AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal DiseaseNCT04954963

CT Mar Technology and MR Mavric, Semac Sequence in Removing Artifacts of Orthopedic Metal Internal Fixation

An observational study of Spinal Disease, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

1. Objective to compare the effect of single energy imaging and mar technology in reducing artifacts of knee and hip replacement, and to explore the appropriate keV range of Mar technology in removing metal artifacts.,2. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Disease
What is being tested?
Reduce metal artifacts examination
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Dec 2019to 30 Oct 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: From December 2019 to October 2020, patients who were reexamined after spinal internal fixation or knee and hip replacement in Peking University Third Hospital.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients after spinal internal fixation or knee or hip replacement

Who cannot join

  • Patients with poor image quality caused by their own factors such as patients' movement can not meet the diagnostic requirements

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 010

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Objective to Explore the Clinical Application Value of Spectral CT Mar Technology and Magnetic Resonance Mavric, Semac Sequence in Removing Artifacts of Orthopedic Metal Internal Fixation

  1. Objective to compare the effect of single energy imaging and mar technology in reducing artifacts of knee and hip replacement, and to explore the appropriate keV range of Mar technology in removing metal artifacts.,2. Objective to compare the effects of different MRI sequences (mavric / semac, stir, ideal, FSE) in removing artifacts of spinal internal fixation, knee and hip replacement.
Read the detailed description

Conventional spiral CT [4] examination will form black-and-white stripe artifacts around the metal implant, making the display of adjacent important structures unclear. In routine MRI examination [5], metal will interfere with the uniformity of local magnetic field, resulting in signal loss, and the artifacts will seriously affect the observation of bone and its surrounding structures.

The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the effect of Mar technology on reducing metal artifacts after internal fixation and joint replacement, and then to explore the appropriate keV range of Mar technology to reduce metal artifacts. We also aim to compare the reduction effect of different sequences of MRI on internal fixation artifacts after internal fixation and joint replacement, and to explore the sequence suitable for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Conditions
Spinal Disease
Being tested
Reduce metal artifacts examination
Medical subject headings
Spinal Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Reduce metal artifacts examinationDiagnostic test

    patients undergo reduce metal artifacts examination

Study groups in NCT04954963
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
conventional examinationpatients undergo conventional examination
Reduce metal artifacts examinationpatients undergo reduce metal artifacts examination
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Reduce metal artifacts examination

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Artifact index

    AI in region of interest

    Measured: 2020.10.15-2020.10.30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jul 2021
  2. Study start1 Dec 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04954963
Sponsor's protocol ID
M2019317
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
29 Jun 2021
Last updated
8 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Spinal Disease, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Artifact index (time frame: 2020.10.15-2020.10.30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in