will be assessed via the RU-SATED, constituted by 6 items. RU-SATED appears to be a valid instrument for the assessment of sleep health among adults that is related to, but distinct from, other established sleep constructs. It provides a score from 0 to 12, with response to 6 questions. The lower the score, the worse the self-report sleep quality of the patient.

    Measured: At pre-intervention (1 week before starting with the intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after the last session of the intervention)

  2. Sleep architecture

    Sleep architecture will be assessed subjectively via daily morning and evening sleep diaries, sent to the participants via a REDCap survey. It will be assessed objectively via an actigraphy watch.

    The measured variables are sleep efficiency (SE), total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), number of awakening per night (NOA).

    For such variable, the change in outcomes will be collected; therefore, there is not a scale for measuring the change.

    Measured: Each morning and each evening from the first session to 2 weeks after the last session of the intervention

  3. Change in Self-report Depression Symptoms

    Depression symptoms will be assessed at pre- and post-intervention via Pain-Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ4). The Pain-Health Questionnaire (PHQ, 4 items) allows for a brief and accurate measurement of signs/symptoms of anxiety and depression, by providing an overall measure of symptom burden, as well as functional impairment and disability with a 4-point scale . PHQ-4 has demonstrated strong psychometric properties and have been validated for use in the general population. The first two questions of PHQ4 (PHQ-2) consists of core criteria for depression. The score goes from 0 to 4 for each question (for a total of 8, being 8 the most severe depression symptoms), and a score of 3 or above on the Depression subscale represent a reasonable cut off point for identifying potential cases of depression and a psychologist or counselor referral will be offered.

    Depression symptoms will be also monitored daily via morning and evening daily diaries, sent to the participant via a REDCap survey. �

    Measured: At pre-intervention (one week before the first session of the intervention), at post-intervention (two weeks after the last session of the intervention) and every day during the intervention period

  4. Change in Self-report Anxiety Symptoms

    Anxiety symptoms will be assessed at pre- and post-intervention via Pain-Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ4). The Pain-Health Questionnaire (PHQ, 4 items) allows for a brief and accurate measurement of signs/symptoms of anxiety and depression, by providing an overall measure of symptom burden, as well as functional impairment and disability with a 4-point scale. PHQ-4 has demonstrated strong psychometric properties and have been validated for use in the general population. The last two questions (GAD-2) consists of core criteria for anxiety, with score going from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (most severe anxiety symptoms) for each question. A score of 3 or above on the Anxiety subscale represents a reasonable cut off point for identifying potential cases of depression and a psychologist or counselor referral will be offered.

    Anxiety and depression symptoms will be also monitored daily via morning and evening daily diaries, sent to the participant via a REDCap survey. �

    Measured: At pre-intervention (one week before the first session of the intervention), at post-intervention (two weeks after the last session of the intervention) and every day during the intervention period

  5. Change in Self-report Headache Intensity

    Headache measures will investigate the severity of headache on a 10-point scale (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), with 0 identifying "no pain", and 10 identifying "the worst pain experienced".

    Measured: At pre-intervention (one week before the first session of the intervention), at post-intervention (two weeks after the last session of the intervention)

  6. Change in Self-report Headache Frequency

    This questionnaire investigate headache disability (in terms of lack of productivity, missing working days or school days), frequency and intensity will be also assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS, 6-item).

    Each item identifies the total number of days per month of headache frequency (being 0 "no days of headache" and being 30 "each day with headache"). The minimum score is 0, the maximum is 150, with the upper limit identifying the highest frequency of headaches.

    Measured: At pre-intervention (one week before the first session of the intervention), at post-intervention (two weeks after the last session of the intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2021
  2. Study start21 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion23 May 2023
  4. Study completion23 May 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
19 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04897581
Sponsor's protocol ID
65092
Acronym
BBTI_PSR_21
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
14 May 2021
Last updated
17 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The data will be de-identified from the sensible data information. The data will be retained for 5 years after the end of the study. There is no intension to share the IPD with other researchers. However, the data collected from this study will be utilised by the investigators for possible future studies.

Publications

  • Ballou S, Katon J, Rangan V, Cheng V, Nee J, Iturrino J, Lembo A. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Pilot Study. Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Nov;65(11):3260-3270. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06182-w. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

    PubMed 32152868

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, BBTI and Physical Self-Regulation, PSR in people with Myofascial Pain and Myalgia, run by Ian Boggero, PhD at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Self-report Insomnia Symptoms (time frame: At pre-intervention (1 week before starting with the intervention) and post-intervention (2 weeks after the last session of the intervention)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04897581, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in