NeurophysiologyNCT05102422
Quantitative Electroencephalogram and Bispectral Index Brain Mapping During Propofol vs Sevoflurane General Anesthesia
An observational study of Neurophysiology, run by Pierre Pandin.
Trial summary
General anesthesia interferes with the whole cerebral cortex at different levels. The goal was to investigate the impact of general anesthesia on different regions of the cerebral cortex by recording the brain's electrophysiological activity using QEEG and BIS during general anesthesia for 40 patients undergoing… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 87 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Neurophysiology
- What is being tested?
- Propofol 1 % Injectable Suspension and Sevoflurane inhalant product
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 21 Aug 2007to 15 Dec 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 87 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients scheduled for an orthopedic surgery to be operated in Erasme hospital, Belgium
Who may be able to join
- Non-obese (BMI<27)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II (classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists) adult patients
- Undergoing an orthopedic surgery
- Under general anesthesia
- Supine position
Who cannot join
- History of allergy, intolerance, or reaction to propofol or to sufentanil or hypersensitivity to either drug
- History of allergy, intolerance or reaction to sevoflurane or hypersensitivity to this drug
- History of malignant hyperthermia to sevoflurane or other halogenated gaz
- History of allergy, intolerance, or reaction to cisatracurium or hypersensitivity to this drug
- Any history of neurologic, neurovascular, neurosurgical, or psychiatric active pathology within past 6 months
- History of allergy to egg, soy, or lecithin
Show all 18Show fewer
- Uncontrolled arterial hypertension
- Unstable cardiac status (life-threatening arrhythmias, abnormal cardiac anatomy, significant cardiac dysfunction)
- Concomitant use of opioids, b-receptor antagonist, a2-receptor agonist or calcium channel blocker
- Currently receiving pharmacological agents for hypertension or cardiac disease
- Currently receiving or has received digoxin within the past 3 months BMI >28 kg m²
- Active, uncontrolled gastro-oesophageal reflux - an aspiration risk
- Current (or within past 3 months) history of apnea requiring an apnea monitor
- Craniofacial anomaly, which could make it difficult to effectively establish a mask airway for positive pressure ventilation if needed
- Active, current respiratory issues different from the baseline status (pneumonia, exacerbation of asthma, bronchiolitis, respiratory syncytial virus)
- Refusal of insertion of intravenous catheter while awake
- Patient refusal to participate in the study
- Cerebro-motor retardation / Mental disability / Psychological dependence / Legal guardianship
About this study
Official title: Quantitative Electroencephalogram and Bispectral Index Brain Mapping During Propofol vs Sevoflurane General Anesthesia A Randomized Comparative Trial
General anesthesia interferes with the whole cerebral cortex at different levels. The goal was to investigate the impact of general anesthesia on different regions of the cerebral cortex by recording the brain's electrophysiological activity using QEEG and BIS during general anesthesia for 40 patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries under general anesthesia to see whether our hypothesis, that there is a topographically-dependent impact of general anesthesia on different regions of the cerebral cortex, is valid or not. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups of 20 patients to compare the effect on the brain function monitoring (QEEG vs BIS) of the intravenous anesthesia (propofol) with the halogenated anesthesia (sevoflurane). And finally, we compared the two brain function monitoring techniques, BIS and QEEG.
Read the detailed description
After approval by the ethics committee, every patient signed a consent form to participate in this observational prospective open-label randomized study. We identified potential participants in the anesthesia pre-admission unit who presented to be seen by an anesthesiologist before their intervention. Details of eligibility criteria described later.
According to the international 10-20 reference system, 4 silver cup electrodes were placed on the left prefrontal (Fp1), parietal (P7), temporal (T7), and occipital (O1) points with the vertex (Cz) as a common reference after an adequate preparation of each scalp skin location using a micro-abrasive paste and degreasing using ethyl ether. The cup electrodes were placed and fixed on the skin with adhesive paste . After a similar skin preparation, an adult adhesive EKG surface electrode was secured to the patient's forehead as a cephalic ground electrode. Thus, by using 6 electrodes, we obtain a 4 channels set-up (prefrontal Fp1-CZ, parietal P7-Cz, temporal T7-Cz, and occipital O1-Cz) with a common vertex reference.
Each of the six electrodes of the montage are respectively connected to one special Y adapter including a double connection to be attached at the same time to the EEG amplifier, for the QEEG recording, and to the A1000™ Aspect Medical System™ amplifier, for the BIS recording. After the initial test of the electrode impedance (<5000 Ω), this last one was automatically checked all along the investigation to maintain the electrodes impedance below the same threshold. Regarding the QEEG, the low- and the high-frequency filters were set at 0.5 and 30 Hertz (Hz), respectively. EEG five seconds long epochs were sampled every 30 seconds for further analysis in the three respective domains (frequency, time, and power) in each EEG channel. Concerning the BIS monitoring, the EEG low- and high-frequency filters were set similarly to the QEEG whereas EEG sampling corresponds to 5-second segments of traces without smoothing, every 30 seconds. Finally, the BIS and its ancillary parameters simultaneously calculated in each channel, were extracted every 30 seconds. The selection of parameters for the QEEG analysis included Spectral Edge Frequency (SEF), Median EEG Frequency (MEF), Burst Suppression Ratio (BSR) and Total Spectral Power (TSP). Regarding the bispectral EEG analysis, the only parameter was the BIS itself. Thus, each parameter value is obtained for each channel during EEG and BIS sampling. Finally, for clinical monitoring, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse oximetry (Sa02) were considered.
After the standard clinical monitoring placement (ECG, non-invasive arterial pressure cuff and ear/finger pulse oximetry device) and a peripheral venous catheter insertion connected to an infusion line, the non-premedicated patients were preoxygenated with a facial mask with 100% oxygen. Capnography via nasal cannula were initially applied and monitored prior to the anesthetic induction and replaced by the manual ventilation system when needed during the general anesthesia (GA) effect occurrence. First, every patient received an intravenous (iv) bolus of 0,2 μg.kg-1 sufentanil. After that, in the group 1 the propofol (P) infusion was started using target-controlled infusion (TCI) with a Total IntraVenous Anesthesia (TIVA) pump (Schnider's pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data set); targeting the effect-concentration of 3µg.ml-1. From then on, the effect concentration was gradually increased by 1µg.ml-1 every two to three minutes until loss of consciousness (LOC as loss of verbal contact, spontaneous ventilation, corneal reflex, and ciliary reflex) occurred. At this point the effect concentration level of propofol upon loss of consciousness (PROPLOC) is recorded. At the same time, in group 2, sevoflurane (S) is started at one minimal alveolar concentration (2% in 50% oxygen) during mask assisted ventilation. Then, in a similar manner to group 1, the S concentration is gradually incremented by 2% until the LOC when the mask ventilation became fully assisted. The corresponding S effect-concentration (SEVOLOC) was also noted. Subsequently, the LOC confirmed, after an interval of 1 to 2 minutes, a first laryngoscopy was performed to test the possibility of intubation of the patients. In case of adequate intubation conditions (no physical or hemodynamical reaction to laryngoscopy and/or normal airway compliance), 0.1 mg.kg-1 of iv cisatracurium was given to prepare definitive intubation. When the patients did not encounter correct intubation conditions (first laryngoscopy failure), the P effect-concentration and the S end-tidal concentration were respectively increased of 1µg.ml-1 and 1% until the test laryngoscope was successful. After intravenous cisatracurium administration, manually assisted ventilation was conducted for 3 minutes in a way to have the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) between 32-35 mmHg. Intubation followed and intermittent positive pressure ventilation was used maintaining the same values of etCO2. The corresponding drug concentrations of propofol at intubation (PROPIntub) and sevoflurane at intubation (SEVOIntub) were recorded. From the moment the patient is mechanically ventilated, the effect concentration of propofol and the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane are reduced to 3 to 4 µg.ml-1 and one minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) respectively while awaiting the surgical incision. Then, during the following 15-minute period of data collection no external stimuli were permitted on or around the patient. This pharmacological steady-state period was considered for the comparative topographic analysis between the different electrode categories regarding the general anesthesia effect on the brain. Therefore, the intraoperative period extends from the surgical incision to the end of the surgery. During this period, it is left to the discretion of the anesthetist to add either an iv bolus of sufentanil (0.1 μg.kg-1) and/or an iv bolus of cisatracurium (0.1 mg.kg-1) only if necessary, in the clinical judgment of the practitioner. To note, the parametric values of the QEEG and BIS were not considered to guide the anesthesia throughout the investigation. The postoperative period begins after the end of surgery when the anesthesia is stopped and lasts until the patient is awake and calm, ready to leave the operating room after extubation.
- Conditions
- Neurophysiology
- Being tested
- Propofol 1 % Injectable Suspension, Sevoflurane inhalant product
- Keywords
- General anesthetics, Bispectral index, Quantitative electroencephalography, Monitoring
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Propofol 1 % Injectable SuspensionDrug
Also called Diprivan
Induction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the intravenous anesthetic
Sevoflurane inhalant productDrug
Also called Sevorane
Induction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Propofol | Induction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the intravenous anesthetic.
Every patient received an intravenous bolus of 0,2 μg.kg-1 sufentanil, and the propofol (P) infusion was started using target-controlled infusion (TCI - Schnider's pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data set); targeting the effect-concentration of 3 µg.ml-1. The effect concentration was gradually increased by 1µg.ml-1 every 2 to 3 minutes until loss of consciousness occurred. 0.1 mg.kg-1 of iv cisatracurium was given to prepare definitive intubation. The P effect-concentration were increased of 1 µg.ml-1 until test laryngoscope was successful and oro-tracheal intubation was performed.
The effect concentration of propofol is reduced to 3 to 4 µg.ml-1 while awaiting the surgical incision. It is then left to the discretion of the anesthetist to add either an iv bolus of sufentanil (0.1 μg.kg-1) and/or an iv bolus of cisatracurium (0.1 mg.kg-1) only if necessary, in the clinical judgment of the practitioner. Receives: Drug: Propofol 1 % Injectable Suspension | |
| 2-Sevoflurane | Induction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane.
Every patient received an intravenous (iv) bolus of 0,2 μg.kg-1 sufentanil, then sevoflurane (S) is started at one minimal alveolar concentration (2% in 50% oxygen) during mask assisted ventilation. The S concentration is gradually incremented by 2% until the LOC when the mask ventilation became fully assisted. 0.1 mg.kg-1 of iv cisatracurium was given to prepare definitive intubation. The S end-tidal concentration were increased of 1% until the test laryngoscope was successful and oro-tracheal intubation was performed. The end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane is reduced to one MAC while awaiting the surgical incision.
After surgical incision, it is left to the discretion of the anesthetist to add either an iv bolus of sufentanil (0.1 μg.kg-1) and/or an iv bolus of cisatracurium (0.1 mg.kg-1) only if necessary, in the clinical judgment of the practitioner. Receives: Drug: Sevoflurane inhalant product |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency domain analysis QEEG
Spectral Edge Frequency (Hz) and Median EEG Frequency (Hz) in the four cerebral cortical territories considered (PreFrontal Fp1; Temporal T7; Parietal and Occipital)
Measured: intraoperatively
Time domain analysis QEEG
BSR (Burst Suppression Ratio) in % in the four cerebral cortical territories considered
Measured: intraoperatively
Power domain analysis QEEG
Total Spectral Power (TSP) in the four cerebral cortical territories considered
Measured: intraoperatively
BIS
BIS recordings in the four cerebral cortical territories studied
Measured: intraoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Nov 2021
- Study start21 Aug 2007
- Primary completion15 Dec 2009
- Study completion15 Dec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NeurophysiologyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pierre Pandin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Pierre Pandin, Erasme University Hospital
- Investigators
- Pierre Pandin, MD, Study director, Erasme University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05102422
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- brainmap
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
John ER, Prichep LS, Kox W, Valdes-Sosa P, Bosch-Bayard J, Aubert E, Tom M, di Michele F, Gugino LD. Invariant reversible QEEG effects of anesthetics. Conscious Cogn. 2001 Jun;10(2):165-83. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2001.0507.
PubMed 11414713John ER, Prichep LS. The anesthetic cascade: a theory of how anesthesia suppresses consciousness. Anesthesiology. 2005 Feb;102(2):447-71. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200502000-00030. No abstract available.
PubMed 15681963Cimenser A, Purdon PL, Pierce ET, Walsh JL, Salazar-Gomez AF, Harrell PG, Tavares-Stoeckel C, Habeeb K, Brown EN. Tracking brain states under general anesthesia by using global coherence analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 24;108(21):8832-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017041108. Epub 2011 May 9.
PubMed 21555565Hudetz AG. General anesthesia and human brain connectivity. Brain Connect. 2012;2(6):291-302. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0107.
PubMed 23153273Pandin P, Van Cutsem N, Tuna T, D'hollander A. Bispectral index is a topographically dependent variable in patients receiving propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Nov;97(5):676-80. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael235. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
PubMed 16928697
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Quantitative Electroencephalogram and Bispectral Index Brain Mapping During Propofol vs Sevoflurane General Anesthesia A Randomized Comparative Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05102422
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- brainmap
- Conditions
- Neurophysiology
- Keywords
- General anesthetics, Bispectral index, Quantitative electroencephalography, Monitoring
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pierre PandinUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Aug 2007 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
General anesthesia interferes with the whole cerebral cortex at different levels. The goal was to investigate the impact of general anesthesia on different regions of the cerebral cortex by recording the brain's electrophysiological activity using QEEG and BIS during general anesthesia for 40 patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries under general anesthesia to see whether our hypothesis, that there is a topographically-dependent impact of general anesthesia on different regions of the cerebral cortex, is valid or not. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups of 20 patients to compare the effect on the brain function monitoring (QEEG vs BIS) of the intravenous anesthesia (propofol) with the halogenated anesthesia (sevoflurane). And finally, we compared the two brain function monitoring techniques, BIS and QEEG.
Detailed description
After approval by the ethics committee, every patient signed a consent form to participate in this observational prospective open-label randomized study. We identified potential participants in the anesthesia pre-admission unit who presented to be seen by an anesthesiologist before their intervention. Details of eligibility criteria described later.
According to the international 10-20 reference system, 4 silver cup electrodes were placed on the left prefrontal (Fp1), parietal (P7), temporal (T7), and occipital (O1) points with the vertex (Cz) as a common reference after an adequate preparation of each scalp skin location using a micro-abrasive paste and degreasing using ethyl ether. The cup electrodes were placed and fixed on the skin with adhesive paste . After a similar skin preparation, an adult adhesive EKG surface electrode was secured to the patient's forehead as a cephalic ground electrode. Thus, by using 6 electrodes, we obtain a 4 channels set-up (prefrontal Fp1-CZ, parietal P7-Cz, temporal T7-Cz, and occipital O1-Cz) with a common vertex reference.
Each of the six electrodes of the montage are respectively connected to one special Y adapter including a double connection to be attached at the same time to the EEG amplifier, for the QEEG recording, and to the A1000™ Aspect Medical System™ amplifier, for the BIS recording. After the initial test of the electrode impedance (<5000 Ω), this last one was automatically checked all along the investigation to maintain the electrodes impedance below the same threshold. Regarding the QEEG, the low- and the high-frequency filters were set at 0.5 and 30 Hertz (Hz), respectively. EEG five seconds long epochs were sampled every 30 seconds for further analysis in the three respective domains (frequency, time, and power) in each EEG channel. Concerning the BIS monitoring, the EEG low- and high-frequency filters were set similarly to the QEEG whereas EEG sampling corresponds to 5-second segments of traces without smoothing, every 30 seconds. Finally, the BIS and its ancillary parameters simultaneously calculated in each channel, were extracted every 30 seconds. The selection of parameters for the QEEG analysis included Spectral Edge Frequency (SEF), Median EEG Frequency (MEF), Burst Suppression Ratio (BSR) and Total Spectral Power (TSP). Regarding the bispectral EEG analysis, the only parameter was the BIS itself. Thus, each parameter value is obtained for each channel during EEG and BIS sampling. Finally, for clinical monitoring, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse oximetry (Sa02) were considered.
After the standard clinical monitoring placement (ECG, non-invasive arterial pressure cuff and ear/finger pulse oximetry device) and a peripheral venous catheter insertion connected to an infusion line, the non-premedicated patients were preoxygenated with a facial mask with 100% oxygen. Capnography via nasal cannula were initially applied and monitored prior to the anesthetic induction and replaced by the manual ventilation system when needed during the general anesthesia (GA) effect occurrence. First, every patient received an intravenous (iv) bolus of 0,2 μg.kg-1 sufentanil. After that, in the group 1 the propofol (P) infusion was started using target-controlled infusion (TCI) with a Total IntraVenous Anesthesia (TIVA) pump (Schnider's pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data set); targeting the effect-concentration of 3µg.ml-1. From then on, the effect concentration was gradually increased by 1µg.ml-1 every two to three minutes until loss of consciousness (LOC as loss of verbal contact, spontaneous ventilation, corneal reflex, and ciliary reflex) occurred. At this point the effect concentration level of propofol upon loss of consciousness (PROPLOC) is recorded. At the same time, in group 2, sevoflurane (S) is started at one minimal alveolar concentration (2% in 50% oxygen) during mask assisted ventilation. Then, in a similar manner to group 1, the S concentration is gradually incremented by 2% until the LOC when the mask ventilation became fully assisted. The corresponding S effect-concentration (SEVOLOC) was also noted. Subsequently, the LOC confirmed, after an interval of 1 to 2 minutes, a first laryngoscopy was performed to test the possibility of intubation of the patients. In case of adequate intubation conditions (no physical or hemodynamical reaction to laryngoscopy and/or normal airway compliance), 0.1 mg.kg-1 of iv cisatracurium was given to prepare definitive intubation. When the patients did not encounter correct intubation conditions (first laryngoscopy failure), the P effect-concentration and the S end-tidal concentration were respectively increased of 1µg.ml-1 and 1% until the test laryngoscope was successful. After intravenous cisatracurium administration, manually assisted ventilation was conducted for 3 minutes in a way to have the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) between 32-35 mmHg. Intubation followed and intermittent positive pressure ventilation was used maintaining the same values of etCO2. The corresponding drug concentrations of propofol at intubation (PROPIntub) and sevoflurane at intubation (SEVOIntub) were recorded. From the moment the patient is mechanically ventilated, the effect concentration of propofol and the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane are reduced to 3 to 4 µg.ml-1 and one minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) respectively while awaiting the surgical incision. Then, during the following 15-minute period of data collection no external stimuli were permitted on or around the patient. This pharmacological steady-state period was considered for the comparative topographic analysis between the different electrode categories regarding the general anesthesia effect on the brain. Therefore, the intraoperative period extends from the surgical incision to the end of the surgery. During this period, it is left to the discretion of the anesthetist to add either an iv bolus of sufentanil (0.1 μg.kg-1) and/or an iv bolus of cisatracurium (0.1 mg.kg-1) only if necessary, in the clinical judgment of the practitioner. To note, the parametric values of the QEEG and BIS were not considered to guide the anesthesia throughout the investigation. The postoperative period begins after the end of surgery when the anesthesia is stopped and lasts until the patient is awake and calm, ready to leave the operating room after extubation.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Propofol | – | Drug: Propofol 1 % Injectable SuspensionInduction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the intravenous anesthetic. Every patient received an intravenous bolus of 0,2 μg.kg-1 sufentanil, and the propofol (P) infusion was started using target-controlled infusion (TCI - Schnider's pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data set); targeting the effect-concentration of 3 µg.ml-1. The effect concentration was gradually increased by 1µg.ml-1 every 2 to 3 minutes until loss of consciousness occurred. 0.1 mg.kg-1 of iv cisatracurium was given to prepare definitive intubation. The P effect-concentration were increased of 1 µg.ml-1 until test laryngoscope was successful and oro-tracheal intubation was performed. The effect concentration of propofol is reduced to 3 to 4 µg.ml-1 while awaiting the surgical incision. It is then left to the discretion of the anesthetist to add either an iv bolus of sufentanil (0.1 μg.kg-1) and/or an iv bolus of cisatracurium (0.1 mg.kg-1) only if necessary, in the clinical judgment of the practitioner. |
| 2-Sevoflurane | – | Drug: Sevoflurane inhalant productInduction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane. Every patient received an intravenous (iv) bolus of 0,2 μg.kg-1 sufentanil, then sevoflurane (S) is started at one minimal alveolar concentration (2% in 50% oxygen) during mask assisted ventilation. The S concentration is gradually incremented by 2% until the LOC when the mask ventilation became fully assisted. 0.1 mg.kg-1 of iv cisatracurium was given to prepare definitive intubation. The S end-tidal concentration were increased of 1% until the test laryngoscope was successful and oro-tracheal intubation was performed. The end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane is reduced to one MAC while awaiting the surgical incision. After surgical incision, it is left to the discretion of the anesthetist to add either an iv bolus of sufentanil (0.1 μg.kg-1) and/or an iv bolus of cisatracurium (0.1 mg.kg-1) only if necessary, in the clinical judgment of the practitioner. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 87 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients scheduled for an orthopedic surgery to be operated in Erasme hospital, Belgium
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Non-obese (BMI<27)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II (classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists) adult patients
- Undergoing an orthopedic surgery
- Under general anesthesia
- Supine position
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- History of allergy, intolerance, or reaction to propofol or to sufentanil or hypersensitivity to either drug
- History of allergy, intolerance or reaction to sevoflurane or hypersensitivity to this drug
- History of malignant hyperthermia to sevoflurane or other halogenated gaz
- History of allergy, intolerance, or reaction to cisatracurium or hypersensitivity to this drug
- Any history of neurologic, neurovascular, neurosurgical, or psychiatric active pathology within past 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Propofol 1 % Injectable SuspensionAlso: DiprivanInduction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the intravenous anesthetic | Drug | 1-Propofol |
| Sevoflurane inhalant productAlso: SevoraneInduction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane | Drug | 2-Sevoflurane |
Primary outcome
Frequency domain analysis QEEG
Time frame: intraoperatively
Spectral Edge Frequency (Hz) and Median EEG Frequency (Hz) in the four cerebral cortical territories considered (PreFrontal Fp1; Temporal T7; Parietal and Occipital)
Time domain analysis QEEG
Time frame: intraoperatively
BSR (Burst Suppression Ratio) in % in the four cerebral cortical territories considered
Power domain analysis QEEG
Time frame: intraoperatively
Total Spectral Power (TSP) in the four cerebral cortical territories considered
BIS
Time frame: intraoperatively
BIS recordings in the four cerebral cortical territories studied
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2021.
- Background: PubMed 11414713John ER, Prichep LS, Kox W, Valdes-Sosa P, Bosch-Bayard J, Aubert E, Tom M, di Michele F, Gugino LD. Invariant reversible QEEG effects of anesthetics. Conscious Cogn. 2001 Jun;10(2):165-83. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2001.0507.
- Background: PubMed 15681963John ER, Prichep LS. The anesthetic cascade: a theory of how anesthesia suppresses consciousness. Anesthesiology. 2005 Feb;102(2):447-71. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200502000-00030. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21555565Cimenser A, Purdon PL, Pierce ET, Walsh JL, Salazar-Gomez AF, Harrell PG, Tavares-Stoeckel C, Habeeb K, Brown EN. Tracking brain states under general anesthesia by using global coherence analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 24;108(21):8832-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017041108. Epub 2011 May 9.
- Background: PubMed 23153273Hudetz AG. General anesthesia and human brain connectivity. Brain Connect. 2012;2(6):291-302. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0107.
- Background: PubMed 16928697Pandin P, Van Cutsem N, Tuna T, D'hollander A. Bispectral index is a topographically dependent variable in patients receiving propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Nov;97(5):676-80. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael235. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Neurophysiology
Recruiting
NEURO-IS: Neurophysiology of Inner Speech Across Neurotypical Participants.
Healthy Volunteer
Recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Movement Disorders
Parkinson's Disease, Essential Tremor
RecruitingObservational study
Comparative Study of Gender Identity Disorder Versus Control
Gender Dysphoria, Adult
RecruitingPhase 2
Imaging the Effects of Serotonin 2A Receptor Modulation on Synaptic Density in Treatment-resistant Depression (SYNVEST)
Treatment Resistant Depression
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Testosterone and Neural Function in Men With Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pierre Pandin, MD study director
Erasme University Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Neurophysiology, run by Pierre Pandin.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency domain analysis QEEG (time frame: intraoperatively). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05102422, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2021.