AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic NeoplasmsNCT04975620

Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy Needles for EUS-FNB in Solid Pancreatobiliary Mass Lesions

A study testing Fine needle biopsy in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms, run by University of Tehran at 1 site in Iran.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

EUS-guided tissue acquisition is an established modality to diagnose malignancies of the pancreas and extrahepatic bile ducts. In the recent years fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles have largely replaced fine needle aspiration (FNA) for EUS-guided tissue acquisition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Fine needle biopsy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
114 participants
Where
1 siteIran
Study dates
1 Aug 2021to 30 Jun 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Inpatients and outpatients 18 years of age or older with solid mass lesions in the pancreas or extrahepatic biliary system

Who cannot join

  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5)
  • Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (platelet < 50,000)
  • Decline to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form
  • Cystic lesions.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Iran1 site
  • Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Ave.,

    Tehran, 1411713135

Other trials in Iran

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Solid Pancreatobiliary Mass Lesions

EUS-guided tissue acquisition is an established modality to diagnose malignancies of the pancreas and extrahepatic bile ducts. In the recent years fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles have largely replaced fine needle aspiration (FNA) for EUS-guided tissue acquisition. The Acquire FNB needle is a Franseen needle which has three symmetric cutting edges to obtain core tissue specimens. The Trident FNB needle has been recently introduced to the market for EUS-guided tissue acquisition. It has a multi-blade three-prong tip which one of the tips is longer than the other two.

The aim of this study is to prospectively compare these two types of needle in term of diagnostic accuracy, and safety profile.

Read the detailed description

Patients with solid mass lesions in the pancreas or extrahepatic biliary system will be randomly assigned to one of two types of FNB needle. Four passes of FNB will be acquired from the mass lesion in each patient. The primary aim is to compare sensitivity of two types of FNB needle to diagnose malignancy. Also, each pass of FNB needle will be assessed separately by two expert pathologists to determine per-pass sensitivity of two types of FNB needles.

Being tested
Fine needle biopsy
Keywords
Fine needle biopsy, Endoscopic ultrasonography, Diagnosis
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fine needle biopsyDevice

    Taking biopsy from solid pancreatobiliary mass lesions with 8 back and forth movement of the needle within the lesion with slow withdrawal of the stylet

Study groups in NCT04975620
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Franseen needle with three symmetric cutting edgesExperimentalThese patients will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the Franseen needle (Acquire FNB needle; Boston Scientific): eight back and forth movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by withdrawing the needle stylet slowly. Four passes of FNB will be made from each mass lesion and the specimens from each pass will be placed in different containers for cell block preparation and histologic evaluation.
Receives: Device: Fine needle biopsy
Multi-blade needle with three-prong tip with one tip longer than the other twoExperimentalThese patients will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using a multi-blade three-prong tip needle (Trident; Microtech): eight back and forth movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by withdrawing the needle stylet slowly. Four passes of FNB will be made from each mass lesion and the specimens from each pass will be placed in different containers for cell block preparation and histologic evaluation.
Receives: Device: Fine needle biopsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of EUS-FNB sensitivity using two types of FNB needles

    Comparison of EUS-FNB sensitivity using two types of FNB needles

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Comparing per-pass sensitivity in two types of FNB needles

    Comparing per-pass sensitivity in two types of FNB needles

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Comparing the adequacy of specimen for each pass in two types of FNB needles

    Comparing the adequacy of specimen for each pass in two types of FNB needles

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Comparing the rate of core tissue acquisition for each pass in two types of FNB needles

    Comparing the rate of core tissue acquisition for each pass in two types of FNB needles

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Comparing specimen cellularity for each pass in two types of FNB needles

    Comparing specimen cellularity for each pass in two types of FNB needles

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Comparing the score of blood content n for each pass in two types of FNB needles.

    Comparing the score of blood content n for each pass in two types of FNB needles. (The blood content is scored from 1 to 3 in which 1 represents minimal presence of blood in the specimen).

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jul 2021
  2. Study start1 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04975620
Sponsor's protocol ID
IR.TUMS.DDRI.REC.1400.008
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
4 Jul 2021
Last updated
16 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Mohamadnejad M, Mullady D, Early DS, Collins B, Marshall C, Sams S, Yen R, Rizeq M, Romanas M, Nawaz S, Ulusarac O, Hollander T, Wilson RH, Simon VC, Kushnir V, Amateau SK, Brauer BC, Gaddam S, Azar RR, Komanduri S, Shah R, Das A, Edmundowicz S, Muthusamy VR, Rastogi A, Wani S. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jul;15(7):1071-1078.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.018. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

    PubMed 28025154
  • Sadeghi A, Mohamadnejad M, Islami F, Keshtkar A, Biglari M, Malekzadeh R, Eloubeidi MA. Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA for malignant biliary stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):290-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

    PubMed 26422979
  • Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology. Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2081-2084. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315154. Epub 2017 Oct 7. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28988195
  • Mohamadnejad M, Mirzaie V, Sotoudeh M, Nikmanesh A, Hosseini R, Muthusamy R. Comparing per-pass performance of 2 types of needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatobiliary masses in a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Sep;98(3):371-380. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.2070. Epub 2023 Apr 23.

    PubMed 37098399

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fine needle biopsy in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms, run by University of Tehran at 1 site in Iran.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Iran. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of EUS-FNB sensitivity using two types of FNB needles (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04975620, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in