Chronic PainPhase 2MERITNCT05071547
Guided Internet-delivered Psychological Treatment for Chronic Pain
A Phase 2 study testing Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program (IPRP) in people with Chronic Pain, run by Linkoeping University.
Trial summary
The aim of this feasibility study is to investigate if an addition of an internet-delivered psychological treatment, Acceptance and commitment therapy (IACT), can enhance the effect of an existing evidence-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program (IRPR) for chronic pain patients enrolled in clinical tertiary… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program (IPRP)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2010to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- chronic pain (ie consistent for 6 months), w/out common comorbid or multimorbid diagnoses
- awaiting start of IPRP after medical and psychiatric assessment
- completion of informed consent and pre-measurement forms
Who cannot join
- unable to communicate in writing in Swedish
- lack access to a smart phone, tablet or computer
About this study
Official title: Internet-Delivered Acceptance And Commitment Therapy Added To Multimodal Pain Rehabilitation: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Pilot And Feasibility Trial
The aim of this feasibility study is to investigate if an addition of an internet-delivered psychological treatment, Acceptance and commitment therapy (IACT), can enhance the effect of an existing evidence-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program (IRPR) for chronic pain patients enrolled in clinical tertiary care, on pain-related psychological outcomes. The study might contribute to developing internet-delivered treatments suitable for this patient group and also help develop implementation strategies for internet interventions in clinical services. The study is planned to run for 2 years and include 300 patients, of which 150 will be in the intervention group and 150 in the control condition.
The overall hypothesis is that the IACT addition will lead to better and more sustained results compared to the IRPR alone. The first sub-hypothesis is that the IACT addition will enhance adherence and uptake during the IRPR. The second sub-hypothesis is that the IACT addition will help patients maintain results after the IRPR has ended.
Read the detailed description
The trial is an un-blinded single-center randomized controlled trial with two parallel study groups set at a clinical service in regular care at a University Hospital. An online true random-number service (www.random.org) executed by a research assistant not otherwise involved in the trial, will allocate participants, with 1:1 allocation ratio, upon enrollment. Patients will be recruited from a specialist pain clinic which provides tertiary care (IPRP) for non-malign chronic pain with mild to moderate psychiatric comorbidities and serves as competence center for complex chronic pain in its City Council in southern Sweden. As an active comparator will be used as the control condition, an effect size of d=0.30 (specific component comparator was expected. Given 80 % power and a 5% significance level, the sample size calculation indicated that 90 participants in each group were needed. Considering a 50% dropout rate, a sample size of 135 participants in each group would be sufficient. The study planned to include n=300. Outcome variables will be collected digitally on 4 occasions; at pre and post treatment, at post aftercare intervention and at 1 year follow up. Additional complementary pen-and-paper data will be drawn from a national register (the SQRP) at three occasions; at pre-baseline/enrollment, at post treatment and at 1 year follow up. Outcome measures include psychological outcomes: pain acceptance, psychological inflexibility, self-efficacy, harm/negative effects and psychosocial consequences of living with pain. Also, measures of cost-effectiveness, usability, dose and time spent will be collected. Patients with long pain duration, high pain intensity, overuse of analgesics, alcohol or opioids, social withdrawnness, depression, or previous treatment failures constitute high risk of attrition. Early signs of attrition will be monitored by delayed response frequency. A plan to prevent attrition will be set at the inclusion assessment. As long as participant follow the IPRP through, data will likely be collected and there will be opportunities to discuss or prevent drop-out. Data will be entered and stored digitally. The process is monitored by a responsible research assistant who will also alert the research time of missing data. Access to study data will be restricted to the research team.The two study arms will be compared using parametric methods for data analysis or other methods depending on the robustness of the data. Missing data will be handled depending on the robustness of the data, assessed by Little MCAR test. Intention to treat analysis is an opportunity given the missing is not more than 40 %. Mixed models may be an option given missing data is not random. The steering committee will act as data monitoring committee (the lead investigator excluded) and will decide of interim analyses and execute stopping guidelines. The research assistant responsible for data management will alert the steering committee if collected data on negative experiences of treatment signals that any participant needs additional care related to experiences of the trial. Any modifications to the protocol which may impact on the study, will be agreed on within the research group. These changes will be either documented to be addressed at publication or communicated with the regional Ethical board if needed. Written informed consent will be obtained as pre-measurement are collected. An oral consent will be obtained prior to that, during the assessment interview, whereas participants may ask for further information. All recruited participants will be given an identification number. As little personal information as possible (e.g. only informed consent forms) will be kept locally as the majority of participants' information will be digital, secured with password-protected access systems. The research team members will be given access to the cleaned data set. To ensure confidentiality, data dispersed to project team members will be blinded of any identifying participant information. The steering committee will have access to the un-cleaned data set. Post-trial care will be given by IPRP staff when needed.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program (IPRP)
- Keywords
- Internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (IACT), Interdisciplinary pain Rehabilitation Program (IRPR), Aftercare, Combined treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)Behavioural
ACT builds on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and includes methods for experiential learning and focus on psychological flexibility
Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program (IPRP)Other
Multimodal treatment where physio therapists, occupational therapists, psychologists and physicians give synchronized treatments to raise physical and psychological function and promote return to work
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy addition | Experimental | The IACT addition supplies participants with weekly educational material and additional exercises in line with live IRPR, although enriched with multimedia. Participants will have access to their rehabilitation content via the web-site and can practice in their homes in-between live sessions of IRPR. Receives: Behavioral: Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) |
| Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program | Active comparator | A 6-week long multimodal treatment including approximately 108 hours on site, focusing on return to work. Psychologists, physicians, physiotherapists (PT) and occupational therapists (OT) give synchronized treatments with a CBT/ACT approach. Receives: Other: Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program (IPRP) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in pain acceptance (The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, CPAQ)
CPAQ is a measure of pain acceptance with 20 items rated on a 6-point scale ranging from "never true" to "always true" and divided into two subscales: activity engagement and pain willingness. CPAQ has been validated for a Swedish sample and for an internet sample. Studies have shown high test-retest reliability (α=0.72-0.92).
Measured: Week 0 (pre treatment), week 6 (post treatment), week 17 (post aftercare) and at 1 year follow up.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in psychological inflexibility (Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale, PIPS)
Twelve items are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from "never true" to "always true" and divided into two subscales: Avoidance and Cognitive fusion. Higher score means higher psychological inflexibility. PIPS has been found a valid and reliable measure which may function as a working mechanism in ACT for chronic pain
Measured: Week 0 (pre treatment), week 6 (post treatment), week 17 (post aftercare) and at 1 year follow up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2021
- Study start1 Nov 2010
- Primary completion1 May 2014
- Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Linkoeping UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Upon acceptance and after informed consent has been obtained, participants are consecutively randomized to one of two study groups.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Linkoeping University
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nina Bendelin, Linkoeping University
- Investigators
- Björn Gerdle, PhD, Study director, Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05071547
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2010/186-31
- Acronym
- MERIT
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 10 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Internet-Delivered Acceptance And Commitment Therapy Added To Multimodal Pain Rehabilitation: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Pilot And Feasibility Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05071547
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MERIT / 2010/186-31
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Keywords
- Internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (IACT), Interdisciplinary pain Rehabilitation Program (IRPR), Aftercare, Combined treatment
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Linkoeping UniversityOther government
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this feasibility study is to investigate if an addition of an internet-delivered psychological treatment, Acceptance and commitment therapy (IACT), can enhance the effect of an existing evidence-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program (IRPR) for chronic pain patients enrolled in clinical tertiary care, on pain-related psychological outcomes. The study might contribute to developing internet-delivered treatments suitable for this patient group and also help develop implementation strategies for internet interventions in clinical services. The study is planned to run for 2 years and include 300 patients, of which 150 will be in the intervention group and 150 in the control condition.
The overall hypothesis is that the IACT addition will lead to better and more sustained results compared to the IRPR alone. The first sub-hypothesis is that the IACT addition will enhance adherence and uptake during the IRPR. The second sub-hypothesis is that the IACT addition will help patients maintain results after the IRPR has ended.
Detailed description
The trial is an un-blinded single-center randomized controlled trial with two parallel study groups set at a clinical service in regular care at a University Hospital. An online true random-number service (www.random.org) executed by a research assistant not otherwise involved in the trial, will allocate participants, with 1:1 allocation ratio, upon enrollment. Patients will be recruited from a specialist pain clinic which provides tertiary care (IPRP) for non-malign chronic pain with mild to moderate psychiatric comorbidities and serves as competence center for complex chronic pain in its City Council in southern Sweden. As an active comparator will be used as the control condition, an effect size of d=0.30 (specific component comparator was expected. Given 80 % power and a 5% significance level, the sample size calculation indicated that 90 participants in each group were needed. Considering a 50% dropout rate, a sample size of 135 participants in each group would be sufficient. The study planned to include n=300. Outcome variables will be collected digitally on 4 occasions; at pre and post treatment, at post aftercare intervention and at 1 year follow up. Additional complementary pen-and-paper data will be drawn from a national register (the SQRP) at three occasions; at pre-baseline/enrollment, at post treatment and at 1 year follow up. Outcome measures include psychological outcomes: pain acceptance, psychological inflexibility, self-efficacy, harm/negative effects and psychosocial consequences of living with pain. Also, measures of cost-effectiveness, usability, dose and time spent will be collected. Patients with long pain duration, high pain intensity, overuse of analgesics, alcohol or opioids, social withdrawnness, depression, or previous treatment failures constitute high risk of attrition. Early signs of attrition will be monitored by delayed response frequency. A plan to prevent attrition will be set at the inclusion assessment. As long as participant follow the IPRP through, data will likely be collected and there will be opportunities to discuss or prevent drop-out. Data will be entered and stored digitally. The process is monitored by a responsible research assistant who will also alert the research time of missing data. Access to study data will be restricted to the research team.The two study arms will be compared using parametric methods for data analysis or other methods depending on the robustness of the data. Missing data will be handled depending on the robustness of the data, assessed by Little MCAR test. Intention to treat analysis is an opportunity given the missing is not more than 40 %. Mixed models may be an option given missing data is not random. The steering committee will act as data monitoring committee (the lead investigator excluded) and will decide of interim analyses and execute stopping guidelines. The research assistant responsible for data management will alert the steering committee if collected data on negative experiences of treatment signals that any participant needs additional care related to experiences of the trial. Any modifications to the protocol which may impact on the study, will be agreed on within the research group. These changes will be either documented to be addressed at publication or communicated with the regional Ethical board if needed. Written informed consent will be obtained as pre-measurement are collected. An oral consent will be obtained prior to that, during the assessment interview, whereas participants may ask for further information. All recruited participants will be given an identification number. As little personal information as possible (e.g. only informed consent forms) will be kept locally as the majority of participants' information will be digital, secured with password-protected access systems. The research team members will be given access to the cleaned data set. To ensure confidentiality, data dispersed to project team members will be blinded of any identifying participant information. The steering committee will have access to the un-cleaned data set. Post-trial care will be given by IPRP staff when needed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Upon acceptance and after informed consent has been obtained, participants are consecutively randomized to one of two study groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy addition | Experimental | Behavioral: Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)The IACT addition supplies participants with weekly educational material and additional exercises in line with live IRPR, although enriched with multimedia. Participants will have access to their rehabilitation content via the web-site and can practice in their homes in-between live sessions of IRPR. |
| Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program | Active comparator | Other: Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program (IPRP)A 6-week long multimodal treatment including approximately 108 hours on site, focusing on return to work. Psychologists, physicians, physiotherapists (PT) and occupational therapists (OT) give synchronized treatments with a CBT/ACT approach. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- chronic pain (ie consistent for 6 months), w/out common comorbid or multimorbid diagnoses
- awaiting start of IPRP after medical and psychiatric assessment
- completion of informed consent and pre-measurement forms
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- unable to communicate in writing in Swedish
- lack access to a smart phone, tablet or computer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)ACT builds on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and includes methods for experiential learning and focus on psychological flexibility | Behavioural | Internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy addition |
| Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program (IPRP)Multimodal treatment where physio therapists, occupational therapists, psychologists and physicians give synchronized treatments to raise physical and psychological function and promote return to work | Other | Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program |
Primary outcome
Change in pain acceptance (The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, CPAQ)
Time frame: Week 0 (pre treatment), week 6 (post treatment), week 17 (post aftercare) and at 1 year follow up.
CPAQ is a measure of pain acceptance with 20 items rated on a 6-point scale ranging from "never true" to "always true" and divided into two subscales: activity engagement and pain willingness. CPAQ has been validated for a Swedish sample and for an internet sample. Studies have shown high test-retest reliability (α=0.72-0.92).
1 secondary outcome
Change in psychological inflexibility (Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale, PIPS)
Time frame: Week 0 (pre treatment), week 6 (post treatment), week 17 (post aftercare) and at 1 year follow up.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Björn Gerdle, PhD study director
Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program (IPRP) in people with Chronic Pain, run by Linkoeping University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in pain acceptance (The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, CPAQ) (time frame: Week 0 (pre treatment), week 6 (post treatment), week 17 (post aftercare) and at 1 year follow up.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2021.