Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS)NCT04990713
QoR40 Between Intercostal Block and Intercostal Block and Serratus Plane Catheter During VATS
A study testing Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic) in people with Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) and Pain Management, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has emerged as standard of care for majority of thoracic surgeries. It is less invasive compared to thoracotomy and is associated with improved perioperative outcomes [1-3]. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS), Pain Management
- What is being tested?
- Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2022to 31 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing elective VATS lung resections including wedge resection, segmentectomy, bi-lobectomy, or lobectomy.
- Age > 18 years.
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) Score - 1 to 4.
- Gender - all genders
- Patients able to consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal to participate in the study.
- Emergency surgery.
- Allergies to local anesthetics
- BMI>40
- Presence of local (chest wall) or systemic infection.
- Previous lung resection on the same hemithorax.
- Patient suffering from chronic pain defined by persistent pain more than six month.
- Conversion to thoracotomy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: QORVATS Study. A Randomized Controlled, Triple Blinded to Compare the Quality of Recovery (QoR 40) Between Intercostal Block and a Combination of Intercostal Nerve Block With Serratus Plane Catheter for Patient's Undergoing VATS Procedures.
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has emerged as standard of care for majority of thoracic surgeries. It is less invasive compared to thoracotomy and is associated with improved perioperative outcomes [1-3]. Good perioperative analgesia after thoracic surgery will enable pulmonary toilet, early chest physiotherapy and mobilisation, [4,5,6]. Thirty-day hospital visits and hospital readmissions at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) is around 21% and 9% respectively [7]. One of the top five determinant for hospital visit and readmission in 30 days, was persistent post operative pain [7].
Several options to analgesia are available for patients undergoing VATS procedure. Systemic opioid based multimodal analgesia, central neuraxial blocks like thoracic epidural and peripheral nerve blocks are different available options, and their practise varies across institution [4,8,9]. Thoracic epidural or paravertebral blocks can be challenging to perform with high failure rates [10-12].
Read more
Fascial plane blocks (SAB; ESP) are in vogue in the present era [13-16]. They are easy to perform and do not require similar dexterity as needed to perform thoracic epidural or paravertebral blocks. They have minimal side effects and provide the options for continuous infusion for prolonged analgesia. They have become an effective part of multimodal analgesia and have established their roles in ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) protocol for VATS procedures.
SAB has become a common practise at our institution with proved clinical efficacy.
Perioperative Surgical Home is a patient centric team-based approach to improve patient's experiences in the perioperative period and thus improve healthcare [17]. Quality of Recovery (QoR) is a key determinant to perioperative surgical home and can be measured using the QoR 40 score [18]. This is a well validated score with a minimal important clinical difference (MICD) of 6.3 [19]. Quality of recovery combines five dimensions of health: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence and pain to achieve a single patient outcome - improved patient care [18].
The investigators hypothesize the that patients undergoing VATS lung resections using a combination of intercostal nerve block plus continuous SAB catheter infusion of local anesthetics will have a 20% increase in their QoR-40 score 24hour after the surgery compared to a single shot intercostal nerve block.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective randomized controlled triple-blind study. There will be two study groups. All study participants will receive SAB with catheter for continuous infusion and intercostal block. Depending on the group allocation, the study participants may receive local anesthetics or placebo for the block.
Participants depending on the group allocation, will either receive ropivacaine 0.2% or equal volume of normal saline (placebo) solutions for the nerve blocks. This is meant to maintain participant, clinical team, and investigator blinding. The anesthetist(s) performing the block will be blinded to the intervention along with the anesthetists performing the general anesthesia and the surgical team. Importantly, the intraoperative and postoperative opioids will be administered by anesthetists and nurses, respectively, who are blinded to group allocation. Furthermore, the research coordinator collecting all outcome data will also be blinded Interventions Intraoperative anesthetic managements will depend on the anesthesiologists in care of the patient on that day and will be based on standard of institutional practise and Canadian anesthesia society guidelines irrespective of patient study participation. Intraoperatively, the patient will receive Opioids or NSAIDS on discretion of the anesthesiologists depending on the clinical need. To standardize the perioperative multimodal analgesic management and to reduce biases, none of these patients will receive any ketamine or gabapentin during the perioperative period. All the study interventions will be performed after completion of surgery and when the patient is still under anesthesia. After the completion of surgery, with patient still on lateral decubitus, surgical site being non dependant, the thoracic wall will be cleaned with 2% chlorhexidine solution and draped aseptically to maintain a sterile environment. The intercostal block will be completed by the surgical team while the serratus catheter will be performed by one of the anesthesiologist coinvestigators. The study drugs will be prepared by a different co-investigator and the anesthesiologists performing the block or providing general anesthesia for the patient will not be aware of the content of the study drugs.
Patients will be recovered from anesthesia once the blocks are complete and transferred to PACU for recovery. All the patients will receive opioid based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with hydromorphone or morphine only along with acetaminophen in the postoperative period. These are standard of care at LHSC. The participants will also receive 0.2% ropivacaine infusion 7 mL/hr or normal saline infusion 7mL/hr depending on the study group. Their postoperative pain will be managed by the acute pain services as per standard hospital guidelines irrespective of their study participation.
One of the study team members will access the patient in the postoperative period (PACU and once daily) until discharge for data collection.
Intercostal nerve block The intercostal block will be performed by the surgical team under direct vision using thoracoscope. 5 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected at each 4th,5th,6th and 7thintercostal nerve at posterior axillary line. After full asepsis and placement of thoracoscope respective ribs will be palpated to identify the inferior border and neuronal anatomy will be identified using video assistance thoracoscope. Study drugs will be injected at the inferior border at midaxillary line at each space. Total volume of study drugs injected will be 20 mL.
SAB catheter The ultrasound (Sonosite) transducer will be placed in a caudal to cranial orientation on the mid axillary line at the level of the 5th rib. The target fascial plane between the serratus anterior (superficial) and the external intercostal (deep) muscles and the rib will be identified, and the path of the block needle will be determined. Braun, contiplex Touhy ultra echogenic needle with non stimulating catheter system for continuous nerve will be used. The needle will be inserted at the cranial aspect of the ultrasound probe and advanced in-plane to target the fascial plane directly below the serratus muscle. Once the tip is verified in the correct position, 10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine or normal saline will be injected into the plane slowly in 5 mL aliquots under frequent aspiration and correct spread in the interfacial plane will be observed. The catheter will be placed in the plane and another 10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine or normal saline will be injected through the catheter to verify the catheter placement.
Sample size calculation Sample size calculations were based on the study published by Do-Hyeong Kim et al [15] The calculation for the projected sample size is as follows. For MCID(minimal clinically important difference)- 6.3; Beta = 80% power, alpha = 0.05 N = 7.85 x [ (14.4)2 + (15.9)2] / (6.3)2 = 7.85 x [207.36 + 252.81] / 39.69 = 91 Sample size for one group = 91 Sample size for two groups = (91x2) = 182 Sample size for 10% loss in follow-up = 200 (approximately 100 in each group)
Statistical Analysis Baseline data will be presented in tabular form by treatment group. Categorical variables will be summarized as number (%). Percentages will be calculated according to the number of patients for whom data is available. Where values are missing, the denominator will be stated in the Table. Normality of continuous outcomes will be assessed visually (using histograms of raw and/or transformed data) and numerically (using the Shapiro-Wilk test). If the raw or transformed data are approximately normally-distributed, then a parametric method (t test) will be used for analysis, otherwise a non-parametric or semi-parametric method will be used (0.5 quantile [median] regression for non-time-to-event data and Cox regression for time-to-event data). Data will be presented as mean, SD (standard deviation) (for normally-distributed outcomes) or median/ IQR (interquartile range) (for non-normally-distributed outcomes). 95% CIs for the differences between groups will be constructed using standard techniques (for normally-distributed outcomes) or using bootstrapping of 10,000 replications (for non-normally-distributed outcomes).
Categorical outcomes will be analyzed using Fisher's exact test, along with the relative risk and its two-sided 95% CI (confidence interval).
Regression adjustment will be performed for any prognostically-important differences between groups in baseline variables.
A P value of < 0.05 will be considered significant
Randomization and Blinding Participants will be randomized to one of two groups by a computer-generated sequence using Lawson Redcap by one of the study members. The investigators, participants, and outcome assessors will be blinded to participant group assignment at the time of randomization as well as throughout treatment and assessment. The drugs will be prepared by one of the study members who will not be involved directly in the patient's care that day.
Data Collection Data will be collected on case record forms. Each form will be signed and dated by the assessor. Paper files will be stored in the locked office of the study PI in the Anesthesia Department at Victoria Hospital, LHSC. Electronic data will be kept in the REDCap database which is housed with the Lawson Research Informatics servers in the hospital's data centre Collection
- Being tested
- Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic), Serratus Plane Block (Placebo) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthestic)
- Keywords
- Intercostal Block, Fascial Plane Block
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic)Procedure or surgery
Also called Serratus Plane Block administering Ropivacaine 0.2%
Patients will receive local anesthetic via serratus plane block as opposed to saline placebo
Serratus Plane Block (Placebo) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthestic)Procedure or surgery
Also called Serratus Plane Block administering Saline Placebo
Patients will receive saline placebo via serratus plane block
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Serratus Plane Block (Placebo) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthestic) | Placebo comparator | Patients randomized to this group will receive the intercostal block with local anesthetic and the serratus plane block with saline placebo. Local anesthetic administered will be ropivacaine 0.2%. Receives: Procedure: Serratus Plane Block (Placebo) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthestic) |
| Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic) | Experimental | Patients randomized to this group will receive the intercostal block with local anesthetic and the serratus plane block with local anesthetic. Local anesthetic administered will be ropivacaine 0.2%. Receives: Procedure: Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Recovery
Measured using the Quality of Recovery 40 (Qor-40) Score and asking patients to complete the questions.
Measured: Measured on postoperative day 1
Secondary outcomes (5)
Postoperative pain scores
Pain will be assessed on an 11- point numerical scale of '0' to '10'. Zero signifies no pain whereas 10 signifies maximum pain. Measured by asking patient to rate their pain using this scale. This will be measured every 24 hours following surgery until the patient is discharged, on average one week.
Measured: Until patient discharge, on average one week.
Total opioid consumption
Total opioid consumption will be administered in IV morphine equivalents. This will be assessed daily upon admission to post-anesthesia care unit (postoperative care unit) until day of discharge, on average one week. Measured by evaluating patient's medical record for administered morphine equivalents.
Measured: Until patient discharge, on average one week.
Postoperative complications after thoracic surgery
Any complication that requires assessment and/or treatment postoperatively. This will be recorded by evaluating the patient's medical chart for any noted complication following surgery.
Measured: Immediately following surgery until discharge, on average one week.
Hospital readmission
Instances that the patient may be re-admitted to the hospital following discharge after surgery. To be measured by evaluating the patient's medical record.
Measured: 30 days postoperative
Side effects
Side effects will be recorded only if the patient has received an intervention and needed treatment. This will be measured by asking patients each day whether or not they are experiencing any side effects. Patients complaining of mild side effects, like nausea, pruritus or retention of urine, had these effects resolved without administration of any treatment inform of medication or interventions like catheterisation, will be not be counted for this study purpose. Side effects include: nausea and vomiting (needing medication for treatment), pruritus (needing medication for treatment), and retention of urine needing catheterization. This will be measured by recording the type of side effect experienced and the frequency with which the patient mentioned experiencing them.
Measured: Until patient discharge, on average one week.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2021
- Study start30 Jun 2022
- Primary completion31 Jan 2026
- Study completion31 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- There will be two study groups. All study participants will receive serratus plane block (SAB) with catheter for continuous infusion and an intercostal block. Depending on the group allocation, the study participants may receive local anesthetics or placebo for the serratus plane block.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Abhijit Biswas, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- Abhijit Biswas, MD, Principal investigator, Western University, Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04990713
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QORVATS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: None. No plan to share IPD (individual participant data).
Publications
Agostini P, Lugg ST, Adams K, Vartsaba N, Kalkat MS, Rajesh PB, Steyn RS, Naidu B, Rushton A, Bishay E. Postoperative pulmonary complications and rehabilitation requirements following lobectomy: a propensity score matched study of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomydagger. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun 1;24(6):931-937. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx002.
PubMed 28329213Zaatar M, Stork T, Valdivia D, Mardanzai K, Stefani D, Collaud S, Poellen P, Hegedus B, Ploenes T, Aigner C. Minimal-invasive approach reduces cardiopulmonary complications in elderly after lung cancer surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2372-2379. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.73.
PubMed 32642142Cattaneo SM, Park BJ, Wilton AS, Seshan VE, Bains MS, Downey RJ, Flores RM, Rizk N, Rusch VW. Use of video-assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy in the elderly results in fewer complications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):231-5; discussion 235-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.080.
PubMed 18154816Marshall K, McLaughlin K. Pain Management in Thoracic Surgery. Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 Aug;30(3):339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
PubMed 32593366Heinrich S, Janitz K, Merkel S, Klein P, Schmidt J. Short- and long term effects of epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality of esophageal cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jan;400(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1248-9. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
PubMed 25240610Saeki H, Ishimura H, Higashi H, Kitagawa D, Tanaka J, Maruyama R, Katoh H, Shimazoe H, Yamauchi K, Ayabe H, Kakeji Y, Morita M, Maehara Y. Postoperative management using intensive patient-controlled epidural analgesia and early rehabilitation after an esophagectomy. Surg Today. 2009;39(6):476-80. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-3924-2. Epub 2009 May 27.
PubMed 19468802LHSC, data support team financial year 2017-2018
Novak-Jankovic V, Markovic-Bozic J. REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA IN THORACIC AND ABDOMINAL SURGERY. Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Jun;58(Suppl 1):96-100. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.14.
PubMed 31741566D'Ercole F, Arora H, Kumar PA. Paravertebral Block for Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):915-927. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
PubMed 29169795Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;109(2):144-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes214. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
PubMed 22735301McLeod G, Davies H, Munnoch N, Bannister J, MacRae W. Postoperative pain relief using thoracic epidural analgesia: outstanding success and disappointing failures. Anaesthesia. 2001 Jan;56(1):75-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01763-7.x.
PubMed 11167441Naja Z, Lonnqvist PA. Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade. Incidence of failed block and complications. Anaesthesia. 2001 Dec;56(12):1184-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02084-2.x.
PubMed 11736777Wang L, Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhu X, Wang G. Serratus anterior plane block or thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain treatment after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective propensity-matched study. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 23;12:2231-2238. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S209012. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31413621Viti A, Bertoglio P, Zamperini M, Tubaro A, Menestrina N, Bonadiman S, Avesani R, Guerriero M, Terzi A. Serratus plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery major lung resection: a randomized controlled trial. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar 1;30(3):366-372. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz289.
PubMed 31808538Kim DH, Oh YJ, Lee JG, Ha D, Chang YJ, Kwak HJ. Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Plane Block on Postoperative Quality of Recovery and Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Anesth Analg. 2018 Apr;126(4):1353-1361. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002779.
PubMed 29324496
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- QORVATS Study. A Randomized Controlled, Triple Blinded to Compare the Quality of Recovery (QoR 40) Between Intercostal Block and a Combination of Intercostal Nerve Block With Serratus Plane Catheter for Patient's Undergoing VATS Procedures.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04990713
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QORVATS
- Keywords
- Intercostal Block, Fascial Plane Block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has emerged as standard of care for majority of thoracic surgeries. It is less invasive compared to thoracotomy and is associated with improved perioperative outcomes [1-3]. Good perioperative analgesia after thoracic surgery will enable pulmonary toilet, early chest physiotherapy and mobilisation, [4,5,6]. Thirty-day hospital visits and hospital readmissions at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) is around 21% and 9% respectively [7]. One of the top five determinant for hospital visit and readmission in 30 days, was persistent post operative pain [7].
Several options to analgesia are available for patients undergoing VATS procedure. Systemic opioid based multimodal analgesia, central neuraxial blocks like thoracic epidural and peripheral nerve blocks are different available options, and their practise varies across institution [4,8,9]. Thoracic epidural or paravertebral blocks can be challenging to perform with high failure rates [10-12].
Fascial plane blocks (SAB; ESP) are in vogue in the present era [13-16]. They are easy to perform and do not require similar dexterity as needed to perform thoracic epidural or paravertebral blocks. They have minimal side effects and provide the options for continuous infusion for prolonged analgesia. They have become an effective part of multimodal analgesia and have established their roles in ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) protocol for VATS procedures.
SAB has become a common practise at our institution with proved clinical efficacy.
Perioperative Surgical Home is a patient centric team-based approach to improve patient's experiences in the perioperative period and thus improve healthcare [17]. Quality of Recovery (QoR) is a key determinant to perioperative surgical home and can be measured using the QoR 40 score [18]. This is a well validated score with a minimal important clinical difference (MICD) of 6.3 [19]. Quality of recovery combines five dimensions of health: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence and pain to achieve a single patient outcome - improved patient care [18].
The investigators hypothesize the that patients undergoing VATS lung resections using a combination of intercostal nerve block plus continuous SAB catheter infusion of local anesthetics will have a 20% increase in their QoR-40 score 24hour after the surgery compared to a single shot intercostal nerve block.
Detailed description
This is a prospective randomized controlled triple-blind study. There will be two study groups. All study participants will receive SAB with catheter for continuous infusion and intercostal block. Depending on the group allocation, the study participants may receive local anesthetics or placebo for the block.
Participants depending on the group allocation, will either receive ropivacaine 0.2% or equal volume of normal saline (placebo) solutions for the nerve blocks. This is meant to maintain participant, clinical team, and investigator blinding. The anesthetist(s) performing the block will be blinded to the intervention along with the anesthetists performing the general anesthesia and the surgical team. Importantly, the intraoperative and postoperative opioids will be administered by anesthetists and nurses, respectively, who are blinded to group allocation. Furthermore, the research coordinator collecting all outcome data will also be blinded Interventions Intraoperative anesthetic managements will depend on the anesthesiologists in care of the patient on that day and will be based on standard of institutional practise and Canadian anesthesia society guidelines irrespective of patient study participation. Intraoperatively, the patient will receive Opioids or NSAIDS on discretion of the anesthesiologists depending on the clinical need. To standardize the perioperative multimodal analgesic management and to reduce biases, none of these patients will receive any ketamine or gabapentin during the perioperative period. All the study interventions will be performed after completion of surgery and when the patient is still under anesthesia. After the completion of surgery, with patient still on lateral decubitus, surgical site being non dependant, the thoracic wall will be cleaned with 2% chlorhexidine solution and draped aseptically to maintain a sterile environment. The intercostal block will be completed by the surgical team while the serratus catheter will be performed by one of the anesthesiologist coinvestigators. The study drugs will be prepared by a different co-investigator and the anesthesiologists performing the block or providing general anesthesia for the patient will not be aware of the content of the study drugs.
Patients will be recovered from anesthesia once the blocks are complete and transferred to PACU for recovery. All the patients will receive opioid based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with hydromorphone or morphine only along with acetaminophen in the postoperative period. These are standard of care at LHSC. The participants will also receive 0.2% ropivacaine infusion 7 mL/hr or normal saline infusion 7mL/hr depending on the study group. Their postoperative pain will be managed by the acute pain services as per standard hospital guidelines irrespective of their study participation.
One of the study team members will access the patient in the postoperative period (PACU and once daily) until discharge for data collection.
Intercostal nerve block The intercostal block will be performed by the surgical team under direct vision using thoracoscope. 5 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected at each 4th,5th,6th and 7thintercostal nerve at posterior axillary line. After full asepsis and placement of thoracoscope respective ribs will be palpated to identify the inferior border and neuronal anatomy will be identified using video assistance thoracoscope. Study drugs will be injected at the inferior border at midaxillary line at each space. Total volume of study drugs injected will be 20 mL.
SAB catheter The ultrasound (Sonosite) transducer will be placed in a caudal to cranial orientation on the mid axillary line at the level of the 5th rib. The target fascial plane between the serratus anterior (superficial) and the external intercostal (deep) muscles and the rib will be identified, and the path of the block needle will be determined. Braun, contiplex Touhy ultra echogenic needle with non stimulating catheter system for continuous nerve will be used. The needle will be inserted at the cranial aspect of the ultrasound probe and advanced in-plane to target the fascial plane directly below the serratus muscle. Once the tip is verified in the correct position, 10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine or normal saline will be injected into the plane slowly in 5 mL aliquots under frequent aspiration and correct spread in the interfacial plane will be observed. The catheter will be placed in the plane and another 10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine or normal saline will be injected through the catheter to verify the catheter placement.
Sample size calculation Sample size calculations were based on the study published by Do-Hyeong Kim et al [15] The calculation for the projected sample size is as follows. For MCID(minimal clinically important difference)- 6.3; Beta = 80% power, alpha = 0.05 N = 7.85 x [ (14.4)2 + (15.9)2] / (6.3)2 = 7.85 x [207.36 + 252.81] / 39.69 = 91 Sample size for one group = 91 Sample size for two groups = (91x2) = 182 Sample size for 10% loss in follow-up = 200 (approximately 100 in each group)
Statistical Analysis Baseline data will be presented in tabular form by treatment group. Categorical variables will be summarized as number (%). Percentages will be calculated according to the number of patients for whom data is available. Where values are missing, the denominator will be stated in the Table. Normality of continuous outcomes will be assessed visually (using histograms of raw and/or transformed data) and numerically (using the Shapiro-Wilk test). If the raw or transformed data are approximately normally-distributed, then a parametric method (t test) will be used for analysis, otherwise a non-parametric or semi-parametric method will be used (0.5 quantile [median] regression for non-time-to-event data and Cox regression for time-to-event data). Data will be presented as mean, SD (standard deviation) (for normally-distributed outcomes) or median/ IQR (interquartile range) (for non-normally-distributed outcomes). 95% CIs for the differences between groups will be constructed using standard techniques (for normally-distributed outcomes) or using bootstrapping of 10,000 replications (for non-normally-distributed outcomes).
Categorical outcomes will be analyzed using Fisher's exact test, along with the relative risk and its two-sided 95% CI (confidence interval).
Regression adjustment will be performed for any prognostically-important differences between groups in baseline variables.
A P value of < 0.05 will be considered significant
Randomization and Blinding Participants will be randomized to one of two groups by a computer-generated sequence using Lawson Redcap by one of the study members. The investigators, participants, and outcome assessors will be blinded to participant group assignment at the time of randomization as well as throughout treatment and assessment. The drugs will be prepared by one of the study members who will not be involved directly in the patient's care that day.
Data Collection Data will be collected on case record forms. Each form will be signed and dated by the assessor. Paper files will be stored in the locked office of the study PI in the Anesthesia Department at Victoria Hospital, LHSC. Electronic data will be kept in the REDCap database which is housed with the Lawson Research Informatics servers in the hospital's data centre Collection
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- There will be two study groups. All study participants will receive serratus plane block (SAB) with catheter for continuous infusion and an intercostal block. Depending on the group allocation, the study participants may receive local anesthetics or placebo for the serratus plane block.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Serratus Plane Block (Placebo) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthestic) | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Serratus Plane Block (Placebo) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthestic)Patients randomized to this group will receive the intercostal block with local anesthetic and the serratus plane block with saline placebo. Local anesthetic administered will be ropivacaine 0.2%. |
| Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic) | Experimental | Procedure: Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic)Patients randomized to this group will receive the intercostal block with local anesthetic and the serratus plane block with local anesthetic. Local anesthetic administered will be ropivacaine 0.2%. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients undergoing elective VATS lung resections including wedge resection, segmentectomy, bi-lobectomy, or lobectomy.
- Age > 18 years.
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) Score - 1 to 4.
- Gender - all genders
- Patients able to consent to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient refusal to participate in the study.
- Emergency surgery.
- Allergies to local anesthetics
- BMI>40
- Presence of local (chest wall) or systemic infection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic)Also: Serratus Plane Block administering Ropivacaine 0.2%Patients will receive local anesthetic via serratus plane block as opposed to saline placebo | Procedure or surgery | Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic) |
| Serratus Plane Block (Placebo) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthestic)Also: Serratus Plane Block administering Saline PlaceboPatients will receive saline placebo via serratus plane block | Procedure or surgery | Serratus Plane Block (Placebo) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthestic) |
Primary outcome
Quality of Recovery
Time frame: Measured on postoperative day 1
Measured using the Quality of Recovery 40 (Qor-40) Score and asking patients to complete the questions.
5 secondary outcomes
Postoperative pain scores
Time frame: Until patient discharge, on average one week.
Total opioid consumption
Time frame: Until patient discharge, on average one week.
Postoperative complications after thoracic surgery
Time frame: Immediately following surgery until discharge, on average one week.
Hospital readmission
Time frame: 30 days postoperative
Side effects
Time frame: Until patient discharge, on average one week.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28329213Agostini P, Lugg ST, Adams K, Vartsaba N, Kalkat MS, Rajesh PB, Steyn RS, Naidu B, Rushton A, Bishay E. Postoperative pulmonary complications and rehabilitation requirements following lobectomy: a propensity score matched study of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomydagger. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun 1;24(6):931-937. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx002.
- Background: PubMed 32642142Zaatar M, Stork T, Valdivia D, Mardanzai K, Stefani D, Collaud S, Poellen P, Hegedus B, Ploenes T, Aigner C. Minimal-invasive approach reduces cardiopulmonary complications in elderly after lung cancer surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2372-2379. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.73.
- Background: PubMed 18154816Cattaneo SM, Park BJ, Wilton AS, Seshan VE, Bains MS, Downey RJ, Flores RM, Rizk N, Rusch VW. Use of video-assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy in the elderly results in fewer complications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):231-5; discussion 235-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.080.
- Background: PubMed 32593366Marshall K, McLaughlin K. Pain Management in Thoracic Surgery. Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 Aug;30(3):339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
- Background: PubMed 25240610Heinrich S, Janitz K, Merkel S, Klein P, Schmidt J. Short- and long term effects of epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality of esophageal cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jan;400(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1248-9. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
- Background: PubMed 19468802Saeki H, Ishimura H, Higashi H, Kitagawa D, Tanaka J, Maruyama R, Katoh H, Shimazoe H, Yamauchi K, Ayabe H, Kakeji Y, Morita M, Maehara Y. Postoperative management using intensive patient-controlled epidural analgesia and early rehabilitation after an esophagectomy. Surg Today. 2009;39(6):476-80. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-3924-2. Epub 2009 May 27.
- BackgroundLHSC, data support team financial year 2017-2018
- Background: PubMed 31741566Novak-Jankovic V, Markovic-Bozic J. REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA IN THORACIC AND ABDOMINAL SURGERY. Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Jun;58(Suppl 1):96-100. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.14.
- Background: PubMed 29169795D'Ercole F, Arora H, Kumar PA. Paravertebral Block for Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):915-927. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
- Background: PubMed 22735301Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;109(2):144-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes214. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
- Background: PubMed 11167441McLeod G, Davies H, Munnoch N, Bannister J, MacRae W. Postoperative pain relief using thoracic epidural analgesia: outstanding success and disappointing failures. Anaesthesia. 2001 Jan;56(1):75-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01763-7.x.
- Background: PubMed 11736777Naja Z, Lonnqvist PA. Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade. Incidence of failed block and complications. Anaesthesia. 2001 Dec;56(12):1184-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02084-2.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. None. No plan to share IPD (individual participant data).
Related trials for Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS)
Recruiting
ITPB 1 vs 3 in VATS
Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
Not yet recruiting
TBLC vs NIVATS in Interstitial Lung Disease
Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD)
RecruitingObservational study
Sensory Anesthesia Achieved Through Different Paravertebral Block Approaches for Post-Op Pain Management After VATS Lung Resection
Thoracic Surgery, Video-assisted
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Medium Chain Triglyceride Diet May Reduce Hospital Stay Following Lung Resection
Thoracic Neoplasms
Recruiting
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Midpoint Transverse Process to Pleura (MTP) Block and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) at RS Ngoerah
Pain, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abhijit Biswas, MD principal investigator
Western University, Canada
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Serratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic) in people with Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) and Pain Management, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Recovery (time frame: Measured on postoperative day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04990713, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2026.