Inguinal HerniaNCT05069142
Peri-Operative Rehab Program for Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery
A study testing Rehabilitation in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries, with more than 20 million performed globally each year. It is estimated that approximately 15% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair will experience persistent post-surgical pain that could last months to years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Inguinal Hernia
- What is being tested?
- Rehabilitation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2022to 9 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Scheduled to undergo first-time inguinal hernia repair surgery after a physical examination identified signs and symptoms consistent with inguinal hernia (direct or indirect hernia)
- Willingness to participate in a targeted peri-operative exercise program
- 18+ years of age
- No medical contraindications to participation in exercise
- Employed full-time and required to lift at least 10kg for work
Who cannot join
- Previous inguinal hernia
- Body Mass Index >35 since morbidly obese patients experience more surgical complications
- Specific contra-indications that will be screened for include associated medical conditions that preclude exercise, this includes uncontrolled medical conditions including diabetes, hypertension, vertigo, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intra-abdominal ascites, or pre-existing malnutrition. We will also screen for use or narcotics, bone and joint conditions of the spine or extremities, or history of other abdominal surgeries.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Study Evaluating the Feasibility of a Peri-Operative Rehabilitation Program for Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery to Reduce Risk of Post-Surgical Pain
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries, with more than 20 million performed globally each year. It is estimated that approximately 15% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair will experience persistent post-surgical pain that could last months to years. Evidence from related procedures indicates that better surgical preparation through pre-operative exercise and education (i.e. Prehabilitation) followed by ongoing post-surgical rehabilitation leads to more rapid recovery, return to activities and lower likelihood of persistent post-surgical pain. The investigators will determine the feasibility of a peri-operative rehabilitation program (pre- and post-surgery) and our study protocol for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery. The investigators hypothesize that: 1) our peri-operative intervention will be feasible and safe to undertake within a clinical setting; 2) adequate numbers will be enrolled to justify a larger trial; and that 3) our outcome measurement protocol will provide meaningful information with high response rate and low attrition after 3 months.
Read the detailed description
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries performed globally, with more than 20 million performed each year. Not only does this huge number of surgeries have a substantial direct economic burden on healthcare systems, there is also indirect impact from time off work and decreased productivity due ongoing post-surgical pain requiring extended time spent on modified duties. It is estimated that approximately 15% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair will experience persistent post-surgical pain that could last months to years. Furthermore, current clinical guidelines for return to work and activity after inguinal hernia repair are inconsistently informed by evidence, highly variable, and outdated. Forbes et al (2012) found that the average patient undergoing inguinal hernia repair experiences more than 40 days of short-term disability despite indications that earlier return to activity is safe (i.e. will not lead to repair failure) and likely beneficial for reducing chronic pain and disability.
Evidence from related procedures indicates that better surgical preparation through pre-operative exercise and education (i.e. Prehabilitation) followed by ongoing post-surgical rehabilitation leads to more rapid recovery, return to activities and lower likelihood of persistent post-surgical pain. Prehabilitation was first described in the 1940's when the British Army developed a prehabilitation program as part of an experiment to increase the quality of recruits. The concept of prehabilitation gained traction within the medical community when Topp et. al. and Ditmyer et. al. promoted a theoretical model of prehabilitation, positing that patients who participate in presurgical exercise with the goal of improving functional capacity may experience more rapid postoperative recovery than patients who remain physically inactive through the preoperative period. Prehab has also been shown to increase self-efficacy, a moderator of pain catastrophizing and fear avoidance beliefs, that are important factors linked to the pain experience of those with persistent pain. The investigators propose that this theoretical model can be extrapolated to inguinal hernia repair and theorize that prehabilitation will increase patients' preoperative self-efficacy, allowing them to more rapidly regain abilities, subsequently shortening duration of modified duties and decreasing likelihood of persistent post-surgical pain.
Little information is available regarding the use of prehabilitation in the context of inguinal hernia repair. There have been numerous studies looking at prehabilitation in orthopedics, cardiovascular surgery, and prior to major abdominal surgeries, but limited studies for inguinal hernia repair. A randomized control study by Liang et. al. examined the impact of prehabilitation on ventral hernia recurrence and post-operative complications. They concluded that patients undergoing prehabilitation have a higher likelihood of being hernia-free and complication-free 30 days postoperatively. Notably, this study is limited in that only obese patients were included, and outcomes only included recurrence and complications. No studies were located examining the impact of prehabilitation on recovery time, post-surgical pain, and return to activity after inguinal hernia repair. However psychosocial factors such as pain catastrophizing appear to be important predictors. Typical practice guidelines often recommend limiting activity for at least 3 months to avoid re-rupture. However, these guidelines are based on expert opinion due to a lack of quality research and can pose a risk in building unhelpful beliefs about pain, fear of movement and poor coping strategies. Research is needed to inform practice guidelines and return-to-activity recommendations.
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Being tested
- Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, prehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Inguinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RehabilitationOther
Pre- and post-operative exercise and education.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | 15 participants will be randomly selected to the intervention group. These individuals will receive six weeks of pre-operative exercise instruction and education, as well as six weeks of graduated post-operative exercise instruction, beginning at three weeks post-op with the surgeons clearance. Receives: Other: Rehabilitation |
| Control group | No intervention | 15 participants will be randomly selected to the control group. This group will receive pre-operative education in the form of videos regarding the procedure and pain. They will not receive exercise instruction. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analogue Pain Scale
Post-surgical pain intensity ratings will be measured on a 0-100mm Visual Analogue Scale, a valid measure of pain intensity.
Measured: 3 Months after the operation
Secondary outcomes (2)
Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS)
Post-surgical pain quality will be measured using the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), a questionnaire for evaluating pain and sensations experienced by patients after inguinal hernia operations.
Measured: 3 Months after the operation
Change in scores on the Short-Form Functional Capacity Evaluation
The Short-Form Functional Capacity Evaluation is a performance-based test of work function. In this test, patients are tested on 5 key activities of work performance (lifting, standing, trunk rotation, crouching, forward trunk flexion). Performance on each scale is compared to required job demands and the number of "failed" items is summed (0 to 5 failures). Short-Form Functional Capacity Evaluation is a valid indicator of work ability that has been found predictive of future work ability.
Measured: Changes between baseline to three months after the operation.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Oct 2021
- Study start1 Jan 2022
- Primary completion12 Oct 2022
- Study completion9 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Inguinal HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Pilot Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05069142
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00106451
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Since this is a pilot study we have no plans to share IPD with other researchers
Publications
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
PubMed 29330835van Hanswijck de Jonge P, Lloyd A, Horsfall L, Tan R, O'Dwyer PJ. The measurement of chronic pain and health-related quality of life following inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature. Hernia. 2008 Dec;12(6):561-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0412-y. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
PubMed 18716856Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA. A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain. 2003 Jan-Feb;19(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200301000-00006.
PubMed 12514456Cabilan CJ, Hines S, Munday J. The effectiveness of prehabilitation or preoperative exercise for surgical patients: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):146-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1885.
PubMed 26447015Lundberg M, Archer KR, Larsson C, Rydwik E. Prehabilitation: The Emperor's New Clothes or a New Arena for Physical Therapists? Phys Ther. 2019 Feb 1;99(2):127-130. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy133. No abstract available.
PubMed 30508203Topp R, Ditmyer M, King K, Doherty K, Hornyak J 3rd. The effect of bed rest and potential of prehabilitation on patients in the intensive care unit. AACN Clin Issues. 2002 May;13(2):263-76. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200205000-00011.
PubMed 12011598Ditmyer MM, Topp R, Pifer M. Prehabilitation in preparation for orthopaedic surgery. Orthop Nurs. 2002 Sep-Oct;21(5):43-51; quiz 52-4. doi: 10.1097/00006416-200209000-00008.
PubMed 12432699Liang MK, Bernardi K, Holihan JL, Cherla DV, Escamilla R, Lew DF, Berger DH, Ko TC, Kao LS. Modifying Risks in Ventral Hernia Patients With Prehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Oct;268(4):674-680. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002961.
PubMed 30048306Nienhuijs SW, Rosman C, Strobbe LJ, Wolff A, Bleichrodt RP. An overview of the features influencing pain after inguinal hernia repair. Int J Surg. 2008 Aug;6(4):351-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
PubMed 18450528Sobol-Kwapinska M, Babel P, Plotek W, Stelcer B. Psychological correlates of acute postsurgical pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2016 Nov;20(10):1573-1586. doi: 10.1002/ejp.886. Epub 2016 May 2.
PubMed 27136510Schug SA, Lavand'homme P, Barke A, Korwisi B, Rief W, Treede RD; IASP Taskforce for the Classification of Chronic Pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain. Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):45-52. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001413.
PubMed 30586070Yeo AE, Berney CR. Carolinas Comfort Scale for mesh repair of inguinal hernia. ANZ J Surg. 2012 Apr;82(4):285-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06012.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 22510195Heniford BT, Lincourt AE, Walters AL, Colavita PD, Belyansky I, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Augenstein VA. Carolinas Comfort Scale as a Measure of Hernia Repair Quality of Life: A Reappraisal Utilizing 3788 International Patients. Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):171-176. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002027.
PubMed 27655239Shologan A, Farooq O, Bostick G, Macedo L, Durand-Moreau Q, Peters MR, Gross DP. A pilot randomized controlled trial examining the feasibility of perioperative rehabilitation for inguinal hernia repair surgery. PLoS One. 2025 May 22;20(5):e0324907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324907. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 40403095
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study Evaluating the Feasibility of a Peri-Operative Rehabilitation Program for Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery to Reduce Risk of Post-Surgical Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05069142
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00106451
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, prehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries, with more than 20 million performed globally each year. It is estimated that approximately 15% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair will experience persistent post-surgical pain that could last months to years. Evidence from related procedures indicates that better surgical preparation through pre-operative exercise and education (i.e. Prehabilitation) followed by ongoing post-surgical rehabilitation leads to more rapid recovery, return to activities and lower likelihood of persistent post-surgical pain. The investigators will determine the feasibility of a peri-operative rehabilitation program (pre- and post-surgery) and our study protocol for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery. The investigators hypothesize that: 1) our peri-operative intervention will be feasible and safe to undertake within a clinical setting; 2) adequate numbers will be enrolled to justify a larger trial; and that 3) our outcome measurement protocol will provide meaningful information with high response rate and low attrition after 3 months.
Detailed description
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries performed globally, with more than 20 million performed each year. Not only does this huge number of surgeries have a substantial direct economic burden on healthcare systems, there is also indirect impact from time off work and decreased productivity due ongoing post-surgical pain requiring extended time spent on modified duties. It is estimated that approximately 15% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair will experience persistent post-surgical pain that could last months to years. Furthermore, current clinical guidelines for return to work and activity after inguinal hernia repair are inconsistently informed by evidence, highly variable, and outdated. Forbes et al (2012) found that the average patient undergoing inguinal hernia repair experiences more than 40 days of short-term disability despite indications that earlier return to activity is safe (i.e. will not lead to repair failure) and likely beneficial for reducing chronic pain and disability.
Evidence from related procedures indicates that better surgical preparation through pre-operative exercise and education (i.e. Prehabilitation) followed by ongoing post-surgical rehabilitation leads to more rapid recovery, return to activities and lower likelihood of persistent post-surgical pain. Prehabilitation was first described in the 1940's when the British Army developed a prehabilitation program as part of an experiment to increase the quality of recruits. The concept of prehabilitation gained traction within the medical community when Topp et. al. and Ditmyer et. al. promoted a theoretical model of prehabilitation, positing that patients who participate in presurgical exercise with the goal of improving functional capacity may experience more rapid postoperative recovery than patients who remain physically inactive through the preoperative period. Prehab has also been shown to increase self-efficacy, a moderator of pain catastrophizing and fear avoidance beliefs, that are important factors linked to the pain experience of those with persistent pain. The investigators propose that this theoretical model can be extrapolated to inguinal hernia repair and theorize that prehabilitation will increase patients' preoperative self-efficacy, allowing them to more rapidly regain abilities, subsequently shortening duration of modified duties and decreasing likelihood of persistent post-surgical pain.
Little information is available regarding the use of prehabilitation in the context of inguinal hernia repair. There have been numerous studies looking at prehabilitation in orthopedics, cardiovascular surgery, and prior to major abdominal surgeries, but limited studies for inguinal hernia repair. A randomized control study by Liang et. al. examined the impact of prehabilitation on ventral hernia recurrence and post-operative complications. They concluded that patients undergoing prehabilitation have a higher likelihood of being hernia-free and complication-free 30 days postoperatively. Notably, this study is limited in that only obese patients were included, and outcomes only included recurrence and complications. No studies were located examining the impact of prehabilitation on recovery time, post-surgical pain, and return to activity after inguinal hernia repair. However psychosocial factors such as pain catastrophizing appear to be important predictors. Typical practice guidelines often recommend limiting activity for at least 3 months to avoid re-rupture. However, these guidelines are based on expert opinion due to a lack of quality research and can pose a risk in building unhelpful beliefs about pain, fear of movement and poor coping strategies. Research is needed to inform practice guidelines and return-to-activity recommendations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Pilot Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Other: Rehabilitation15 participants will be randomly selected to the intervention group. These individuals will receive six weeks of pre-operative exercise instruction and education, as well as six weeks of graduated post-operative exercise instruction, beginning at three weeks post-op with the surgeons clearance. |
| Control group | No intervention | –15 participants will be randomly selected to the control group. This group will receive pre-operative education in the form of videos regarding the procedure and pain. They will not receive exercise instruction. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Scheduled to undergo first-time inguinal hernia repair surgery after a physical examination identified signs and symptoms consistent with inguinal hernia (direct or indirect hernia)
- Willingness to participate in a targeted peri-operative exercise program
- 18+ years of age
- No medical contraindications to participation in exercise
- Employed full-time and required to lift at least 10kg for work
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Previous inguinal hernia
- Body Mass Index >35 since morbidly obese patients experience more surgical complications
- Specific contra-indications that will be screened for include associated medical conditions that preclude exercise, this includes uncontrolled medical conditions including diabetes, hypertension, vertigo, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intra-abdominal ascites, or pre-existing malnutrition. We will also screen for use or narcotics, bone and joint conditions of the spine or extremities, or history of other abdominal surgeries.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RehabilitationPre- and post-operative exercise and education. | Other | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Visual Analogue Pain Scale
Time frame: 3 Months after the operation
Post-surgical pain intensity ratings will be measured on a 0-100mm Visual Analogue Scale, a valid measure of pain intensity.
2 secondary outcomes
Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS)
Time frame: 3 Months after the operation
Change in scores on the Short-Form Functional Capacity Evaluation
Time frame: Changes between baseline to three months after the operation.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2023.
- Background: PubMed 29330835HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
- Background: PubMed 18716856van Hanswijck de Jonge P, Lloyd A, Horsfall L, Tan R, O'Dwyer PJ. The measurement of chronic pain and health-related quality of life following inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature. Hernia. 2008 Dec;12(6):561-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0412-y. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
- Background: PubMed 12514456Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA. A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain. 2003 Jan-Feb;19(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200301000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 26447015Cabilan CJ, Hines S, Munday J. The effectiveness of prehabilitation or preoperative exercise for surgical patients: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):146-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1885.
- Background: PubMed 30508203Lundberg M, Archer KR, Larsson C, Rydwik E. Prehabilitation: The Emperor's New Clothes or a New Arena for Physical Therapists? Phys Ther. 2019 Feb 1;99(2):127-130. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy133. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12011598Topp R, Ditmyer M, King K, Doherty K, Hornyak J 3rd. The effect of bed rest and potential of prehabilitation on patients in the intensive care unit. AACN Clin Issues. 2002 May;13(2):263-76. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200205000-00011.
- Background: PubMed 12432699Ditmyer MM, Topp R, Pifer M. Prehabilitation in preparation for orthopaedic surgery. Orthop Nurs. 2002 Sep-Oct;21(5):43-51; quiz 52-4. doi: 10.1097/00006416-200209000-00008.
- Background: PubMed 30048306Liang MK, Bernardi K, Holihan JL, Cherla DV, Escamilla R, Lew DF, Berger DH, Ko TC, Kao LS. Modifying Risks in Ventral Hernia Patients With Prehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Oct;268(4):674-680. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002961.
- Background: PubMed 18450528Nienhuijs SW, Rosman C, Strobbe LJ, Wolff A, Bleichrodt RP. An overview of the features influencing pain after inguinal hernia repair. Int J Surg. 2008 Aug;6(4):351-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
- Background: PubMed 27136510Sobol-Kwapinska M, Babel P, Plotek W, Stelcer B. Psychological correlates of acute postsurgical pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2016 Nov;20(10):1573-1586. doi: 10.1002/ejp.886. Epub 2016 May 2.
- Background: PubMed 30586070Schug SA, Lavand'homme P, Barke A, Korwisi B, Rief W, Treede RD; IASP Taskforce for the Classification of Chronic Pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain. Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):45-52. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001413.
- Background: PubMed 22510195Yeo AE, Berney CR. Carolinas Comfort Scale for mesh repair of inguinal hernia. ANZ J Surg. 2012 Apr;82(4):285-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06012.x. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Since this is a pilot study we have no plans to share IPD with other researchers
Related trials for Inguinal Hernia
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Laryngeal Mask Airway vs Endotracheal Tube on Hypothermia in Laparoscopic Hernia Surgery
Perioperative Hypothermia, Hernia, Inguinal
Not yet recruiting
Bassini Repair Versus Desarda Technique in Urgent Complicated Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of a New Laparoscopic Non-mesh Hernia Needle Set Designed for Indirect Inguinal Hernia
Inguinal Hernia, Without Mention of Obstruction or Gangrene
Recruiting
Desarda Tissue Technique vs Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia Unilateral, Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care
Active, not recruiting
Urinary Catheterization Versus No Catheterization in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernias
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rehabilitation in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analogue Pain Scale (time frame: 3 Months after the operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05069142, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2023.