AzTrials
AzTrials

KeratoconusNCT05019768

Topo-pachimetric Accelerated Epi-On Cross-linking Compared to Dresden Protocol Using Riboflavin With Vitamin E TPGS

A study testing accelerated custom-fast CXL and Standard CXL in people with Keratoconus, run by Ciro Caruso at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In the present study the investigators compare the clinical outcome corneal cross linking with either the stand-ard Dresden (sCXL) or the accelerated custom-fast (aCFXL) ultraviolet A irradiation protocol using riboflavin-D-α-Tocopheryl polyethyleneglycol1000 succinate for progressive keratoconus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Keratoconus
What is being tested?
accelerated custom-fast CXL and Standard CXL
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
41 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Sep 2017to 31 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • documented progressive keratoconus
  • changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) above 1.00 D
  • Corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) above 1.00 D
  • spherical equivalent greater than 0.50 D

Who cannot join

  • Corneal pachymetry of less than 400 µm
  • less than 2000 cells/cm2,
  • corneal scarring,
  • nystagmus or any motility disorder that prevented a fixed gaze during the examination
  • Current contact lens use

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Pellegrini Hospital

    Naples

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Topo-pachimetric Accelerated Epi-On Cross-linking Compared to Dresden Protocol Using Riboflavin With Vitamin E TPGS: Results of a 2-year Randomized Study

In the present study the investigators compare the clinical outcome corneal cross linking with either the stand-ard Dresden (sCXL) or the accelerated custom-fast (aCFXL) ultraviolet A irradiation protocol using riboflavin-D-α-Tocopheryl polyethyleneglycol1000 succinate for progressive keratoconus.

Conditions
Keratoconus
Being tested
accelerated custom-fast CXL, Standard CXL
Medical subject headings
Keratoconus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • accelerated custom-fast CXLOther

    The accelerated custom fast CXL (aCFXL) has been developed on a published mathematical model that takes into consideration objective variables such as the equation governing the UVA-induced riboflavin consumption rate and the corneal thickness at its thinnest point. By knowing both values, the mathematical model allows to objectively calculate both the exact UVA irradiation value (intensity), expressed in mW/cm2, and the irradiation time

  • Standard CXLOther

    The standard CXL procedure has been carried on following the Dresden protocol

Study groups in NCT05019768
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
sCXLActive comparatorStandard protocol of Dresden Riboflavin-VEPTGS solution applied every 2 mins during UV UVA fluence of 3mW/cm2 UVA Irradiation time 30 minutes
Receives: Other: Standard CXL
aCFXLExperimentalAccelerated custom fast CXL protocol. The protocol has been developed on a published mathematical model that takes into consideration objective variables such as the equation governing the UVA-induced riboflavin con-sumption rate and the corneal thickness at its thinnest point. Riboflavin-VEPTGS solution: Epithelial lavage before UV UVA fluence of 1.8 ±0.9 mW/cm2 UVA Irradiation time 10 ± 1.5 minutes
Receives: Other: accelerated custom-fast CXL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Topographical parameters

    Maximum keratometry: diopters Mean keratometry: diopters Minimum corneal tickness: diopters

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Refractive parameters

    Corrected distance acuity (BCVA): Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR)

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Refractive parameters

    Spherical equi-valent: diopters Refractive cylinder magnitude: diopters

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Biomechanical parameters

    Corneal hysteresis: mmHg

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2021
  2. Study start1 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05019768
Sponsor's protocol ID
127
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
10 Aug 2021
Last updated
15 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Caruso C, Ostacolo C, Epstein RL, Barbaro G, Troisi S, Capobianco D. Transepithelial Corneal Cross-Linking With Vitamin E-Enhanced Riboflavin Solution and Abbreviated, Low-Dose UV-A: 24-Month Clinical Outcomes. Cornea. 2016 Feb;35(2):145-50. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000699.

    PubMed 26606293
  • Caruso C, Epstein RL, Ostacolo C, Pacente L, Troisi S, Barbaro G. Customized Corneal Cross-Linking-A Mathematical Model. Cornea. 2017 May;36(5):600-604. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001160.

    PubMed 28257382

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing accelerated custom-fast CXL and Standard CXL in people with Keratoconus, run by Ciro Caruso at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Topographical parameters (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05019768, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in