AzTrials
AzTrials

Tooth DiseasesNCT04999956

Accuracy and Primary Stability in Immediate Implant Placement: Dynamic Navigation Versus Freehand

A study testing dynamic navigation surgery and freehand surgery in people with Tooth Diseases, run by Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University at 3 sites in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prosthetic-driven immediate implant placement for optimal aesthetic restoration has been increasing in demand during the last decades but requires higher accuracy. Dynamic navigation has been reported better implant positioning. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tooth Diseases
What is being tested?
dynamic navigation surgery and freehand surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
24 participants
Where
3 sitesChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 31 Jul 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥18 years old and in good health;
  • The maxillary incisor that cannot be retained due to non-periodontitis;
  • The buccal bone plate is complete;
  • No acute infection;
  • The extraction socket have at least 3-5 mm apical bone.

Who cannot join

  • General contraindications of oral implant surgery (such as immunodeficiency, long-term use of corticosteroids);
  • Treatments or diseases that may affect bone tissue metabolism (for example, taking bisphosphonates or receiving local radiotherapy);
  • Periodontitis history or uncontrolled periodontitis. Bleeding of probing (BOP) positive site ≥ 10%, or probing depth (PD) ≥ 4mm;
  • Heavy smokers or previous heavy smoking history (quit smoking time <5 years or> 20 cigarettes per day);
  • Refuse to participate in this trial.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

China3 sites
  • Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011

  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011

  • Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Accuracy and Primary Stability in Immediate Implant Placement Using Dynamic Navigation or Freehand

Prosthetic-driven immediate implant placement for optimal aesthetic restoration has been increasing in demand during the last decades but requires higher accuracy. Dynamic navigation has been reported better implant positioning. However, dynamic navigation's application to immediate implant placement has not been studied, and its exact role is still needed to be investigated further. Besides, implant insertion angle may influence primary stability, which is a prerequisite in achieving osseointegration, while dynamic navigation can precisely control angle and position. Therefore, the investigators designed a randomized controlled clinical trial study to verify the clinical efficacy of dynamic navigation and freehand in immediate implant placement. Patients will then be followed up one year after delivery of the crown to assess additional parameters.

Read the detailed description

Prosthetic-driven immediate implant placement for optimal aesthetic restoration has been increasing in demand during the last decades but requires higher accuracy. Dynamic navigation has been reported better implant positioning. However, dynamic navigation's application to immediate implant placement has not been studied, and its exact role is still needed to be investigated further. Besides, implant insertion angle may influence primary stability, which is a prerequisite in achieving osseointegration, while dynamic navigation can precisely control angle and position. Therefore, the investigators designed a randomized controlled clinical trial study to verify the clinical efficacy of dynamic navigation and freehand in immediate implant placement. Patients will then be followed up one year after delivery of the crown to assess additional parameters.

These will include the assessment of soft tissue inflammation, cytokine concentrations, microbiome, stability of the buccal bone plate.

Conditions
Tooth Diseases
Being tested
dynamic navigation surgery, freehand surgery
Medical subject headings
Tooth Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • dynamic navigation surgeryProcedure or surgery

    immediate implant placement using dynamic navigation

  • freehand surgeryProcedure or surgery

    immediate implant placement using freehand surgery

Study groups in NCT04999956
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
dynamic navigationExperimentalDental implant placement using a dynamic navigation system
Receives: Procedure: dynamic navigation surgery
freehandSham comparatorDental implant placement using freehand technique
Receives: Procedure: freehand surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy

    Taking cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The deviation between the planned implant and the actual implant were measured by Computer Assisted Dental Implant Precision System (Dcarer, Suzhou, China) as follows: (1) At least four feature points (like tooth cusps or bone pits) were selected in preoperative and postoperative CBCT for rough registration. (2) Feature surface circles in preoperative CBCT were selected, and then a mathematical algorithm displayed a similar feature surface circle in postoperative CBCT. The algorithm registered thousands of points in these two circles via conventional iso-surface thresholding technology. The software calculated registration error automatically. (3) Finally, the planned and actual implant were identified, and the deviation would be automatically calculated.

    Measured: before surgery to after surgery one week

  2. Peri-implant soft tissue health

    Assessment of tissue health according to the definition of the 2017 International Classification. Berglundh et al.

    Measured: 12-months follow-up after delivery of crown

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Insetion torque value (ITV)

    A general method to to detect primary stability roughly. The ITV were evaluated by a wrench (Straumann, Waldenburg, Switzerland) at the time of implant placement. The investigator record the number of scale. Being equal to or greater than 35N is a ideal primary stability.

    Measured: surgery day

  2. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ)

    A device to detect primary stability precisely. A Smartpeg was screwed into each implant, and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed using Osstell Mentor (Osstell/Integration Diagnostics, Goteborg, Sweden). ISQ were recorded in the buccal and the palatal directions three times and averaged. <60 represents low stability; 60-70 represents medium stability; higher than 70 represents high stability.

    Measured: surgery day

  3. Esthetic appearance of the dental crown

    PES-WES Score assessed using the Belser criteria

    Measured: 12-months follow-up after delivery of the crown

  4. Patient satisfaction

    Assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS=100mm, with 0=completely dissatisfied and 100 completely satisfied).

    Measured: 12-months follow-up after delivery of crown

  5. Peri-implant sulcus fluid Inflammation

    Cytokine concentrations determined by multiplex ELISA

    Measured: 12-months follow-up after delivery of crown

  6. Buccal bone changes

    Measurements performed on post-operative CBCT taken for routine follow-up

    Measured: 12-months follow-up after delivery of crown

  7. Implant microbiome

    16S microbiome analysis performed on submarginal biofilm taken with a sterile paper point

    Measured: 12-months follow-up after delivery of crown

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2021
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04999956
Sponsor's protocol ID
SH9H-2020-T122-2
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
29 Jul 2021
Last updated
18 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing dynamic navigation surgery and freehand surgery in people with Tooth Diseases, run by Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University at 3 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy (time frame: before surgery to after surgery one week). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in