ChildrenI4PNCT05103930
InnovationForParticipation
An observational study of Children and Disabilities, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Children with disabilities experience activities limitations and participation restrictions. Facilitating the children with disabilities' independence while performing tasks is a key stake to improve their successful participation and their development. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Children, Disabilities
- How many people
- 1,055 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 11 Mar 2019to 31 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Three participant profiles are targeted to collect information about life situations during which a technical solution might be useful for children with disabilities: children and young adults with disabilities since childhood, their relatives (family and friendly network) and the professionals who work with them
Who may be able to join
- Persons with disabilities, their families and professionals who work with them
Who cannot join
- non-French respondents
- duplicates
- void answers
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Innovation for Participation
Children with disabilities experience activities limitations and participation restrictions. Facilitating the children with disabilities' independence while performing tasks is a key stake to improve their successful participation and their development.
Products and technology can prevent, compensate, relieve or neutralize disability or handicap and help children and youth with disabilities to perform tasks that might otherwise be difficult or impossible.
Read more
The aim of this study was i) to identify the most frequent activity limitations and participation restrictions for which assistive products and technology may be useful for children and youth with disabilities, and ii) to highlight macroscopic trends related to encountered difficulties and wished products and technology.
The hypotheses were i/ that difficulties would be particularly expected for certain life situations, especially outside the home in an unfamiliar environment ii/ that products and technology would be wished for those situations which should be defined as priority subjects and iii/ that thanks to those results it could be possible to highlight new processes to develop innovative solutions.
Read the detailed description
The study was conducted according to current French legislation (loi Jardé (n°2012-300).It was a cross-sectional study with a convergent parallel mixed method design. It used an online open survey following the STROBE and CHERRIES guidelines. A tailored survey with closed and open questions was used to obtain complementarity data on the topic i.e. to identify the most frequent life situations for children with disabilities for which a product or technology could be useful and drill deeper in these situations with responders' personal experiences to characterize those situations and identify wished solutions.
Survey's development The survey was developed by a group involving three Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation physicians and two occupational therapists. The conceptual framework of the ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and health) which recognizes the role of environmental factors in the creation of disability was used. The survey was pilot tested by two mothers of children with disabilities and an adult who has had a disability since childhood. Comments were considered to improve the survey in a second version.
It was developed using an online tool (google form). Three versions were developed targeting the three participant profiles: persons with childhood onset disabilities, their relatives and the professionals who work with them. Each version was composed of 14 to 16 questions (in 6 pages). Firstly, participants had access to a description of the study with a dedicated picture so that making everyone aware of the project, and precising the general objective of the study. Then, questions were asked on epidemiological data. In a second step, a closed multiple-choice question was presented with a pre-established list of life situations of a regular day. Responders had to select the life situations which they evaluated as the most difficult for children with disabilities to be involved in. Respondents could tick as many items as they wished. All items were extracted from validated scales ("Life H": assesment of Life habits/ "ABILHAND assessment" / "ABILOCO KIDS"/ "PEDI": Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory / "ACTIVLIM-CP"). The list was proposed in a chronological order in order to help the responder think of his own life. Then, open questions invited the respondents to precise the ticked items. The first open question proposed to precisely describe examples from the respondents' own experience (hereinafter referred to as "difficulties") in regular weekdays. Then they had to describe wished strategies that could allow an improvement (hereinafter referred to as "solutions"). Eventually, these last three questions were repeated but dealing with weekend and holidays situations instead of regular weekday situations. The survey was conceived to be short and take less than 10 minutes. Respondents could review and change their answers. No completeness check was proposed. Responders could not be identified from the survey (no identity data, no email or Internet Protocol (IP) address), thus anonymity was guaranteed.
Survey's distribution Participants were surveyed through convenience and snowball sampling to obtain data from participants with a wide range of situations between March and December 2019. The survey was promoted in France through "SFERHE" (Société Francophone d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Handicaps de l'Enfance) and through the "EACD" (European Academy of Childhood Disability). A leaflet was prepared to present the project. It was posted in hospitals and distributed on social media (Linked in, Facebook, Twitter), and by e-mail. To facilitate the diffusion, the survey was addressed to families and patients' organisations (FFAIMC, "Fondation PC", "AFM"), professional networks ("réseaux maladies rares") and directly promoted during professional events (e.g. "EACD 2019 Paris", "SOFMER 2019 Bordeaux"). Participants answered voluntarily, no incentive was proposed.
- Conditions
- Children, Disabilities
- Keywords
- assistive products, technology, children with disabilities, life situation
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Survey- quantitative data
Quantitative data: identify the frequent difficult life situations for which a technical solution could be useful for children with disabilities
Measured: From March 2019 to January 2020
Survey- qualitative data
Qualitative data: drill deeper in these situations with responders' personal experiences
Measured: From March 2019 to January 2020
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2021
- Study start11 Mar 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2019
- Study completion31 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ChildrenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Family based
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 1,055 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Brest
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sylvain Brochard, Study director, CHRU de Brest, Brest, FranceChristelle Pons, Principal investigator, Fondation Ildys
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05103930
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- InnovationForParticipation
- Acronym
- I4P
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 4 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Innovation for Participation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05103930
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- I4P / InnovationForParticipation
- Conditions
- Children, Disabilities
- Keywords
- assistive products, technology, children with disabilities, life situation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,055 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BrestUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Children with disabilities experience activities limitations and participation restrictions. Facilitating the children with disabilities' independence while performing tasks is a key stake to improve their successful participation and their development.
Products and technology can prevent, compensate, relieve or neutralize disability or handicap and help children and youth with disabilities to perform tasks that might otherwise be difficult or impossible.
The aim of this study was i) to identify the most frequent activity limitations and participation restrictions for which assistive products and technology may be useful for children and youth with disabilities, and ii) to highlight macroscopic trends related to encountered difficulties and wished products and technology.
The hypotheses were i/ that difficulties would be particularly expected for certain life situations, especially outside the home in an unfamiliar environment ii/ that products and technology would be wished for those situations which should be defined as priority subjects and iii/ that thanks to those results it could be possible to highlight new processes to develop innovative solutions.
Detailed description
The study was conducted according to current French legislation (loi Jardé (n°2012-300).It was a cross-sectional study with a convergent parallel mixed method design. It used an online open survey following the STROBE and CHERRIES guidelines. A tailored survey with closed and open questions was used to obtain complementarity data on the topic i.e. to identify the most frequent life situations for children with disabilities for which a product or technology could be useful and drill deeper in these situations with responders' personal experiences to characterize those situations and identify wished solutions.
Survey's development The survey was developed by a group involving three Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation physicians and two occupational therapists. The conceptual framework of the ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and health) which recognizes the role of environmental factors in the creation of disability was used. The survey was pilot tested by two mothers of children with disabilities and an adult who has had a disability since childhood. Comments were considered to improve the survey in a second version.
It was developed using an online tool (google form). Three versions were developed targeting the three participant profiles: persons with childhood onset disabilities, their relatives and the professionals who work with them. Each version was composed of 14 to 16 questions (in 6 pages). Firstly, participants had access to a description of the study with a dedicated picture so that making everyone aware of the project, and precising the general objective of the study. Then, questions were asked on epidemiological data. In a second step, a closed multiple-choice question was presented with a pre-established list of life situations of a regular day. Responders had to select the life situations which they evaluated as the most difficult for children with disabilities to be involved in. Respondents could tick as many items as they wished. All items were extracted from validated scales ("Life H": assesment of Life habits/ "ABILHAND assessment" / "ABILOCO KIDS"/ "PEDI": Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory / "ACTIVLIM-CP"). The list was proposed in a chronological order in order to help the responder think of his own life. Then, open questions invited the respondents to precise the ticked items. The first open question proposed to precisely describe examples from the respondents' own experience (hereinafter referred to as "difficulties") in regular weekdays. Then they had to describe wished strategies that could allow an improvement (hereinafter referred to as "solutions"). Eventually, these last three questions were repeated but dealing with weekend and holidays situations instead of regular weekday situations. The survey was conceived to be short and take less than 10 minutes. Respondents could review and change their answers. No completeness check was proposed. Responders could not be identified from the survey (no identity data, no email or Internet Protocol (IP) address), thus anonymity was guaranteed.
Survey's distribution Participants were surveyed through convenience and snowball sampling to obtain data from participants with a wide range of situations between March and December 2019. The survey was promoted in France through "SFERHE" (Société Francophone d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Handicaps de l'Enfance) and through the "EACD" (European Academy of Childhood Disability). A leaflet was prepared to present the project. It was posted in hospitals and distributed on social media (Linked in, Facebook, Twitter), and by e-mail. To facilitate the diffusion, the survey was addressed to families and patients' organisations (FFAIMC, "Fondation PC", "AFM"), professional networks ("réseaux maladies rares") and directly promoted during professional events (e.g. "EACD 2019 Paris", "SOFMER 2019 Bordeaux"). Participants answered voluntarily, no incentive was proposed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Family based
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Three participant profiles are targeted to collect information about life situations during which a technical solution might be useful for children with disabilities: children and young adults with disabilities since childhood, their relatives (family and friendly network) and the professionals who work with them
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Persons with disabilities, their families and professionals who work with them
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- non-French respondents
- duplicates
- void answers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Survey- quantitative data
Time frame: From March 2019 to January 2020
Quantitative data: identify the frequent difficult life situations for which a technical solution could be useful for children with disabilities
Survey- qualitative data
Time frame: From March 2019 to January 2020
Qualitative data: drill deeper in these situations with responders' personal experiences
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Apr 2022.
Related trials for Children
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Zopapogene Imadenovec for the Treatment of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis in Children
Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis (RRP), Juvenile-onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis
Recruiting
Evaluating Operation Calm With Children, Parents, and Clinicians
Preoperative Anxiety Experienced by the Pediatric Patient, Dental Anxiety in Children
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1010 in Healthy Children
Seasonal Influenza
Not yet recruiting
Effects of the 11 for Health Program on Physical Fitness and Health-Related Outcomes in Schoolchildren
Physical Fitness, Health
Recruiting
Exercise and Physical Activity in Children With Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury
Acquired Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sylvain Brochard study director
CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
Christelle Pons principal investigator
Fondation Ildys
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Children and Disabilities, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Survey- quantitative data (time frame: From March 2019 to January 2020). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2022.