Aortic AneurysmNCT04966247
Cerebral Protection in Aortic Arch Surgery
An observational study of Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection, run by Barts & The London NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Aortic arch repair surgery is a technically complex and challenging procedure to treat aortic pathologies. Despite advancements in perioperative care, detrimental neurological complications occur during or after surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Aneurysm, Aortic Dissection, Aortic Arch
- What is being tested?
- Microdialysis
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 19 Jul 2023to 19 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study focuses on patients undergoing aortic arch surgery secondary to aortic pathologies such as aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection.
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing aortic arch surgery
- Patients aged 18 and over
- Patients who are able to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with intraoperative death
- Patients with preoperative neurological dysfunction
- Patients who are not able to provide informed consent (language barrier, unconscious, unable to understand, retain and process information)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
St Bartholomew's Hospital
London
Myat Thet, MD
About this study
Aortic arch repair surgery is a technically complex and challenging procedure to treat aortic pathologies. Despite advancements in perioperative care, detrimental neurological complications occur during or after surgery. The neurological complications increase the economic burden of healthcare, morbidity and quality of life for the patients, even if they survive. Stroke, for example, leads to an increase in healthcare and social care costs, requiring a subsequent lengthy rehabilitation. Milder neurological impairments include transient ischaemic attacks, confusion and delirium, necessitating longer intensive care and hospital stay.
Currently applied cerebral monitoring modalities are electroencephalogram and cerebral oximetry. However, they are not specific enough to timely detect early cerebral ischaemia to prevent neurological complications. S100B protein and neuron-specific enolase are serum markers that reflect cerebral damage, however, their applicability in the hyperacute setting is limited. However, rapid measurements of glial fibrillary protein have paved new pathways to detect cerebral injury. Recent studies reveal more sensitive biomarkers of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate and glycerol. These biomarkers could potentially detect cerebral ischaemia on a near real-time basis using the microdialysis method. The aim of the project is to develop a bedside system for early detection of cerebral ischaemia on a near real-time basis during aortic arch surgery.
Early detection of cerebral ischaemia could mandate more aggressive cerebral protection strategies by further optimisation of hypothermia and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during surgery, and optimisation of blood pressure and oxygenation in the intensive care unit. Ultimately, early detection of cerebral ischemia during surgery will prevent disabling and costly neurological complications following surgery.
Read the detailed description
Aortic arch surgery is used to treat life-threatening aortic dissections, aortic aneurysms involving the arch and other aortic pathologies. The procedure is performed under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Neurological complications are detrimental and disabling for the patients, even if they survive. In the 1990s, the risk of stroke after aortic arch surgery was 48% with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The risk of stroke has largely decreased to about 3% after elective surgery and 11% after emergency aortic arch repair in recent years, largely attributed to the development of current cerebral protection strategies. Despite this, the risk of stroke is considerably high and it accompanies devastating disabilities for the patients leading to longer hospital stays and lower quality of life for surviving patients.
Neurological complications are not without an economic burden on the NHS healthcare system. After analysing 84,184 patients admitted to hospital with a stroke, it is reported that the mean total healthcare and social care cost of a stroke patient in the UK is £22,429 at 1 year, and this amount increases to £46,039 in 5-year. The costs also increase with age and severity of the stroke (Figure 1).
Electroencephalogram (EEG) and cerebral oximetry are currently used modalities for cerebral ischaemia monitoring, yet, they fail to detect early cerebral ischaemia. EEG only processes data from superficial cortex areas only. It is also affected by anaesthetic agents, neuromuscular blocking agents and other intraoperative factors. Cerebral oximetry uses near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to monitor cerebral regional oxygen saturation in the frontal cortex. It has a weak predictive value of neurological events, and no data exists to support the optimum threshold of oximetry. Moreover, there is no association between spectroscopy measurements and stroke. The latest emerging imaging modality for monitoring is transcranial doppler ultrasound. It is operator-dependent and images are usually acquired through a small transtemporal window. It measures velocity in cranial arteries such as middle cerebral arteries, and it is still yet to be validated with larger studies. Limitations in these monitoring modalities could often bring the adequacy of cerebral protection into question.
The brain is a very sensitive organ to hypoxemia, and mixed venous oxygen saturation can be used to estimate the oxygen delivery and usage in the body by measuring the blood returning to the right side of the heart. Mixed venous saturation is influenced by many factors, such as cardiac output, respiration and oxygenation, and tissue metabolism in the perioperative period. Intraoperatively, it could serve as a more specific marker of global oxygen delivery during the cardiopulmonary bypass since the pump flow and metabolic rates are fairly constant.
Alternatively, certain proteins, such as the S100B protein, neuron-specific enolase and glial fibrillary protein (GFAP) could be monitored. They are released into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood after cerebral damage. Their concentrations correlate with the extent of cerebral injury and predict the adverse clinical outcomes. However, S100B and neuron-specific enolase cannot accurately diagnose stroke, even after 6 hours from the onset of clinical symptoms. Moreover, their measurement results could take at least 2 hours, and also reliability of the measurements decrease with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Hence, their applicability in the hyperacute setting of aortic surgery is very limited.
On the other hand, GFAP and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have been described as emerging biomarkers for cerebral injury in an acute setting. The conventional measurement of GFAP using ELISA assays cannot reliably detect low levels of GFAP, especially in the blood. However, since the introduction of the portable point-of-care device to measure GFAP and UCH-L1 levels in the blood, these could be measured in as little as 10-15 minutes. This has paved the way for further exploring the role of GFAP as a biomarker for the early identification of cerebral ischaemia in aortic arch surgery.
Recent studies have evaluated the role of metabolic biomarkers; glucose, pyruvate, lactate, glutamate, and glycerol, in cardiac surgery, using the microdialysis method. Although conventional analysis of biomarkers is difficult on a near real-time basis, it is feasible using the microdialysis method. It has been validated and in clinical use for more than 30 years. The microdialysis system consists of a small catheter with a semipermeable membrane placed in the interstitial space and physiologic salt solution is constantly perfused in the catheter allowing some of the solutes to diffuse from the interstitial space into the microdialysis catheter along a concentration gradient. The dialysate can then be analysed for concentrations of biomarkers.
Choice of biomarkers (glucose, pyruvate, lactate, glutamate, and glycerol) is largely dependent on the commercially available analysis capacity of microdialysis method and previous studies on biomarkers in cardiac surgery. Glucose is the sole fuel of the brain. It is broken down in the glycolytic pathway to generate pyruvate, which is then used in mitochondria by oxidative metabolism via the tricarboxylic acid cycle. In the absence of oxygen, pyruvate is converted to lactate by the lactate dehydrogenase reaction for anaerobic glycolysis. An increase in the lactate-to-pyruvate ratio is shown to be a very sensitive biomarker for impending cerebral damage. Glutamate, which acts as the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain, is released in excessive amounts following trauma, various brain pathologies and ischaemic events, such as stroke, leading to excitotoxic injury and neural cell death. Glycerol is known to be a sensitive marker for phospholipid cellular membrane degradation after ischaemic cell injury as well. Detection of biomarkers using the near real-time microdialysis method is a promising way of developing a better cerebral monitoring system during aortic surgery to prevent neurological complications.
- Conditions
- Aortic Aneurysm, Aortic Dissection, Aortic Arch, Aortic Diseases
- Being tested
- Microdialysis
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm, Aortic Dissection, Aortic Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MicrodialysisOther
Monitoring real-time cerebral biomarkers using microdialysis method
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Aortic Arch Pathology | Patients undergoing aortic arch surgery for aortic arch pathologies, such as aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Receives: Other: Microdialysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with postoperative stroke
New onset stroke after surgery
Measured: From the start of surgery until patient is discharged from the hospital, an average of 7 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of participants with postoperative delirium
New onset delirium after surgery will be assessed using the "Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)"
Measured: From the start of surgery until patient is discharged from the hospital, an average of 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2021
- Study start19 Jul 2023
- Primary completion19 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion19 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Aortic AneurysmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Barts & The London NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queen Mary University of London, Imperial College London
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aung Ye Oo, MD, FRCS-CTh, Principal investigator, Queen Mary University London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04966247
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 299015
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cerebral Protection in Aortic Arch Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04966247
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 299015
- Conditions
- Aortic Aneurysm, Aortic Dissection, Aortic Arch, Aortic Diseases
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Barts & The London NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queen Mary University of London, Imperial College London
- Study start
- 19 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 19 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aortic arch repair surgery is a technically complex and challenging procedure to treat aortic pathologies. Despite advancements in perioperative care, detrimental neurological complications occur during or after surgery. The neurological complications increase the economic burden of healthcare, morbidity and quality of life for the patients, even if they survive. Stroke, for example, leads to an increase in healthcare and social care costs, requiring a subsequent lengthy rehabilitation. Milder neurological impairments include transient ischaemic attacks, confusion and delirium, necessitating longer intensive care and hospital stay.
Currently applied cerebral monitoring modalities are electroencephalogram and cerebral oximetry. However, they are not specific enough to timely detect early cerebral ischaemia to prevent neurological complications. S100B protein and neuron-specific enolase are serum markers that reflect cerebral damage, however, their applicability in the hyperacute setting is limited. However, rapid measurements of glial fibrillary protein have paved new pathways to detect cerebral injury. Recent studies reveal more sensitive biomarkers of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate and glycerol. These biomarkers could potentially detect cerebral ischaemia on a near real-time basis using the microdialysis method. The aim of the project is to develop a bedside system for early detection of cerebral ischaemia on a near real-time basis during aortic arch surgery.
Early detection of cerebral ischaemia could mandate more aggressive cerebral protection strategies by further optimisation of hypothermia and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during surgery, and optimisation of blood pressure and oxygenation in the intensive care unit. Ultimately, early detection of cerebral ischemia during surgery will prevent disabling and costly neurological complications following surgery.
Detailed description
Aortic arch surgery is used to treat life-threatening aortic dissections, aortic aneurysms involving the arch and other aortic pathologies. The procedure is performed under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Neurological complications are detrimental and disabling for the patients, even if they survive. In the 1990s, the risk of stroke after aortic arch surgery was 48% with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The risk of stroke has largely decreased to about 3% after elective surgery and 11% after emergency aortic arch repair in recent years, largely attributed to the development of current cerebral protection strategies. Despite this, the risk of stroke is considerably high and it accompanies devastating disabilities for the patients leading to longer hospital stays and lower quality of life for surviving patients.
Neurological complications are not without an economic burden on the NHS healthcare system. After analysing 84,184 patients admitted to hospital with a stroke, it is reported that the mean total healthcare and social care cost of a stroke patient in the UK is £22,429 at 1 year, and this amount increases to £46,039 in 5-year. The costs also increase with age and severity of the stroke (Figure 1).
Electroencephalogram (EEG) and cerebral oximetry are currently used modalities for cerebral ischaemia monitoring, yet, they fail to detect early cerebral ischaemia. EEG only processes data from superficial cortex areas only. It is also affected by anaesthetic agents, neuromuscular blocking agents and other intraoperative factors. Cerebral oximetry uses near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to monitor cerebral regional oxygen saturation in the frontal cortex. It has a weak predictive value of neurological events, and no data exists to support the optimum threshold of oximetry. Moreover, there is no association between spectroscopy measurements and stroke. The latest emerging imaging modality for monitoring is transcranial doppler ultrasound. It is operator-dependent and images are usually acquired through a small transtemporal window. It measures velocity in cranial arteries such as middle cerebral arteries, and it is still yet to be validated with larger studies. Limitations in these monitoring modalities could often bring the adequacy of cerebral protection into question.
The brain is a very sensitive organ to hypoxemia, and mixed venous oxygen saturation can be used to estimate the oxygen delivery and usage in the body by measuring the blood returning to the right side of the heart. Mixed venous saturation is influenced by many factors, such as cardiac output, respiration and oxygenation, and tissue metabolism in the perioperative period. Intraoperatively, it could serve as a more specific marker of global oxygen delivery during the cardiopulmonary bypass since the pump flow and metabolic rates are fairly constant.
Alternatively, certain proteins, such as the S100B protein, neuron-specific enolase and glial fibrillary protein (GFAP) could be monitored. They are released into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood after cerebral damage. Their concentrations correlate with the extent of cerebral injury and predict the adverse clinical outcomes. However, S100B and neuron-specific enolase cannot accurately diagnose stroke, even after 6 hours from the onset of clinical symptoms. Moreover, their measurement results could take at least 2 hours, and also reliability of the measurements decrease with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Hence, their applicability in the hyperacute setting of aortic surgery is very limited.
On the other hand, GFAP and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have been described as emerging biomarkers for cerebral injury in an acute setting. The conventional measurement of GFAP using ELISA assays cannot reliably detect low levels of GFAP, especially in the blood. However, since the introduction of the portable point-of-care device to measure GFAP and UCH-L1 levels in the blood, these could be measured in as little as 10-15 minutes. This has paved the way for further exploring the role of GFAP as a biomarker for the early identification of cerebral ischaemia in aortic arch surgery.
Recent studies have evaluated the role of metabolic biomarkers; glucose, pyruvate, lactate, glutamate, and glycerol, in cardiac surgery, using the microdialysis method. Although conventional analysis of biomarkers is difficult on a near real-time basis, it is feasible using the microdialysis method. It has been validated and in clinical use for more than 30 years. The microdialysis system consists of a small catheter with a semipermeable membrane placed in the interstitial space and physiologic salt solution is constantly perfused in the catheter allowing some of the solutes to diffuse from the interstitial space into the microdialysis catheter along a concentration gradient. The dialysate can then be analysed for concentrations of biomarkers.
Choice of biomarkers (glucose, pyruvate, lactate, glutamate, and glycerol) is largely dependent on the commercially available analysis capacity of microdialysis method and previous studies on biomarkers in cardiac surgery. Glucose is the sole fuel of the brain. It is broken down in the glycolytic pathway to generate pyruvate, which is then used in mitochondria by oxidative metabolism via the tricarboxylic acid cycle. In the absence of oxygen, pyruvate is converted to lactate by the lactate dehydrogenase reaction for anaerobic glycolysis. An increase in the lactate-to-pyruvate ratio is shown to be a very sensitive biomarker for impending cerebral damage. Glutamate, which acts as the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain, is released in excessive amounts following trauma, various brain pathologies and ischaemic events, such as stroke, leading to excitotoxic injury and neural cell death. Glycerol is known to be a sensitive marker for phospholipid cellular membrane degradation after ischaemic cell injury as well. Detection of biomarkers using the near real-time microdialysis method is a promising way of developing a better cerebral monitoring system during aortic surgery to prevent neurological complications.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Aortic Arch Pathology | – | Other: MicrodialysisPatients undergoing aortic arch surgery for aortic arch pathologies, such as aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study focuses on patients undergoing aortic arch surgery secondary to aortic pathologies such as aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients undergoing aortic arch surgery
- Patients aged 18 and over
- Patients who are able to provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with intraoperative death
- Patients with preoperative neurological dysfunction
- Patients who are not able to provide informed consent (language barrier, unconscious, unable to understand, retain and process information)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MicrodialysisMonitoring real-time cerebral biomarkers using microdialysis method | Other | Patients with Aortic Arch Pathology |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with postoperative stroke
Time frame: From the start of surgery until patient is discharged from the hospital, an average of 7 days
New onset stroke after surgery
1 secondary outcome
Number of participants with postoperative delirium
Time frame: From the start of surgery until patient is discharged from the hospital, an average of 7 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Aortic Aneurysm
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Aortic Size and Height Indices in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Ruptured
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real-World Data Collection of GORE Devices Used In the Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms Which Incorporate Visceral Arteries.
Complex Aortic Aneurysms, Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm
Active, not recruiting
GORE® Ascending Stent Graft in the Treatment of De Novo Type A Aortic Dissections
Aortic Dissection
Recruiting
GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Zone 0/1 Post-Approval Study
Aortic Arch Dissection, Aortic Arch Aneurysm
Recruiting
Triple Branched Stent Graft System for Aortic Arch Lesions
Aortic Arch Aneurysm, Aortic Arch Pseudoaneurysm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Aung Ye Oo, MD, FRCS-CTh principal investigator
Queen Mary University London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection, run by Barts & The London NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Myat Soe Thet, MD, MSc (+44 20 7377 7000, myatsoe.thet@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with postoperative stroke (time frame: From the start of surgery until patient is discharged from the hospital, an average of 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.