Pancreatic NeoplasmsNCT04975620
Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy Needles for EUS-FNB in Solid Pancreatobiliary Mass Lesions
A study testing Fine needle biopsy in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms, run by University of Tehran at 1 site in Iran.
Trial summary
EUS-guided tissue acquisition is an established modality to diagnose malignancies of the pancreas and extrahepatic bile ducts. In the recent years fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles have largely replaced fine needle aspiration (FNA) for EUS-guided tissue acquisition. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Fine needle biopsy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 114 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIran
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2021to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inpatients and outpatients 18 years of age or older with solid mass lesions in the pancreas or extrahepatic biliary system
Who cannot join
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5)
- Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (platelet < 50,000)
- Decline to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form
- Cystic lesions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Iran1 site
Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Ave.,
Tehran, 1411713135
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Solid Pancreatobiliary Mass Lesions
EUS-guided tissue acquisition is an established modality to diagnose malignancies of the pancreas and extrahepatic bile ducts. In the recent years fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles have largely replaced fine needle aspiration (FNA) for EUS-guided tissue acquisition. The Acquire FNB needle is a Franseen needle which has three symmetric cutting edges to obtain core tissue specimens. The Trident FNB needle has been recently introduced to the market for EUS-guided tissue acquisition. It has a multi-blade three-prong tip which one of the tips is longer than the other two.
The aim of this study is to prospectively compare these two types of needle in term of diagnostic accuracy, and safety profile.
Read the detailed description
Patients with solid mass lesions in the pancreas or extrahepatic biliary system will be randomly assigned to one of two types of FNB needle. Four passes of FNB will be acquired from the mass lesion in each patient. The primary aim is to compare sensitivity of two types of FNB needle to diagnose malignancy. Also, each pass of FNB needle will be assessed separately by two expert pathologists to determine per-pass sensitivity of two types of FNB needles.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Fine needle biopsy
- Keywords
- Fine needle biopsy, Endoscopic ultrasonography, Diagnosis
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fine needle biopsyDevice
Taking biopsy from solid pancreatobiliary mass lesions with 8 back and forth movement of the needle within the lesion with slow withdrawal of the stylet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Franseen needle with three symmetric cutting edges | Experimental | These patients will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the Franseen needle (Acquire FNB needle; Boston Scientific): eight back and forth movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by withdrawing the needle stylet slowly. Four passes of FNB will be made from each mass lesion and the specimens from each pass will be placed in different containers for cell block preparation and histologic evaluation. Receives: Device: Fine needle biopsy |
| Multi-blade needle with three-prong tip with one tip longer than the other two | Experimental | These patients will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using a multi-blade three-prong tip needle (Trident; Microtech): eight back and forth movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by withdrawing the needle stylet slowly. Four passes of FNB will be made from each mass lesion and the specimens from each pass will be placed in different containers for cell block preparation and histologic evaluation. Receives: Device: Fine needle biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of EUS-FNB sensitivity using two types of FNB needles
Comparison of EUS-FNB sensitivity using two types of FNB needles
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Comparing per-pass sensitivity in two types of FNB needles
Comparing per-pass sensitivity in two types of FNB needles
Measured: 6 months
Comparing the adequacy of specimen for each pass in two types of FNB needles
Comparing the adequacy of specimen for each pass in two types of FNB needles
Measured: 6 months
Comparing the rate of core tissue acquisition for each pass in two types of FNB needles
Comparing the rate of core tissue acquisition for each pass in two types of FNB needles
Measured: 6 months
Comparing specimen cellularity for each pass in two types of FNB needles
Comparing specimen cellularity for each pass in two types of FNB needles
Measured: 6 months
Comparing the score of blood content n for each pass in two types of FNB needles.
Comparing the score of blood content n for each pass in two types of FNB needles. (The blood content is scored from 1 to 3 in which 1 represents minimal presence of blood in the specimen).
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2021
- Study start1 Aug 2021
- Primary completion15 Jun 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Tehran
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mehdi Mohamadnejad, University of Tehran
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04975620
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IR.TUMS.DDRI.REC.1400.008
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 16 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Mohamadnejad M, Mullady D, Early DS, Collins B, Marshall C, Sams S, Yen R, Rizeq M, Romanas M, Nawaz S, Ulusarac O, Hollander T, Wilson RH, Simon VC, Kushnir V, Amateau SK, Brauer BC, Gaddam S, Azar RR, Komanduri S, Shah R, Das A, Edmundowicz S, Muthusamy VR, Rastogi A, Wani S. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jul;15(7):1071-1078.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.018. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
PubMed 28025154Sadeghi A, Mohamadnejad M, Islami F, Keshtkar A, Biglari M, Malekzadeh R, Eloubeidi MA. Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA for malignant biliary stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):290-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
PubMed 26422979Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology. Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2081-2084. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315154. Epub 2017 Oct 7. No abstract available.
PubMed 28988195Mohamadnejad M, Mirzaie V, Sotoudeh M, Nikmanesh A, Hosseini R, Muthusamy R. Comparing per-pass performance of 2 types of needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatobiliary masses in a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Sep;98(3):371-380. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.2070. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
PubMed 37098399
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Solid Pancreatobiliary Mass Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04975620
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IR.TUMS.DDRI.REC.1400.008
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Fine needle biopsy, Endoscopic ultrasonography, Diagnosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of TehranUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
EUS-guided tissue acquisition is an established modality to diagnose malignancies of the pancreas and extrahepatic bile ducts. In the recent years fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles have largely replaced fine needle aspiration (FNA) for EUS-guided tissue acquisition. The Acquire FNB needle is a Franseen needle which has three symmetric cutting edges to obtain core tissue specimens. The Trident FNB needle has been recently introduced to the market for EUS-guided tissue acquisition. It has a multi-blade three-prong tip which one of the tips is longer than the other two.
The aim of this study is to prospectively compare these two types of needle in term of diagnostic accuracy, and safety profile.
Detailed description
Patients with solid mass lesions in the pancreas or extrahepatic biliary system will be randomly assigned to one of two types of FNB needle. Four passes of FNB will be acquired from the mass lesion in each patient. The primary aim is to compare sensitivity of two types of FNB needle to diagnose malignancy. Also, each pass of FNB needle will be assessed separately by two expert pathologists to determine per-pass sensitivity of two types of FNB needles.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Franseen needle with three symmetric cutting edges | Experimental | Device: Fine needle biopsyThese patients will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the Franseen needle (Acquire FNB needle; Boston Scientific): eight back and forth movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by withdrawing the needle stylet slowly. Four passes of FNB will be made from each mass lesion and the specimens from each pass will be placed in different containers for cell block preparation and histologic evaluation. |
| Multi-blade needle with three-prong tip with one tip longer than the other two | Experimental | Device: Fine needle biopsyThese patients will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using a multi-blade three-prong tip needle (Trident; Microtech): eight back and forth movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by withdrawing the needle stylet slowly. Four passes of FNB will be made from each mass lesion and the specimens from each pass will be placed in different containers for cell block preparation and histologic evaluation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inpatients and outpatients 18 years of age or older with solid mass lesions in the pancreas or extrahepatic biliary system
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5)
- Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (platelet < 50,000)
- Decline to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form
- Cystic lesions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fine needle biopsyTaking biopsy from solid pancreatobiliary mass lesions with 8 back and forth movement of the needle within the lesion with slow withdrawal of the stylet | Device | Franseen needle with three symmetric cutting edges, Multi-blade needle with three-prong tip with one tip longer than the other two |
Primary outcome
Comparison of EUS-FNB sensitivity using two types of FNB needles
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison of EUS-FNB sensitivity using two types of FNB needles
5 secondary outcomes
Comparing per-pass sensitivity in two types of FNB needles
Time frame: 6 months
Comparing the adequacy of specimen for each pass in two types of FNB needles
Time frame: 6 months
Comparing the rate of core tissue acquisition for each pass in two types of FNB needles
Time frame: 6 months
Comparing specimen cellularity for each pass in two types of FNB needles
Time frame: 6 months
Comparing the score of blood content n for each pass in two types of FNB needles.
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 28025154Mohamadnejad M, Mullady D, Early DS, Collins B, Marshall C, Sams S, Yen R, Rizeq M, Romanas M, Nawaz S, Ulusarac O, Hollander T, Wilson RH, Simon VC, Kushnir V, Amateau SK, Brauer BC, Gaddam S, Azar RR, Komanduri S, Shah R, Das A, Edmundowicz S, Muthusamy VR, Rastogi A, Wani S. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jul;15(7):1071-1078.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.018. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 26422979Sadeghi A, Mohamadnejad M, Islami F, Keshtkar A, Biglari M, Malekzadeh R, Eloubeidi MA. Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA for malignant biliary stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):290-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 28988195Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology. Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2081-2084. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315154. Epub 2017 Oct 7. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37098399Mohamadnejad M, Mirzaie V, Sotoudeh M, Nikmanesh A, Hosseini R, Muthusamy R. Comparing per-pass performance of 2 types of needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatobiliary masses in a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Sep;98(3):371-380. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.2070. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Pancreatic Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fine needle biopsy in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms, run by University of Tehran at 1 site in Iran.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Iran. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of EUS-FNB sensitivity using two types of FNB needles (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04975620, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2023.