Low Back PainNCT05044702
Effects of Retro Walking in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
A study testing Retro walking and conventional physical therapy in people with Low Back Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a clinical entity that can be defined as back pain with duration of more than 12 weeks. Chronic low back pain is associated with restriction in daily physical activities that ultimately leads to disuse atrophy of muscles. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Retro walking and conventional physical therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2021to 25 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age:25-45yrs
- LBP for>12 weeks
- those having mild-to-moderate disability
- An ODI score ranging from 20 to 60%
- Being able to walk independently with or without walking aids
- Being able to understand and follow instructions on testing procedures.
Who cannot join
- Any recent trauma leading to body pain and postural deformities
- Any previous surgery leading to body pain and postural deformities,
- congenital postural deformities,
- current pregnancy,
- Nerve root compression (determined by the presence of two or more of the symptoms-weakness of myotomes, sensory loss of dermatomes, and hyporefexia),
- sacroiliac joint dysfunction (determined by any three positives among distraction test, gaenslen's test, thigh thrust test, sacral thrust test, and compression test),
- any metabolic or vascular disease with a neurological component such as atherosclerosis
- Any contraindication to physiotherapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site
Physical therapy Center in DHQ hospital
Nankana Sahib, Punjab Province
About this study
Official title: Effects of Retro Walking on Pain, Physical Function and Flexibility in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a clinical entity that can be defined as back pain with duration of more than 12 weeks. Chronic low back pain is associated with restriction in daily physical activities that ultimately leads to disuse atrophy of muscles. Moreover, weak and atrophied muscles around the lumbar spine cause immense immobility and recurring low back pain in these patients. The objective of this study will be to determine the effect of retro walking on pain, physical function and flexibility in chronic non-specific low back pain.
This study will be a randomized controlled trial and will be conducted in physiotherapy department in DHQ hospital Nankana Sahib. The study will be completed in time duration of six months after the approval of synopsis and consecutive sampling technique will be used. 40 subjects will be divided in two groups. Group A will follow retro walking and conventional treatment while group B will follow only conventional treatment. Data will be collected by all participants before 1st session after 6th session and at the end of 12th session by using NPRS, MODI, sit and reach test and Modified schobber's test. Data will be analyzed by SPSS-25.
Read the detailed description
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a clinical entity that can be defined as back pain with duration of more than 12 weeks. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that 50% of the general population experiences CLBP and around 70% have encountered at least one occurrence of it during their lifetime.Chronic low back pain is associated with restriction in daily physical activities that ultimately leads to disuse atrophy of muscles.Moreover, weak and atrophied muscles around the lumbar spine cause immense immobility and recurring low back pain in these patients The prevalence of low back pain increases peak between 35-55 years of age.Low back pain is caused by a degenerated or damaged facet joint or sacroiliac joint with soft tissue injury on the trunk or by lumbar instability from weakened muscle strength.Lumbar instability restricts muscle strength, endurance, flexibility, and active range of motion (AROM). In particular, patients with Chronic low back pain (CLBP) persisting for more than 6 months restrict trunk movement to minimize pain in the lumbosacral area or leg, which aggravates the level of lumbar muscle weakness in paraspinal muscles and the multifidus.These changes increase lumbar instability and raise the recurrence of low back pain. Patients with CLBP suffer from deteriorated physical functions and production activities due to weakened muscle strength in the lumbar region.
In 2015 Yun Ha Park et al, conducted a study to confirm the effect of various forms of walking on health related physical fitness, lumbar muscle strength, range of motion and the pain index. Forty females were divided into 4 groups: walking forward (n=10), walking backward (n=10), walking forward \& backward (n=10), and control group (n=10). All participants in walking groups walked 50 min/day and 3 days/week during 10 weeks. The results of study concluded that walking forward, walking backward, and walking forward \& backward caused significant changes in health related physical fitness, lumbar muscle strength, ROM and pain. Especially the group of walking backward showed low figures in pain.
In a study conducted by Kim SH et al, in 2016 twenty five unilateral exercise athlete were included. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of backward walking on isokinetic muscular function, low back pain index and lumbo sacral angle in unilateral exercise athletes. Backward walking was performed with a frequency of three times a week by 60 minutes at a time for 10 weeks. Comparison of related variables before and after backward walking was verified. This study concluded that backward walking improves muscle strength of the lumbar vertebra and reduces the lumbosacral angle and appeared to reduce the pain of the lumbar vertebra.
In an experimental study conducted by Manisha Rathi et al in 2017, 30 women having mechanical low back pain were divided in 2 groups Group A and Group B. Group A underwent core strengthening exercises and hot pack for 10 min, and Group B underwent same protocol along with Retro-walking for 10 min, the protocol was given for 4 weeks, outcome measures were NPRS at rest and activity and core strength. Results showed that there was significant reduction in NPRS at rest and activity in both the groups but group B showed more reduction.
In 2018 Ansari B et al, conducted an experimental study to investigate the electromyographic activity of lumbar multifidus (MF) and erector spinae (ES) muscle during forward walking (FW) and backward walking (BW) in participants with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). 25 health and 25 chronic low back pain patients was included. Study concluded that BW leads to greater activation of the paraspinal muscles. Along with global extensor (ES), activity of core extensor (MF) is also higher during BW than FW in both healthy participants and CLBP patients. BW is a more favorable aerobic activity to enhance lumbar para spinal recruitment. These findings may have important clinical implications in the rehabilitation of CLBP.
In a study conducted by Ansari S et al, in 2020 thirty athletes with low back pain were randomly assigned in two groups. One group was given conventional treatment and other was given retro walking and conventional treatment. . Pain, flexion range of motion, balance, and muscle fatigability were examined before and after 4 weeks of the intervention. Study concluded that retro walking when added to conventional exercises may be helpful in reducing chronic mechanical LBP and improving dynamic balance but has no additional effect in improving the flexion range of motion and reducing muscle fatigability.
The literature has proved the significant effects of retro walking on pain, balance, and range of motion in athletes, but its effects on physical function, pain and flexibility of hamstrings and flexibility of lumbar spine in chronic non- specific low back pain in general population are still needed to be investigated further. The objective of current study will be to determine the effects of retro walking on pain, physical function and flexibility in chronic non-specific low back pain.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Retro walking, conventional physical therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Retro walkingOther
Retro walking will be performed on treadmill for 15 min per day for 3 days per week for 4 weeks at self-paced speed.
conventional physical therapyOther
hot pack for 10 mints and conventional exercise program Conventional physiotherapeutic exercise program which consist of exercises such as
- prone leg extension
- prone lying chest elevation
- prone extension with alternate arm and leg lift
- supine bridging, bridging with one leg lift Each exercise will be performed as 2 sets of 12 repetitions of each exercise, each exercise position maintained for 10 s, and a rest of 1 min between the sets will be perform. No external load/resistance will be provided for the exercises, and the participants will be perform the exercise within their available range of motion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Retro walking | Experimental | Retro walking Receives: Other: Retro walking; Other: conventional physical therapy |
| conventional physical therapy | Active comparator | Conventional Physical therapy Receives: Other: conventional physical therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
• Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS is anchored by terms describing pain severity extremes. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable")
Measured: 4 weeks
MODIFIED OSWESTRY LOW BACK DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE
The MODI has been developed to assess pain related disability. The questionnaire consists of 10 items addressing different aspects of function. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, with higher values representing greater disability. The total score is multiplied by 2 and expressed as a percentage
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
MODIFIED SCHOBER TEST
It is commonly used assessment methods for lumbar flexion ROM. To perform this test, the examiner puts his thumbs on the inferior margin of the subject's PSIS. An ink mark is drawn along the midline of the lumbar spine horizontal to the PSIS (lower landmark). While the examiner holds the tape firmly against the subject's skin, he marks a second line 15 cm above the original one (higher landmark). Then the subject is asked to do an active anterior flexion of the trunk without increasing the pain. The new distance between the lower and higher landmarks is then measured. The subject returns to the neutral position. The difference in the initial distance between the skin markings in the neutral position and the new measurements made in the flexion position is used to indicate the amount of lumbar flexion. Measurements are recorded to the nearest mm
Measured: 4 weeks
SIT-AND-REACH TEST
Sit-and-reach test (SR) are commonly used to evaluate the hamstring and lower back flexibility. The subjects sit with their feet approximately hip-wide against the testing box. They keep their knees extended and place the right hand over the left, and slowly reach forward as far as they could by sliding their hands along the measuring board
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2021
- Study start15 Sep 2021
- Primary completion15 Mar 2022
- Study completion25 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Riphah International UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Saima Zahid, PhD*, Study chair, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05044702
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC/RCR&AHS/21/0126
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Smeets RJ, Wade D, Hidding A, Van Leeuwen PJ, Vlaeyen JW, Knottnerus JA. The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Jun 15;28(11):673-93. doi: 10.1080/09638280500264782.
PubMed 16809211Chatzitheodorou D, Kabitsis C, Malliou P, Mougios V. A pilot study of the effects of high-intensity aerobic exercise versus passive interventions on pain, disability, psychological strain, and serum cortisol concentrations in people with chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2007 Mar;87(3):304-12. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060080. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
PubMed 17284546Hoogkamer W, Meyns P, Duysens J. Steps forward in understanding backward gait: from basic circuits to rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2014 Jan;42(1):23-9. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000000.
PubMed 24188982Viggiano D, Travaglio M, Cacciola G, Di Costanzo A. Effect of backward walking on attention: possible application on ADHD. Transl Med UniSa. 2014 Dec 19;11:48-54. eCollection 2015 Jan-Apr.
PubMed 25674550Ansari B, Bhati P, Singla D, Nazish N, Hussain ME. Lumbar Muscle Activation Pattern During Forward and Backward Walking in Participants With and Without Chronic Low Back Pain: An Electromyographic Study. J Chiropr Med. 2018 Dec;17(4):217-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2018.03.008. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
PubMed 30846913Tousignant M, Poulin L, Marchand S, Viau A, Place C. The Modified-Modified Schober Test for range of motion assessment of lumbar flexion in patients with low back pain: a study of criterion validity, intra- and inter-rater reliability and minimum metrically detectable change. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 May 20;27(10):553-9. doi: 10.1080/09638280400018411.
PubMed 16019864Lopez-Minarro PA, Andujar PS, Rodrnguez-Garcna PL. A comparison of the sit-and-reach test and the back-saver sit-and-reach test in university students. J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Mar 1;8(1):116-22. eCollection 2009.
PubMed 24150564
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Retro Walking on Pain, Physical Function and Flexibility in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05044702
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC/RCR&AHS/21/0126
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a clinical entity that can be defined as back pain with duration of more than 12 weeks. Chronic low back pain is associated with restriction in daily physical activities that ultimately leads to disuse atrophy of muscles. Moreover, weak and atrophied muscles around the lumbar spine cause immense immobility and recurring low back pain in these patients. The objective of this study will be to determine the effect of retro walking on pain, physical function and flexibility in chronic non-specific low back pain.
This study will be a randomized controlled trial and will be conducted in physiotherapy department in DHQ hospital Nankana Sahib. The study will be completed in time duration of six months after the approval of synopsis and consecutive sampling technique will be used. 40 subjects will be divided in two groups. Group A will follow retro walking and conventional treatment while group B will follow only conventional treatment. Data will be collected by all participants before 1st session after 6th session and at the end of 12th session by using NPRS, MODI, sit and reach test and Modified schobber's test. Data will be analyzed by SPSS-25.
Detailed description
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a clinical entity that can be defined as back pain with duration of more than 12 weeks. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that 50% of the general population experiences CLBP and around 70% have encountered at least one occurrence of it during their lifetime.Chronic low back pain is associated with restriction in daily physical activities that ultimately leads to disuse atrophy of muscles.Moreover, weak and atrophied muscles around the lumbar spine cause immense immobility and recurring low back pain in these patients The prevalence of low back pain increases peak between 35-55 years of age.Low back pain is caused by a degenerated or damaged facet joint or sacroiliac joint with soft tissue injury on the trunk or by lumbar instability from weakened muscle strength.Lumbar instability restricts muscle strength, endurance, flexibility, and active range of motion (AROM). In particular, patients with Chronic low back pain (CLBP) persisting for more than 6 months restrict trunk movement to minimize pain in the lumbosacral area or leg, which aggravates the level of lumbar muscle weakness in paraspinal muscles and the multifidus.These changes increase lumbar instability and raise the recurrence of low back pain. Patients with CLBP suffer from deteriorated physical functions and production activities due to weakened muscle strength in the lumbar region.
In 2015 Yun Ha Park et al, conducted a study to confirm the effect of various forms of walking on health related physical fitness, lumbar muscle strength, range of motion and the pain index. Forty females were divided into 4 groups: walking forward (n=10), walking backward (n=10), walking forward \& backward (n=10), and control group (n=10). All participants in walking groups walked 50 min/day and 3 days/week during 10 weeks. The results of study concluded that walking forward, walking backward, and walking forward \& backward caused significant changes in health related physical fitness, lumbar muscle strength, ROM and pain. Especially the group of walking backward showed low figures in pain.
In a study conducted by Kim SH et al, in 2016 twenty five unilateral exercise athlete were included. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of backward walking on isokinetic muscular function, low back pain index and lumbo sacral angle in unilateral exercise athletes. Backward walking was performed with a frequency of three times a week by 60 minutes at a time for 10 weeks. Comparison of related variables before and after backward walking was verified. This study concluded that backward walking improves muscle strength of the lumbar vertebra and reduces the lumbosacral angle and appeared to reduce the pain of the lumbar vertebra.
In an experimental study conducted by Manisha Rathi et al in 2017, 30 women having mechanical low back pain were divided in 2 groups Group A and Group B. Group A underwent core strengthening exercises and hot pack for 10 min, and Group B underwent same protocol along with Retro-walking for 10 min, the protocol was given for 4 weeks, outcome measures were NPRS at rest and activity and core strength. Results showed that there was significant reduction in NPRS at rest and activity in both the groups but group B showed more reduction.
In 2018 Ansari B et al, conducted an experimental study to investigate the electromyographic activity of lumbar multifidus (MF) and erector spinae (ES) muscle during forward walking (FW) and backward walking (BW) in participants with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). 25 health and 25 chronic low back pain patients was included. Study concluded that BW leads to greater activation of the paraspinal muscles. Along with global extensor (ES), activity of core extensor (MF) is also higher during BW than FW in both healthy participants and CLBP patients. BW is a more favorable aerobic activity to enhance lumbar para spinal recruitment. These findings may have important clinical implications in the rehabilitation of CLBP.
In a study conducted by Ansari S et al, in 2020 thirty athletes with low back pain were randomly assigned in two groups. One group was given conventional treatment and other was given retro walking and conventional treatment. . Pain, flexion range of motion, balance, and muscle fatigability were examined before and after 4 weeks of the intervention. Study concluded that retro walking when added to conventional exercises may be helpful in reducing chronic mechanical LBP and improving dynamic balance but has no additional effect in improving the flexion range of motion and reducing muscle fatigability.
The literature has proved the significant effects of retro walking on pain, balance, and range of motion in athletes, but its effects on physical function, pain and flexibility of hamstrings and flexibility of lumbar spine in chronic non- specific low back pain in general population are still needed to be investigated further. The objective of current study will be to determine the effects of retro walking on pain, physical function and flexibility in chronic non-specific low back pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Retro walking | Experimental | Other: Retro walking, Other: conventional physical therapyRetro walking |
| conventional physical therapy | Active comparator | Other: conventional physical therapyConventional Physical therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age:25-45yrs
- LBP for>12 weeks
- those having mild-to-moderate disability
- An ODI score ranging from 20 to 60%
- Being able to walk independently with or without walking aids
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Any recent trauma leading to body pain and postural deformities
- Any previous surgery leading to body pain and postural deformities,
- congenital postural deformities,
- current pregnancy,
- Nerve root compression (determined by the presence of two or more of the symptoms-weakness of myotomes, sensory loss of dermatomes, and hyporefexia),
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Retro walkingRetro walking will be performed on treadmill for 15 min per day for 3 days per week for 4 weeks at self-paced speed. | Other | Retro walking |
| conventional physical therapyhot pack for 10 mints and conventional exercise program Conventional physiotherapeutic exercise program which consist of exercises such as * prone leg extension * prone lying chest elevation * prone extension with alternate arm and leg lift * supine bridging, bridging with one leg lift Each exercise will be performed as 2 sets of 12 repetitions of each exercise, each exercise position maintained for 10 s, and a rest of 1 min between the sets will be perform. No external load/resistance will be provided for the exercises, and the participants will be perform the exercise within their available range of motion | Other | Retro walking, conventional physical therapy |
Primary outcome
• Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: 4 weeks
NPRS is anchored by terms describing pain severity extremes. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable")
MODIFIED OSWESTRY LOW BACK DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE
Time frame: 4 weeks
The MODI has been developed to assess pain related disability. The questionnaire consists of 10 items addressing different aspects of function. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, with higher values representing greater disability. The total score is multiplied by 2 and expressed as a percentage
2 secondary outcomes
MODIFIED SCHOBER TEST
Time frame: 4 weeks
SIT-AND-REACH TEST
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 16809211Smeets RJ, Wade D, Hidding A, Van Leeuwen PJ, Vlaeyen JW, Knottnerus JA. The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Jun 15;28(11):673-93. doi: 10.1080/09638280500264782.
- Background: PubMed 17284546Chatzitheodorou D, Kabitsis C, Malliou P, Mougios V. A pilot study of the effects of high-intensity aerobic exercise versus passive interventions on pain, disability, psychological strain, and serum cortisol concentrations in people with chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2007 Mar;87(3):304-12. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060080. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
- Background: PubMed 24188982Hoogkamer W, Meyns P, Duysens J. Steps forward in understanding backward gait: from basic circuits to rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2014 Jan;42(1):23-9. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000000.
- Background: PubMed 25674550Viggiano D, Travaglio M, Cacciola G, Di Costanzo A. Effect of backward walking on attention: possible application on ADHD. Transl Med UniSa. 2014 Dec 19;11:48-54. eCollection 2015 Jan-Apr.
- Background: PubMed 30846913Ansari B, Bhati P, Singla D, Nazish N, Hussain ME. Lumbar Muscle Activation Pattern During Forward and Backward Walking in Participants With and Without Chronic Low Back Pain: An Electromyographic Study. J Chiropr Med. 2018 Dec;17(4):217-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2018.03.008. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
- Background: PubMed 16019864Tousignant M, Poulin L, Marchand S, Viau A, Place C. The Modified-Modified Schober Test for range of motion assessment of lumbar flexion in patients with low back pain: a study of criterion validity, intra- and inter-rater reliability and minimum metrically detectable change. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 May 20;27(10):553-9. doi: 10.1080/09638280400018411.
- Background: PubMed 24150564Lopez-Minarro PA, Andujar PS, Rodrnguez-Garcna PL. A comparison of the sit-and-reach test and the back-saver sit-and-reach test in university students. J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Mar 1;8(1):116-22. eCollection 2009.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Saima Zahid, PhD* study chair
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Retro walking and conventional physical therapy in people with Low Back Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
• Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (time frame: 4 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05044702, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2022.