Postpartum WomenQuReSNCT05077891
Postpartum Quality of Recovery & Maternal Satisfaction After C/S
An observational study of Postpartum Women, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Measuring patient-oriented outcomes and satisfaction is important to guide meaningful changes in obstetric anesthesia care. Quality of Recovery (QoR) scores are patient rated measures, which provide a global measure of recovery after surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Postpartum Women
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2021to 17 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- Women only
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All women above the age of 19 years old whom underwent a caesarean section will be eligible to participate. Women will be surveyed at 24 hours after their cesarean section. Data will be collected by means of validated paper questionnaires administered in person by a study investigator that is not part of clinical care.
Who may be able to join
- Fluent English speaker
- Older than 19 years of age
- Received a cesarean delivery
- Received a cesarean delivery 24-48 hours prior to time of recruitment
Who cannot join
- Non-English speaker
- Below the age of 19 years
- Did not receive a cesarean delivery
- Received a cesarean delivery more than 48hrs after time of recruitment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Relationship Between Patient Reported Postpartum Quality of Recovery and Maternal Satisfaction After Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Observational Study
Measuring patient-oriented outcomes and satisfaction is important to guide meaningful changes in obstetric anesthesia care. Quality of Recovery (QoR) scores are patient rated measures, which provide a global measure of recovery after surgery. They go beyond the measure of physiological variables to include, physical, cognitive, emotive and functional outcomes. Satisfaction, in addition to QoR scores after anaesthesia is an important quality marker. Measuring satisfaction after the birth of a child is a complex and emotive subject. Understanding the factors that can influence maternal satisfaction may improve patient-centred care. Studies have shown that despite favorable clinical outcomes, many women undergoing caesarean deliveries continue to have poor experience with anaesthesia. These poor experiences go beyond inadequate pain control; many are due to poor communication with clinicians, lack of involvement in decision making, lack of provision of high quality education and information and a feeling of inadequate choice and control relating to decisions of the birth of their babies. In non-obstetric studies, satisfaction after anaesthesia has consistently been shown to be dependent on the information patient has received along with the quality of the communication and the quality of the anaesthetist-patient relationship.
- Conditions
- Postpartum Women
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11)
Quality of recovery will be measured using the obstetric quality of recovery score (ObsQoR-11). This is a 11-item, multidimensional recovery scoring tool, which has been validated in this population
Measured: 5 Minutes
Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Cesarean Section (MSSCS)
This 22 item questionnaire measures satisfaction with the anaesthetic, needle insertion, side effects and the theatre atmosphere. Items are rated on a 7-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
Measured: 5 Minutes
Satisfaction with Received Care
First open ended question assessing: "What aspects of your care were you most satisfied with?"
Measured: 1 Minute
Dissatisfaction with Received Care
Second open ended question assessing: "What aspects of your care were you most dissatisfied with?"
Measured: 1 Minute
Improvement of Satisfaction
Third and last open ended question assessing: "Do you have any suggestions on what would improve your satisfaction?"
Measured: 1 Minute
Secondary outcomes (25)
Obstetric History: Gravidity and Preterm
Total frequency of gravidity and preterm
Measured: 1 Minute
Patient Age
Patient age in years
Measured: 1 Minute
Gestational Age
Gestational age in total weeks and days
Measured: 1 Minute
Patient Height
Patient height measured in centimeters
Measured: 1 Minute
Patient Weight
Patient weight measured in kilograms
Measured: 1 Minute
Outcome of Delivery
Result of singleton, twins, or other
Measured: 1 Minute
Neonatal APGARs
APGAR scores at 1 minute and minutes
Measured: 1 Minute
Neonatal Birthweight
Neonatal birthweight measured in grams
Measured: 1 Minute
Patient ASA Status
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system ranging from 1 to 6
Measured: 1 Minute
Pregnancy Medical Conditions
Including: pregnancy induced HTN, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, anemia, hyperemesis, cholestasis, and other.
Measured: 1 Minute
Medical Conditions Outside Pregnancy
Including any medical conditions that do not constitute a pregnancy medical condition
Measured: 1 Minute
Neuraxial Lidocaine
Neuraxial agents and dosage administered prior and during the cesarean section procedure.
Measured: 1 Minute
Neuraxial Bupivicaine
dosage administered prior and during the cesarean section procedure.
Measured: 1 Minute
Neuraxial Morphine
dosage administered prior and during the cesarean section procedure.
Measured: 1 Minute
Neuraxial Fentanyl
dosage administered prior and during the cesarean section procedure.
Measured: 1 Minute
Intraoperative Anxiolytics
Intraoperative anxiolytics drug and dose administered prior and during the cesarean section procedure.
Measured: 1 Minute
Anesthesia Procedure Start
Time in military time format
Measured: 1 Minute
Urgency of Cesarean Delivery
Classified as: scheduled, STAT, P1, or P2
Measured: 1 Minute
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Reason for cesarean delivery
Measured: 1 Minute
Labour Onset
Indicated as: spontaneous, augmented, or induction of labour
Measured: 1 Minute
Labour Length
Length of hours for both first stage and second stage
Measured: 1 Minute
Pain Relief During Labour
Indicated as: epidural/CSE/DPE, Entonox, M\&G, or other
Measured: 1 Minute
Intraoperative Complications
Indicated as: hypotension, shivering, nausea, vomiting, itch, failed neuraxial, or other.
Measured: 1 Minute
Intraoperative Blood Loss
Blood loss measured in milliliters.
Measured: 1 Minute
Postoperative Complications
Any medical complication indicated after the caesarean delivery.
Measured: 1 Minute
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2021
- Study start1 Aug 2021
- Primary completion15 Jan 2022
- Study completion17 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postpartum WomenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anthony Chau, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Anton Chau, MD MMSc, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05077891
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H21-01082
- Acronym
- QuReS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 19 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ciechanowicz S, Setty T, Robson E, Sathasivam C, Chazapis M, Dick J, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;122(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
PubMed 30579408Bowyer A, Jakobsson J, Ljungqvist O, Royse C. A review of the scope and measurement of postoperative quality of recovery. Anaesthesia. 2014 Nov;69(11):1266-78. doi: 10.1111/anae.12730. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
PubMed 24888412Heidegger T, Saal D, Nubling M. Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia - Part 1: satisfaction as part of outcome - and what satisfies patients. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1165-72. doi: 10.1111/anae.12347. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
PubMed 23926924Barnett SF, Alagar RK, Grocott MP, Giannaris S, Dick JR, Moonesinghe SR. Patient-satisfaction measures in anesthesia: qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013 Aug;119(2):452-78. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976014.
PubMed 23669268Camann W. Pain, Pain Relief, Satisfaction and Excellence in Obstetric Anesthesia: A Surprisingly Complex Relationship. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):383-385. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001676. No abstract available.
PubMed 28098685Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17(4):137-44.
Linda D. Results of the National Maternity Experience Survey 2020 2020 [Available from: https://yourexperience.ie/maternity/national-results/.
Porter M, van Teijlingen E, Chi Ying Yip L, Bhattacharya S. Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey. Birth. 2007 Jun;34(2):148-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00161.x.
PubMed 17542819Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33.
PubMed 7728691Cook K, Loomis C. The Impact of Choice and Control on Women's Childbirth Experiences. J Perinat Educ. 2012 Summer;21(3):158-68. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.3.158.
PubMed 23730127Brooks H, Sullivan WJ. The importance of patient autonomy at birth. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2002 Jul;11(3):196-203. doi: 10.1054/ijoa.2002.0958.
PubMed 15321548Morgan PJ, Halpern S, Lo J. The development of a maternal satisfaction scale for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1999 Jul;8(3):165-70. doi: 10.1016/s0959-289x(99)80132-0.
PubMed 15321139Berning V, Laupheimer M, Nubling M, Heidegger T. Influence of quality of recovery on patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2017 Sep;72(9):1088-1096. doi: 10.1111/anae.13906. Epub 2017 May 16.
PubMed 28510285Myles PS, Reeves MD, Anderson H, Weeks AM. Measurement of quality of recovery in 5672 patients after anaesthesia and surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000 Jun;28(3):276-80. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0002800304.
PubMed 10853209Ciechanowicz S, Howle R, Heppolette C, Nakhjavani B, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) following non-elective caesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
PubMed 30885691
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Relationship Between Patient Reported Postpartum Quality of Recovery and Maternal Satisfaction After Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05077891
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QuReS / H21-01082
- Conditions
- Postpartum Women
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Measuring patient-oriented outcomes and satisfaction is important to guide meaningful changes in obstetric anesthesia care. Quality of Recovery (QoR) scores are patient rated measures, which provide a global measure of recovery after surgery. They go beyond the measure of physiological variables to include, physical, cognitive, emotive and functional outcomes. Satisfaction, in addition to QoR scores after anaesthesia is an important quality marker. Measuring satisfaction after the birth of a child is a complex and emotive subject. Understanding the factors that can influence maternal satisfaction may improve patient-centred care. Studies have shown that despite favorable clinical outcomes, many women undergoing caesarean deliveries continue to have poor experience with anaesthesia. These poor experiences go beyond inadequate pain control; many are due to poor communication with clinicians, lack of involvement in decision making, lack of provision of high quality education and information and a feeling of inadequate choice and control relating to decisions of the birth of their babies. In non-obstetric studies, satisfaction after anaesthesia has consistently been shown to be dependent on the information patient has received along with the quality of the communication and the quality of the anaesthetist-patient relationship.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All women above the age of 19 years old whom underwent a caesarean section will be eligible to participate. Women will be surveyed at 24 hours after their cesarean section. Data will be collected by means of validated paper questionnaires administered in person by a study investigator that is not part of clinical care.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Fluent English speaker
- Older than 19 years of age
- Received a cesarean delivery
- Received a cesarean delivery 24-48 hours prior to time of recruitment
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Non-English speaker
- Below the age of 19 years
- Did not receive a cesarean delivery
- Received a cesarean delivery more than 48hrs after time of recruitment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11)
Time frame: 5 Minutes
Quality of recovery will be measured using the obstetric quality of recovery score (ObsQoR-11). This is a 11-item, multidimensional recovery scoring tool, which has been validated in this population
Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Cesarean Section (MSSCS)
Time frame: 5 Minutes
This 22 item questionnaire measures satisfaction with the anaesthetic, needle insertion, side effects and the theatre atmosphere. Items are rated on a 7-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
Satisfaction with Received Care
Time frame: 1 Minute
First open ended question assessing: "What aspects of your care were you most satisfied with?"
Dissatisfaction with Received Care
Time frame: 1 Minute
Second open ended question assessing: "What aspects of your care were you most dissatisfied with?"
Improvement of Satisfaction
Time frame: 1 Minute
Third and last open ended question assessing: "Do you have any suggestions on what would improve your satisfaction?"
25 secondary outcomes
Obstetric History: Gravidity and Preterm
Time frame: 1 Minute
Patient Age
Time frame: 1 Minute
Gestational Age
Time frame: 1 Minute
Patient Height
Time frame: 1 Minute
Patient Weight
Time frame: 1 Minute
Outcome of Delivery
Time frame: 1 Minute
Neonatal APGARs
Time frame: 1 Minute
Neonatal Birthweight
Time frame: 1 Minute
Patient ASA Status
Time frame: 1 Minute
Pregnancy Medical Conditions
Time frame: 1 Minute
Medical Conditions Outside Pregnancy
Time frame: 1 Minute
Neuraxial Lidocaine
Time frame: 1 Minute
Neuraxial Bupivicaine
Time frame: 1 Minute
Neuraxial Morphine
Time frame: 1 Minute
Neuraxial Fentanyl
Time frame: 1 Minute
Intraoperative Anxiolytics
Time frame: 1 Minute
Anesthesia Procedure Start
Time frame: 1 Minute
Urgency of Cesarean Delivery
Time frame: 1 Minute
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Time frame: 1 Minute
Labour Onset
Time frame: 1 Minute
Labour Length
Time frame: 1 Minute
Pain Relief During Labour
Time frame: 1 Minute
Intraoperative Complications
Time frame: 1 Minute
Intraoperative Blood Loss
Time frame: 1 Minute
Postoperative Complications
Time frame: 1 Minute
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Feb 2025.
- Background: PubMed 30579408Ciechanowicz S, Setty T, Robson E, Sathasivam C, Chazapis M, Dick J, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;122(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
- Background: PubMed 24888412Bowyer A, Jakobsson J, Ljungqvist O, Royse C. A review of the scope and measurement of postoperative quality of recovery. Anaesthesia. 2014 Nov;69(11):1266-78. doi: 10.1111/anae.12730. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 23926924Heidegger T, Saal D, Nubling M. Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia - Part 1: satisfaction as part of outcome - and what satisfies patients. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1165-72. doi: 10.1111/anae.12347. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 23669268Barnett SF, Alagar RK, Grocott MP, Giannaris S, Dick JR, Moonesinghe SR. Patient-satisfaction measures in anesthesia: qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013 Aug;119(2):452-78. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976014.
- Background: PubMed 28098685Camann W. Pain, Pain Relief, Satisfaction and Excellence in Obstetric Anesthesia: A Surprisingly Complex Relationship. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):383-385. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001676. No abstract available.
- BackgroundKingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17(4):137-44.
- BackgroundLinda D. Results of the National Maternity Experience Survey 2020 2020 [Available from: https://yourexperience.ie/maternity/national-results/.
- Background: PubMed 17542819Porter M, van Teijlingen E, Chi Ying Yip L, Bhattacharya S. Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey. Birth. 2007 Jun;34(2):148-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00161.x.
- Background: PubMed 7728691Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33.
- Background: PubMed 23730127Cook K, Loomis C. The Impact of Choice and Control on Women's Childbirth Experiences. J Perinat Educ. 2012 Summer;21(3):158-68. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.3.158.
- Background: PubMed 15321548Brooks H, Sullivan WJ. The importance of patient autonomy at birth. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2002 Jul;11(3):196-203. doi: 10.1054/ijoa.2002.0958.
- Background: PubMed 15321139Morgan PJ, Halpern S, Lo J. The development of a maternal satisfaction scale for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1999 Jul;8(3):165-70. doi: 10.1016/s0959-289x(99)80132-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Postpartum Women
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Effect of Two Different Doses of Intravenous Oxytocin on Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness Study of a Lifestyle Intervention Versus Metformin in Mothers With Recent Gestational Diabetes
Weight Loss, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy
Recruiting
Exercise to Improve Heart and Metabolic Health After Childbirth in Women at High Risk for Preeclampsia
Postpartum Exercise, Cardiometabolic Health
RecruitingPhase 1
Ketamine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Postpartum Depression and Pain After Cesarean Delivery
Pain, Postpartum Depression
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Furosemide vs Placebo in Severe Preeclampsia Postpartum
Severe Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anton Chau, MD MMSc principal investigator
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Postpartum Women, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) (time frame: 5 Minutes). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05077891, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2025.