StrokeNCT04978480
STROKE STAT (Stroke Severity-based Triage to Accelerate Treatment)
An observational study of Stroke, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Acute stroke systems of care should emulate trauma systems which deliver the full range of care to all injured patients by means of organized, coordinated efforts in defined geographic areas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- How many people
- 4,893 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Apr 2022to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Prehospital patients evaluated by the Emergency Medical System with suspected acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion
Who may be able to join
- Patients entered into the Alabama stroke system by EMS
- Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion (score ≥ 4) based on a validated 6 item stroke severity scale, the Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment (EMSA)
Who cannot join
- Patients who respond only to pain or who are unresponsive at the time of EMS evaluation based on the Alert, responds to Voice, responds to Pain and Unresponsive (AVPU) Scale
- Patients with last known well time > 24 hours at the time of EMS evaluation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
About this study
Official title: Trauma Communications Center Coordinated Severity-Based Stroke Triage
Acute stroke systems of care should emulate trauma systems which deliver the full range of care to all injured patients by means of organized, coordinated efforts in defined geographic areas. Just as trauma systems have proven ability to save lives of the most severely injured patients, clinicians should have a stroke system able to provide care to patients with the most severe strokes. The most severe type of acute ischemic stroke is due to proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO). Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) offers an extraordinary potential to improve the outcome of patients with LVO. Unfortunately, in part because MT is available only at advanced stroke centers, only a minority of patients with LVO are treated with MT, and there are racial, socioeconomic, and rural disparities in access to MT. Based on the success of trauma systems and our prior collaboration, the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) is planning a five-year statewide quality improvement initiative of trauma communications center (TCC) coordinated severity-based stroke triage (SBST) which aims to transform the fragmented acute stroke care system by coordinating prehospital and inter-facility emergency stroke care.
Read the detailed description
The Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) is implementing a quality improvement initiative of trauma communications center coordinated severity-based stroke triage (TCC Coordinated SBST) which aims to transform the fragmented acute stroke care system by coordinating prehospital and inter-facility emergency stroke care. Investigators will study the implementation of this initiative and the impact it has on access to care and health outcomes. Our specific aims are to (1) Compare the proportion of patients encountered by the emergency medical service (EMS) with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) who are treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) before (adhering to standard triage to the nearest stroke center) and after implementation of TCC Coordinated SBST; (2) Assess the broad public health impact of TCC Coordinated SBST; and (3) Assess stakeholder perceptions of the intervention.
At the heart of the Alabama stroke system is the Alabama Trauma Communications Center (ATCC), where 24 paramedic communicators field calls from EMS and maintain current status of hospitals and resources across the state. EMS providers enter all patients with suspected stroke into the Alabama Stroke System by calling the ATCC. The ATCC, like other Emergency Communication Centers, is not involved with initial emergency medical dispatch, but rather assists EMS by routing the patient to the nearest stroke system hospital depending on hospital-resource availability and notifying the receiving hospital. As necessary components of this stroke system change, the ADPH is adding a designation for thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (MTCs), carrying out EMS training in a validated 6-item stroke severity scale, the Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment (EMSA), across the state, and expanding data collection to capture statewide stroke system data including prehospital EMSA items (gaze, facial droop, arm drift, leg drift, naming, and repetition) and hospital data including whether an LVO was confirmed, LVO location, and whether the patient received MT. Investigators will only collect data for this study on patients who have been entered into the stroke system.
The change in health care policy by the ADPH allows a natural experiment. The ADPH has planned a phased rollout, lending itself to analysis as a stepped wedge cluster trial with each EMS region serving as a cluster. This design will facilitate modeling the impact of time on the effectiveness of TCC Coordinated SBST. This study will broadly and equitably target a population of stroke patients of all ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities. A strength of this study is that at least 50% of subjects will be women and over one-third of the enrolled patients will be African Americans based on census data. As the study involves rural and urban regions and stroke centers of all levels across the State, investigators will gain information regarding the impact on resources (e.g., EMS response times for non-stroke conditions), benefits, and potential risks (e.g., delay to tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) treatment and other unintended consequences) of implementation across a wide range of service delivery contexts. Finally, because the trial is embedded within a state-wide acute stroke registry, investigators will be able to evaluate its public health impact.
A mixed methods methodological approach integrating rigorous quantitative and qualitative methods will be the most effective way to understand varied and multi-level stakeholder perceptions and optimize implementation of this complex health intervention across different service contexts. Investigators will use a multi-phase mixed methods design to assess stakeholders' views about the implementation process. Prior to implementation of TCC Coordinated SBST, investigators will use qualitative and quantitative methods to aid in the development of context specific forms of the model. After implementation, quantitative survey data will yield a general understanding of stakeholder perceptions of the intervention and guide purposeful selection of subjects for interviews to more fully understand context-specific barriers and facilitators to the intervention's implementation.
During the baseline period in each EMS region, all stroke patients will undergo standard triage to the nearest stroke center of any level. During the implementation period in each EMS region, patients with a last known well (LKW) time ≤ 24 hours, who are alert or respond to voice, and who have an EMSA ≥ 4, will be routed by TCC directly to a MTC if additional transport time complies with region-specific transport time limits and will not preclude use of tPA; Otherwise, TCC will coordinate transport to the closest stroke center of any level and initiate a region and hospital specific plan to expedite inter-facility transfer to a MTC for appropriate patients. Patients will receive standard emergency department and hospital evaluation and treatments as clinically indicated.
Over the 36 months of data collection, about 7,000 men and women of all races and ethnicities with suspected severe stroke will be enrolled in this study. There will be a prospective collection of variables in the standard triage period and post-implementation of the TCC Coordinated SBST. Patients entered into the stroke system are assigned an ATCC number which is unique for each EMS transport. The ATCC paramedic will guide EMS in performance of the EMSA; send a hospital pre-notification page that includes the patient's age, sex, specific EMSA items, LKW time, and ATCC number; and enter prehospital clinical variables in an electronic data capture system (LifeTrac). Hospital participation in the Alabama Stroke System requires Stroke Centers to share stroke patient emergency department and hospital data which is entered by stroke center coordinators into the ADPH REDCap database, a secure, HIPAA-compliant, web-based application for supporting data capture for research, linked to prehospital records by the ATCC number. Stroke center coordinators will conduct a validated structured telephone mRS at 3 months post stroke. EMS Regional Agencies will play an important role in ensuring complete data capture from stroke centers by following up with stroke center coordinators. System level data captured by ADPH will allow determination of county and regional EMS response times, proportion of EMS organizations and stroke centers participating, and data on fidelity of implementation.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- no intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
no interventionOther
There is no intervention. We are only collecting standard of care data.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke patients | patients with suspected severe acute stroke Receives: Other: no intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the proportion of prehospital stroke system patients with suspected large vessel occlusion who are treated with mechanical thrombectomy
The investigators will compare the proportion of patients encountered by the Emergency Medical Service with suspected large vessel occlusion who are treated with mechanical thrombectomy before (adhering to standard triage to the nearest stroke center) and after implementation of Trauma Communications Center coordinated Severity-Based Stroke Triage
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in the public health impact measured by the RE-AIM framework
The investigators will compare the public health impact using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework before (adhering to standard triage to the nearest stroke center) and after implementation of Trauma Communications Center coordinated Severity-Based Stroke Triage
Measured: 3 years
Stakeholder perceptions of the intervention using validated, quantitative surveys of feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability and follow-up qualitative interviews with purposefully selected individuals
Using a mixed methods approach, the investigators will survey stakeholders (Trauma Communications Center, Emergency Medical Service Regional Advisory Councils, Emergency Medical Service, and stroke center directors and stroke coordinators) to assess perceptions of Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). The investigators will conduct follow-up qualitative interviews with purposefully selected individuals to identify barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation, maintenance, and spread of the intervention
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2021
- Study start29 Apr 2022
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 4,893 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Toby Ira Gropen, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- Toby Gropen, MD, Principal investigator, UAB Neurology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04978480
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-300005312
- Other IDs
- R01NS117813
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Gropen TI, Ivankova NV, Beasley M, Hess EP, Mittman B, Gazi M, Minor M, Crawford W, Floyd AB, Varner GL, Lyerly MJ, Shoemaker CC, Owens J, Wilson K, Gray J, Kamal S. Trauma Communications Center Coordinated Severity-Based Stroke Triage: Protocol of a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Study. Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 6;12:788273. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.788273. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34938265
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Trauma Communications Center Coordinated Severity-Based Stroke Triage
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04978480
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB-300005312
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 4,893 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- 29 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute stroke systems of care should emulate trauma systems which deliver the full range of care to all injured patients by means of organized, coordinated efforts in defined geographic areas. Just as trauma systems have proven ability to save lives of the most severely injured patients, clinicians should have a stroke system able to provide care to patients with the most severe strokes. The most severe type of acute ischemic stroke is due to proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO). Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) offers an extraordinary potential to improve the outcome of patients with LVO. Unfortunately, in part because MT is available only at advanced stroke centers, only a minority of patients with LVO are treated with MT, and there are racial, socioeconomic, and rural disparities in access to MT. Based on the success of trauma systems and our prior collaboration, the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) is planning a five-year statewide quality improvement initiative of trauma communications center (TCC) coordinated severity-based stroke triage (SBST) which aims to transform the fragmented acute stroke care system by coordinating prehospital and inter-facility emergency stroke care.
Detailed description
The Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) is implementing a quality improvement initiative of trauma communications center coordinated severity-based stroke triage (TCC Coordinated SBST) which aims to transform the fragmented acute stroke care system by coordinating prehospital and inter-facility emergency stroke care. Investigators will study the implementation of this initiative and the impact it has on access to care and health outcomes. Our specific aims are to (1) Compare the proportion of patients encountered by the emergency medical service (EMS) with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) who are treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) before (adhering to standard triage to the nearest stroke center) and after implementation of TCC Coordinated SBST; (2) Assess the broad public health impact of TCC Coordinated SBST; and (3) Assess stakeholder perceptions of the intervention.
At the heart of the Alabama stroke system is the Alabama Trauma Communications Center (ATCC), where 24 paramedic communicators field calls from EMS and maintain current status of hospitals and resources across the state. EMS providers enter all patients with suspected stroke into the Alabama Stroke System by calling the ATCC. The ATCC, like other Emergency Communication Centers, is not involved with initial emergency medical dispatch, but rather assists EMS by routing the patient to the nearest stroke system hospital depending on hospital-resource availability and notifying the receiving hospital. As necessary components of this stroke system change, the ADPH is adding a designation for thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (MTCs), carrying out EMS training in a validated 6-item stroke severity scale, the Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment (EMSA), across the state, and expanding data collection to capture statewide stroke system data including prehospital EMSA items (gaze, facial droop, arm drift, leg drift, naming, and repetition) and hospital data including whether an LVO was confirmed, LVO location, and whether the patient received MT. Investigators will only collect data for this study on patients who have been entered into the stroke system.
The change in health care policy by the ADPH allows a natural experiment. The ADPH has planned a phased rollout, lending itself to analysis as a stepped wedge cluster trial with each EMS region serving as a cluster. This design will facilitate modeling the impact of time on the effectiveness of TCC Coordinated SBST. This study will broadly and equitably target a population of stroke patients of all ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities. A strength of this study is that at least 50% of subjects will be women and over one-third of the enrolled patients will be African Americans based on census data. As the study involves rural and urban regions and stroke centers of all levels across the State, investigators will gain information regarding the impact on resources (e.g., EMS response times for non-stroke conditions), benefits, and potential risks (e.g., delay to tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) treatment and other unintended consequences) of implementation across a wide range of service delivery contexts. Finally, because the trial is embedded within a state-wide acute stroke registry, investigators will be able to evaluate its public health impact.
A mixed methods methodological approach integrating rigorous quantitative and qualitative methods will be the most effective way to understand varied and multi-level stakeholder perceptions and optimize implementation of this complex health intervention across different service contexts. Investigators will use a multi-phase mixed methods design to assess stakeholders' views about the implementation process. Prior to implementation of TCC Coordinated SBST, investigators will use qualitative and quantitative methods to aid in the development of context specific forms of the model. After implementation, quantitative survey data will yield a general understanding of stakeholder perceptions of the intervention and guide purposeful selection of subjects for interviews to more fully understand context-specific barriers and facilitators to the intervention's implementation.
During the baseline period in each EMS region, all stroke patients will undergo standard triage to the nearest stroke center of any level. During the implementation period in each EMS region, patients with a last known well (LKW) time ≤ 24 hours, who are alert or respond to voice, and who have an EMSA ≥ 4, will be routed by TCC directly to a MTC if additional transport time complies with region-specific transport time limits and will not preclude use of tPA; Otherwise, TCC will coordinate transport to the closest stroke center of any level and initiate a region and hospital specific plan to expedite inter-facility transfer to a MTC for appropriate patients. Patients will receive standard emergency department and hospital evaluation and treatments as clinically indicated.
Over the 36 months of data collection, about 7,000 men and women of all races and ethnicities with suspected severe stroke will be enrolled in this study. There will be a prospective collection of variables in the standard triage period and post-implementation of the TCC Coordinated SBST. Patients entered into the stroke system are assigned an ATCC number which is unique for each EMS transport. The ATCC paramedic will guide EMS in performance of the EMSA; send a hospital pre-notification page that includes the patient's age, sex, specific EMSA items, LKW time, and ATCC number; and enter prehospital clinical variables in an electronic data capture system (LifeTrac). Hospital participation in the Alabama Stroke System requires Stroke Centers to share stroke patient emergency department and hospital data which is entered by stroke center coordinators into the ADPH REDCap database, a secure, HIPAA-compliant, web-based application for supporting data capture for research, linked to prehospital records by the ATCC number. Stroke center coordinators will conduct a validated structured telephone mRS at 3 months post stroke. EMS Regional Agencies will play an important role in ensuring complete data capture from stroke centers by following up with stroke center coordinators. System level data captured by ADPH will allow determination of county and regional EMS response times, proportion of EMS organizations and stroke centers participating, and data on fidelity of implementation.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke patients | – | Other: no interventionpatients with suspected severe acute stroke |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Prehospital patients evaluated by the Emergency Medical System with suspected acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients entered into the Alabama stroke system by EMS
- Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion (score ≥ 4) based on a validated 6 item stroke severity scale, the Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment (EMSA)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who respond only to pain or who are unresponsive at the time of EMS evaluation based on the Alert, responds to Voice, responds to Pain and Unresponsive (AVPU) Scale
- Patients with last known well time > 24 hours at the time of EMS evaluation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| no interventionThere is no intervention. We are only collecting standard of care data. | Other | Stroke patients |
Primary outcome
Change in the proportion of prehospital stroke system patients with suspected large vessel occlusion who are treated with mechanical thrombectomy
Time frame: 3 years
The investigators will compare the proportion of patients encountered by the Emergency Medical Service with suspected large vessel occlusion who are treated with mechanical thrombectomy before (adhering to standard triage to the nearest stroke center) and after implementation of Trauma Communications Center coordinated Severity-Based Stroke Triage
2 secondary outcomes
Change in the public health impact measured by the RE-AIM framework
Time frame: 3 years
Stakeholder perceptions of the intervention using validated, quantitative surveys of feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability and follow-up qualitative interviews with purposefully selected individuals
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 34938265Gropen TI, Ivankova NV, Beasley M, Hess EP, Mittman B, Gazi M, Minor M, Crawford W, Floyd AB, Varner GL, Lyerly MJ, Shoemaker CC, Owens J, Wilson K, Gray J, Kamal S. Trauma Communications Center Coordinated Severity-Based Stroke Triage: Protocol of a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Study. Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 6;12:788273. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.788273. eCollection 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Closed-Loop SCS-BCI for Post-Stroke Hemiplegia
Stroke, Motor Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
Transferring Speed of Processing Gains to Everyday Cognitive Tasks After Stroke
Stroke, Cognitive Dysfunction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Speaking-Valve-Based Decannulation Protocol for Tracheostomized Stroke Patients
Stroke Patients, Tracheostomy
RecruitingPhase 4
Blood Pressure Reduction to Limit the Evolution of Vascular Brain Lesions in Elderly Individuals
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Early Tendon Vibrations on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After a Stroke
Acute Stroke, Upper Limb Motor Deficit
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Toby Gropen, MD principal investigator
UAB Neurology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the proportion of prehospital stroke system patients with suspected large vessel occlusion who are treated with mechanical thrombectomy (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04978480, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2026.