AzTrials
AzTrials

Cancer PainNCT04907643

Virtual Reality for GI Cancer Pain to Improve Patient Reported Outcomes

A study testing PICO G2 4k in people with Cancer Pain and Visceral Pain, run by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with digestive tract malignancy often experience severe and unremitting abdominal pain that negatively affects physical, emotional, and social function, as well as health related quality of life (HRQOL). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
What is being tested?
PICO G2 4k
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
360 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Oct 2021to 16 Mar 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have a primary malignancy of the biliary tract, colon, liver, pancreas, peritoneum, rectum, small intestine, or stomach, with no plan for resection during the study period
  • Tumor types including, but not limited to, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, and tumors of mesenchymal origin will be eligible
  • Have clinically significant visceral pain, measured using the standardized NIH PROMIS GI Pain Scale defined as scoring at least 5 points above the nationally normed score
  • Ability to read and write in English

Who cannot join

  • Have a condition that interferes with VR usage, including but not limited to seizures, facial injury precluding safe placement of headset, and visual impairments
  • Have cognitive impairment that affects protocol participation. This will be done with a three part cognitive assessment during the initial phone call to assess eligibility followed by consent discussion if eligible.
  • Have brain metastases
  • Have a prognosis of <3 months from the time of enrollment per treating oncologist

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Samuel Eberlein, MSHS contact

3104236721

samuel.eberlein@cshs.org

Karisma Suchak, MD contact

3104230714

karisma.suchak@cshs.org

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

    Karisma Kothari, MD, 310-423-0714, karisma.kothari@cshs.org

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual Reality for GI Cancer Pain to Improve Patient Reported Outcomes

Patients with digestive tract malignancy often experience severe and unremitting abdominal pain that negatively affects physical, emotional, and social function, as well as health related quality of life (HRQOL). Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising and evidence-based treatment modality for cancer pain. Users of VR wear a pair of goggles with a close-proximity screen in front of the eyes that creates a sensation of being transported into lifelike, three-dimensional worlds. To date, VR has been limited to short-term clinical trials for cancer pain. Moreover, limited research exists on theory-based VR modalities beyond mere distraction, such as VR that employs acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with components of biofeedback and mindfulness. To bridge these gaps, this study seeks to: (1) assess the impact of immersive VR on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including pain, activity metrics, and opioid use among patients with visceral pain from a digestive tract malignancy; (2) assess differences in PROs, activity metrics, and opioid use between skills-based VR therapy vs. distraction VR therapy; and (3) determine patient-level predictors of VR treatment response in visceral cancer pain.

To address these aims, the study will measure PROs and opioid use in 360 patients randomized among 3 groups and follow them for 60 days after enrollment: (1) an enhanced VR group receiving skills-based VR; (2) a distraction-based VR group receiving patient-selected VR videos; and (3) a VR sham control group using a VR headset with 2-D content. The results will inform best practices for the implementation of VR for visceral cancer pain management and guide selection of patient-tailored experiences.

Read the detailed description

GI cancer pain is a prevalent and costly condition. Medical therapy is not always effective for managing GI cancer pain; there is a need for drug-free alternative to complement or even replace medical therapy, such as opioids. This study will evaluate a novel technology called virtual reality (VR). Users of VR wear a pair of goggles with a three-dimensional screen that creates a sensation of being transported into lifelike worlds. Evidence shows that VR can reduce pain through many different mechanisms. Research shows that VR can also help train people in new skills, such as to meditate, breathe deeply, and learn how to cope with pain.

In this study, patients with GI cancer pain will be randomized into three groups of equal size: (1) immersive skills-based VR therapy; (2) immersive distraction VR therapy; and (3) non-immersive sham VR using 2D videos displayed in a VR headset. The skills-based treatment will use virtual healing environments to teach patients about meditation, breathing exercises, and pain management. The distraction treatment will use immersive videos that are designed to take the mind off of pain. The sham VR will use VR goggles, but patients will only watch a two-dimensional video rather than a 3D, immersive experience.

Eligible patients will have GI cancer pain, meaning belly pain at least 5 points above the national average on the NIH PROMIS GI Scale as well as having a GI cancer diagnosis. . The study will exclude people who are under 18 years of age, unable to understand the consent form, expected to live less than 3 months, brain tumors not responding to treatment, or injury that makes it difficult to wear something on their face.

Randomization between groups will occur using a computer program called REDCap and will be performed after obtaining patient consent for participating in the study. The VR goggles will be shipped via FedEx to patients in all three groups, along with instructions for use. Patients will then be asked to actively use the headset for four weeks on a daily basis, following the specific instructions for their assigned intervention. In addition, patients will wear a Fitbit watch on their wrist during the study, as tolerated, to monitor step counts and sleep. Participants will fill out a set of weekly questionnaires that will be sent via email.

In order to show a difference between the active VR treatments and the sham VR control treatment, the investigator will recruit a minimum of 120 patients in each arm of the study. This calculation is sufficient to demonstrate clinically meaningful differences in the primary outcome, which is Gastrointestinal belly pain levels as measured by the NIH Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System, or PROMIS® questionnaire. PROMIS is a well-validated set of questionnaires that measure different aspects of quality of life; for this study the investigator will focus on PROMIS Gastrointestinal belly pain, Global physical and mental health, and Social isolation. Daily pain catastrophizing, Milligram morphine equivalent daily dose, Simulator sickness, Pain treatment satisfaction, Pain self-efficacy (PSEQ), baseline demographic information, Pain Diary, and Pain Behaviors will also be measured. The investigator will compare the number of steps taken per day and sleep levels among the three groups using statistical tests that account for potential difference among the groups. Finally, the investigator will perform statistical analyses to identify whether there are individual patient characteristics that predict response to VR therapy. The goal will be to develop a mathematical algorithm that optimized patient selection to make more precise treatment decisions with VR.

To learn more about the study and to assess your eligibility, please visit our study website at: https://virtualmedicine.org/research/current/gicancer

Being tested
PICO G2 4k
Keywords
Virtual Reality, VR, support, GI cancer, cancer pain
Medical subject headings
Cancer Pain, Visceral Pain, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Liver Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Biliary Tract Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PICO G2 4kDevice

    Participants will use the Pico G2 4K VR audio and visual head-mounted device. The Pico G2 4K is a standalone VR headset that comes with an orientation-tracked controller. It does not require a smartphone or personal computer to operate. The device supports 3 degrees of freedom (3DOF) head tracking, has best-in-class optics, and a wide field-of-view.

Study groups in NCT04907643
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Virtual Reality Program AExperimentalThis arm will include software that provides immersive skills-based content for pain reduction.
Receives: Device: PICO G2 4k
Virtual Reality Program BExperimentalThis arm will include software that provides immersive distraction based content for pain reduction.
Receives: Device: PICO G2 4k
Virtual Reality Program CSham comparatorThis arm will include software that provides nonimmersive distraction based content for pain reduction.
Receives: Device: PICO G2 4k

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal Belly Pain over 30 days from the baseline

    Gastrointestinal Belly Pain over time as measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal Belly Pain 5a delivered on a weekly basis (T-Scored, Continuous, 1-5, higher the worse).

    Measured: Over 30 days from the baseline

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal Belly Pain

    Gastrointestinal Belly Pain over time as measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal Belly Pain 5a delivered on a weekly basis (T-Scored, Continuous, 1-5, higher the worse).

    Measured: Over 60 days

  2. Daily pain intensity

    Daily pain intensity for one week at baseline, week of Day 30, and week of Day 60 as measured by Daily Pain Intensity Scale (0-10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable).

    Measured: At baseline, week of Day 30, and week of Day 60

  3. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global physical and mental health

    Global physical and mental health over time as measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Physical and Mental 2a. delivered on a weekly basis (1-5, higher the better)

    Measured: Over 60 days

  4. Opioid prescriptions of Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)

    Comparing the change from study baseline to Day 60 in weekly MME of prescribed medication.

    Measured: In a 60-day period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jun 2021
  2. Study start5 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion16 Mar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
360 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04907643
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00001363
Other IDs
R01CA252211
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
26 Jan 2021
Last updated
20 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PICO G2 4k in people with Cancer Pain and Visceral Pain, run by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Samuel Eberlein, MSHS (3104236721, samuel.eberlein@cshs.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal Belly Pain over 30 days from the baseline (time frame: Over 30 days from the baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in