AzTrials
AzTrials

Nerve BlockNCT05034601

ESPB vs TPVB for Postoperative Analgesia After the Nuss Procedure

A study testing ESPB group and TPVB group in people with Nerve Block and Analgesia, run by West China Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective randomized double-blind non-inferiority trial designed to test the hypothesis that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is non-inferior to thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in postoperative pain control after pectus excavatum repair. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Nerve Block, Analgesia, Pectus Excavatum
What is being tested?
ESPB group and TPVB group
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
25 Sep 2021to 23 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 4 to 18 years Scheduled for elective Nuss surgery Written informed consent is obtained from parents of each patient.

Who cannot join

  • Coagulation dysfunction. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 4 or 5. Allergy to study medication. Local infection at the site of injection or systemic infection. Inability to understand Chinese.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane and Paravertebral Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Children After the Nuss Procedure

This is a prospective randomized double-blind non-inferiority trial designed to test the hypothesis that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is non-inferior to thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in postoperative pain control after pectus excavatum repair.

Being tested
ESPB group, TPVB group
Medical subject headings
Agnosia, Funnel Chest

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ESPB groupProcedure or surgery

    Also called Erector spinae plane block

    A 21-gauge 100-mm needle will be inserted into the fascial layer beneath the iliocostalis, longissimus, and spinalis muscles. A bolus of 0.25% ropivacaine 0.5 ml/kg will be injected into the fascial layer. Contralateral ESPB will be performed similarly.

  • TPVB groupProcedure or surgery

    Also called Thoracic paravertebral block

    A 21-gauge 100-mm insulated needle will be inserted into the paravertebral space via an in-plane parasagittal approach. After perforating the costotransverse ligament, 0.25% ropivacaine 0.5 ml/kg will be injected. Anterior movement of the pleura indicated the appropriate spread of the local anesthetics in the paravertebral space. The process will be repeated on the contralateral side.

Study groups in NCT05034601
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ESPB groupExperimental0.25% ropivacaine 0.5 ml/kg is injected at the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle
Receives: Procedure: ESPB group
TPVB groupActive comparator0.25% ropivacaine 0.5 ml/kg is injected into the thoracic paravertebral space (T5) using TPVB approach.
Receives: Procedure: TPVB group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain scores at rest at 24 hours postoperatively

    Pain scores will be recorded using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores (0-10).

    Measured: 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. The pain degree at rest and after movement or coughing(dynamic)

    The pain degree at rest and after movement or coughing at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery respectively.

    Measured: at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery

  2. total rescue morphine-equivalent consumption per weight

    total rescue morphine-equivalent consumption per weight at predetermined time intervals (24 and 48 hours) after surgery

    Measured: at 24 and 48 hours after surgery

  3. Emergence agitation at 5, 15, 30 min after extubation

    Emergence agitation will be registered using pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) at 5, 15, 30 min after extubation

    Measured: at 5, 15, 30 min after extubation

  4. Total dosage of intraoperative sufentanil and remifentanil

    Total dosage of intraoperative sufentanil and remifentanil per weight

    Measured: during surgery

  5. The time to first analgesia request

    Time from operation to first rescue analgesia request

    Measured: within the 3 days after surgery

  6. The time to first mobilization

    Time from operation to ambulation

    Measured: within the 3 days after surgery

  7. Side effects

    Side effects such as pneumothorax, local anesthetic toxicity, postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Measured: within the 5 days after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2021
  2. Study start25 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion23 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion23 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05034601
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-866
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
21 Aug 2021
Last updated
18 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Xu M, Zhang G, Gong J, Yang J. Comparison of erector spinae plane and paravertebral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia in children after the Nuss procedure: study protocol for a randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial. Trials. 2022 Feb 14;23(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06044-y.

    PubMed 35164831

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ESPB group and TPVB group in people with Nerve Block and Analgesia, run by West China Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain scores at rest at 24 hours postoperatively (time frame: 24 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05034601, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in