AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT04927728

The Application of a Mental Practice Protocol in the Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting

A study testing Mental Practice, Repetitive-Task Practice and Traditional Therapy in people with Stroke and Upper Extremity Paresis, run by Adventist HealthCare at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of audio-guided mental practice (MP) and video-guided MP on the impairment and functional abilities of upper extremity (UE) hemiparesis following a stroke. Participants are recruited from Adventist Healthcare Rehabilitation Hospital. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
What is being tested?
Mental Practice, Repetitive-Task Practice and Traditional Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
28 Jan 2019to 25 Nov 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Primary diagnosis of stroke
  • Less than one-month post-stroke
  • Hemiparesis of one upper extremity
  • Moderate upper extremity impairment

Who cannot join

  • History of prior stroke
  • Comorbidities (severe neurological, orthopedic, rheumatoid, or cardiac impairments)
  • Severe spasticity
  • Severe cognitive impairments
  • Inability to perform mental imagery
  • Severe aphasia based on speech therapist evaluation
  • Low English proficiency
  • Severe pain

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Adventist Healthcare Rehabilitation

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Application of a Mental Practice Protocol to Increase the Functional Recovery of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity in the Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of audio-guided mental practice (MP) and video-guided MP on the impairment and functional abilities of upper extremity (UE) hemiparesis following a stroke. Participants are recruited from Adventist Healthcare Rehabilitation Hospital. All participants must be less than one-month post-stroke with moderate UE hemiparesis. Eligible participants are randomly assigned to an experimental group, (MP or repetitive-task practice (RTP)), or the control group.

The MP groups will perform either audio-guided MP or video-guided MP, five days a week, with 20 repetitions of the following tasks: wiping a table, picking up a cup, brushing hair, and turning the pages of a book. The RTP group physically performed the same tasks. The control group received traditional stroke rehabilitation.

The investigators hypothesize that video MP will have greater improvements in UE impairments and functional abilities than audio MP, RTP, and/or traditional therapy.

Being tested
Mental Practice, Repetitive-Task Practice, Traditional Therapy
Keywords
mental practice, stroke, upper extremity, hemiparesis, rehabilitation interventions
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Paresis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mental PracticeOther

    Also called Mental Imagery, Motor Imagery

    MP is the cognitive rehearsal of a motor task without physical movement, with the intent to improve motor performance. Mental practice can be completed via audio or video recording, visual prompts, written instructions, self-initiated or recorded pictures.

  • Repetitive-Task PracticeOther

    Also called Repetitive-Task Specific Practice

    Repetitive-Task Practice is the repetitive rehearsal of a motor task with the intent to improve motor performance.

  • Traditional TherapyOther

    Traditional therapy includes traditional interventions completed in occupational therapy for patients following a stroke. These interventions include but are not limited to, range of motion, weight-bearing, massage, modalities, self-care training, and transfer training.

Study groups in NCT04927728
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Audio MPExperimentalParticipants of the audio mental practice (MP) group will complete MP via audio-guided multisensory cues of one of four tasks: (1) wiping a table (2) picking up a cup (3) brushing hair and/or (4) turning the page of a book. The assigned motor task is based upon the functional abilities of the patient. MP will be performed followed by physical practice of the same task with a research therapist 3x/week and independent MP 2 days/week. Each audio recording consists of 20 repetitions of the task.
Receives: Other: Mental Practice
Video MPExperimentalParticipants of the video mental practice (MP) group will complete MP via video-guided multisensory cues of one of four tasks: (1) wiping a table (2) picking up a cup (3) brushing hair and/or (4) turning the page of a book. The assigned motor task is based upon the functional abilities of the patient. MP will be performed followed by physical practice of the same task with a research therapist 3x/week and independent MP 2 days/week. Each audio recording consists of 20 repetitions of the task.
Receives: Other: Mental Practice
Repetitive-Task PracticeExperimentalParticipants of the repetitive-task practice group will complete repetitive practice of one of four tasks: (1) wiping a table (2) picking up a cup (3) brushing hair and/or (4) turning the page of a book. The assigned motor task is based upon the functional abilities of the patient. MP will be performed followed by physical practice of the same task with a research therapist 3x/week and independent MP 2 days/week. Each participant completed at least 20 repetitions of the task.
Receives: Other: Repetitive-Task Practice
Traditional TherapyActive comparatorThe control group received traditional occupational therapy stroke rehabilitation.
Receives: Other: Traditional Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fugl Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Portion (FMA-UE) (Measuring pre/post intervention change)

    The Fugl Meyer Assessment-upper extremity(FMA-UE) portion will be administered to measure the impairment of the upper extremity. Upper extremity movements are rated on 3-point ordinal scale where 0= unable to perform, 1= performs partially, 2= performs fully. Cumulative scores range from 0-66 where a lower score indicates increased impairment.

    Measured: Within 3 days of admission and within 3 days prior to discharge

  2. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) (Measuring pre/post intervention change)

    The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is used to measure the functional abilities of the UE. 15 tasks are performed including six timed joint-segment movements and eight timed integrative functional movements. Tasks are rated on a 6-point ordinal scale where 0= does not attempt to 5=movement appears to be normal. Timed and functional ability scores are calculated to indicate the functional abilities of the UE.

    Measured: Within 3 days of admission and within 3 days prior to discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jun 2021
  2. Study start28 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion25 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion25 Nov 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04927728
Sponsor's protocol ID
AdventistHC
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
1 Jun 2021
Last updated
16 Jun 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mental Practice, Repetitive-Task Practice and Traditional Therapy in people with Stroke and Upper Extremity Paresis, run by Adventist HealthCare at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fugl Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Portion (FMA-UE) (Measuring pre/post intervention change) (time frame: Within 3 days of admission and within 3 days prior to discharge). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in