AzTrials
AzTrials

Wound of SkinNCT05107050

Comparing a Synergistic Antimicrobial Cleanser and Gel to Normal Saline and an Amorphous Gel in Reducing Bioburden and Promoting Healing in Chronic Lower Extremity Ulcers

A study testing Normal Saline and Amorphous gel and BIAKOS™ Antimicrobial Skin & Wound Cleanser, BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel in people with Wound of Skin, run by SerenaGroup, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial designed to compare healing rates between normal saline wash in combination with an amorphous gel (NSS-HG) versus the grouping of a synergistic antimicrobial cleanser (AMC) and antimicrobial gel (AMG) in chronic lower extremity ulcers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Wound of Skin
What is being tested?
Normal Saline and Amorphous gel and BIAKOS™ Antimicrobial Skin & Wound Cleanser, BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Dec 2021to 25 May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 18 years old
  • Presence of a diabetic foot ulcer, Wagner 1 or 2 grade, extending at least through the dermis or subcutaneous tissue and may involve the tendon or muscle provided it is below the medial aspect of the malleolus OR Presence of a full thickness venous leg ulcer (VLU)
  • Index ulcer (i.e. current episode of ulceration) has been present for greater than 4 weeks prior to the initial screening visit.
  • Study ulcer size is a minimum of 0.75 cm2 and a maximum of 5 cm2 at first treatment visit for DFU OR a minimum of 2.0cm2 and a maximum of 20.0 cm2 at the first treatment visit for VLU.
  • Adequate circulation to the affected extremity as demonstrated by a transcutaneous oxygen measurement (TCOM) or a skin perfusion pressure (SPP) measurement of ≥ 30 mmHg, OR an Ankle Brachial Index (ABI - measure of blood flow to the ankle) between 0.7 and ≤ 1.3 OR a toe brachial index >0.5 within 3 months of the first Screening Visit.
  • Females of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable methods of contraception (birth control pills, barriers, or abstinence).
  • Subject understands and is willing to participate in the clinical study and can comply with weekly visits and the follow-up regimen.
  • Subject has read and signed the IRB approved Informed Consent Form before screening procedures are undertaken.

Who cannot join

  • Study ulcer(s) deemed by the investigator to be caused by a medical condition other than diabetes or venous disease.
  • A surgery for operative debridement or revascularization is planned for the ulcer to be treated.
  • Index ulcer has a history of cancer or, in the opinion of the investigator, is suspicious for cancer and should undergo an ulcer biopsy to rule out a carcinoma of the ulcer.
  • Subjects with a history of more than two weeks treatment with immunosuppressants (including systemic corticosteroids >10mg daily dose), cytotoxic chemotherapy, or application of topical steroids to the ulcer surface within one month prior to first Screening Visit, or who receive such medications during the screening period, or who are anticipated to require such medications during the course of the study.
  • History of radiation at the ulcer site.
  • Subject with DFUs who cannot adhere to strict offloading according to protocol standards in the opinion of the investigator.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Subjects with VLUs who cannot adhere to multilayer compression.
  • Presence of any condition(s) which seriously compromises the subject's ability to complete this study or has a known history of poor adherence with medical treatment.
  • Active treatment of infection anywhere in the body with IV antibiotics, at screening and baseline.
  • Suspected or confirmed signs/symptoms of gangrene on any part of the affected limb.
  • Known Osteomyelitis or bone infection of the affected foot or leg as verified by diagnostic imaging within 30 days prior to enrollment.
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding.
  • Study ulcer with a history of treatment with hyperbaric oxygen, growth factors or other biologic treatments, or a Cellular or Tissue-based Product (CTP) within 30 days of enrollment.
  • Subject has a known or suspected allergy to products under study.
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The Serens Group Austin Research Center

    Austin, Texas, 78701

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing a Synergistic Antimicrobial Cleanser and Gel to Normal Saline and an Amorphous Gel in Reducing Bioburden and Promoting Healing in Chronic Lower Extremity Ulcers

The study is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial designed to compare healing rates between normal saline wash in combination with an amorphous gel (NSS-HG) versus the grouping of a synergistic antimicrobial cleanser (AMC) and antimicrobial gel (AMG) in chronic lower extremity ulcers.

After consenting, the ulcers of eligible subjects are measured, photographed and undergo the MolecuLight imaging procedure (MiX). The subject is then randomized to one of two arms: target ulcer cleansed saline wash and an amorphous gel (NSS-HG) or synergistic antimicrobial cleanser (AMC) and antimicrobial gel (AMG). After cleansing the wound a second MiX is performed. The subject is given a four-week supply.

Read the detailed description

BIAKOS™ Antimicrobial Skin \& Wound Cleanser helps in the mechanical removal of debris and foreign material from the skin, wound, or application site. BIAKOS™ Antimicrobial Skin and Wound Cleanser is a pure, colorless, isotonic cleanser that is safe. The preservative, PHMB, at a concentration of 0.1% w/w is added to the product to inhibit the growth of microorganisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, antibiotic resistant Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA). and fungus Candida albicans within the product.

BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel provides a moist environment to wound surfaces. BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel is a safe and gentle colorless gel. The gel provides preservative properties through the antimicrobial PHMB. BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel: • Resists microbial colonization within the gel during shelf storage. • Provides an amorphous gel covering. • Facilitates autolytic debridement through a moist wound environment. Wounds experience some level of autolytic debridement in which the body's own enzymes breakdown necrotic tissue.

Conditions
Wound of Skin
Being tested
Normal Saline and Amorphous gel, BIAKOS™ Antimicrobial Skin & Wound Cleanser, BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Normal Saline and Amorphous gelDevice

    Saline - sodium chloride and water Amorphous hydrogel dressings are formulations of water, polymers

  • BIAKOS™ Antimicrobial Skin & Wound Cleanser, BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound GelDevice

    Antimicrobial Skin \& Wound Cleanser helps in the mechanical removal of debris and foreign material from the skin, wound, or application site.

    BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel provides a moist environment to wound surfaces. BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel is a safe and gentle colorless gel. The gel provides preservative properties through the antimicrobial PHMB. BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel: • Resists microbial colonization within the gel during shelf storage. • Provides an amorphous gel covering. • Facilitates autolytic debridement through a moist wound environment. Wounds experience some level of autolytic debridement in which the body's own enzymes breakdown necrotic tissue.

Study groups in NCT05107050
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Normal saline wash and an amorphous gel (NSS-HG)Active comparatorNormal Saline Wash and Amorphous Gel
Receives: Device: Normal Saline and Amorphous gel
synergistic antimicrobial cleanser (AMC) and antimicrobial gel (AMG)ExperimentalAntimicrobial Skin \& Wound Cleanser helps in the mechanical removal of debris and foreign material from the skin, wound, or application site. BIAKOS™ BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel provides a moist environment to wound surfaces. BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel is a safe and gentle colorless gel.
Receives: Device: BIAKOS™ Antimicrobial Skin & Wound Cleanser, BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compare healing rates (percent area reduction) through digital device

    Compare healing rates (percent area reduction) between normal saline wash and an amorphous gel (NSS-HG) to the combination of a synergistic antimicrobial cleanser (AMC) and antimicrobial gel (AMG) in chronic lower extremity ulcers.

    Measured: 4-weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Compare the reduction in bacterial bioburden

    Compare the reduction in bacterial bioburden as determined by the MolecuLight Procedure (MiX) between lower extremity ulcers treated with NSS-HG and AMC-AMG as determined by the WoundChek Protease Status between lower extremity ulcers treated with NSS-HG and AMC-AMG.

    Measured: 4-weeks

  2. Pain Score

    The difference in pain scores between subjects treated with NSS-HG and AMC-AMG using the numeric PEG score. The PEG scale is a validated pain scoring system. It consists of three 1-10 rating scales.

    Measured: 4-weeks

  3. Adverse Events

    Compare the difference in adverse events between subjects treated with NSS-HG and AMC-AMG determined by adverse event reporting through case report forms.

    Measured: 4-weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion1 May 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion25 May 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial comparing a synergistic antimicrobial cleanser and gel to normal saline comparing to an amorphous gel in reducing bioburden and promoting healing in chronic lower extremity ulcers
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05107050
Sponsor's protocol ID
BIAKŌS
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
27 Oct 2021
Last updated
26 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Normal Saline and Amorphous gel and BIAKOS™ Antimicrobial Skin & Wound Cleanser, BIAKŌS Antimicrobial Wound Gel in people with Wound of Skin, run by SerenaGroup, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compare healing rates (percent area reduction) through digital device (time frame: 4-weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in