AzTrials
AzTrials

ChalazionNCT05070611

Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalazia

A study testing IPL-MGX in people with Chalazion, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of intense pulse light and meibomian glands expression in cases of recurrent chalazion after surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 24 to 74 years
Conditions the study is for
Chalazion
What is being tested?
IPL-MGX
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
35 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jul 2020to 1 Nov 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 24 to 74 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients had chronic unilateral recurrent chalazia that failed to resolve after conservative treatment that included warm compresses and antibiotic and steroid ophthalmic ointments.

Who cannot join

  • (1) any intraocular inflammation, ocular infection, allergy, ocular surgery, or ocular trauma in the past 6 months; (2) any eyelid diseases or structural abnormality; (3) any systematic diseases may lead to dry eye or MGD; (4) skin cancer or pigmented lesion in the treatment zone.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Hospital

    Hangzhou

    zhu y rui, 15868805518, zhuyirui001@126.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of intense pulse light and meibomian glands expression in cases of recurrent chalazion after surgery.

Read the detailed description

We hypothesized that IPL application on the skin adjacent to eyelids after chalazion surgery will result in better meibomian gland function and lower recurrence. To date, it has not been previously reported the outcomes of the use of this technology for the management of chalazions recurrence. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of intense pulse light and meibomian glands expression in cases of recurrent chalazion after surgery.

Conditions
Chalazion
Being tested
IPL-MGX
Keywords
Chalazion, IPL, Meibomian gland function
Medical subject headings
Chalazion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IPL-MGXDevice

    One week after lesion incision, the E-Eye machine (E-SWIN company, France) IPL treatment was administered to the skin area below the lower eyelid.13 Before treatment, the eyes were protected with opaque goggles and ultrasound gel was applied on the patient's face from tragus to tragus including the nose to conduct the light.

Study groups in NCT05070611
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Recurrent chalazia with IPL-MGXExperimentalThe patients whose lesions had failed to respond to warm compresses and antibiotic and steroid treatment underwent incision and curettage. One week after lesion incision, the E-Eye machine (E-SWIN company, France) IPL treatment was administered to the skin area below the lower eyelid. After removal of the ultrasound gel, meibomian gland expression (MGX) was performed with forceps-shaped meibomian gland compressor.
Receives: Device: IPL-MGX

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recurrence rate of chalazia

    The recurrence rate of the recurrent chalazia

    Measured: an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. NITBUT

    non-invasive tear film breakup time

    Measured: an average of 1 year

  2. meibomian expressibility and quality

    The expressibility and quality score of the meibum

    Measured: an average of 1 year

  3. TMH

    tear meniscus height

    Measured: an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2021
  2. Study start1 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2020
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
35 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05070611
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-0562
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
9 Sep 2021
Last updated
7 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing IPL-MGX in people with Chalazion, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact jin x ming (13989455778, 18344980413@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recurrence rate of chalazia (time frame: an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in