PainPhase 1NCT05074485
Discovery and Analytical Validation of Inflammatory Bio-signatures of the Human Pain Experience
A Phase 1 study testing anakinra and Nociceptive pain challenge in people with Pain, run by Alan Prossin at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The first objective of the study is to evaluate whether a novel bio-signature (derived from a wide range of pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokine activity) will predict pain experienced and also release of underlying endogenous opioid neurotransmitters during an experimental nociceptive pain challenge, which… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- anakinra and Nociceptive pain challenge
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Jul 2021to 7 May 2026
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Obese or non-obese
- Awaiting elective surgery
- Negative urine pregnancy test
Who cannot join
- Active, severe medical or psychiatric illness (per DSM-V)
- History of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms with or without presence of a DSM-V depressive and/or anxiety disorder
- Current or recent (within past 3 months) suicidal thoughts/plans/attempts
- Current or recent (within past 3 months) substance use/abuse/dependence (Note: stable nicotine use is acceptable, non-risky alcohol use is acceptable)
- Active or chronic medical illness (except obesity: either obese or non-obese volunteers can enroll in the study).
- MRI exclusion criteria including presence of non-MRI-safe medical device(s), magnetizable objects in soft tissue, severe claustrophobia, etc.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Recent (past year) PET scan(s).
- Lifetime excessive radiation exposure that would be exclusionary via standards of the local radiation safety committee.
- Current medication treatment that would impact measures of interest.
- Current pregnancy or recent (within the past 2 months) intercourse without an acceptable contraceptive method
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
Alan R Prossin, MD, 713-486-2836, Alan.Prossin@uth.tmc.edu
About this study
The first objective of the study is to evaluate whether a novel bio-signature (derived from a wide range of pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokine activity) will predict pain experienced and also release of underlying endogenous opioid neurotransmitters during an experimental nociceptive pain challenge, which will be performed while simultaneously quantifying mu-opioid receptor activity in the brain via [11C]-carfentanil PET neuroimaging in healthy subjects. Another objective is to evaluate whether an anti-inflammatory drug that reduces activation of IL-1b (minocycline) will perturb the balance between pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 cytokines and effect a reduction in pain experienced (and endogenous opioids released) during the experimental, nociceptive pain challenge. A final objective is to evaluate performance characteristics (sensitivity, accuracy, dynamic range) of the biosignature for the purpose of predicting post-operative pain.
Read the detailed description
Lack of precision in tools that quantify risk and assess presentation of post-operative pain poses substantial burden to prevention and treatment and is a major contributor to the nationwide opioid epidemic. Enhanced precision in post- operative pain care requires quantitative tools that individualize assessment of widely variant human pain experiences, accounting for variance in intensity, threshold, and in both affective and sensory components of pain. No currently available measure is sufficiently sensitive, accurate, and reliable to account for the wide variance in risk or clinical presentation of post-operative pain that is required to impact best practices. To address this unmet need, we will discover (R61 phase) and validate (R33 phase) a novel, fit-for-purpose, objective bio-signature that is sensitive, accurate, and reliable in predicting risk (and presentation) of post-operative pain states following a elective cosmetic surgery (e.g. abdominoplasty), a body contouring surgery frequently performed and associated with post-operative pain.
Evidence suggests it is biologically plausible to develop a bio-signature of the human pain experience that derives from IL-1 family cytokine activity. In animal models, imbalance between pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokines is readily induced pharmacologically and surgically, enhancing pain behavior, central endogenous opioid release, and tolerance to opioid analgesics, all factors that contribute to chronicity. Pharmacologic blockade of pro-nociceptive IL-1 cytokines with soluble IL-1ra reverses the pro-nociceptive effects. Evidence suggests similar relationships exist in humans. Concentration of IL-1b sampled intra-operatively from wound site blood revealed predicts surgical complications and post-operative pain. However, IL-1b (on its own) has not proven sufficiently accurate, sensitive, or reliable to account for the broad inter-individual variance in risk and clinical presentation of human post-operative pain states. In preliminary data from separate regression analyses, neither IL-1b nor IL-1ra significantly predicted pain (intensity or threshold). However, regression models incorporating both IL-1b and IL-1ra showed that imbalance between these 2 factors (pro-nociceptive IL-1bias) synergistically enhanced prediction of pain (intensity and threshold) and underlying endogenous opioid release during a standardized pain challenge, accounting for 20% of the pain variance. IL-1b (pro-nociceptive) was a positive predictor and IL-1ra (anti-nociceptive) a negative predictor of pain. Including additional variance factors (sex, mu-opioid receptor polymorphism, neuroticism) in the model accounted for another 5% of the pain variance. Pain variance factors can impact concentration of additional IL-1 cytokines that regulate IL-1 signaling, suggesting it is both biologically and statistically plausible that incorporating a wide array of IL-1 family cytokines (IL-1b, IL-1ra, IL-1a, sIL-1r1, IL-1RAcP, IL-18, IL-18bp, IL-18Ra, IL-18Rb, IL-36, IL-38, IL-33, sTLR4) into a broader bio-signature of IL-1 family cytokine activity will perform superior to simple measures of IL-1bias (that include only IL-1b and IL-1ra) in predicting the highly heterogeneous human post-operative pain experience.
This study phase focuses on discovery (and analytic validation) of a novel, bio-signature of risk for post-operative pain states and underlying opioid-cytokine interactions. Performance (accuracy, sensitivity, dynamic range) in predicting experimental and post-operative pain will be tested in n=70 healthy humans following elective abdominoplasty.
More Specifically, The first objective of the study is to evaluate whether a novel bio-signature (derived from a wide range of pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokine activity) will predict pain experienced and also release of underlying endogenous opioid neurotransmitters during an experimental nociceptive pain challenge, which will be performed while simultaneously quantifying mu-opioid receptor activity in the brain via [11C]-carfentanil PET neuroimaging in healthy subjects. Another objective is to evaluate whether an anti-inflammatory drug that reduces activation of IL-1b (anakinra) will perturb the balance between pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 cytokines and effect a reduction in pain experienced (and endogenous opioids released) during the experimental, nociceptive pain challenge. A final objective is to evaluate performance characteristics (sensitivity, accuracy, dynamic range) of the biosignature for the purpose of predicting post-operative pain.
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- anakinra, Placebo, Nociceptive pain challenge
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
anakinraDrug
Also called Kineret
intravenous injection of 100 milligrams anakinra
PlaceboDrug
Also called Inert Substance
intravenous injection of 1 milliliter normal saline
Nociceptive pain challengeOther
Also called Pain Induction
The experimental, standardized, nociceptive pain challenge will induce a moderate level of sustained pain. The pain challenge involves a masseteric injection in the left or right jaw muscle of normal saline (0.15 ml bolus of 0.9% normal saline) over a 15 second period followed by continuous infusion via a closed loop infusion system for 20 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge, then anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge | Experimental | Pharmacological challenge (with placebo) plus nociceptive pain challenge, then pharmacological challenge (with anakinra) plus nociceptive pain challenge Receives: Drug: anakinra; Drug: Placebo; Other: Nociceptive pain challenge |
| Anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge, then placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge | Experimental | Pharmacological challenge (with anakinra) plus nociceptive pain challenge, then pharmacological challenge (with placebo) plus nociceptive pain challenge Receives: Drug: anakinra; Drug: Placebo; Other: Nociceptive pain challenge |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Measured: 0 minutes, This represents the study baseline, prior to any brain imaging
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Measured: 90 minutes, upon completion of brain imaging
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Measured: 12 to 24 hours before elective surgery
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Measured: 24 to 48 hours after elective surgery
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Measured: 6 to 8 weeks after elective surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2021
- Study start19 Jul 2021
- Primary completion7 May 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion7 May 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alan Prossin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Alan Prossin, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Investigators
- Alan R Prossin, MD, Principal investigator, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05074485
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSC-MS-19-0627
- Other IDs
- R61NS113316
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Discovery and Analytical Validation of Inflammatory Bio-signatures of the Human Pain Experience
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05074485
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSC-MS-19-0627
- Conditions
- Pain
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Alan ProssinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- 19 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 May 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 7 May 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The first objective of the study is to evaluate whether a novel bio-signature (derived from a wide range of pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokine activity) will predict pain experienced and also release of underlying endogenous opioid neurotransmitters during an experimental nociceptive pain challenge, which will be performed while simultaneously quantifying mu-opioid receptor activity in the brain via [11C]-carfentanil PET neuroimaging in healthy subjects. Another objective is to evaluate whether an anti-inflammatory drug that reduces activation of IL-1b (minocycline) will perturb the balance between pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 cytokines and effect a reduction in pain experienced (and endogenous opioids released) during the experimental, nociceptive pain challenge. A final objective is to evaluate performance characteristics (sensitivity, accuracy, dynamic range) of the biosignature for the purpose of predicting post-operative pain.
Detailed description
Lack of precision in tools that quantify risk and assess presentation of post-operative pain poses substantial burden to prevention and treatment and is a major contributor to the nationwide opioid epidemic. Enhanced precision in post- operative pain care requires quantitative tools that individualize assessment of widely variant human pain experiences, accounting for variance in intensity, threshold, and in both affective and sensory components of pain. No currently available measure is sufficiently sensitive, accurate, and reliable to account for the wide variance in risk or clinical presentation of post-operative pain that is required to impact best practices. To address this unmet need, we will discover (R61 phase) and validate (R33 phase) a novel, fit-for-purpose, objective bio-signature that is sensitive, accurate, and reliable in predicting risk (and presentation) of post-operative pain states following a elective cosmetic surgery (e.g. abdominoplasty), a body contouring surgery frequently performed and associated with post-operative pain.
Evidence suggests it is biologically plausible to develop a bio-signature of the human pain experience that derives from IL-1 family cytokine activity. In animal models, imbalance between pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokines is readily induced pharmacologically and surgically, enhancing pain behavior, central endogenous opioid release, and tolerance to opioid analgesics, all factors that contribute to chronicity. Pharmacologic blockade of pro-nociceptive IL-1 cytokines with soluble IL-1ra reverses the pro-nociceptive effects. Evidence suggests similar relationships exist in humans. Concentration of IL-1b sampled intra-operatively from wound site blood revealed predicts surgical complications and post-operative pain. However, IL-1b (on its own) has not proven sufficiently accurate, sensitive, or reliable to account for the broad inter-individual variance in risk and clinical presentation of human post-operative pain states. In preliminary data from separate regression analyses, neither IL-1b nor IL-1ra significantly predicted pain (intensity or threshold). However, regression models incorporating both IL-1b and IL-1ra showed that imbalance between these 2 factors (pro-nociceptive IL-1bias) synergistically enhanced prediction of pain (intensity and threshold) and underlying endogenous opioid release during a standardized pain challenge, accounting for 20% of the pain variance. IL-1b (pro-nociceptive) was a positive predictor and IL-1ra (anti-nociceptive) a negative predictor of pain. Including additional variance factors (sex, mu-opioid receptor polymorphism, neuroticism) in the model accounted for another 5% of the pain variance. Pain variance factors can impact concentration of additional IL-1 cytokines that regulate IL-1 signaling, suggesting it is both biologically and statistically plausible that incorporating a wide array of IL-1 family cytokines (IL-1b, IL-1ra, IL-1a, sIL-1r1, IL-1RAcP, IL-18, IL-18bp, IL-18Ra, IL-18Rb, IL-36, IL-38, IL-33, sTLR4) into a broader bio-signature of IL-1 family cytokine activity will perform superior to simple measures of IL-1bias (that include only IL-1b and IL-1ra) in predicting the highly heterogeneous human post-operative pain experience.
This study phase focuses on discovery (and analytic validation) of a novel, bio-signature of risk for post-operative pain states and underlying opioid-cytokine interactions. Performance (accuracy, sensitivity, dynamic range) in predicting experimental and post-operative pain will be tested in n=70 healthy humans following elective abdominoplasty.
More Specifically, The first objective of the study is to evaluate whether a novel bio-signature (derived from a wide range of pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokine activity) will predict pain experienced and also release of underlying endogenous opioid neurotransmitters during an experimental nociceptive pain challenge, which will be performed while simultaneously quantifying mu-opioid receptor activity in the brain via [11C]-carfentanil PET neuroimaging in healthy subjects. Another objective is to evaluate whether an anti-inflammatory drug that reduces activation of IL-1b (anakinra) will perturb the balance between pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 cytokines and effect a reduction in pain experienced (and endogenous opioids released) during the experimental, nociceptive pain challenge. A final objective is to evaluate performance characteristics (sensitivity, accuracy, dynamic range) of the biosignature for the purpose of predicting post-operative pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge, then anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge | Experimental | Drug: anakinra, Drug: Placebo, Other: Nociceptive pain challengePharmacological challenge (with placebo) plus nociceptive pain challenge, then pharmacological challenge (with anakinra) plus nociceptive pain challenge |
| Anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge, then placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge | Experimental | Drug: anakinra, Drug: Placebo, Other: Nociceptive pain challengePharmacological challenge (with anakinra) plus nociceptive pain challenge, then pharmacological challenge (with placebo) plus nociceptive pain challenge |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Obese or non-obese
- Awaiting elective surgery
- Negative urine pregnancy test
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Active, severe medical or psychiatric illness (per DSM-V)
- History of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms with or without presence of a DSM-V depressive and/or anxiety disorder
- Current or recent (within past 3 months) suicidal thoughts/plans/attempts
- Current or recent (within past 3 months) substance use/abuse/dependence (Note: stable nicotine use is acceptable, non-risky alcohol use is acceptable)
- Active or chronic medical illness (except obesity: either obese or non-obese volunteers can enroll in the study).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| anakinraAlso: Kineretintravenous injection of 100 milligrams anakinra | Drug | Anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge, then placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge, Placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge, then anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge |
| PlaceboAlso: Inert Substanceintravenous injection of 1 milliliter normal saline | Drug | Anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge, then placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge, Placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge, then anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge |
| Nociceptive pain challengeAlso: Pain InductionThe experimental, standardized, nociceptive pain challenge will induce a moderate level of sustained pain. The pain challenge involves a masseteric injection in the left or right jaw muscle of normal saline (0.15 ml bolus of 0.9% normal saline) over a 15 second period followed by continuous infusion via a closed loop infusion system for 20 minutes. | Other | Anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge, then placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge, Placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge, then anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge |
Primary outcome
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time frame: 0 minutes, This represents the study baseline, prior to any brain imaging
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time frame: 90 minutes, upon completion of brain imaging
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 to 24 hours before elective surgery
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time frame: 24 to 48 hours after elective surgery
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time frame: 6 to 8 weeks after elective surgery
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Dec 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alan R Prossin, MD principal investigator
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing anakinra and Nociceptive pain challenge in people with Pain, run by Alan Prossin at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alan R Prossin, MD ((713) 486-2836, Alan.Prossin@uth.tmc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire (time frame: 0 minutes, This represents the study baseline, prior to any brain imaging). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2023.