Alcohol MisuseNCT05018624
Alcohol Brief Intervention Integrated With Mobile Chat-based Support for Risky Drinkers in Emergency Departments
A study testing Alcohol brief intervention, 12-page health warning leaflet and Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM) in people with Alcohol Misuse, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of chat-based intervention on reducing risky alcohol consumption to inform clinical practice for providing ABI to risky drinkers attending AED in Hong Kong. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Alcohol Misuse
- What is being tested?
- Alcohol brief intervention, 12-page health warning leaflet and Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 632 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- 23 May 2022to 31 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HK resident able to read/communicate in Cantonese/Putonghua. This may exclude potential subjects from other countries with higher alcohol consumption than local Chinese, but quality of the chat-based intervention is important for the research hypothesis, and it will not be feasible to recruit other language speakers (e.g., English) in the present study.
- Aged ≥18 with proficiency in using IM Apps (e.g., WhatsApp, WeChat). Those aged <18 are excluded as other studies suggest they have different patterns of alcohol drinking and reduction from adult drinkers.
Who cannot join
- Those unable to understand or receive face-to-face ABI due to severe traumatic injury, unconscious, or drunk patients unable to follow commands
- Anticipated to be admitted to in-patient department for >1 week, which will interfere with the chat-based intervention
- Having psychiatric/psychological diseases or receiving regular psychotropic medication
- Participating in other alcohol reduction or abstinence programmes
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Hong Kong1 site
School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, 000
About this study
Official title: Alcohol Brief Intervention Integrated With Mobile Chat-based Support for Risky Drinkers in Emergency Departments: a Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of chat-based intervention on reducing risky alcohol consumption to inform clinical practice for providing ABI to risky drinkers attending AED in Hong Kong.
Read the detailed description
Alcohol use is a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases and 6th leading cause of death and disability-adjusted life years. The prevalence of alcohol consumption has increased since 2008 after introduction of zero tax on alcohol with strength <30% (e.g., wine and beer) and due to promoting the city as Asia's wine hub. ABI reduced alcohol intake by about 20g/week at 12-month follow-up in primary healthcare populations. Given the relatively low prevalence of risky alcohol drinkers in Hong Kong, testing ABI in clinics may face difficulties in recruitment. Alcohol use is associated with problems such as injury and violence requiring accident and emergency department (AED) services, thus AEDs in Hong Kong are more feasible places to recruit subjects for delivering ABI.
Primary hypothesis: The Intervention group has significantly larger reduction of weekly alcohol consumption compared with the Control group at 12-month follow-up
Secondary hypotheses: Compared with the Control group, the Intervention group has lower AUDIT scores, fewer episodes of heavy/binge drinking, lower re-attendence at AED and reduced alcohol-related harms at 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
- Conditions
- Alcohol Misuse
- Being tested
- Alcohol brief intervention, 12-page health warning leaflet, Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM), Real-time chat-based support through IM Apps, AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong Kong
- Keywords
- Chat-based IM, Alcohol brief intervention, AED, AUDIT
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Alcohol brief interventionBehavioural
At baseline, subjects will receive face-to-face or online alcohol brief intervention developed based on the guideline by the World Health Organisation in 5-10 minutes
12-page health warning leafletBehavioural
Nurses will provide information about the consequences of drinking using a 12-page health warning booklet. Benefits of reducing and quit drinking will be emphasized by focusing on improving their perception towards the impacts on health, social problems, risky behaviors, academic performance and financial issues.
Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM)Behavioural
A total of 26 e-messages will be scheduled: once daily for the first week, 3 time/week for subsequent 4 weeks and 1 time/week for the remaining 7 weeks. The frequency will be adjusted according to IM Apps conversation and subject's requests.
Real-time chat-based support through IM AppsBehavioural
The chat-based IM support is the extension of baseline ABI and regular e-messages, which aims to provide real-time behavioral and psychosocial support to reduce or quit drinking. It will be personalized according to the subjects' characteristics (gender, drinking pattern and alcoholic drinks preferences), intention to drink and specific questions regarding drinking. Through real-time chatting (text and/or voice), drinkers can acquire information on consequences of drinking and gain social support immediately to reduce intention to drink and alcohol consumption.
AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong KongBehavioural
a diagram explaining drinking behaviour and potential health risks, definitions of "alcohol unit" and "binge drinking", and advise on limiting daily drinking to 2 alcohol units for men and 1 unit for women
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Alcohol brief intervention, leaflets, regular personalized messages on ABI through IM Apps, real-time chat-based support through IM Apps Receives: Behavioral: Alcohol brief intervention; Behavioral: 12-page health warning leaflet; Behavioral: Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM); Behavioral: Real-time chat-based support through IM Apps; Behavioral: AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong Kong |
| control group | Active comparator | Alcohol brief intervention, leaflets, regular messages on general health through SMS Receives: Behavioral: Alcohol brief intervention; Behavioral: 12-page health warning leaflet; Behavioral: AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong Kong |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Amount of alcohol consumption per week (gram/week) at 12-month follow-up
Assessed by unit in gram and compare the alcohol consumption between intervention and control group at 12-month after baseline.
Measured: 12-month after baseline
Compare the primary outcome using intention-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP) and as-treated (AP) analysis with Compliance Average Causal Effect (CACE) analysis
To estimate large, moderate and null (same as the control) treatment effects and check whether ITT, AP and PP analysis estimates are biased compared with CACE estimates (alcohol consumption per week at 6-month follow-up)
Measured: 6-month after baseline
Secondary outcomes (9)
Amount of alcohol consumption per week (gram/week) at 3- and 6-month follow-ups
Assessed by unit in gram and compare the alcohol consumption between intervention and control group at 3- and 6-month after baseline.
Measured: 3 and 6 months after baseline
AUDIT scores at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Assessed by Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (ranged 0-40 with higher score indicating problematic alcohol use) and compare the AUDIT between intervention and control group at 3-, 6- adn 12-month after baseline.
Measured: 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Number of standard drinks (10g of alcohol) per week at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups
Assessed by either increase or decrease in standard drinks number and compared between intervention and control group at 3-, 6-, and 12-month
Measured: 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Episode of binge drinking in the past 30-day at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Defined by 5 standard drink [male] or 4 standard drink [female] in one occasion for binge drinking and compared between intervention and control group at 3-, 6-, and 12-month
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline
Episode of heavy drinking in the past 30-day at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Defined by 15 standard drink [male] or 8 standard drink[female] in a week for heavy drinking and compared between intervention and control group at 3-, 6-, and 12-month
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline
Planned drinking measured in the coming 30-day at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Compare the number of planned drinking (yes or no) between intervention group and control group at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline
Re-attendance of AED at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Ask for attendance of AED (yes/no) in the past 3 months at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline
Health status of participants at 12-month
Measured by EQ-5D-5L. Comprises five dimensions (MOBILITY, SELF-CARE, USUAL ACTIVITIES, PAIN /DISCOMFORT and ANXIETY / DEPRESSION), each dimension has five response levels:no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to/extreme problems. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health state by checking the box next to the most appropriate response level. Responses are coded as single-digit numbers expressing the severity level selected in each dimension. Extreme problem is coded as 5, severe problem is coded as 4, moderate is coded as 3, slight problem is coded as 2 and no problem is coded as 1.
Measured: 12 months after baseline
Current health of participants at 12-month
Measured by EQ VAS. Participant is asked to rate his/her health on a vertical visual analogue scale. The scale is numbered from 0-100.100 means the best health, 0 is the worst. Participant will put a "cross" on the scale to indicate his/her current health.
Measured: 12 months after baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Aug 2021
- Study start23 May 2022
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024
- Study completion31 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Alcohol MisuseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 632 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Wang Man-Ping, The University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05018624
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Chat-based ABI (AED)
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Alcohol Brief Intervention Integrated With Mobile Chat-based Support for Risky Drinkers in Emergency Departments: a Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05018624
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Chat-based ABI (AED)
- Conditions
- Alcohol Misuse
- Keywords
- Chat-based IM, Alcohol brief intervention, AED, AUDIT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 632 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of chat-based intervention on reducing risky alcohol consumption to inform clinical practice for providing ABI to risky drinkers attending AED in Hong Kong.
Detailed description
Alcohol use is a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases and 6th leading cause of death and disability-adjusted life years. The prevalence of alcohol consumption has increased since 2008 after introduction of zero tax on alcohol with strength <30% (e.g., wine and beer) and due to promoting the city as Asia's wine hub. ABI reduced alcohol intake by about 20g/week at 12-month follow-up in primary healthcare populations. Given the relatively low prevalence of risky alcohol drinkers in Hong Kong, testing ABI in clinics may face difficulties in recruitment. Alcohol use is associated with problems such as injury and violence requiring accident and emergency department (AED) services, thus AEDs in Hong Kong are more feasible places to recruit subjects for delivering ABI.
Primary hypothesis: The Intervention group has significantly larger reduction of weekly alcohol consumption compared with the Control group at 12-month follow-up
Secondary hypotheses: Compared with the Control group, the Intervention group has lower AUDIT scores, fewer episodes of heavy/binge drinking, lower re-attendence at AED and reduced alcohol-related harms at 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Alcohol brief intervention, Behavioral: 12-page health warning leaflet, Behavioral: Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM), Behavioral: Real-time chat-based support through IM Apps, Behavioral: AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong KongAlcohol brief intervention, leaflets, regular personalized messages on ABI through IM Apps, real-time chat-based support through IM Apps |
| control group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Alcohol brief intervention, Behavioral: 12-page health warning leaflet, Behavioral: AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong KongAlcohol brief intervention, leaflets, regular messages on general health through SMS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- HK resident able to read/communicate in Cantonese/Putonghua. This may exclude potential subjects from other countries with higher alcohol consumption than local Chinese, but quality of the chat-based intervention is important for the research hypothesis, and it will not be feasible to recruit other language speakers (e.g., English) in the present study.
- Aged ≥18 with proficiency in using IM Apps (e.g., WhatsApp, WeChat). Those aged <18 are excluded as other studies suggest they have different patterns of alcohol drinking and reduction from adult drinkers.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Those unable to understand or receive face-to-face ABI due to severe traumatic injury, unconscious, or drunk patients unable to follow commands
- Anticipated to be admitted to in-patient department for >1 week, which will interfere with the chat-based intervention
- Having psychiatric/psychological diseases or receiving regular psychotropic medication
- Participating in other alcohol reduction or abstinence programmes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Alcohol brief interventionAt baseline, subjects will receive face-to-face or online alcohol brief intervention developed based on the guideline by the World Health Organisation in 5-10 minutes | Behavioural | Intervention group, control group |
| 12-page health warning leafletNurses will provide information about the consequences of drinking using a 12-page health warning booklet. Benefits of reducing and quit drinking will be emphasized by focusing on improving their perception towards the impacts on health, social problems, risky behaviors, academic performance and financial issues. | Behavioural | Intervention group, control group |
| Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM)A total of 26 e-messages will be scheduled: once daily for the first week, 3 time/week for subsequent 4 weeks and 1 time/week for the remaining 7 weeks. The frequency will be adjusted according to IM Apps conversation and subject's requests. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
| Real-time chat-based support through IM AppsThe chat-based IM support is the extension of baseline ABI and regular e-messages, which aims to provide real-time behavioral and psychosocial support to reduce or quit drinking. It will be personalized according to the subjects' characteristics (gender, drinking pattern and alcoholic drinks preferences), intention to drink and specific questions regarding drinking. Through real-time chatting (text and/or voice), drinkers can acquire information on consequences of drinking and gain social support immediately to reduce intention to drink and alcohol consumption. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
| AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong Konga diagram explaining drinking behaviour and potential health risks, definitions of "alcohol unit" and "binge drinking", and advise on limiting daily drinking to 2 alcohol units for men and 1 unit for women | Behavioural | Intervention group, control group |
Primary outcome
Amount of alcohol consumption per week (gram/week) at 12-month follow-up
Time frame: 12-month after baseline
Assessed by unit in gram and compare the alcohol consumption between intervention and control group at 12-month after baseline.
Compare the primary outcome using intention-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP) and as-treated (AP) analysis with Compliance Average Causal Effect (CACE) analysis
Time frame: 6-month after baseline
To estimate large, moderate and null (same as the control) treatment effects and check whether ITT, AP and PP analysis estimates are biased compared with CACE estimates (alcohol consumption per week at 6-month follow-up)
9 secondary outcomes
Amount of alcohol consumption per week (gram/week) at 3- and 6-month follow-ups
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after baseline
AUDIT scores at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Number of standard drinks (10g of alcohol) per week at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Episode of binge drinking in the past 30-day at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline
Episode of heavy drinking in the past 30-day at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline
Planned drinking measured in the coming 30-day at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline
Re-attendance of AED at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline
Health status of participants at 12-month
Time frame: 12 months after baseline
Current health of participants at 12-month
Time frame: 12 months after baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2025.
Related trials for Alcohol Misuse
Recruiting
MATAspire: Mental Health Awareness Tailored App for Substance Prevention and Integrated Resilience Education
Alcohol Use, Cannabis Use
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Cross-Cutting E-Health Prevention Approaches
Alcohol Misuse Prevention, Sexual Violence Prevention
Recruiting
Advancing Scalable Alcohol Brief Interventions in the ED: A Trial of Conversational AI With Digital Reinforcements
Alcohol Misuse
Recruiting
The PEth Results Communication Study
Alcohol Misuse, Alcohol Biomarkers
Recruiting
The PSP Alcohol Reset Course
Alcohol Misuse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Alcohol brief intervention, 12-page health warning leaflet and Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM) in people with Alcohol Misuse, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Amount of alcohol consumption per week (gram/week) at 12-month follow-up (time frame: 12-month after baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.