AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain, ChronicNCT05083702

Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Cancer Bladder Patients

A study testing Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach and ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block in people with Pain, Chronic, run by National Cancer Institute, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pelvic cancer pain is a chronic condition related to the involvement of viscera, pelvic muscular structures or neural structures by tumor. The superior hypogastric plexus block is a sympathetic block used to treat pelvic visceral pain that is unresponsive to oral or parenteral opioids different approaches for superior… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Chronic
What is being tested?
Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach and ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Dec 2020to 30 Oct 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 20 years.
  • Patients with advanced stage cancer bladder.
  • Patient with severe pain (VAS) 7 or more .
  • Patients don't receive any strong opioids for pain at least 2 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal.
  • Local infection at the puncture site.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Cognitive disorders.
  • Unstable cardiovascular disease.
  • History of psychiatric disorders.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • History of drug abuse.
  • Patients allergic to medication used.
  • Patients with any contraindications to drugs and dye used.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Asmaa khalil, A.lecturer contact

01009468049

sosoelsayed1177@yahoo.com

Khaled Mostafa, Professor contact

01011505033

K24mostafa@hotmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • National cancer institute

    Cairo

    Asmaa Khalil, A.lecturer, 01009468049, sosoelsayed11@yahoo.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Cancer Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Pelvic cancer pain is a chronic condition related to the involvement of viscera, pelvic muscular structures or neural structures by tumor. The superior hypogastric plexus block is a sympathetic block used to treat pelvic visceral pain that is unresponsive to oral or parenteral opioids different approaches for superior hypogastric block as transdiscal approach, classic approach, Posteromedial approach, CT guided approach and ultrasound anterior approach The ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus neurolysis technique (anterior approach) is simple to perform. We believe this block can be useful in cancer patients who are having difficulty in lying prone, because it is a procedure performed in the supine position and it is less time-consuming. It also avoids the radiation exposure involved with a computed tomography-guided and fluoroscopy posterior approach.

Read the detailed description

Aim of the study:

To compare Fluoroscopic guided transdiscal superior hypogastric block and Ultrasound guided superior hypogastric block regarding their efficacy to control pelvic pain and

Statistical analysis:

Data will be described as mean ±SD or as frequencies (number of cases) and percentages when appropriate. Comparison of numerical variables between two study groups will be carried out using parametric and non-parametric t- tests for independent samples. Within group comparison of numerical variables was carried out using repeated measures ANOVA. P values of less than 0.05 will be statistically significant. All statistical calculations are performed using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS, version 23 for Microsoft Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA)

Conditions
Pain, Chronic
Being tested
Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach, ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block
Keywords
fluroscopy and ultrasound SHPB in cancer bladder
Medical subject headings
Chronic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approachProcedure or surgery

    Also called fluroscopy

    Patient lies prone, L5-S1 interspace identified under fluoroscopy, the skin is prepared and sterile drapes are placed after local anesthetic infiltration of the skin the subcutaneous tissue with 2% lidocaine a 20 guage, 15 cm needle with short bevel is inserted at the center of L5- S1 interlaminar space under anteroposterior fluoroscopic vision. The needle is then advanced toward the intervertebral disc. After confirmation, the needle is advanced through the intervertebral disc until it exists at its anterior surface confirmed by administration of 4 ml of soluble contrast media in both lateral and anteroposterior fluoroscopic view. Neurolysis is performed with 8 ml 8 % phenol solution. After neurolysis, 0.5 ml of saline is given to avoid the deposition of phenol within the intervertebral disc material. While withdrawing, the needle cephazoline 50 mg in 1 ml is injected into the disc.

  • ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus blockProcedure or surgery

    Also called ultrasound

    Patients are placed in the supine position and after sterilization, the low-frequency curved probe is used in the longitudinal axis to visualize the aortic bifurcation and is identified using a longitudinal Ultra-Sound (Phillips Healthcare, Andover, Massachusetts, US). Next, the probe is placed deeply transverse till aorta end and bifurcation seen of iliac vessels once seen we enter out of plane and inject.as it lies in front the vertebral body of the L5 vertebra. Local infiltration with 1% lidocaine is obtained at port of entry 1-1.5 inches below the umbilicus. A 15-cm, 22-G Chiba needle is inserted (out-of-plane) and advanced by avoiding vascular structures until contact with the L5-body. The needle will be withdrawan the 1-2 mm and inject 8 ml 8% phenol in saline. Finally, 0.5 ml of lidocaine is injected during Chiba needle removal

Study groups in NCT05083702
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approachActive comparatorfluroscopy guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach for chronic pain treatment in cancer bladder VAS score and morphine consumption are measured before and after 1 day , 1 month , 3 monthes
Receives: Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach
ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus blockActive comparatorultrasound guided superior hypogastric plexus block in treatment of chronic pain in cancer badder VAS score and morphine consumption are measured before and after 1 day , 1 month , 3 monthes
Receives: Procedure: ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score

    Pain Intensity measured by Visual analogue scale score16 (A 100 mm horizontal line version is used with 2 ends left end means no pain and right end means the worst pain.

    VAS will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.

    Measured: Three months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. The amount of daily morphine consumption

    Daily morphine or other drugs consumption according to WHO ladder after the procedure.

    This will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.

    Measured: Three months after the procedure

  2. Patient functional capacity

    Patient functional capacity (is evaluated using Eastern cooperative oncology group "ECOG" scoring (0=fully active, 1= able to perform light effort, 2= in bed <50% of the day 3=in bed >50% of the day, 4=bed ridden).

    This will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.

    Measured: Three months after the procedure

  3. Quality of life

    Patient quality of life SF-36 19 (consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

    This will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.

    Measured: Three months after the procedure

  4. Complications

    Any complications will be detected: back pain, bleeding, infection, L5 root injury with paresthesia or motor weakness, and visceral or vascular injuries.

    Measured: Three months after the procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2021
  2. Study start1 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2021
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05083702
Sponsor's protocol ID
AP2103-30101R
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
10 Jun 2021
Last updated
19 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach and ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block in people with Pain, Chronic, run by National Cancer Institute, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Asmaa khalil, A.lecturer (01009468049, sosoelsayed1177@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual analogue scale (VAS) score (time frame: Three months after the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in