AzTrials
AzTrials

Long-term CareNCT05073146

Quality Management of Reablement Service by Professionals in Taiwan: Review and Analysis

An observational study of Long-term Care, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Since the Ministry of Health and Welfare promoted long-term care 2.0 in 2017, it has actively flipped the concept of care. The long-term care professional service added the spirit of self-care, emphasized the dignity and autonomy of the elderly, and provided professional services (including reablement services) to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Long-term Care
What is being tested?
interview
How many people
151 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Dec 2021to 3 Nov 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Model cases (long-term professional service users, hereinafter referred to as professional service users, and their family members or main caregivers) and long-term professional service providers of model cases.

Who may be able to join

  • (1) The care management specialist or case manager of the A-level unit (community integrated service center) or the B-level unit (combined service center) judged to be an effective professional service user who has reached the age of 20 (e.g. : Decline in the level of disability, decrease in the number of hours of care required, decrease in the burden of caregivers, etc.) and their family members or main caregivers.
  • (2) The cognitive status and language ability of professional service users are acceptable for face-to-face (or video) interviews. If the professional service user is a case where a research team such as a dementia patient determines that the cognitive state cannot be interviewed, it will be replaced by interviewing the long-term professional service experience of the family or the main caregiver.
  • (3) Understand the research content and agree to accept the interview.
  • (1) The main caregivers of professional service users who have reached the age of 20, and their cognitive and language skills are acceptable for face-to-face (or video) interviews
  • (2) Relevant professional service providers (including but not limited to: case managers, care managers, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses, home care service supervisors, caring service supervisor, home service assistants, etc.)
  • (3) Understand the research content and agree to accept the interview.

Who cannot join

  • N/A
  • Caregivers and professionals
  • The cognitive status and language ability of the main caregivers in the families of professional service users are not acceptable for face-to-face interviews.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • College of Medicine, National Taiwan University

    Taipei, Taiwan, 10051

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Since the Ministry of Health and Welfare promoted long-term care 2.0 in 2017, it has actively flipped the concept of care. The long-term care professional service added the spirit of self-care, emphasized the dignity and autonomy of the elderly, and provided professional services (including reablement services) to enhance the individual's ability to live independently. However, the use of professional services may be controversial due to unclear understanding of the purpose and service mode of professional services and lack of preparation, vertical (county and city governments, community integrated service centers (A-level units), long-term care service units, etc.) and horizontal cross-professional cooperation is rare, the effectiveness of professional services is unclear, and issues of service quality management also need attention. Therefore, there is an urgent need to integrate the current implementation content and service personnel qualifications of professional services, improve the knowledge of professional service personnel, strengthen the links between county and city governments, A-level units, and long-term care service units, and improve the quality of professional services.

The purpose of this plan is to set up experts and working groups, revise the professional service manuals, develop long-term professional service operation guidelines, review the long-term professional service payment system, and develop professional service quality management mechanisms to provide reference for policy planning.

Read more

Researchers will achieve their goals through the following methods:

  1. Establish an interdisciplinary, academic and practical expert working group, professional service manual/operation guide revising group, and hold meetings. Researchers will also review professional service manuals and operational guidelines for the drafts of professional services, and the payment system and the improvement mechanism of service quality, etc.
  2. Review domestic and foreign documents: four countries including Norway, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Japan. Researchers will compare the long-term care professional service or reablement service models of various countries, and serve as follow-up experts to revise professional service manuals, operating guidelines, and basis for professional service execution and quality management mode.
  3. Achievement analysis of model cases: based on the extended case method of qualitative research, it is expected to solicit high-quality model long-term care professional service units, and in-depth collection of relevant information on the characteristics, process and results of the case homes and service units of successful cases of long-term professional services, conduct ethnographic research and benchmarking, understand the operation of the domestic model, as a follow-up reference for the various tasks of this project .
  4. Based on the above-mentioned literature review, model case analysis, expert writing, and multiple meetings, develop a long-term professional service manual/long-term professional service operation guidelines, and propose an amendment draft.
  5. Suggestions for the review of the payment system for long-term care professional services: methods include the above-mentioned literature review, establishment of an expert group, case visits, analysis of results of typical cases, and discussions on the draft and different payment methods of various care packages and classification of different payment cases, obtain group consensus through the Delphi method, and conduct pros and cons analysis.
  6. Conduct simulation verification for the service payment method draft and different payment case classifications, visit cases (including cases with different disability levels or characteristics), and analyze the verification results and make recommendations for revision.
  7. Based on the above literature review, analysis of the results of model cases and discussions at expert meetings, develop professional service quality evaluation and management mechanisms
  8. Produce public version of long-term professional service manual/long-term professional service operation guide for lecture notes and educational training media, and handle seven sessions of education training in North, Central, South, and East of Taiwan.
Conditions
Long-term Care
Being tested
interview

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • interviewOther

    Starting from the user as an extended starting point, through on-site visits and interviews with relevant personnel, such as personal management, professional service teams, cases, family members, other long-term care service providers (home service assistants), etc., collect relevant information and summarize successful strategies and related elements of long-term professional services (including conditions, demand analysis, service usage, professional team interaction, payment and payment systems, characteristics of case, etc.) of model cases.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Long-Term Care Case-Mix System Score

    Collect and analyze participants' Long-Term Care Case-Mix System Score.

    Measured: 5 months

  2. Multi-Dimensional Assessment Instrument

    Collect and analyze participants' Multi-Dimensional Assessment Instrument Score.

    Measured: 5 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Extended Case interview feedback (Qualitative Research)

    Analyze the number of occurrences of specific words in interview transcript.

    Measured: 5 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Oct 2021
  2. Study start1 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion3 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion3 Nov 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
151 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05073146
Sponsor's protocol ID
202106002RINB
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
25 Aug 2021
Last updated
18 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Long-term Care, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Long-Term Care Case-Mix System Score (time frame: 5 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in