GliomacircTeloDIAGNCT04931732
The circTeloDIAG: Liquid Biopsy for Glioma Tumor
An observational study of Glioma, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Gliomas represent the most frequent primary brain tumor, with 2,500 to 3,000 new cases per year in France. Their diagnosis, although highly complex, is essential for determining patient management. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Glioma
- What is being tested?
- ctDNA analysis
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 4 Nov 2021to Nov 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with suspected glioma and patients with suspected recurrent glioma
Who may be able to join
- Adult patient
- Obtainment of written informed consent
- Suspected newly or recurrent glioma (grade ≥ II) on MRI
- Patient eligible for surgery (biopsy or resection)
- Decision of surgery (biopsy or resection) at neuro-oncology interdisciplinary tumor board
Who cannot join
- Rejection of consent by patient
- Hemoglobin < 7g/dl
- Rejection of surgery by patient
- Suspected grade I tumor on MRI
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
East Group Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Bron, 69677
GARNIER Louis, Dr, +33 (0)4 72 68 13 59, louis.garnier@chu-lyon.fr
PONCET Delphine, DR, +33 (0)4 27 85 57 34, delphine.poncet@chu-lyon.fr
About this study
Official title: The circTeloDIAG: a New Approach of Liquid Biopsy for the Diagnosis and Follow-up of Patients With Glioma Tumor
Gliomas represent the most frequent primary brain tumor, with 2,500 to 3,000 new cases per year in France. Their diagnosis, although highly complex, is essential for determining patient management. While grade I gliomas (infrequent) are curable by surgery or present a slow progression, grades II to IV require heavy treatment (surgery and radio-chemotherapy), and are associated with a prognosis ranging from 10-15 years for grade II to only 15 months for glioblastoma.
One of the key processes in glioma oncogenesis is the activation of a telomeric maintenance mechanism (TMM). Two TMMs ensure the maintenance of a telomere size compatible with intense cell proliferation (TERT mutation and ATRX loss).
Read more
Liquid biopsy is used for the routine diagnosis and monitoring of treatment efficacy of different cancers. To date, no routine clinical testing of liquid biopsies is available for gliomas.
The detection of glioma-specific oncogenic processes, by liquid biopsy, in peripheral blood (ctDNA) could improve diagnosis and follow-up and then avoid surgery for patients with suspected lesions.
Three oncogenic markers can be used to detect gliomas: IDH mutation, TERT mutation, and a marker correlated with ATRX loss on total blood cells.
We hypothesized that the circTeloDIAG will improve and accelerate the diagnostic/prognostic value of the actual classification and provide a new tool to manage patient response to treatment via liquid biopsy. It will combine detection of three markers in liquid biopsy, to produce a versatile tool for all types of gliomas.
Patients with suspected newly diagnosed or recurrent glioma will be included.
Read the detailed description
Gliomas, heterogeneous and aggressive tumors awaiting new therapeutic approaches.
Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumors, with 2,500 to 3,000 new cases per year in France. They concern the elderly but can also affect children and young adults. Their diagnosis is often complex (differential diagnoses, delicate classification). However, this diagnosis is essential to determine the therapeutic management. Thus, while grade I gliomas (infrequent) are curable by surgery or have a slow progression, grades II to IV have a cost in terms of therapeutic costs (surgery and radio-chemotherapy), in connection with a prognosis ranging from heavy 10-15 years for grades II to only 15 months for glioblastoma (grade IV). New biotherapies (such as anti-VEGF) have not improved the prognosis and to date there are no targeted therapies or immune systems that have shown a benefit.
It is more than ever necessary to propose targeted treatments against alterations of each type of glioma and to develop in parallel the therapeutic tests allowing their prescription.
DIAGNOSIS OF GLIOMAS: IMPORTANCE OF BIOMARKERS
The diagnosis of gliomas was subject to a high rate of inter-observer discrepancies. Molecular criteria have recently made it possible to refine and secure the diagnosis1. Thus, in hospital routine, mutations in Isocitrate Dehydrogenases (IDH1 and 2), 1p19q deletion, EGFR amplification, loss of CDKN2A, mutations in histones H3.3 and H3.1 (G35R / V, K28M), methylation of MGMT, as well as two telomeric markers: mutations of the TERT promoter (TERTmt) and the deletion of ATRX (lost ATRX) (see below). Thus, the new "histo-molecular" classification of WHO1 (2016) and its following updates define different classes of gliomas:
- Oligodendrogliomas (OD) (IDHmt, 1p19q lost) (grades II-III)
- IDHmt (A) Astrocytomas (IDHmt and ATRXperdu / TP53 positive) (grades II-III)
- IDHmt Glioblastomas (GBM IDHmt) (IDHmt and ATRXperdu) (grade IV)
- IDHwt (GBM) Glioblastomas (IDHwt and TERTmt) (grade IV)
- IDHwt Astrocytomas (A IDHwt) (IDHwt) (grades II-III)
- midline mutated histone gliomas (G35R / V, K28M)
However, this classification does not fully reflect the actual aggressiveness of the tumors and has prognostic insufficiencies. Adaptations are therefore regularly made to these initial categories. Despite these diagnostic adaptations, some tumors present discrepancies between the immunohistological and molecular diagnosis, they are annotated NEC (Not Elsewhere Classified).
LIQUID BIOPSY: AN EXPECTED DIAGNOSIS TOOL FOR GLIOMAS
Liquid biopsy-type approaches have rapidly developed in the clinic; they already make it possible to monitor and / or participate in the diagnosis of various cancers on a routine basis (eg: EGFR mutations in lung cancers). In the case of gliomas, their benefit is obvious: in addition to imaging, or as a replacement for stereotaxic biopsy (1% mortality), they could improve the quality of follow-up and speed up the initial diagnosis. In particular, 47% of patients with GBM have an MRI imaging suggesting progression after radiotherapy, the detection of a circulating marker would make it possible to differentiate a progression (27%) from a "pseudo-progression" (20%). When monitoring gliomas, the reappearance of the circulating marker would make it possible to objectify the recurrence and to set up a second line or inclusion in a clinical trial more quickly. Finally, during the initial diagnosis, the delay of one month after biopsy or surgery necessary for the conventional diagnostic circuit could be reduced to one week thanks to this type of test; therapeutic management could then be accelerated.
At this time, there is no such test for gliomas. However, preliminary studies carried out on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected during surgery show a sensitivity of around 100% for the detection of TERTmt9. However, the removal of LCS for follow-up is an invasive act to which we should favor approaches by blood sampling.
The first studies of this type on circulating DNA (cfDNA) in plasma, via whole exome sequencing (a very expensive technique) detected gene abnormalities in nearly 50% of the cfDNAs analyzed. However, detection of diagnostic hotspots characteristic of gliomas such as TERTmt is insufficient on cfDNA (0-8% detection for glioblastomas). Other studies have looked at the analysis of tumor DNA carried by exosome-like vesicles, but have not been satisfactory. Finally, an alternative is based on the purification of circulating tumor cells (CTC). The latter have been detected in nearly 77% of gliomas; the best results having been obtained using density gradient centrifugation techniques, such as that offered by the OncoQuick kits combining a density gradient with filtration. Using this technique, from 1 to 10 CTC per 7.5 ml of blood were detected in 31 patients with gliomas of different grades. The advantage of this approach is that it preserves the entire genome of the tumor cell and will therefore allow the identification of characteristic diagnostic hotspots such as TERTmt and IDH1 / 2mt. The search for these mutations will then be objectivable by inexpensive techniques (such as the digital PCR droplet), already used routinely and not by high-throughput techniques (eg: whole genome sequencing) unsuitable for routine.
There is therefore a real expectation regarding liquid biopsies for the diagnosis and follow-up of gliomas. The targeted research approach for hotspot alterations with diagnostic value in glioma (such as TERTmt and IDH1 / 2mt), via CTC enrichment appears to be a promising avenue.
- Conditions
- Glioma
- Being tested
- ctDNA analysis
- Keywords
- liquid biopsy, glioma, pseudoprogression, relapse
- Medical subject headings
- Glioma, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ctDNA analysisBiological
ctDNA analysis of patients with suspected primary glioma tumors and in patients with suspected recurrence.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | Not described Receives: Biological: ctDNA analysis | |
| Relapse | Not described Receives: Biological: ctDNA analysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ctDNA analysis
The main objective is to evaluate the performances of the diagnostic test "circTeloDIAG" dedicated to liquid biopsy. Primary endpoint is the sensitivity and specificity of the circTeloDIAG assay, at time of initial surgery. It will be established in CTCs in comparison with tumoral with positivity of one of the three markers tested
Measured: At inclusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2021
- Study start4 Nov 2021
- Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GliomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04931732
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 69HCL20_0461
- Acronym
- circTeloDIAG
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The circTeloDIAG: a New Approach of Liquid Biopsy for the Diagnosis and Follow-up of Patients With Glioma Tumor
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04931732
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- circTeloDIAG / 69HCL20_0461
- Conditions
- Glioma
- Keywords
- liquid biopsy, glioma, pseudoprogression, relapse
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Gliomas represent the most frequent primary brain tumor, with 2,500 to 3,000 new cases per year in France. Their diagnosis, although highly complex, is essential for determining patient management. While grade I gliomas (infrequent) are curable by surgery or present a slow progression, grades II to IV require heavy treatment (surgery and radio-chemotherapy), and are associated with a prognosis ranging from 10-15 years for grade II to only 15 months for glioblastoma.
One of the key processes in glioma oncogenesis is the activation of a telomeric maintenance mechanism (TMM). Two TMMs ensure the maintenance of a telomere size compatible with intense cell proliferation (TERT mutation and ATRX loss).
Liquid biopsy is used for the routine diagnosis and monitoring of treatment efficacy of different cancers. To date, no routine clinical testing of liquid biopsies is available for gliomas.
The detection of glioma-specific oncogenic processes, by liquid biopsy, in peripheral blood (ctDNA) could improve diagnosis and follow-up and then avoid surgery for patients with suspected lesions.
Three oncogenic markers can be used to detect gliomas: IDH mutation, TERT mutation, and a marker correlated with ATRX loss on total blood cells.
We hypothesized that the circTeloDIAG will improve and accelerate the diagnostic/prognostic value of the actual classification and provide a new tool to manage patient response to treatment via liquid biopsy. It will combine detection of three markers in liquid biopsy, to produce a versatile tool for all types of gliomas.
Patients with suspected newly diagnosed or recurrent glioma will be included.
Detailed description
Gliomas, heterogeneous and aggressive tumors awaiting new therapeutic approaches.
Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumors, with 2,500 to 3,000 new cases per year in France. They concern the elderly but can also affect children and young adults. Their diagnosis is often complex (differential diagnoses, delicate classification). However, this diagnosis is essential to determine the therapeutic management. Thus, while grade I gliomas (infrequent) are curable by surgery or have a slow progression, grades II to IV have a cost in terms of therapeutic costs (surgery and radio-chemotherapy), in connection with a prognosis ranging from heavy 10-15 years for grades II to only 15 months for glioblastoma (grade IV). New biotherapies (such as anti-VEGF) have not improved the prognosis and to date there are no targeted therapies or immune systems that have shown a benefit.
It is more than ever necessary to propose targeted treatments against alterations of each type of glioma and to develop in parallel the therapeutic tests allowing their prescription.
DIAGNOSIS OF GLIOMAS: IMPORTANCE OF BIOMARKERS
The diagnosis of gliomas was subject to a high rate of inter-observer discrepancies. Molecular criteria have recently made it possible to refine and secure the diagnosis1. Thus, in hospital routine, mutations in Isocitrate Dehydrogenases (IDH1 and 2), 1p19q deletion, EGFR amplification, loss of CDKN2A, mutations in histones H3.3 and H3.1 (G35R / V, K28M), methylation of MGMT, as well as two telomeric markers: mutations of the TERT promoter (TERTmt) and the deletion of ATRX (lost ATRX) (see below). Thus, the new "histo-molecular" classification of WHO1 (2016) and its following updates define different classes of gliomas:
- Oligodendrogliomas (OD) (IDHmt, 1p19q lost) (grades II-III)
- IDHmt (A) Astrocytomas (IDHmt and ATRXperdu / TP53 positive) (grades II-III)
- IDHmt Glioblastomas (GBM IDHmt) (IDHmt and ATRXperdu) (grade IV)
- IDHwt (GBM) Glioblastomas (IDHwt and TERTmt) (grade IV)
- IDHwt Astrocytomas (A IDHwt) (IDHwt) (grades II-III)
- midline mutated histone gliomas (G35R / V, K28M)
However, this classification does not fully reflect the actual aggressiveness of the tumors and has prognostic insufficiencies. Adaptations are therefore regularly made to these initial categories. Despite these diagnostic adaptations, some tumors present discrepancies between the immunohistological and molecular diagnosis, they are annotated NEC (Not Elsewhere Classified).
LIQUID BIOPSY: AN EXPECTED DIAGNOSIS TOOL FOR GLIOMAS
Liquid biopsy-type approaches have rapidly developed in the clinic; they already make it possible to monitor and / or participate in the diagnosis of various cancers on a routine basis (eg: EGFR mutations in lung cancers). In the case of gliomas, their benefit is obvious: in addition to imaging, or as a replacement for stereotaxic biopsy (1% mortality), they could improve the quality of follow-up and speed up the initial diagnosis. In particular, 47% of patients with GBM have an MRI imaging suggesting progression after radiotherapy, the detection of a circulating marker would make it possible to differentiate a progression (27%) from a "pseudo-progression" (20%). When monitoring gliomas, the reappearance of the circulating marker would make it possible to objectify the recurrence and to set up a second line or inclusion in a clinical trial more quickly. Finally, during the initial diagnosis, the delay of one month after biopsy or surgery necessary for the conventional diagnostic circuit could be reduced to one week thanks to this type of test; therapeutic management could then be accelerated.
At this time, there is no such test for gliomas. However, preliminary studies carried out on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected during surgery show a sensitivity of around 100% for the detection of TERTmt9. However, the removal of LCS for follow-up is an invasive act to which we should favor approaches by blood sampling.
The first studies of this type on circulating DNA (cfDNA) in plasma, via whole exome sequencing (a very expensive technique) detected gene abnormalities in nearly 50% of the cfDNAs analyzed. However, detection of diagnostic hotspots characteristic of gliomas such as TERTmt is insufficient on cfDNA (0-8% detection for glioblastomas). Other studies have looked at the analysis of tumor DNA carried by exosome-like vesicles, but have not been satisfactory. Finally, an alternative is based on the purification of circulating tumor cells (CTC). The latter have been detected in nearly 77% of gliomas; the best results having been obtained using density gradient centrifugation techniques, such as that offered by the OncoQuick kits combining a density gradient with filtration. Using this technique, from 1 to 10 CTC per 7.5 ml of blood were detected in 31 patients with gliomas of different grades. The advantage of this approach is that it preserves the entire genome of the tumor cell and will therefore allow the identification of characteristic diagnostic hotspots such as TERTmt and IDH1 / 2mt. The search for these mutations will then be objectivable by inexpensive techniques (such as the digital PCR droplet), already used routinely and not by high-throughput techniques (eg: whole genome sequencing) unsuitable for routine.
There is therefore a real expectation regarding liquid biopsies for the diagnosis and follow-up of gliomas. The targeted research approach for hotspot alterations with diagnostic value in glioma (such as TERTmt and IDH1 / 2mt), via CTC enrichment appears to be a promising avenue.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | – | Biological: ctDNA analysis |
| Relapse | – | Biological: ctDNA analysis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with suspected glioma and patients with suspected recurrent glioma
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult patient
- Obtainment of written informed consent
- Suspected newly or recurrent glioma (grade ≥ II) on MRI
- Patient eligible for surgery (biopsy or resection)
- Decision of surgery (biopsy or resection) at neuro-oncology interdisciplinary tumor board
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Rejection of consent by patient
- Hemoglobin < 7g/dl
- Rejection of surgery by patient
- Suspected grade I tumor on MRI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ctDNA analysisctDNA analysis of patients with suspected primary glioma tumors and in patients with suspected recurrence. | Biological | Diagnosis, Relapse |
Primary outcome
ctDNA analysis
Time frame: At inclusion
The main objective is to evaluate the performances of the diagnostic test "circTeloDIAG" dedicated to liquid biopsy. Primary endpoint is the sensitivity and specificity of the circTeloDIAG assay, at time of initial surgery. It will be established in CTCs in comparison with tumoral with positivity of one of the three markers tested
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Glioma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
EF-41/KEYNOTE D58: Phase 3 Study of Optune Concomitant With Temozolomide Plus Pembrolizumab in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of the Drugs Selumetinib vs. Carboplatin and Vincristine in Patients With Low-Grade Glioma
Low Grade Astrocytoma, Low Grade Glioma
RecruitingPhase 3
Beginning Radiation Immediately With GammaTile at GBM Excision Versus Standard of Care
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of an Anti-cancer Drug, Selinexor, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Temozolomide) for Brain Tumors That Have Returned After Previous Treatment
Recurrent Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype, Recurrent MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Glioma, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact GARNIER Louis, Dr (+33 (0)4 72 68 13 59, louis.garnier@chu-lyon.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ctDNA analysis (time frame: At inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2023.