AzTrials
AzTrials

Tuberculosis, PulmonaryPredicTBNCT05122624

A Clinical Risk Score for Early Management of TB in Uganda

A study testing PredicTB score in people with Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in Uganda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Although curative treatment exists, tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of infectious mortality worldwide - often because people seek care for TB symptoms in highly resource-constrained clinics that cannot provide same-day diagnostic testing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
What is being tested?
PredicTB score
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,332 participants
Where
1 siteUganda
Study dates
10 Nov 2021to 29 Feb 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All adult patients submitting sputum for a new diagnosis of pulmonary TB in the four study clinics and four comparison clinics between month -6 and month 18 will have their records abstracted by study staff.
  • Starting in the 13th month after PredicTB implementation (i.e., after the 12-month post-implementation period has ended), study staff will position themselves in the four study clinics for purposes of recruiting and enrolling adult patients submitting sputum for a new diagnosis of pulmonary TB. No exclusions will be made except for age (as above), and we will seek to enroll all consecutive patients until our target sample size (25 participants per clinic, total n = 100) has been reached.

Who cannot join

  • Age < 15 years old

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Uganda1 site
  • Makerere University

    Kampala

Other trials in Uganda

About this study

Official title: PredicTB: Validating a Clinical Risk Score for Early Management of Tuberculosis in Ugandan Primary Health Clinics

Although curative treatment exists, tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of infectious mortality worldwide - often because people seek care for TB symptoms in highly resource-constrained clinics that cannot provide same-day diagnostic testing. The research team has developed an easy-to-use clinical risk score that, if implemented in these settings, might help clinicians identify patients at high risk for TB and thereby start treatment for those patients on the same day. This study will investigate the effectiveness and implementation of this score in four peri-urban clinics in Uganda, providing critical pragmatic data to inform (or halt) the design of a definitive large-scale cluster randomized trial.

Read the detailed description

An estimated 1.5 million people die of tuberculosis (TB) every year. Many of these are people who seek care in under-resourced clinics (for example, in rural areas or informal settlements) where same-day TB diagnosis is not available. These patients are often unable to return promptly to receive their results and start treatment, resulting in ongoing disease transmission and often death. If TB treatment could be started on the same day as these patients initially seek care, substantial mortality and transmission could be averted. The research team has developed and validated a clinical risk score ("PredicTB") for adult pulmonary TB that could aid in clinical decision-making. This risk score ranges from 1-10, can be calculated by hand in under a minute using readily available clinical data (e.g., age, sex, self-reported HIV status), and has sufficiently high accuracy to inform decisions about same-day empiric treatment initiation while confirmatory test results are pending. Same-day treatment initiation improves patient outcomes for other infectious diseases (for example, sexually transmitted diseases including HIV), and this novel clinical risk score holds similar promise for TB, the leading cause of infectious mortality worldwide. However, before conducting a large-scale cluster randomized trial to evaluate whether this score could improve patient-important outcomes, it is critical to first generate evidence that this score could be effective and be implemented in the most-resource-limited settings for which it is intended.

The research team proposes a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation evaluation of the PredicTB clinical risk score in four peri-urban clinics in Uganda, with an additional four clinics serving as a comparison group. The Specific Aims are to evaluate the effectiveness of PredicTB on clinical outcomes including rapid treatment initiation, TB mortality, and loss to care (Aim 1); to evaluate the implementation of PredicTB in terms of reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (Aim 2); and the project the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of PredicTB implementation (Aim 3). The primary outcome is the increase in the proportion of patients with microbiologically confirmed TB who start treatment within seven days of initial presentation. To accomplish these aims, the research team will adopt a highly pragmatic study design in which the research team train clinicians in the use of the PredicTB score and perform quarterly site visits but otherwise minimize contact between study staff and treating clinicians. This will enable the research team to evaluate whether implementation of PredicTB is likely to impact clinical decision-making and patient outcomes under actual field settings. If successful, this evaluation will provide critical data to justify (or halt) the conduct of a large-scale pragmatic clinical trial - not only will it generate preliminary evidence of effectiveness, but it will also inform appropriate implementation. Patients in highly resource-constrained settings are at the greatest risk of suffering the ill effects of TB disease, including long-term morbidity and death. This study represents an important first step toward improving clinical management for these marginalized patients and thus toward reaching global targets for ending the TB epidemic.

Being tested
PredicTB score
Medical subject headings
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PredicTB scoreOther

    This is an easy-to-use clinical risk score designed to improve early management of tuberculosis in highly resource-constrained settings where same-day microbiological testing is unavailable. It consists of readily accessible demographic and clinical data and is scored from 1-10.

    We will train clinic staff in eight clinics (four study clinics and four comparison clinics) on the Ugandan standard of care for the diagnosis and treatment of TB. In addition, in the four study clinics, we will provide training on the PredicTB score.

Study groups in NCT05122624
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Score intervention armExperimentalThe PredicTB score will be implemented in this arm.
Receives: Other: PredicTB score
Control armNo interventionThe standard of care will be conducted in this arm.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in 7-day Treatment Initiation From Pre-implementation to Post-implementation

    The percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who initiated treatment within 7 days during post-implementation 'minus' The percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who initiated treatment within 7 days during pre-implementation

    Measured: Up to 12 months post intervention

  2. Implementation: Percentage of Encountered Patients at Intervention Arm Who Initiated the Same-day Treatment Based on PredicTB Score as Indicated

    Percentage of patients who initiated same-day treatment divided by the number of patients who had a higher PredicTB score than the clinic-specific score of treatment threshold in the post-implementation period in intervention arm

    Measured: Up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Incremental Cost-effectiveness of PredicTB

    (cost of implementing PredicTB - cost of standard of care)/(projected disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in standard of care - projected DALYs with PredicTB)

    Measured: Months 0 - 12

  2. Difference in TB Mortality From Pre-implementation to Post-implementation

    The percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who died of any cause in the post-implementation "minus" The percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who died of any cause in the pre-implementation

    Measured: 12 Months

  3. Difference in Loss to Care From Pre-implementation To Post-implementation

    The percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who were lost to follow-up in the post-implementation "minus" The percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who were lost to follow-up in the pre-implementation

    Measured: 12 Months

  4. Difference in Percentage of Participants With Microbiologically Confirmed TB

    Difference in the percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who initiated treatment within 7 days from post-implementation to pre-implementation at intervention arm "minus" Difference in the percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who initiated treatment within 7 days from post-implementation to pre-implementation at comparison arm

    Measured: Up to 12 months post-implementation

  5. Reach: Percentage of Patients Who Were Administered (or Evaluated) by PredicTB Score

    Percentage of patients who were administered (or evaluated) by PredicTB score among those who presented presumptive TB symptoms at clinics in the post-implementation period in intervention arm

    Measured: Up to 12 months

  6. Adoption: Percentage of Providers Adopting PredicTB

    Percentage of providers using PredicTB in over 50% of encounters in which sputum is submitted for pulmonary TB diagnosis among those seeing >5 patients who submit sputum for diagnosis of pulmonary TB

    Measured: Month 18

  7. Maintenance: Change in Effectiveness Over Time in the Post-implementation Phase at Intervention Arm

    Percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who initiated treatment within seven days in the post-implementation phase at intervention arm "minus" Percentage of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB who initiated treatment within seven days in the post-implementation phase at intervention arm

    Measured: Up to 12 months

  8. Modeled Changes in 5-year Mortality With PredicTB

    Modeled hypothetical, expected changes in mortality at year 5, comparing simulations in which PredicTB is implemented to those in which PredicTB is not implemented, using a Markov state-transition model

    Measured: Month 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2021
  2. Study start10 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion29 Feb 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study includes an intervention arm (four clinics) and a control arm (four clinics).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3,332 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05122624
Sponsor's protocol ID
R21AI161301
Other IDs
R21AI161301, IRB00015699
Acronym
PredicTB
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
1 Nov 2021
Last updated
23 Jul 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Baik Y, Musoke M, Twinamasiko A, Lamunu M, Nabacwa V, Sanyu A, Robsky KO, Sung J, Kityamuwesi A, Katamba A, Dowdy DW. Effectiveness and Implementation of a Clinical Risk Score for Early Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Uganda: A Pragmatic, Clustered Randomization Clinical Trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Oct;22(10):1476-1483. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-422OC.

    PubMed 40587503

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PredicTB score in people with Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in Uganda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in 7-day Treatment Initiation From Pre-implementation to Post-implementation (time frame: Up to 12 months post intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05122624, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in