AzTrials
AzTrials

ACLNCT06456268

VibraCool Device to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR)

A study testing VibraCool mechanical stimulation and neuromodulatory therapeutic device, Cryocompression (Game Ready, Bregs) device and Standard ice packs in people with ACL and Opioid Use, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this project is to test the effects of the VibraCool mechanical stimulation neuromodulatory therapeutic device on post-operative pain and opioid use following anterior crucitate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and thus residual opioids in circulation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
ACL, Opioid Use, Cryotherapy Effect
What is being tested?
VibraCool mechanical stimulation and neuromodulatory therapeutic device, Cryocompression (Game Ready, Bregs) device and Standard ice packs
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
130 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2027to 30 Nov 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Underwent ACL reconstruction

Who cannot join

  • Pediatric iliotibial band ACL reconstruction (known to cause significantly more pain)
  • Non-english speakers (limitations of our study group)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Evaluation of an External Neuromodulation Device (VibraCool) to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR)

The goal of this project is to test the effects of the VibraCool mechanical stimulation neuromodulatory therapeutic device on post-operative pain and opioid use following anterior crucitate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and thus residual opioids in circulation.

Being tested
VibraCool mechanical stimulation and neuromodulatory therapeutic device, Cryocompression (Game Ready, Bregs) device, Standard ice packs
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VibraCool mechanical stimulation and neuromodulatory therapeutic deviceDevice

    Multiple studies have shown that vibration sources applied to muscles prior to exercise reduced soreness and lactate dehydrogenase production, and increased range of motion at 48 and 72 hours. Acute pain results from fast A nerves transmitting nociceptive information to the dorsal column, where the substantia gelatinosa's interneurons prioritize competing A mechanoreceptor and C-fibers to slow pain transmission. One study observed that stimulation of A mechanoreceptors "shut the gate" on pain transmission, an inhibitory mechanism known as "gate control". Multiple physical methodologies leverage gate control physiology for pain relief, such as vibratory massage therapy and electrical stimulation to varying degrees. However, the use of vibratory massage to improve pain control and reduce opioid use following ACLR has not been well studied, and to our knowledge there are no randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of this modality compared to standard ice or cryocompression.

  • Cryocompression (Game Ready, Bregs) deviceDevice

    Cryotherapy has also been used as an adjunctive post-operative therapy to reduce pain and inflammation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It has been shown to decrease local metabolism, resulting in reduced pain and inflammation. Multiple studies have shown the benefits of using cryotherapy after ACLR, and more recently dynamic intermittent compression has been shown to improve circulation while reducing the risk of skin necrosis associated with static permanent compression. A recent meta-analysis including ten RCTs found significant reductions in post-operative VAS pain scores and breakthrough opioid consumption when using cryotherapy, such as Game Ready or Breggs ice therapy, following ACLR.

  • Standard ice packsDevice

    Cold also provides peripheral gate-control relief via small, slow C-Fibers that transmit low level pain. In addition to local pain relief, intense cold can raise the A pain threshold distant to the location. The mechanism has been called descending or diffuse noxious inhibitory relief, or more recently conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Injections, aches, and infiltration of local anesthesia and dermal fillers are relieved by applying cold. For acute injury, near freezing cold relieves pain by suppressing the local metabolic production of inflammation and concomitant tissue ischemia from hypoxia due to the increased metabolic rate.

Study groups in NCT06456268
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard Ice packsActive comparatorStandard ice packs applied to knee for 20 minutes a day three times a day
Receives: Device: Standard ice packs
Cryocompression deviceActive comparatorCryocompression device (Game Ready, Bregs) with ice placed into the device and applied to knee for 20 minutes a day, three times a day
Receives: Device: Cryocompression (Game Ready, Bregs) device
VibraCoolExperimentalFDA-approved VibraCool mechanical stimulation and neuromodulatory therapeutic device with ice placed into it and applied to knee for 20 minutes a day, three times a day
Receives: Device: VibraCool mechanical stimulation and neuromodulatory therapeutic device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain

    Scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the worst pain and 0 being no pain. Will record daily mean VAS pain scores over the first seven post-operative days

    Measured: First 7 post-operative days

  2. Opioid use

    Percent of patients discontinuing opioid use by or on post-operative day three, compared to those who continue after day three

    Measured: First 3 post-operative days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Mean reduction in opioid use in mg of morphine equivalents per day

    mean reduction in opioid use in milligrams of morphine equivalents per day (MMOD) of 30% from patients not using the device over the 7-day period

    Measured: First 7 post-operative days

  2. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference score

    PROMIS is a computerized adaptive patient-reported test to measure interference of pain in everyday functioning. The raw score is converted to a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean and 10 is the standard deviation. Higher T-scores represent increased pain interference.

    Measured: First 7 post-operative days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jun 2024
  2. Study startNov 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
130 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06456268
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAU3696
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
8 Jun 2024
Last updated
28 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: None will be shared

Publications

  • Bartels K, Mayes LM, Dingmann C, Bullard KJ, Hopfer CJ, Binswanger IA. Opioid Use and Storage Patterns by Patients after Hospital Discharge following Surgery. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0147972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147972. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 26824844
  • Webster BS, Verma SK, Gatchel RJ. Relationship between early opioid prescribing for acute occupational low back pain and disability duration, medical costs, subsequent surgery and late opioid use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19):2127-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a731.

    PubMed 17762815
  • Bleakley C, McDonough S, MacAuley D. The use of ice in the treatment of acute soft-tissue injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;32(1):251-61. doi: 10.1177/0363546503260757.

    PubMed 14754753
  • Clarke H, Soneji N, Ko DT, Yun L, Wijeysundera DN. Rates and risk factors for prolonged opioid use after major surgery: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Feb 11;348:g1251. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1251.

    PubMed 24519537
  • Crystal NJ, Townson DH, Cook SB, LaRoche DP. Effect of cryotherapy on muscle recovery and inflammation following a bout of damaging exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Oct;113(10):2577-86. doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2693-9. Epub 2013 Jul 20.

    PubMed 23873339
  • Davey MS, Hurley ET, Anil U, Moses A, Thompson K, Alaia M, Strauss EJ, Campbell KA. Pain Management Strategies After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1290-1300.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

    PubMed 33515736
  • Scully RE, Schoenfeld AJ, Jiang W, Lipsitz S, Chaudhary MA, Learn PA, Koehlmoos T, Haider AH, Nguyen LL. Defining Optimal Length of Opioid Pain Medication Prescription After Common Surgical Procedures. JAMA Surg. 2018 Jan 1;153(1):37-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3132.

    PubMed 28973092
  • Hollins M, Roy EA, Crane SA. Vibratory antinociception: effects of vibration amplitude and frequency. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):381-91. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00714-4.

    PubMed 14622680
  • Khanna A, Gougoulias N, Maffulli N. Intermittent pneumatic compression in fracture and soft-tissue injuries healing. Br Med Bull. 2008;88(1):147-56. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldn024. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

    PubMed 18596049
  • Benedetti MG, Boccia G, Cavazzuti L, Magnani E, Mariani E, Rainoldi A, Casale R. Localized muscle vibration reverses quadriceps muscle hypotrophy and improves physical function: a clinical and electrophysiological study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Dec;40(4):339-346. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000242.

    PubMed 28723717

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing VibraCool mechanical stimulation and neuromodulatory therapeutic device, Cryocompression (Game Ready, Bregs) device and Standard ice packs in people with ACL and Opioid Use, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain (time frame: First 7 post-operative days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06456268, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in