HivTALCNCT04955795
Telemedicine for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Persons Living With HIV Using CETA
A study testing Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI) and Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) via Telemedicine in people with Hiv and Alcohol Problem, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is designed to examine the efficacy of an alcohol-focused brief intervention alone versus the brief intervention plus referral to a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention to address unhealthy alcohol use and comorbid mental health symptoms to improve HIV outcomes among people living with HIV in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hiv, Alcohol Problem
- What is being tested?
- Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI) and Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) via Telemedicine
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 308 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 May 2023to 31 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- Living with HIV infection
- Receiving HIV care in Alabama
- Unhealthy alcohol use based on AUDIT score of 4 or greater for women and 8 or greater for men.
Who cannot join
- Inability to use a mobile phone due to cognitive or physical impairments
- Unable to speak sufficient English to provide informed consent and receive cognitive behavioral therapy
- Active suicidality or psychosis
- Risk for acute alcohol withdrawal or seizures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
About this study
Official title: Telemedicine for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Persons Living With HIV Using Common Elements Treatment Approach
This study is designed to examine the efficacy of an alcohol-focused brief intervention alone versus the brief intervention plus referral to a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention to address unhealthy alcohol use and comorbid mental health symptoms to improve HIV outcomes among people living with HIV in Alabama.
Read the detailed description
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI) or BI plus telephone-delivered Common Elements Treatment Approach (T-CETA) via telephone. Participants will receive either 1 phone session of BI or around 6 to 12 weekly phone sessions of BI + T-CETA. Follow ups assessments of the outcomes will occur at 6 and 12 months with participants.
Participants will provide data on alcohol use, mental health comorbidities, HIV outcomes, medication adherence, and laboratory collections (CD4+ T cell count, viral load, and an alcohol biomarker: PEth) at the baseline assessment and again at the 6 and 12 month follow ups.
The study will also conduct mixed methods implementation measures with a subset of participants who are selected across various strata (i.e. sex, age, trial arm).
- Conditions
- Hiv, Alcohol Problem
- Being tested
- Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI), Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) via Telemedicine
- Keywords
- HIV Outcomes, Unhealthy Alcohol Use, Mental Health, Medication Adherence
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Psychological Well-Being, Medication Adherence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI)Behavioural
The BI we will use was based on CETA's substance use module and was designed for one-on-one delivery. It is comprised of 6 elements (i.e. assessment, understanding impacts, exploring change, goal setting, identifying the reasons, and skill building) including a 2-week alcohol timeline follow back assessment, which is completed by the therapist. BI will be provided by a trained research assistant who has completed consent, enrollment, and randomized procedures with the client.
Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) via TelemedicineBehavioural
CETA consists of nine key elements (i.e. engagement and education; safety assessment and planning; psychoeducation/introduction; substance use reduction; behavioral activation; cognitive coping/restructuring; relaxation; exposure; and problem solving) that address common mental health problems such as trauma, PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Participants randomized to CETA will be assigned to a CETA provider (clinical psychology or social work graduate student or master's degree substance abuse counselor). Enrolled participants will be discussed at weekly supervision meetings. An individualized treatment plan will be designed for each participant including type and order of CETA modules. The counselor will contact the participant by phone to schedule CETA sessions and follow up any missed appointments. Counselors, who will also be given a unique ID# for documentation and analysis, will carry 3-10 active CETA cases at a time depending on their experience level.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI) | Active comparator | At the time of trial enrollment, participants will receive a single session of alcohol brief intervention (BI) via telephone. This session will typically last 20-40 minutes. Receives: Behavioral: Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI) |
| Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) via Telemedicine | Experimental | Participants will be provided with around 6 to 12 weekly CETA sessions via telephone. The specific number of sessions is based on symptom severity and responsiveness to treatment. Receives: Behavioral: Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI); Behavioral: Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) via Telemedicine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in self-reported alcohol use at 6 months
Defined by the participant's score on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). The minimum score on the AUDIT measure is 0, and the maximum score on the AUDIT measure is 40. For women, a score of of 4 or greater indicates hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption. For men, a score of 8 or greater indicates hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption. Higher scores on the AUDIT measure indicates more hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption. This outcome will be the change in AUDIT from enrollment to 6 months.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change from baseline substance use at 6 months
Defined by the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). The minimum score on each substance (i.e. tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamines, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, opioids, or other substances) is 0 to 3 (Low health risk). Moderate health risk is defined as a score of 4-26. High heath risk is defined as a score of 27 and higher. Higher scores indicate greater risk for health issues as a result of substance use. For this outcome we look at the change from enrollment to 6 months.
Measured: 6 months
Change from Baseline Substance Use at 12 months
Defined by the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). The minimum score on each substance (i.e. tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamines, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, opioids, or other substances) is 0 to 3 (Low health risk). Moderate health risk is defined as a score of 4-26. High heath risk is defined as a score of 27 and higher. Higher scores indicate greater risk for health issues as a result of substance use.
Measured: 12 months
Change from Baseline Depression at 6 months
Defined by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) validated tool. The minimum score on this measure is 0 and the maximum score on this measure is 27. Higher scores on this measure indicates a worse outcome.
Measured: 6 months
Change from Baseline Depression at 12 months
Defined by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) validated tool. The minimum score on this measure is 0 and the maximum score on this measure is 27. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
Measured: 12 months
Change from Baseline Anxiety at 6 months
Defined by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Item (GAD-7) validated tool. The minimum score of this measure is 0, and the maximum score of this measure is 21. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
Measured: 6 months
Change from Baseline Anxiety at 12 months
Defined by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Item (GAD-7) validated tool. The minimum score of this measure is 0, and the maximum score of this measure is 21. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
Measured: 12 months
Change from Baseline Traumatic Stress at 6 months
Defined by the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-IV (PCL-4) validated tool. The minimum score of this measure is 0, and the maximum score of this measure is 80. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
Measured: 6 months
Change from Baseline Traumatic Stress at 12 months
Defined by the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-IV (PCL-4) validated tool. The minimum score of this measure is 0, and the maximum score of this measure is 80. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2021
- Study start4 May 2023
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HivStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 308 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Vinikoor, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- Michael Vinikoor, MD, Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04955795
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-300007410
- Other IDs
- P01AA029540
- Acronym
- TALC
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 26 May 2021
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No