Pulmonary EmbolismRAMBONCT05015153
Impact on Quality of Life With Pulmonary RehAbilitation After Pulmonary eMBOlism: RAMBO Study
A study testing Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in people with Pulmonary Embolism and Quality of Life and Dyspnea, run by University Hospital, Brest at 6 sites in France.
Trial summary
Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a common and serious disease. Indeed, the annual incidence is 1/1000 patients per year and the 3-month mortality is 10%, which is twice that of myocardial infarction. The treatment is based on anticoagulation for at least 3 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Embolism, Quality of Life and Dyspnea
- What is being tested?
- Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 112 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 11 May 2022to 11 Feb 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Patient treated with at least 3 months and up to 8 months of anticoagulation for symptomatic EP diagnosed according the ESC and ACCP guidelines.
- Patients who have a PembQol score ≥ 10% and whose total scores for the subgroups Q7+8 (dyspnea) and Q4 (impact of daily life) are ≥ 10%.
Who cannot join
- Presence of CTEPH according to international guidelines
- Patients treated for acute PE with anticoagulants for more than 8 months
- Active cancer or in remission for less than two years
- Dyspnea post - COVID due to parenchymal injuries
- Post-COVID hyperventilation syndrome without pulmonary vascular perfusion sequelae.
- Physical or psychological inability to undertake PR
Show all 18Show fewer
- Isolated or more distal segmental PE
- Neuro-muscular disease with PR contraindication.
- Cardiac insufficiency (unstable coronary artery disease)
- Severe respiratory failure (long-term oxygen therapy, pulmonary hypertension)
- Chronic dyspnea MMRC ≥ 2 before PE
- Cardiac or respiratory rehabilitation in the previous year
- Indication to urgent PR within 6 months at the time of inclusion
- Life expectancy of less than 12 months
- Inability to give consent
- Patient under guardianship or curatorship
- Patient deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision
- Patient has not social security affiliation or who don't beneficiary of such social security
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
6 sites in 1 country
France6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHU Angers
Angers, 49100
Frédéric GAGNADOUX, PU-PH
Frédéric GAGNADOUX, PU-PH
- Recruiting
CHU Brest
Brest, France, 29609
Cécile TROMEUR, PH
Cécile TROMEUR, PH
- Recruiting
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, 38048
Hélène BOUVAIST, 06 85 42 48 43, hbouvaist@chu-grenoble.fr
- Recruiting
CHBS Lorient
Lorient, 56100
Mikael LE HENAFF, PH
Mikael LE HENAFF, PH
- Recruiting
Hegp (Ap-Hp)
Paris, 75015
Benjamin PLANQUETTE, PH
Benjamin PLANQUETTE, PH
- Recruiting
CHU Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42055
Laurent BERTOLETTI, PU-PH
Laurent BERTOLETTI, PU-PH
About this study
Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a common and serious disease. Indeed, the annual incidence is 1/1000 patients per year and the 3-month mortality is 10%, which is twice that of myocardial infarction. The treatment is based on anticoagulation for at least 3 months. However, after three or six months of anticoagulation, persistent dyspnea and impairment of quality of life are observed in at least 30% of cases. Several mechanisms explain dyspnea and impairment of quality of life after PE, such as residual pulmonary artery obstruction, exercise deconditioning, depressive syndrome or development of a cardio-respiratory pathology. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to be effective on dyspnea and quality of life and is included in the therapeutic management of chronic respiratory diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or pulmonary fibrosis. Furthermore, PR is also used after a myocardial infarction. However, PR after PE is still not included in therapeutic management of PE while outpatient management is recommended for the majority of patients after an acute PE episode. Study hypothesis is that PR has the potential to improve quality of life and dyspnea perception in patients who have received anticoagulation for at least 3 months after PE and who present an impairment of quality of life and/or a persistent dyspnea. This study presents several innovative aspects. First, to our knowledge, This study is the first large randomized trial assessing PR at least 3 months after acute symptomatic PE. Only one small randomized trial on 18 patients evaluating the impact of PR after PE has been published; as PR was performed just after the acute phase of PE in this trial, the clinical status improvement observed in this study could not be explained by PR alone, but also by anticoagulation. In this study, the investigators will include 112 patients at least 3 months after PE in order to exclude the bias related to anticoagulation effect. Second, This study is the first large randomized trial. Third, this study is the first that have the potential to demonstrate efficacy and safety of delayed PR after PE in patients with impaired quality of life due to persistent residual dyspnea.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism, Quality of Life and Dyspnea
- Being tested
- Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR)
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Embolism, Dyspnea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR)Other
20 sessions of PR in respiratory rehabilitation centre will be performed over a period of 3 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | 20 sessions of Pulmonary rehabilitation will be performed over a period of 3 months Receives: Other: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) |
| Control group | No intervention | No Pulmonary rehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of life - PEmbQoL score
Pulmonary embolism Quality of life score. This score includes 6 items regarding the frequency of lung complaints, their intensity, their physical, personal, social and professional impact. For each item, an average score is collected
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Safety : number and type of adverse reactions
Number of events
Measured: 3 months
Quality of life - PEmbQoL score
Pulmonary embolism Quality of life score. This score includes 6 items regarding the frequency of lung complaints, their intensity, their physical, personal, social and professional impact. For each item, an average score is collected
Measured: 15 months
Pulmonary Vascular Obstruction index
Pulmonary Vascular Obstruction (Meyer score) assessed with V/Q lung scan
Measured: 3 months
Incidence of dyspnea
Multidimensional dyspnea Profile (MDP) at the cycloergometer, Borg scale at the cycloergometer and at the 6 minute-walk-test, and Modified Medical Research Council scale (MMRC)
Measured: 3 months and 15 months
Change of 6 Minutes Walk Test
6 Minutes Walk Test
Measured: 3 months and 15 months
Change of Psychological status
Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. 14 rated items from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), allowing thus obtaining two scores (maximum score for each score = 21)
Measured: 3 months and 15 months
Symptomatic recurrent PE
Number of events
Measured: 15 months
Arterial thromboembolic events
Number of events
Measured: 15 months
Deaths of all causes
Number of events
Measured: 15 months
Hospitalizations and acute medical events
Number of events
Measured: 15 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2021
- Study start11 May 2022
- Primary completion25 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion11 Feb 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pulmonary EmbolismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BrestThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Brest
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05015153
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 29BRC21.0093 (RAMBO)
- Acronym
- RAMBO
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All collected data that underlie results in a publication
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact on Quality of Life With Pulmonary RehAbilitation After Pulmonary eMBOlism: RAMBO Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05015153
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RAMBO / 29BRC21.0093 (RAMBO)
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism, Quality of Life and Dyspnea
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BrestUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 11 Feb 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a common and serious disease. Indeed, the annual incidence is 1/1000 patients per year and the 3-month mortality is 10%, which is twice that of myocardial infarction. The treatment is based on anticoagulation for at least 3 months. However, after three or six months of anticoagulation, persistent dyspnea and impairment of quality of life are observed in at least 30% of cases. Several mechanisms explain dyspnea and impairment of quality of life after PE, such as residual pulmonary artery obstruction, exercise deconditioning, depressive syndrome or development of a cardio-respiratory pathology. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to be effective on dyspnea and quality of life and is included in the therapeutic management of chronic respiratory diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or pulmonary fibrosis. Furthermore, PR is also used after a myocardial infarction. However, PR after PE is still not included in therapeutic management of PE while outpatient management is recommended for the majority of patients after an acute PE episode. Study hypothesis is that PR has the potential to improve quality of life and dyspnea perception in patients who have received anticoagulation for at least 3 months after PE and who present an impairment of quality of life and/or a persistent dyspnea. This study presents several innovative aspects. First, to our knowledge, This study is the first large randomized trial assessing PR at least 3 months after acute symptomatic PE. Only one small randomized trial on 18 patients evaluating the impact of PR after PE has been published; as PR was performed just after the acute phase of PE in this trial, the clinical status improvement observed in this study could not be explained by PR alone, but also by anticoagulation. In this study, the investigators will include 112 patients at least 3 months after PE in order to exclude the bias related to anticoagulation effect. Second, This study is the first large randomized trial. Third, this study is the first that have the potential to demonstrate efficacy and safety of delayed PR after PE in patients with impaired quality of life due to persistent residual dyspnea.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Other: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR)20 sessions of Pulmonary rehabilitation will be performed over a period of 3 months |
| Control group | No intervention | –No Pulmonary rehabilitation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Patient treated with at least 3 months and up to 8 months of anticoagulation for symptomatic EP diagnosed according the ESC and ACCP guidelines.
- Patients who have a PembQol score ≥ 10% and whose total scores for the subgroups Q7+8 (dyspnea) and Q4 (impact of daily life) are ≥ 10%.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Presence of CTEPH according to international guidelines
- Patients treated for acute PE with anticoagulants for more than 8 months
- Active cancer or in remission for less than two years
- Dyspnea post - COVID due to parenchymal injuries
- Post-COVID hyperventilation syndrome without pulmonary vascular perfusion sequelae.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR)20 sessions of PR in respiratory rehabilitation centre will be performed over a period of 3 months | Other | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Quality of life - PEmbQoL score
Time frame: 3 months
Pulmonary embolism Quality of life score. This score includes 6 items regarding the frequency of lung complaints, their intensity, their physical, personal, social and professional impact. For each item, an average score is collected
10 secondary outcomes
Safety : number and type of adverse reactions
Time frame: 3 months
Quality of life - PEmbQoL score
Time frame: 15 months
Pulmonary Vascular Obstruction index
Time frame: 3 months
Incidence of dyspnea
Time frame: 3 months and 15 months
Change of 6 Minutes Walk Test
Time frame: 3 months and 15 months
Change of Psychological status
Time frame: 3 months and 15 months
Symptomatic recurrent PE
Time frame: 15 months
Arterial thromboembolic events
Time frame: 15 months
Deaths of all causes
Time frame: 15 months
Hospitalizations and acute medical events
Time frame: 15 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All collected data that underlie results in a publication
Related trials for Pulmonary Embolism
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Long-Term Safety and Outcomes of Treating Pulmonary Embolism With the Indigo Aspiration System
Pulmonary Embolism
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study Evaluating Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Device in Acute Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Pulmonary Embolism (PE), Pulmonary Embolism With Right Ventricle Enlargement
RecruitingObservational study
Inari VISION Registry
Pulmonary Embolism
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in people with Pulmonary Embolism and Quality of Life and Dyspnea, run by University Hospital, Brest at 6 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Cécile TROMEUR, PH (+33230337602, cecile.tromeur@chu-brest.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of life - PEmbQoL score (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2026.