Coronary OcclusionSTARNCT05089864
STAR and Deferred Stenting Study
A study testing Stent Placement Timing - Early and Stent Placement Timing - Late in people with Coronary Occlusion and Coronary Stenosis, run by Saint Luke's Health System at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
STAR is a minimal-risk pragmatic clinical trial of patients admitted for a CTO-PCI procedure. The overall objective of the STAR Study is to address the current gaps in knowledge regarding use of STAR during CTO-PCI, as a prospective, multi-center study of 150 participants with randomization of timing of staged PCI. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Occlusion, Coronary Stenosis, Coronary Restenosis
- What is being tested?
- Stent Placement Timing - Early and Stent Placement Timing - Late
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 Nov 2021to 7 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is scheduled for a PCI procedure for at least one chronic total occlusion with TIMI antegrade flow of zero.
- Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at the time of consent
- The operator attempted STAR technique defined as knuckle guidewire across or into the CTO segment during the CTO PCI and is planned for a staged procedure.
- English speaking due to follow up.
Who cannot join
- The CTO segment is in a graft.
- Female subjects with a positive quantitative or qualitative pregnancy test, in accordance with hospital policy.
- Unable to participate in telephone follow-up
- Too hard of hearing to do follow-up by telephone or deaf.
- Incarcerated prisoner.
- History of dementia.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Subjects without a way for contact by telephone for follow-up.
- Previously enrolled in STAR.
- Patient not a candidate for baseline and final angiography (CKD with eGFR<30).
- The knuckled guidewire did not cross into the CTO segment during STAR attempt.
- A stent was placed into the STAR segment during the Index Procedure.
- Refused participation in the study.
- Patient enrolled in another study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
About this study
Official title: Outcomes and Safety in Patients Treated With STAR and Deferred Stenting After Unsuccessful CTO PCI
STAR is a minimal-risk pragmatic clinical trial of patients admitted for a CTO-PCI procedure. The overall objective of the STAR Study is to address the current gaps in knowledge regarding use of STAR during CTO-PCI, as a prospective, multi-center study of 150 participants with randomization of timing of staged PCI. Five sites will be selected to participate in STAR from a national network of highly experienced CTO-PCI centers across the United States.
Read the detailed description
To date, there have been no studies that prospectively and systemically evaluated the efficacy and safety of STAR with deferred stenting and described the frequency of its use in the hybrid approach. The aim of this study is to address these current gaps in knowledge, including the frequency of use of STAR by experienced operators, the safety of its use, optimal timing of staged stenting and health status change associated with this procedure. This prospective study will enroll 150 patients undergoing elective PCI of native CTO utilizing the STAR technique and will subsequently randomize patients in a 1:1 fashion to early (5-7 weeks) and later (12-14 weeks) timing of subsequent stenting.
- Conditions
- Coronary Occlusion, Coronary Stenosis, Coronary Restenosis
- Being tested
- Stent Placement Timing - Early, Stent Placement Timing - Late
- Keywords
- chronic total occlusion, sub-intimal plaque modification
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Occlusion, Coronary Stenosis, Coronary Restenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Stent Placement Timing - EarlyOther
Stent placement 5-7 weeks after STAR procedure
Stent Placement Timing - LateOther
Stent placement 12-14 weeks after STAR procedure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early stent placement | Other | Stent placement 5-7 weeks post-STAR procedure Receives: Other: Stent Placement Timing - Early |
| Later stent placement | Other | Stent placement 12-14 weeks post-STAR procedure Receives: Other: Stent Placement Timing - Late |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Staged Procedure Success
success of the staged stenting procedure will be core lab adjudicated and defined as TIMI 3 flow, no major side branch loss, and residual stenosis <30%
Measured: 14 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Vessel patency at time of staged stenting procedure
number of distal branches, and the antegrade TIMI flow through the vessel, assessed by core-lab analysis
Measured: 14 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2021
- Study start23 Nov 2021
- Primary completion7 Aug 2025
- Study completion7 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary OcclusionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Saint Luke's Health System
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Asahi-Intecc
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05089864
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 21-122
- Acronym
- STAR
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 24 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, Boudou N, Sianos G, Gelev V, Rumoroso JR, Erglis A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, di Mario C, Hovasse T, Teruel L, Bufe A, Lauer B, Bogaerts K, Goicolea J, Spratt JC, Gershlick AH, Galassi AR, Louvard Y; EUROCTO trial investigators. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jul 7;39(26):2484-2493. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy220.
PubMed 29722796Sapontis J, Salisbury AC, Yeh RW, Cohen DJ, Hirai T, Lombardi W, McCabe JM, Karmpaliotis D, Moses J, Nicholson WJ, Pershad A, Wyman RM, Spaedy A, Cook S, Doshi P, Federici R, Thompson CR, Marso SP, Nugent K, Gosch K, Spertus JA, Grantham JA. Early Procedural and Health Status Outcomes After Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty: A Report From the OPEN-CTO Registry (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1523-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.065.
PubMed 28797429Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S, Wyman RM, Burke MN, Karmpaliotis D, Lembo N, Pershad A, Kandzari DE, Buller CE, DeMartini T, Lombardi WL, Thompson CA. A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr;5(4):367-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.02.006.
PubMed 22516392Hirai T, Grantham JA, Sapontis J, Cohen DJ, Marso SP, Lombardi W, Karmpaliotis D, Moses J, Nicholson WJ, Pershad A, Wyman RM, Spaedy A, Cook S, Doshi P, Federici R, Nugent K, Gosch KL, Spertus JA, Salisbury AC; OPEN CTO Study Group. Impact of subintimal plaque modification procedures on health status after unsuccessful chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 1;91(6):1035-1042. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27380. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
PubMed 29068126Hirai T, Grantham JA, Gosch KL, Patterson C, Kirtane AJ, Lombardi W, Nicholson WJ, Moses J, Karmpaliotis D, Salisbury AC. Impact of Subintimal or Plaque Modification on Repeat Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty Following an Unsuccessful Attempt. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 27;13(8):1010-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.214. No abstract available.
PubMed 32327084Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Tomasello SD, Marza F, Azzarelli S, Giubilato S, Khamis H. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of the mini-STAR technique as a bailout strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. Can J Cardiol. 2014 Nov;30(11):1400-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
PubMed 25442438Goleski PJ, Nakamura K, Liebeskind E, Salisbury AC, Grantham JA, McCabe JM, Lombardi WL. Revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions with subintimal tracking and reentry followed by deferred stenting: Experience from a high-volume referral center. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 1;93(2):191-198. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27783. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
PubMed 30411863Xenogiannis I, Choi JW, Alaswad K, Khatri JJ, Doing AH, Dattilo P, Jaffer FA, Uretsky B, Krestyaninov O, Khelimskii D, Patel M, Mahmud E, Potluri S, Koutouzis M, Tsiafoutis I, Jaber W, Samady H, Jefferson BK, Patel T, Megaly MS, Hall AB, Vemmou E, Nikolakopoulos I, Rangan BV, Abdullah S, Garcia S, Banerjee S, Burke MN, Brilakis ES. Outcomes of subintimal plaque modification in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(5):1029-1035. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28614. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
PubMed 31797507Azzalini L, Kearney K, Salisbury AC, Stone N, Gosch KL, Jones PG, Spertus JA, Pershad A, Nicholson W, Lombardi W, Wyman RM, Davies R, Grantham JA, Hirai T; STAR Study Group. Early vs Late Staged PCI After Subintimal Tracking and Re-Entry for Chronic Total Occlusions: A Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 Jan 27;87(3):286-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1598. Epub 2025 Nov 26.
PubMed 41295935Hirai T, Kearney K, Azzalini L, Salisbury AC, Stone N, Gosch KL, Pershad A, Nicholson W, Lombardi W, Wyman RM, Davies R, Grantham JA; STAR Study Group. Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention after subintimal tracking and re-entry: Rationale and design of the subintimal tracking and re-entry with deferred stenting study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Sep;104(3):444-450. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31161. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
PubMed 39044659
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcomes and Safety in Patients Treated With STAR and Deferred Stenting After Unsuccessful CTO PCI
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05089864
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STAR / 21-122
- Conditions
- Coronary Occlusion, Coronary Stenosis, Coronary Restenosis
- Keywords
- chronic total occlusion, sub-intimal plaque modification
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Saint Luke's Health SystemUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Asahi-Intecc
- Study start
- 23 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
STAR is a minimal-risk pragmatic clinical trial of patients admitted for a CTO-PCI procedure. The overall objective of the STAR Study is to address the current gaps in knowledge regarding use of STAR during CTO-PCI, as a prospective, multi-center study of 150 participants with randomization of timing of staged PCI. Five sites will be selected to participate in STAR from a national network of highly experienced CTO-PCI centers across the United States.
Detailed description
To date, there have been no studies that prospectively and systemically evaluated the efficacy and safety of STAR with deferred stenting and described the frequency of its use in the hybrid approach. The aim of this study is to address these current gaps in knowledge, including the frequency of use of STAR by experienced operators, the safety of its use, optimal timing of staged stenting and health status change associated with this procedure. This prospective study will enroll 150 patients undergoing elective PCI of native CTO utilizing the STAR technique and will subsequently randomize patients in a 1:1 fashion to early (5-7 weeks) and later (12-14 weeks) timing of subsequent stenting.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early stent placement | Other | Other: Stent Placement Timing - EarlyStent placement 5-7 weeks post-STAR procedure |
| Later stent placement | Other | Other: Stent Placement Timing - LateStent placement 12-14 weeks post-STAR procedure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject is scheduled for a PCI procedure for at least one chronic total occlusion with TIMI antegrade flow of zero.
- Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at the time of consent
- The operator attempted STAR technique defined as knuckle guidewire across or into the CTO segment during the CTO PCI and is planned for a staged procedure.
- English speaking due to follow up.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- The CTO segment is in a graft.
- Female subjects with a positive quantitative or qualitative pregnancy test, in accordance with hospital policy.
- Unable to participate in telephone follow-up
- Previously enrolled in STAR.
- Patient not a candidate for baseline and final angiography (CKD with eGFR<30).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Stent Placement Timing - EarlyStent placement 5-7 weeks after STAR procedure | Other | Early stent placement |
| Stent Placement Timing - LateStent placement 12-14 weeks after STAR procedure | Other | Later stent placement |
Primary outcome
Staged Procedure Success
Time frame: 14 weeks
success of the staged stenting procedure will be core lab adjudicated and defined as TIMI 3 flow, no major side branch loss, and residual stenosis <30%
1 secondary outcome
Vessel patency at time of staged stenting procedure
Time frame: 14 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Oct 2025.
- Background: PubMed 29722796Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, Boudou N, Sianos G, Gelev V, Rumoroso JR, Erglis A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, di Mario C, Hovasse T, Teruel L, Bufe A, Lauer B, Bogaerts K, Goicolea J, Spratt JC, Gershlick AH, Galassi AR, Louvard Y; EUROCTO trial investigators. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jul 7;39(26):2484-2493. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy220.
- Background: PubMed 28797429Sapontis J, Salisbury AC, Yeh RW, Cohen DJ, Hirai T, Lombardi W, McCabe JM, Karmpaliotis D, Moses J, Nicholson WJ, Pershad A, Wyman RM, Spaedy A, Cook S, Doshi P, Federici R, Thompson CR, Marso SP, Nugent K, Gosch K, Spertus JA, Grantham JA. Early Procedural and Health Status Outcomes After Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty: A Report From the OPEN-CTO Registry (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1523-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.065.
- Background: PubMed 22516392Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S, Wyman RM, Burke MN, Karmpaliotis D, Lembo N, Pershad A, Kandzari DE, Buller CE, DeMartini T, Lombardi WL, Thompson CA. A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr;5(4):367-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.02.006.
- Background: PubMed 29068126Hirai T, Grantham JA, Sapontis J, Cohen DJ, Marso SP, Lombardi W, Karmpaliotis D, Moses J, Nicholson WJ, Pershad A, Wyman RM, Spaedy A, Cook S, Doshi P, Federici R, Nugent K, Gosch KL, Spertus JA, Salisbury AC; OPEN CTO Study Group. Impact of subintimal plaque modification procedures on health status after unsuccessful chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 1;91(6):1035-1042. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27380. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 32327084Hirai T, Grantham JA, Gosch KL, Patterson C, Kirtane AJ, Lombardi W, Nicholson WJ, Moses J, Karmpaliotis D, Salisbury AC. Impact of Subintimal or Plaque Modification on Repeat Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty Following an Unsuccessful Attempt. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 27;13(8):1010-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.214. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25442438Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Tomasello SD, Marza F, Azzarelli S, Giubilato S, Khamis H. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of the mini-STAR technique as a bailout strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. Can J Cardiol. 2014 Nov;30(11):1400-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
- Background: PubMed 30411863Goleski PJ, Nakamura K, Liebeskind E, Salisbury AC, Grantham JA, McCabe JM, Lombardi WL. Revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions with subintimal tracking and reentry followed by deferred stenting: Experience from a high-volume referral center. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 1;93(2):191-198. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27783. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 31797507Xenogiannis I, Choi JW, Alaswad K, Khatri JJ, Doing AH, Dattilo P, Jaffer FA, Uretsky B, Krestyaninov O, Khelimskii D, Patel M, Mahmud E, Potluri S, Koutouzis M, Tsiafoutis I, Jaber W, Samady H, Jefferson BK, Patel T, Megaly MS, Hall AB, Vemmou E, Nikolakopoulos I, Rangan BV, Abdullah S, Garcia S, Banerjee S, Burke MN, Brilakis ES. Outcomes of subintimal plaque modification in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(5):1029-1035. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28614. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41295935Azzalini L, Kearney K, Salisbury AC, Stone N, Gosch KL, Jones PG, Spertus JA, Pershad A, Nicholson W, Lombardi W, Wyman RM, Davies R, Grantham JA, Hirai T; STAR Study Group. Early vs Late Staged PCI After Subintimal Tracking and Re-Entry for Chronic Total Occlusions: A Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 Jan 27;87(3):286-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1598. Epub 2025 Nov 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39044659Hirai T, Kearney K, Azzalini L, Salisbury AC, Stone N, Gosch KL, Pershad A, Nicholson W, Lombardi W, Wyman RM, Davies R, Grantham JA; STAR Study Group. Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention after subintimal tracking and re-entry: Rationale and design of the subintimal tracking and re-entry with deferred stenting study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Sep;104(3):444-450. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31161. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Occlusion
Not yet recruiting
NHLBI SESAME (SEptal Scoring Along Midline Endocardium) Multi-Center Prospective Study Using Improvised Off-Label Devices
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
Not yet recruiting
TRADENT Scoring Balloon Versus Non-scoring Balloon for Lesion Preparation in DCB-Based Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Diet Supplements for Older Patients Undergoing TAVI: the IRON-TAVI Trial
Aortic Stenosis Disease, Aortic Stenosis Symptomatic
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Relationship Between Frontal QRS-T Angle and Collateral Circulation in Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion
Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO), Frontal QRS-T Angle
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment of Primary Coronary Artery Vascular Lesions With Biolimus Coated Coronary Balloon Dilation Catheter
Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Stent Placement Timing - Early and Stent Placement Timing - Late in people with Coronary Occlusion and Coronary Stenosis, run by Saint Luke's Health System at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Staged Procedure Success (time frame: 14 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05089864, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2025.