Kidney StonePhase 2SWEETSTONENCT04911660
Impact of the SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin on Urinary Supersaturations in Kidney Stone Formers
A Phase 2 study testing Empagliflozin 25 MG in people with Kidney Stone, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to test the effect of a new drug on the composition of the urine in kidney stone patients. This new drug (Jardiance®, substance: empagliflozin) is currently approved in Switzerland for the treatment of patients with diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 74 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Stone
- What is being tested?
- Empagliflozin 25 MG
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 25 Aug 2021to 28 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 74 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
- Age between 18 and 74 years old
- One or more kidney stone event(s) in the past
- Any past kidney stone containing ≥ 80 % of calcium or ≥ 80 % of uric acid
- HbA1c < 6.5 %
Who cannot join
- Patients with secondary causes of recurrent nephrolithiasis:
- Severe eating disorders (anorexia or bulimia)
- Chronic bowel disease, past intestinal or bariatric surgery
- Sarcoidosis
- Primary hyperparathyroidism
- Complete distal tubular acidosis
Show all 25Show fewer
- Patients with the following medications:
- Anti-diabetic treatment (insulin and non-insulin agents)
- Patients not able or not willing to stop the following medication during the period of participation in the trial (including a time window of 4 weeks wash out prior to randomization):
- Diuretics (thiazide and loop diuretics)
- Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (including topiramate)
- Xanthine oxidase inhibitors
- Alkali, including potassium citrate or sodium bicarbonate
- Treatment with 1,25-OH Vitamin D (calcitriol)
- Calcium supplementation
- Bisphosphonates, Denosumab, Teriparatide
- Glucocorticoids
- Obstructive uropathy, if not treated successfully
- Genito-urinary infection, if not treated successfully
- Chronic kidney disease (defined as CKD-EPI eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 body surface area)
- Kidney transplant
- Pregnant and lactating women [urine pregnancy test to be performed for women of childbearing potential (defined as women who are not surgically sterilized/ hysterectomized, and/ or who are postmenopausal for less than 12 months)] or women of childbearing potential that refuse to use an effective contraceptive method (birth control pill or IUD).
- Inability to understand and follow the protocol
- Known allergy to the study drug
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 4 weeks prior to baseline and during the current trial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Inselspital, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension
Bern, 3010
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial Assessing the Impact of the SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin on Urinary Supersaturations in Kidney Stone Formers
The aim of this study is to test the effect of a new drug on the composition of the urine in kidney stone patients. This new drug (Jardiance®, substance: empagliflozin) is currently approved in Switzerland for the treatment of patients with diabetes. Data from previous studies with and without diabetes suggest that it may have a beneficial effect on the composition of the urine and thereby reduce the risk of developing kidney stones.
Read the detailed description
Kidney stones - a global epidemic associated with obesity and diabetes
Kidney stones are a worldwide healthcare problem with a current lifetime risk of ~18.8 % in men and ~9.4 % in women in Western civilizations. Recurrence rates are high, up to 40 % and 75 % at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Hospitalizations, surgery and lost work time associated with kidney stones cause enormous healthcare-related expenditures. Although kidney stone disease is traditionally considered an isolated renal disorder, there is overwhelming evidence that it is in fact a systemic disease. Arterial hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, gouty diathesis, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and low bone mass are much more prevalent in kidney stone formers than in non-stone formers. It is currently unknown if stone disease is a cause of this co-morbidity per se or if it is a consequence of the same underlying conditions that lead to these disorders and kidney stones. Clearly, however, these co-morbidities contribute significantly to stone-related morbidity and mortality.
The strong, positive and independent association of Body Mass Index (BMI) with kidney stone disease is well established. The magnitude of the increased risk is larger in women than in men. In addition to BMI, significant weight gain is also associated with a greater risk of developing symptomatic kidney stone disease in the future. In recent decades, the prevalence of both kidney stone disease and obesity increased significantly, irrespective of age, sex and race. In large cross-sectional analyses, the prevalence of both symptomatic and asymptomatic kidney stones increased proportionally with the number of metabolic syndrome features present. Both calcium and uric acid stones are associated with obesity, but the ratio of calcium stones to uric acid stones is lower in obese compared to non-obese stone formers, suggesting a disproportionate increase of uric acid stone disease in obesity. Absolute urinary excretion rates of stone formation promoters (calcium, phosphate, oxalate and uric acid) as well as urinary supersaturation ratios for calcium oxalate and uric acid are increased in obese individuals. In addition, there is a well documented negative association of BMI with urinary pH in both stone formers and non-stone formers, and low urinary pH is the main driver of uric acid stone formation. The latter may be explained by insulin resistance which affects the generation of renal ammonium by direct and indirect mechanisms. In contrast to urinary pH, urinary calcium excretion (the main driver for calcium stone formation) is not independently associated with BMI but rather due to other factors known to affect urinary calcium excretion (e.g. secondary to increased sodium and animal protein intake).
Supersaturation - driver of kidney stone formation
Supersaturation, the presence of a material in solution at a concentration above its own solubility, is the driving force for crystallization and therefore kidney stone formation. Relevant supersaturations for kidney stones disease in humans include calcium oxalate, brushite (calcium phosphate) and uric acid. At a supersaturation <1, crystals dissolve, at a supersaturation >1, crystals form. Urinary supersaturations calculated from ambulatory 24 h urine collections accurately reflect the long-term average supersaturation values in the urine and are highly correlated with the kidney stone composition encountered in the individual kidney stone former. Treatments that reduced stone events in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are highly correlated with reductions in urinary supersaturations. A recent analysis of a large 5-year kidney stone RCT revealed that as early as 1 week after randomization, every 10 % reduction of urinary calcium oxalate supersaturation from baseline was associated with an 8 % reduction in the risk of stone recurrence during follow-up.
SGLT2 inhibitors - a promising new drug class for kidney stone formers
Inhibitors of the sodium/glucose co-transporter isoform 2 (SLC5A2 or SGLT2) belong to a new class of oral hypoglycemic drugs. SGLT2 resides in the brush border membrane of proximal tubular cells in the kidney and reabsorbs ~90 % of glucose filtered at the glomerulus. SGLT2 inhibitors block the physiological glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule from the glomerular filtrate, thereby inducing significant glucosuria accompanied by a reduction of blood glucose levels. Empagliflozin, the clinically best characterized SGLT2 inhibitor to date, decreases cardiovascular mortality, death from any cause, hospitalizations for heart failure, decline of GFR and need for renal replacement therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Some of these findings were also observed with two other SGLT2 inhibitors canagliflozin and dapagliflozin in large outcome trials. Due to their unique mode of action, SGLT2 inhibitors induce weight loss, decrease blood pressure and increase urinary volume, the latter being a very effective measure to reduce stone recurrence. Driven by promising results in RCTs, SGLT2 inhibitors are currently widely tested in non-diabetics e.g. for the treatment of heart failure, non-diabetic kidney disease, arterial hypertension or obesity (www.clinicaltrials.gov). The pleiotropic beneficial effects make SGLT2 inhibitors also a very attractive class of drugs for kidney stone formers, which often suffer concomitantly from arterial hypertension, CKD, obesity and diabetes.
Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on bone fractures, mineral metabolism and kidney stone events
Therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors as monotherapy or add-on therapy to various glucose-lowering agents is generally well tolerated. An increased incidence of genital infections and (although rare) euglycemic ketoacidosis are known side effects of this new class of medications. The latter is mainly observed in type I diabetics and less frequently in type II diabetics. To the best of our knowledge, no cases of euglycemic ketoacidosis in individuals without diabetes treated with SGLT2 inhibitors have been reported.
In the large canagliflozin outcome study CANVAS, an increased incidence of lower extremity amputations was noted. This adverse effect has not been reported with other SGLT2 inhibitors. In addition, both canagliflozin and dapagliflozin have been associated with an increased risk of bone fractures compared to placebo. In a short term study in healthy volunteers, canagliflozin increased serum phosphate, plasma fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) and decreased the level of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Similar results were obtained in individuals with diabetes treated with dapagliflozin. In contrast, pooled analyses of phase I, II and III trials of patients with type 2 diabetes treated with empagliflozin encompassing > 15'000 patient-years of exposure did not reveal an increased rate of bone fractures, alterations of blood electrolytes, PTH, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D or bone turnover markers.
While blood electrolyte and mineral metabolism parameters in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors have been well studied in healthy volunteers and patients with diabetes, there is a lack of data on the impact of SGLT2 inhibition on urinary parameters, especially on parameters that influence the kidney stone formation rate. Also, to our knowledge, no studies have been conducted thus far with SGLT2 inhibitors in kidney stone formers.
Interestingly, in pooled analyses of phase I, II and III trials, the rate of kidney stone events tended to be 30-50 % lower in patients treated with 10 or 25 mg empagliflozin versus placebo. However, detailed analyses for kidney stone events in empagliflozin outcome trials have not been reported. Reported stone event rates in these pooled empagliflozin trials (0.5 - 1/100 person years) are similar to what has been observed in individuals with diabetes in three large prospective US cohorts (Nurses' Health Study I, the Nurses' Health Study II and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. In contrast, stone event rates are considerably (10 - 100-fold) higher in patients with a history of kidney stone disease. RCTs testing dietary or pharmacologic measures for recurrence prevention typically included patients with stone event rates between 20 and 200 events/100 person-years.
In summary, SGLT2 inhibitors represent a promising new drug class for kidney stone formers. Kidney stone formers are likely to profit from the metabolic and cardiovascular effects of SGLT2 inhibition. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors may decrease the stone formation rate. Based on the overall experience thus far, empagliflozin seems to have by far the most favorable side effect profile. Clearly, there is a dire need for clinical studies with SGLT2 inhibitors in kidney stone formers.
- Conditions
- Kidney Stone
- Being tested
- Empagliflozin 25 MG, Placebo
- Keywords
- Kidney stones, Empagliflozin, Supersaturation
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Calculi
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Empagliflozin 25 MGDrug
1 empagliflozin 25 mg capsule per day for 14 days
PlaceboOther
1 placebo capsule per day for 14 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Empagliflozin + Placebo | Active comparator | 1 capsule containing 25 mg empagliflozin per day for 14 days, followed by a 14-42 days wash-out phase and a second treatment phase with 1 capsule containing placebo for 14 days. Receives: Drug: Empagliflozin 25 MG; Other: Placebo |
| Placebo + Empagliflozin | Placebo comparator | 1 capsule containing placebo per day for 14 days, followed by a 14-42 days wash-out phase and a second treatment phase with 1 capsule containing 25 mg empagliflozin for 14 days. Receives: Drug: Empagliflozin 25 MG; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary outcome component 1 - calcium oxalate supersaturation in urine (empagliflozin treatment)
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately.
- change in calcium oxalate supersaturation after empagliflozin treatment
Calcium oxalate supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the oxalate concentration in urine.
Measured: Oxalate supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with empagliflozin
Primary outcome component 1 - calcium oxalate supersaturation in urine (placebo treatment)
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately.
- change in calcium oxalate supersaturation after placebo treatment as a comparator for empagliflozin treatment
Calcium oxalate supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the oxalate concentration in urine.
Measured: Oxalate supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with placebo
Primary outcome component 2 - calcium phosphate supersaturation in urine (empagliflozin treatment)
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately.
- change in calcium phosphate supersaturation after empagliflozin treatment
Calcium phosphate supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the calcium phosphate concentration in urine.
Measured: Calcium phosphate supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with empagliflozin
Primary outcome component 2 - calcium phosphate supersaturation in urine (placebo treatment)
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately.
- change in calcium phosphate supersaturation after placebo treatment as a comparator for empagliflozin treatment
Calcium phosphate supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the calcium phosphate concentration in urine.
Measured: Calcium phosphate supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with placebo
Primary outcome component 3 - uric acid supersaturation in urine (empagliflozin treatment)
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately.
- change in uric acid supersaturation after empagliflozin treatment
Uric acid supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the uric acid concentration in urine.
Measured: Uric acid supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with empagliflozin
Primary outcome component 3 - uric acid supersaturation in urine (placebo treatment)
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately.
- change in uric acid supersaturation after placebo treatment as a comparator for empagliflozin treatment
Uric acid supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the uric acid concentration in urine.
Measured: Uric acid supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with placebo
Secondary outcomes (47)
Blood sodium level change from baseline
Sodium level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood potassium level change from baseline
Potassium level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood chloride level change from baseline
Chloride level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood total calcium level change from baseline
Total calcium level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood ionized calcium level change from baseline
Ionized calcium level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood phosphate level change from baseline
Phosphate level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood magnesium level change from baseline
Magnesium level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Venous bicarbonate level change from baseline
Venous bicarbonate level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood glucose level change from baseline
Blood glucose level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood urea level change from baseline
Urea level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood total cholesterol level change from baseline
Total cholesterol level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood HDL cholesterol level change from baseline
HDL cholesterol level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood LDL cholesterol level change from baseline
LDL cholesterol level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood triglycerides level change from baseline
Triglycerides level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood osmolality change from baseline
Osmolality measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood creatinine level change from baseline
Creatinine level measured in μmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood uric acid level change from baseline
Uric acid level measured in μmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood 25-OH vitamine D level change from baseline
25-OH vitamine D level measured in nmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood 1,25-OH vitamine D level change from baseline
1,25-OH vitamine D level measured in pmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Venous pCO2 change from baseline
Venous pCO2 measured in mmHg
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Venous pH change from baseline
Venous pH measured in pH units
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood albumin level change from baseline
Albumin level measured in g/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood parathormone level change from baseline
Parathormone level measured in pg/ml
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood FGF23 level change from baseline
FGF23 level measured in pg/ml
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood alcaline phosphatase activity change from baseline
Alcaline phosphatase activity level measured in U/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood TSH activity change from baseline
TSH activity level measured in mU/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood haemoglobin A1c level change from baseline
Haemoglobin A1c activity level measured in mU/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine sodium level change from baseline
Urine sodium level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine potassium level change from baseline
Urine potassium level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine chloride level change from baseline
Chloride level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine calcium level change from baseline
Calcium level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine phosphate level change from baseline
Phosphate level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine magnesium level change from baseline
Magnesium level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine glucose level change from baseline
Glucose level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine urea level change from baseline
Urea level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine osmolality level change from baseline
Osmolality level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine citrate level change from baseline
Citrate level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine sulfate level change from baseline
Sulfate level measured in mmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine oxalate level change from baseline
Oxalate level measured in μmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine ammonia level change from baseline
Ammonia level measured in μmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine creatinine level change from baseline
Creatinine level measured in μmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine uric acid level change from baseline
Uric acid level measured in μmol/l
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine pH change from baseline
pH measured in pH units
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine pCO2 change from baseline
pCO2 measured in mmHg
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Calculated outcomes 1: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Blood)
eGFR will be derived from the serum creatinine concentration, age and sex using the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Calculated outcomes 2: titratable acid (urine)
Titratable acid will be calculated in g/100 ml with the Equil-2 program.
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Calculated outcomes 3: bicarbonate (urine)
Urine bicarbonate in mmol/l will be calculated with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation using urine pH and urine pCO2
HCO-3= 0.0309 x pCO2 x 10pH-6.1
Measured: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2021
- Study start25 Aug 2021
- Primary completion30 Mar 2023
- Study completion28 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Kidney StoneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Eligible individuals will be randomized in equal proportions to 25 mg empagliflozin or placebo, taken once daily per os in the morning. Placebo will be administered to individuals randomized to that treatment in a form identical to empagliflozin. Patients will remain on the assigned IMP for 14 days. The following 14 days (days 15 - 28) will be a wash out period without IMP intake; this wash out time can be extended to up to 6 weeks if necessary. On day 29 of the study (or later according to the length of the wash out phase), a second 14 days period with IMP intake starts (empagliflozin or placebo, whichever was not received initially).
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, University of Bern
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Daniel Fuster, MD, Principal investigator, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04911660
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-02679
- Acronym
- SWEETSTONE
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 6 May 2021
- Last updated
- 12 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Anderegg MA, Schietzel S, Bargagli M, Bally L, Faller N, Moor MB, Cereghetti GM, Roumet M, Trelle S, Fuster DG. Empagliflozin in nondiabetic individuals with calcium and uric acid kidney stones: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2025 Jan;31(1):286-293. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03330-x. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
PubMed 39747681Schietzel S, Bally L, Cereghetti G, Faller N, Moor MB, Vogt B, Rintelen F, Trelle S, Fuster D. Impact of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on urinary supersaturations in kidney stone formers (SWEETSTONE trial): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 14;12(3):e059073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059073.
PubMed 35288397
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial Assessing the Impact of the SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin on Urinary Supersaturations in Kidney Stone Formers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04911660
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SWEETSTONE / 2020-02679
- Conditions
- Kidney Stone
- Keywords
- Kidney stones, Empagliflozin, Supersaturation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, University of Bern
- Study start
- 25 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to test the effect of a new drug on the composition of the urine in kidney stone patients. This new drug (Jardiance®, substance: empagliflozin) is currently approved in Switzerland for the treatment of patients with diabetes. Data from previous studies with and without diabetes suggest that it may have a beneficial effect on the composition of the urine and thereby reduce the risk of developing kidney stones.
Detailed description
Kidney stones - a global epidemic associated with obesity and diabetes
Kidney stones are a worldwide healthcare problem with a current lifetime risk of ~18.8 % in men and ~9.4 % in women in Western civilizations. Recurrence rates are high, up to 40 % and 75 % at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Hospitalizations, surgery and lost work time associated with kidney stones cause enormous healthcare-related expenditures. Although kidney stone disease is traditionally considered an isolated renal disorder, there is overwhelming evidence that it is in fact a systemic disease. Arterial hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, gouty diathesis, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and low bone mass are much more prevalent in kidney stone formers than in non-stone formers. It is currently unknown if stone disease is a cause of this co-morbidity per se or if it is a consequence of the same underlying conditions that lead to these disorders and kidney stones. Clearly, however, these co-morbidities contribute significantly to stone-related morbidity and mortality.
The strong, positive and independent association of Body Mass Index (BMI) with kidney stone disease is well established. The magnitude of the increased risk is larger in women than in men. In addition to BMI, significant weight gain is also associated with a greater risk of developing symptomatic kidney stone disease in the future. In recent decades, the prevalence of both kidney stone disease and obesity increased significantly, irrespective of age, sex and race. In large cross-sectional analyses, the prevalence of both symptomatic and asymptomatic kidney stones increased proportionally with the number of metabolic syndrome features present. Both calcium and uric acid stones are associated with obesity, but the ratio of calcium stones to uric acid stones is lower in obese compared to non-obese stone formers, suggesting a disproportionate increase of uric acid stone disease in obesity. Absolute urinary excretion rates of stone formation promoters (calcium, phosphate, oxalate and uric acid) as well as urinary supersaturation ratios for calcium oxalate and uric acid are increased in obese individuals. In addition, there is a well documented negative association of BMI with urinary pH in both stone formers and non-stone formers, and low urinary pH is the main driver of uric acid stone formation. The latter may be explained by insulin resistance which affects the generation of renal ammonium by direct and indirect mechanisms. In contrast to urinary pH, urinary calcium excretion (the main driver for calcium stone formation) is not independently associated with BMI but rather due to other factors known to affect urinary calcium excretion (e.g. secondary to increased sodium and animal protein intake).
Supersaturation - driver of kidney stone formation
Supersaturation, the presence of a material in solution at a concentration above its own solubility, is the driving force for crystallization and therefore kidney stone formation. Relevant supersaturations for kidney stones disease in humans include calcium oxalate, brushite (calcium phosphate) and uric acid. At a supersaturation <1, crystals dissolve, at a supersaturation >1, crystals form. Urinary supersaturations calculated from ambulatory 24 h urine collections accurately reflect the long-term average supersaturation values in the urine and are highly correlated with the kidney stone composition encountered in the individual kidney stone former. Treatments that reduced stone events in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are highly correlated with reductions in urinary supersaturations. A recent analysis of a large 5-year kidney stone RCT revealed that as early as 1 week after randomization, every 10 % reduction of urinary calcium oxalate supersaturation from baseline was associated with an 8 % reduction in the risk of stone recurrence during follow-up.
SGLT2 inhibitors - a promising new drug class for kidney stone formers
Inhibitors of the sodium/glucose co-transporter isoform 2 (SLC5A2 or SGLT2) belong to a new class of oral hypoglycemic drugs. SGLT2 resides in the brush border membrane of proximal tubular cells in the kidney and reabsorbs ~90 % of glucose filtered at the glomerulus. SGLT2 inhibitors block the physiological glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule from the glomerular filtrate, thereby inducing significant glucosuria accompanied by a reduction of blood glucose levels. Empagliflozin, the clinically best characterized SGLT2 inhibitor to date, decreases cardiovascular mortality, death from any cause, hospitalizations for heart failure, decline of GFR and need for renal replacement therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Some of these findings were also observed with two other SGLT2 inhibitors canagliflozin and dapagliflozin in large outcome trials. Due to their unique mode of action, SGLT2 inhibitors induce weight loss, decrease blood pressure and increase urinary volume, the latter being a very effective measure to reduce stone recurrence. Driven by promising results in RCTs, SGLT2 inhibitors are currently widely tested in non-diabetics e.g. for the treatment of heart failure, non-diabetic kidney disease, arterial hypertension or obesity (www.clinicaltrials.gov). The pleiotropic beneficial effects make SGLT2 inhibitors also a very attractive class of drugs for kidney stone formers, which often suffer concomitantly from arterial hypertension, CKD, obesity and diabetes.
Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on bone fractures, mineral metabolism and kidney stone events
Therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors as monotherapy or add-on therapy to various glucose-lowering agents is generally well tolerated. An increased incidence of genital infections and (although rare) euglycemic ketoacidosis are known side effects of this new class of medications. The latter is mainly observed in type I diabetics and less frequently in type II diabetics. To the best of our knowledge, no cases of euglycemic ketoacidosis in individuals without diabetes treated with SGLT2 inhibitors have been reported.
In the large canagliflozin outcome study CANVAS, an increased incidence of lower extremity amputations was noted. This adverse effect has not been reported with other SGLT2 inhibitors. In addition, both canagliflozin and dapagliflozin have been associated with an increased risk of bone fractures compared to placebo. In a short term study in healthy volunteers, canagliflozin increased serum phosphate, plasma fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) and decreased the level of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Similar results were obtained in individuals with diabetes treated with dapagliflozin. In contrast, pooled analyses of phase I, II and III trials of patients with type 2 diabetes treated with empagliflozin encompassing > 15'000 patient-years of exposure did not reveal an increased rate of bone fractures, alterations of blood electrolytes, PTH, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D or bone turnover markers.
While blood electrolyte and mineral metabolism parameters in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors have been well studied in healthy volunteers and patients with diabetes, there is a lack of data on the impact of SGLT2 inhibition on urinary parameters, especially on parameters that influence the kidney stone formation rate. Also, to our knowledge, no studies have been conducted thus far with SGLT2 inhibitors in kidney stone formers.
Interestingly, in pooled analyses of phase I, II and III trials, the rate of kidney stone events tended to be 30-50 % lower in patients treated with 10 or 25 mg empagliflozin versus placebo. However, detailed analyses for kidney stone events in empagliflozin outcome trials have not been reported. Reported stone event rates in these pooled empagliflozin trials (0.5 - 1/100 person years) are similar to what has been observed in individuals with diabetes in three large prospective US cohorts (Nurses' Health Study I, the Nurses' Health Study II and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. In contrast, stone event rates are considerably (10 - 100-fold) higher in patients with a history of kidney stone disease. RCTs testing dietary or pharmacologic measures for recurrence prevention typically included patients with stone event rates between 20 and 200 events/100 person-years.
In summary, SGLT2 inhibitors represent a promising new drug class for kidney stone formers. Kidney stone formers are likely to profit from the metabolic and cardiovascular effects of SGLT2 inhibition. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors may decrease the stone formation rate. Based on the overall experience thus far, empagliflozin seems to have by far the most favorable side effect profile. Clearly, there is a dire need for clinical studies with SGLT2 inhibitors in kidney stone formers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Eligible individuals will be randomized in equal proportions to 25 mg empagliflozin or placebo, taken once daily per os in the morning. Placebo will be administered to individuals randomized to that treatment in a form identical to empagliflozin. Patients will remain on the assigned IMP for 14 days. The following 14 days (days 15 - 28) will be a wash out period without IMP intake; this wash out time can be extended to up to 6 weeks if necessary. On day 29 of the study (or later according to the length of the wash out phase), a second 14 days period with IMP intake starts (empagliflozin or placebo, whichever was not received initially).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Empagliflozin + Placebo | Active comparator | Drug: Empagliflozin 25 MG, Other: Placebo1 capsule containing 25 mg empagliflozin per day for 14 days, followed by a 14-42 days wash-out phase and a second treatment phase with 1 capsule containing placebo for 14 days. |
| Placebo + Empagliflozin | Placebo comparator | Drug: Empagliflozin 25 MG, Other: Placebo1 capsule containing placebo per day for 14 days, followed by a 14-42 days wash-out phase and a second treatment phase with 1 capsule containing 25 mg empagliflozin for 14 days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
- Age between 18 and 74 years old
- One or more kidney stone event(s) in the past
- Any past kidney stone containing ≥ 80 % of calcium or ≥ 80 % of uric acid
- HbA1c < 6.5 %
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Patients with secondary causes of recurrent nephrolithiasis:
- Severe eating disorders (anorexia or bulimia)
- Chronic bowel disease, past intestinal or bariatric surgery
- Sarcoidosis
- Primary hyperparathyroidism
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Empagliflozin 25 MG1 empagliflozin 25 mg capsule per day for 14 days | Drug | Empagliflozin + Placebo, Placebo + Empagliflozin |
| Placebo1 placebo capsule per day for 14 days | Other | Empagliflozin + Placebo, Placebo + Empagliflozin |
Primary outcome
Primary outcome component 1 - calcium oxalate supersaturation in urine (empagliflozin treatment)
Time frame: Oxalate supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with empagliflozin
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately. 1) change in calcium oxalate supersaturation after empagliflozin treatment Calcium oxalate supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the oxalate concentration in urine.
Primary outcome component 1 - calcium oxalate supersaturation in urine (placebo treatment)
Time frame: Oxalate supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with placebo
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately. 1) change in calcium oxalate supersaturation after placebo treatment as a comparator for empagliflozin treatment Calcium oxalate supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the oxalate concentration in urine.
Primary outcome component 2 - calcium phosphate supersaturation in urine (empagliflozin treatment)
Time frame: Calcium phosphate supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with empagliflozin
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately. 2) change in calcium phosphate supersaturation after empagliflozin treatment Calcium phosphate supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the calcium phosphate concentration in urine.
Primary outcome component 2 - calcium phosphate supersaturation in urine (placebo treatment)
Time frame: Calcium phosphate supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with placebo
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately. 2) change in calcium phosphate supersaturation after placebo treatment as a comparator for empagliflozin treatment Calcium phosphate supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the calcium phosphate concentration in urine.
Primary outcome component 3 - uric acid supersaturation in urine (empagliflozin treatment)
Time frame: Uric acid supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with empagliflozin
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately. 3) change in uric acid supersaturation after empagliflozin treatment Uric acid supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the uric acid concentration in urine.
Primary outcome component 3 - uric acid supersaturation in urine (placebo treatment)
Time frame: Uric acid supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with placebo
The primary endpoint is composed of three primary outcomes that will be assessed separately. 3) change in uric acid supersaturation after placebo treatment as a comparator for empagliflozin treatment Uric acid supersaturation will be calculated by the Equil-2 program from the uric acid concentration in urine.
47 secondary outcomes
Blood sodium level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood potassium level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood chloride level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood total calcium level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood ionized calcium level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood phosphate level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood magnesium level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Venous bicarbonate level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood glucose level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood urea level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood total cholesterol level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood HDL cholesterol level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood LDL cholesterol level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood triglycerides level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood osmolality change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood creatinine level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood uric acid level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood 25-OH vitamine D level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood 1,25-OH vitamine D level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Venous pCO2 change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Venous pH change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood albumin level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood parathormone level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood FGF23 level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood alcaline phosphatase activity change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood TSH activity change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Blood haemoglobin A1c level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine sodium level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine potassium level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine chloride level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine calcium level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine phosphate level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine magnesium level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine glucose level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine urea level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine osmolality level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine citrate level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine sulfate level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine oxalate level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Urine ammonia level change from baseline
Time frame: Data collected at baseline, after 1st 14 days treatment and after 2nd 14 days treatment expected to be 6-10 weeks from baseline.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39747681Anderegg MA, Schietzel S, Bargagli M, Bally L, Faller N, Moor MB, Cereghetti GM, Roumet M, Trelle S, Fuster DG. Empagliflozin in nondiabetic individuals with calcium and uric acid kidney stones: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2025 Jan;31(1):286-293. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03330-x. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35288397Schietzel S, Bally L, Cereghetti G, Faller N, Moor MB, Vogt B, Rintelen F, Trelle S, Fuster D. Impact of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on urinary supersaturations in kidney stone formers (SWEETSTONE trial): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 14;12(3):e059073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059073.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Kidney Stone
Not yet recruiting
Automated Versus Manual Irrigation During Flexible Ureteroscopy
Renal Stone Disease
Not yet recruiting
Optimal Intrarenal Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopy
Renal Stone Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Stone Clearance With Aspiration vs Other Technologies: a Real-world Evidence Study
Urolithiasis, Stones, Kidney
Not yet recruiting
Intertransverse Process Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Kidney Stones, Urolithiasis, Hypocitraturia, Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Smart Pressure-Controlled Flexible Ureteroscopy and Flexible Suction Ureteral Access Sheath-Assisted Flexible Ureteroscopy for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
Kidney Stones
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Fuster, MD principal investigator
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Empagliflozin 25 MG in people with Kidney Stone, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary outcome component 1 - calcium oxalate supersaturation in urine (empagliflozin treatment) (time frame: Oxalate supersaturation will be determined at baseline and after 14 days treatment with empagliflozin). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04911660, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2023.