AzTrials
AzTrials

Cryotherapy EffectNCT05091554

Intraoral Cryotherapy in Root Canal Retreatment

A study testing intraoral ice pack application in people with Cryotherapy Effect, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intraoral cryotherapy application on postoperative pain in single and multiple visit retreatment of teeth with symptomatic or asymptomatic apical periodontitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cryotherapy Effect
What is being tested?
intraoral ice pack application
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
118 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Apr 2019to 14 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 and 65 year-old patients.
  • Patients with pre-treated teeth diagnosed with symptomatic or asymptomatic apical periodontitis.
  • Patients who can tolerate the treatment physically and mentally.

Who cannot join

  • The presence of any systemic disease,
  • the presence of any allergic reactions or pregnancy,
  • use of any analgesic or antibiotic medication within 7 days,
  • use of corticosteroid within 6 months,
  • severe periodontal disease (periodontal pockets >3 mm) in the pretreated tooth,
  • surgical endodontic treatment,
Show all 11Show fewer
  • having drainage,
  • periapical index (PAI) score 1 and 2,
  • excessively curved, excessively long or short roots, calcified or resorbed root canals,
  • immature apices,
  • complications like perforation, overfilling, broken files

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Izmir Katip Celebi University

    Izmir, 35620

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Effect of Intraoral Cryotherapy Application on Postoperative Pain in Nonsurgical Endodontic Retreatment of Teeth With Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intraoral cryotherapy application on postoperative pain in single and multiple visit retreatment of teeth with symptomatic or asymptomatic apical periodontitis. This clinical trial was also investigate the potential of intraoral cryotherapy application to reduce on postoperative analgesic use of patients in line with the results obtained.

A total of 118 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected for the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as single visit and multiple visit (n=59). Then, each group was randomly divided into three subgroups as control (without cryotherapy), 15 minutes of cryotherapy, and 30 minutes of cryotherapy. Twenty two teeth were retreated in each cryotherapy group and 15 teeth in each control group. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate and compare postoperative pain. Postoperative analgesic use of patients was also recorded.

Being tested
intraoral ice pack application
Keywords
analgesic, cryotherapy, periapical periodontitis, postoperative pain, retreatment
Medical subject headings
Periapical Periodontitis, Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intraoral ice pack applicationProcedure or surgery

    Tap water was filled into plastic ice molds and kept in the freezer in the clinic until the application was made. The ice packs used were weighed with digital pocket scale (Knmaster CT1000, Turkey) as 6-8 grams. In the cryotherapy groups, at the end of the first appointment ice packs were removed from the freezer, wrapped in sterile gauze and placed on the vestibular mucosa of the teeth.

Study groups in NCT05091554
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single visit controlNo interventionThe root canals were obturated in the same session using cold lateral compaction technique with AH Plus sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), Protaper Universal gutta-percha (ProTaper Universal gutta-percha, Dentsply) and .02 tapered auxiliary gutta-percha (Diadent, Chongju, Korea) cones. Residual gutta-perchas in the access cavity were removed with the aid of heated hand tools. The quality of root canal filling was checked with periapical radiographs. The pulp chamber was filled with flowable composite resin (Filtek Ultimate Flowable, 3M-ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and nanohybrid composite resin (3M-ESPE) using an incremental technique. Intraoral cryotherapy was not applied.
Single visit 15 minutes cryotherapyExperimentalThe root canals were obturated in the same session using cold lateral compaction technique with AH Plus sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), Protaper Universal gutta-percha (ProTaper Universal gutta-percha, Dentsply) and .02 tapered auxiliary gutta-percha (Diadent, Chongju, Korea) cones. Residual gutta-perchas in the access cavity were removed with the aid of heated hand tools. The quality of root canal filling was checked with periapical radiographs. The pulp chamber was filled with flowable composite resin (Filtek Ultimate Flowable, 3M-ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and nanohybrid composite resin (3M-ESPE) using an incremental technique. 15 minutes intraoral cryotherapy was applied.
Receives: Procedure: intraoral ice pack application
Single visit 30 minutes cryotherapyExperimentalThe root canals were obturated in the same session using cold lateral compaction technique with AH Plus sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), Protaper Universal gutta-percha (ProTaper Universal gutta-percha, Dentsply) and .02 tapered auxiliary gutta-percha (Diadent, Chongju, Korea) cones. Residual gutta-perchas in the access cavity were removed with the aid of heated hand tools. The quality of root canal filling was checked with periapical radiographs. The pulp chamber was filled with flowable composite resin (Filtek Ultimate Flowable, 3M-ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and nanohybrid composite resin (3M-ESPE) using an incremental technique. 30 minutes intraoral cryotherapy was applied.
Receives: Procedure: intraoral ice pack application
Multiple visit controlNo interventionRoot canals were filled with calcium hydroxide paste (Kalsin, Turkey), prepared according to the rate recommended by the manufacturer using a lentulo spiral (Dentsply Sirona, Switzerland) 2 mm from the working length. Sterile dry cotton pellets were placed in the pulp chamber, then the access cavity was sealed with a temporary filling material and occlusion was checked. Intraoral cryotherapy was not applied. Patients were given an appointment 7 days later for second visit. In this appointment, patients were anesthetized, the tooth was isolated with rubber dam, the temporary filling material was removed. Then calcium hydroxide paste was removed by using the last instrument used to prepare the root canals at the working length during the first appointment using sufficient irrigation. The final irrigation protocol was repeated. Root canal fillings and permanent restorations were completed by applying the same techniques as in single session groups.
Multiple visit 15 minutes cryotherapyExperimentalRoot canals were filled with calcium hydroxide paste (Kalsin, Turkey), prepared according to the rate recommended by the manufacturer using a lentulo spiral (Dentsply Sirona, Switzerland) 2 mm from the working length. Sterile dry cotton pellets were placed in the pulp chamber, then the access cavity was sealed with a temporary filling material and occlusion was checked. 15 minutes intraoral cryotherapy was applied. Patients were given an appointment 7 days later for second visit. In this appointment, patients were anesthetized, the tooth was isolated with rubber dam, the temporary filling material was removed. Then calcium hydroxide paste was removed by using the last instrument used to prepare the root canals at the working length during the first appointment using sufficient irrigation. The final irrigation protocol was repeated. Root canal fillings and permanent restorations were completed by applying the same techniques as in single session groups.
Receives: Procedure: intraoral ice pack application
Multiple visit 30 minutes cryotherapyExperimentalRoot canals were filled with calcium hydroxide paste (Kalsin, Turkey), prepared according to the rate recommended by the manufacturer using a lentulo spiral (Dentsply Sirona, Switzerland) 2 mm from the working length. Sterile dry cotton pellets were placed in the pulp chamber, then the access cavity was sealed with a temporary filling material and occlusion was checked. 30 minutes intraoral cryotherapy was applied. Patients were given an appointment 7 days later for second visit. In this appointment, patients were anesthetized, the tooth was isolated with rubber dam, the temporary filling material was removed. Then calcium hydroxide paste was removed by using the last instrument used to prepare the root canals at the working length during the first appointment using sufficient irrigation. The final irrigation protocol was repeated. Root canal fillings and permanent restorations were completed by applying the same techniques as in single session groups.
Receives: Procedure: intraoral ice pack application

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Levels of postoperative pain

    The primary endpoint in calculating the sample size was to obtain visual analog scale (VAS) values. The intensity of postoperative pain was evaluated with visual analogue scale, which is a 10 cm line representing a continuum of pain levels between "no pain" on the left side and "most severe pain" on the right side between 0 and 10.

    Measured: 6 hours

  2. Levels of postoperative pain

    The primary endpoint in calculating the sample size was to obtain visual analog scale (VAS) values. The intensity of postoperative pain was evaluated with visual analogue scale, which is a 10 cm line representing a continuum of pain levels between "no pain" on the left side and "most severe pain" on the right side between 0 and 10.

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Levels of postoperative pain

    The primary endpoint in calculating the sample size was to obtain visual analog scale (VAS) values. The intensity of postoperative pain was evaluated with visual analogue scale, which is a 10 cm line representing a continuum of pain levels between "no pain" on the left side and "most severe pain" on the right side between 0 and 10.

    Measured: 72 hours

  4. Levels of postoperative pain

    The primary endpoint in calculating the sample size was to obtain visual analog scale (VAS) values. The intensity of postoperative pain was evaluated with visual analogue scale, which is a 10 cm line representing a continuum of pain levels between "no pain" on the left side and "most severe pain" on the right side between 0 and 10.

    Measured: 1 week

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Rate of analgesic use

    Comparison of analgesic use in groups

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Oct 2021
  2. Study start1 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion14 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion14 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
118 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05091554
Sponsor's protocol ID
IzmirKCUekarataslioglu
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
28 Sep 2021
Last updated
10 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing intraoral ice pack application in people with Cryotherapy Effect, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Levels of postoperative pain (time frame: 6 hours). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in