Cerebellar AtaxiacTUGNCT05132647
Circular Timed Up and Go (cTUG) for Ataxia: Development and Validation
An observational study of Cerebellar Ataxia and Healthy Adults, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
Cerebellar ataxia (CA) is a collection of signs and symptoms caused by cerebellar dysfunction, which can be the result of different disease processes including hereditary and acquired conditions. High incidence of falls is reported in people with CA due to poor balance while walking. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebellar Ataxia, Healthy Adults
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cerebellar ataxia secondary to sporadic, degenerative or acquired cause will be considered. Healthy adults are those who are ambulant with or without the use of a walking assistive device.
Who may be able to join
- CA patients (hereditary, degenerative or acquired underlying cause)
- ambulatory
- age 18-65
- able to walk independently with or without assistive walking device for at least 10m
Who cannot join
- CA patients who require hand held support during walking
- CA patients with severe visual impairment
- Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score >6.5
- Refuse to reveal personal information
- CA patients with other associated neurological conditions that does not result in ataxia features
- Poor cognition or unable to follow the instructions
- Healthy adults: Both genders aged 18 to 65 who are ambulant with or without assistive device for walking.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Circular Timed Up and Go (cTUG) Test for Assessing Balance and Falls Risk Among Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia: Development and Validation
Cerebellar ataxia (CA) is a collection of signs and symptoms caused by cerebellar dysfunction, which can be the result of different disease processes including hereditary and acquired conditions. High incidence of falls is reported in people with CA due to poor balance while walking. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the balance of people with CA to identify potential fallers. There are some clinical tests commonly used for assessing the balance of people with CA, including both generic measures of balance and ataxia-specific rating scales. The current best balance outcome measures for CA includes Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and the balance related items in Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA). TUG is commonly used in clinical settings for the assessment of mobility and fall risk of individuals. However, a study done by Winser et. al (2017) found that the correlation between TUG and ataxia rating scales (SARA and ICARS) is only moderate. This indicates that the gait speed and functional mobility findings of TUG might not truly reflect the balance deficits of CA. Therefore, our study will develop a modified TUG for the assessment of balance in people with CA. Circular TUG (cTUG) is a modified version of the standard TUG. cTUG is an equilibrium test that challenges subjects' ability to maintain balance in response to the constant change in direction of walking. In cTUG, the subject walks a semi-circular pathway instead of a straight line. Walking in a circular pathway targets at challenging the coordination of people with CA as walking in a circle requires constant change in directions and correction after feedback. It is speculated that the cTUG will have better accuracy in predicting the balance and falls risk among people with CA. We will target at recruiting 30 healthy volunteers and 30 individuals with cerebellar ataxia. Besides the cTUG we will also assess disease severity of ataxia using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), balance using the Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go test, Sensory Organization test, Limits of Stability test and functional independence using the Barthel Index. For validation of the cTUG, two types of reliability will be examined, including intra-rater reliability and interrater reliability and four types of validity will be assessed, including concurrent validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and external validity.
Read the detailed description
Background What is Cerebella ataxia (CA)? Cerebellar ataxia (CA) is a collection of signs and symptoms caused by cerebellar dysfunction, which can be the result of different disease processes including hereditary and acquired conditions (Hadjivassiliou et al., 2017).
Common clinical presentation of CA patients includes balance and gait dysfunction, dysmetria, dyssynergia, dysarthria and dysdiadochokinesia (Diener \& Dichgans, 1992). People with CA usually walks with increased step width, increased foot rotation angles and reduced cadence, which is related to impaired balance (Stolze et al., 2002). Marsden \& Harris (2011) suggested that the high incidence of falls in people with CA may be related to their poor balance in walking. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the balance of people with CA to identify potential fallers.
Current balance assessments and drawbacks of TUG There are some clinical tests commonly used for assessing the balance of people with CA, including both generic measures of balance and ataxia-specific rating scales. The current best balance outcome measures for CA includes Berge Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and the balance related items in Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) (Winser et al., 2015). TUG is commonly used in clinical settings for the assessment of mobility and fall risk of individuals (Dawson et al., 2018). However, a study done by Winser et. al (2017) found that the correlation between TUG and ataxia rating scales (SARA and ICARS) is only moderate. This indicates that the gait speed and functional mobility findings of TUG might not truly reflect the balance deficits of CA. Therefore, in order to bridge this gap, our study will develop a modified TUG for the assessment of balance in people with CA. The specific objectives of this study will be to examine the reliability, validity of the modified TUG for identifying the balance and fall risk of cerebellar ataxia patients.
Circular TUG: A modification that might suit CA Circular TUG (cTUG) is a modified version of the standard TUG. cTUG is an equilibrium test that challenges subjects' ability to maintain balance in response to constant change in direction of walking. In standard TUG, the person gets up from an armchair, walks three meters in a straight pathway, then turn 180 degrees and walks back to the chair to sit down (Podsiadlo \& Richardson, 1991b). However, in cTUG, the subject walks a semi-circular pathway instead of a straight line. Walking in a circular pathway targets at challenging the coordination of people with CA as walking in a circle requires constant change in directions and correction after feedback (Goodworth et al., 2012). Moreover, walking in a circle is more difficult for patients with CA as it increases the role of the cerebellum for trunk and foot control during curvilinear locomotion (Goodworth et al., 2012). Therefore, it is speculated that the cTUG will have better accuracy in predicting the balance and falls risk among people with CA.
Objectives and hypothesis The overall aim of this study is to develop and test the psychometric properties of the cTUG in assessing balance and falls risk prediction among individuals with cerebellar ataxia and age-matched healthy volunteers. To address this objective, we have the following specific objectives.
- Develop the cTUG and record the normative scores of the newly developed scale among healthy volunteers and mean scores among individuals with cerebellar ataxia.
- Examine the test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the cTUG among healthy volunteers and individuals with cerebellar ataxia.
- Examine the concurrent validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and external validity of the cTUG among individuals with cerebellar ataxia.
For validity, concurrent validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and external validity will be assessed. Based on the findings of a previous study that reported a moderate negative correlation (-0.62) between standard TUG and Berg Balance scale (BBS) (Cattaneo et al., 2006), we hypothesize a moderate to strong negative correlation between cTUG and BBS.
Moreover, based on the findings of a previous study that reported a moderate positive correlation (0.584) between standard TUG and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) (Choi et al., 2018), we hypothesize a moderate to strong positive correlation between cTUG and the balance component SARA.
In addition, based on the findings of a previous study that reported a positive correlation between TUG and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance (m-CTSIB) and a negative correlation between TUG and Limit of Stability (LOS) (Dawson et al., 2018), we hypothesize a positive correlation between cTUG and Sensory Organization Test (SOT), and a negative correlation between cTUG and LOS.
Besides, based on the findings of a previous study that reported a moderate negative correlation (-0.78) between standard TUG and Barthel Index (BI) (Podsiadlo \& Richardson, 1991b), we hypothesize a moderate negative correlation between cTUG and BI.
For reliability, intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability will be assessed. Repeat assessment by the same investigator will be used to estimate intra-rater reliability and repeat assessments by 2 different investigators will be used to estimate inter-rater reliability. All the assessments will be completed on the same day with each assessment conducted with 1 hour rest period.
Ethics will be obtained through the Human Subjects Ethics Sub-committee of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University and trial registration will be done through the Clinical Trials Registry. Participants with a confirmed diagnosis of CA of any or unknown cause will be recruited through the Hong Kong Spinocerebellar Ataxia Association (HKSCAA) and one group of age-matched healthy volunteers will be recruited from the Hong Kong PolyU campus. We will post advertisement flyers at the HK PolyU campus and at the HKSCAA for recruiting potential participants. In addition, for recruiting participants with cerebellar ataxia, an advertisement flyer will be posted on the monthly newsletter of the HKSCAA. The specific criteria for recruitment are reported elsewhere.
- Conditions
- Cerebellar Ataxia, Healthy Adults
- Keywords
- cerebellar ataxia,, falls risk,, outcome measures, falls prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebellar Ataxia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cerebellar ataxia and Healthy adults | We will not administer any intervention to the patients in this study |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Circular TUG (cTUG)
Circular TUG (cTUG) is a modified version of the standard TUG. cTUG is an equilibrium test that challenges subjects' ability to maintain balance in response to constant change in direction of walking. In standard TUG, the person gets up from an armchair, walks three meters in a straight pathway, then turn 180 degrees and walks back to the chair to sit down (Podsiadlo \& Richardson, 1991b). However, in cTUG, the subject walks a semi-circular pathway instead of a straight line.
Measured: Baseline (T1), Day 1 (T2) and Day 1 (T3)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is a measure to assess the severity of cerebellar ataxia. There are total of 8 items: gait, stance, sitting, speech disturbance, finger chase, nose-finger test, fast alternating hand movement and heel-shin slide. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, which indicates no ataxia to severe ataxia. SARA has high inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98) and high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.90) in assessing cerebellar ataxia patients. Internal consistency is high as indicated by Cronbach's α of 0.94 (Schmitz-Hubsch et al., 2006).
Measured: Assessment 1 day 1
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) measures the ability in maintaining balance during tasks. The scale consists of 14 items, requiring patients to maintain different positions for specific durations. Each item is rated from 0 to 4, from lowest ability to highest ability. The time and quality in maintaining positions are assessed. The maximum score is 56. Score of less than 45 indicates higher fall risk (Katherine et al., 1992). The test has good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.96) and high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94) (Cattaneo et al., 2007).
Measured: Assessment 1 day 1
The timed up and go test
The timed up and go test is a test to quantify the functional mobility by balance, gait speed and functional capacity. The subject is timed while asked to stand up from a chair, walks 3 meters, turns and walks back and sits down again. Those who takes more than 30 seconds to complete the test are considered having poor balance and require assistance for many mobility tasks. Those completed the test in less than 10 seconds are considered very independent in mobility tasks (Podsiadlo \& Richardson, 1991a).
Measured: Assessment 1 on Day 1, Assessment 2 on day 1 and Assessment 3 on day 2
Sensory organization test (SOT)
Sensory organization test (SOT) is an objective evaluation on postural stability under different sensory conditions. The test is performed with the Bertec System. Subjects are challenged to stand unsupported under six sensory scenarios, with different visual, somatosensory and vestibular inputs. There are three trials lasting for 20 seconds in each scenario. Equilibrium score in each scenario and the composite equilibrium score are assessed. The equilibrium score provides quantitative evaluation on subjects' postural sway under different sensory conditions. Composite equilibrium score shows subjects' average performance over the trials. The score of subjects is compared to the normative data in the software database. Results falling outside normal value indicates abnormal sway and shows difficulty in incorporating sensory information for balance control. (Bertec corporation, 2014).
Measured: Assessment 1 day 1
Limit of Stability (LOS)
Limit of Stability (LOS) is an objective balance assessment by assessing the ability to displace centre of gravity in different directions without losing balance. The test is performed with the Bertec System. Subjects are assessed in eight directions and their centre of gravity is traced during movement. The directional control (DCL), reaction time (RT) and maximum excursion (MXE) are assessed. Directional control is the measurement of how much subjects move towards the target direction. Reaction time is the time taken for subjects to respond to the command of moving towards the target. Maximum excursion is measurement of the extent that subjects lean during trials. The score of subjects is compared to the normative data in the software database. Result falling outside the normal value indicates restricted stability limit and an increased risk of falling. (Bertec corporation, 2014).
Measured: Assessment 1 day 1
Barthel Index
The Barthel index (BI) is an ordinal scale for measuring performance in activities of daily living (ADL). There are a total of 10 variables under ADL and mobility, each values a given number of points. Higher points indicate a greater degree of independence (O'Sullivan et al., 2019).
Measured: Assessment 1 day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Nov 2021
- Study start1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 May 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cerebellar AtaxiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stanley J Winser, PhD, Principal investigator, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universit
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05132647
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P0030822
- Acronym
- cTUG
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 24 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The patients' personnel identification will be masked. the scores will be made available for the publisher using an anonymous ID for each participant. Personnel identifiers such as photos or names will be identified in public forums including conference presentations.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Circular Timed Up and Go (cTUG) Test for Assessing Balance and Falls Risk Among Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia: Development and Validation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05132647
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- cTUG / P0030822
- Conditions
- Cerebellar Ataxia, Healthy Adults
- Keywords
- cerebellar ataxia,, falls risk,, outcome measures, falls prevention
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cerebellar ataxia (CA) is a collection of signs and symptoms caused by cerebellar dysfunction, which can be the result of different disease processes including hereditary and acquired conditions. High incidence of falls is reported in people with CA due to poor balance while walking. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the balance of people with CA to identify potential fallers. There are some clinical tests commonly used for assessing the balance of people with CA, including both generic measures of balance and ataxia-specific rating scales. The current best balance outcome measures for CA includes Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and the balance related items in Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA). TUG is commonly used in clinical settings for the assessment of mobility and fall risk of individuals. However, a study done by Winser et. al (2017) found that the correlation between TUG and ataxia rating scales (SARA and ICARS) is only moderate. This indicates that the gait speed and functional mobility findings of TUG might not truly reflect the balance deficits of CA. Therefore, our study will develop a modified TUG for the assessment of balance in people with CA. Circular TUG (cTUG) is a modified version of the standard TUG. cTUG is an equilibrium test that challenges subjects' ability to maintain balance in response to the constant change in direction of walking. In cTUG, the subject walks a semi-circular pathway instead of a straight line. Walking in a circular pathway targets at challenging the coordination of people with CA as walking in a circle requires constant change in directions and correction after feedback. It is speculated that the cTUG will have better accuracy in predicting the balance and falls risk among people with CA. We will target at recruiting 30 healthy volunteers and 30 individuals with cerebellar ataxia. Besides the cTUG we will also assess disease severity of ataxia using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), balance using the Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go test, Sensory Organization test, Limits of Stability test and functional independence using the Barthel Index. For validation of the cTUG, two types of reliability will be examined, including intra-rater reliability and interrater reliability and four types of validity will be assessed, including concurrent validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and external validity.
Detailed description
Background What is Cerebella ataxia (CA)? Cerebellar ataxia (CA) is a collection of signs and symptoms caused by cerebellar dysfunction, which can be the result of different disease processes including hereditary and acquired conditions (Hadjivassiliou et al., 2017).
Common clinical presentation of CA patients includes balance and gait dysfunction, dysmetria, dyssynergia, dysarthria and dysdiadochokinesia (Diener \& Dichgans, 1992). People with CA usually walks with increased step width, increased foot rotation angles and reduced cadence, which is related to impaired balance (Stolze et al., 2002). Marsden \& Harris (2011) suggested that the high incidence of falls in people with CA may be related to their poor balance in walking. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the balance of people with CA to identify potential fallers.
Current balance assessments and drawbacks of TUG There are some clinical tests commonly used for assessing the balance of people with CA, including both generic measures of balance and ataxia-specific rating scales. The current best balance outcome measures for CA includes Berge Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and the balance related items in Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) (Winser et al., 2015). TUG is commonly used in clinical settings for the assessment of mobility and fall risk of individuals (Dawson et al., 2018). However, a study done by Winser et. al (2017) found that the correlation between TUG and ataxia rating scales (SARA and ICARS) is only moderate. This indicates that the gait speed and functional mobility findings of TUG might not truly reflect the balance deficits of CA. Therefore, in order to bridge this gap, our study will develop a modified TUG for the assessment of balance in people with CA. The specific objectives of this study will be to examine the reliability, validity of the modified TUG for identifying the balance and fall risk of cerebellar ataxia patients.
Circular TUG: A modification that might suit CA Circular TUG (cTUG) is a modified version of the standard TUG. cTUG is an equilibrium test that challenges subjects' ability to maintain balance in response to constant change in direction of walking. In standard TUG, the person gets up from an armchair, walks three meters in a straight pathway, then turn 180 degrees and walks back to the chair to sit down (Podsiadlo \& Richardson, 1991b). However, in cTUG, the subject walks a semi-circular pathway instead of a straight line. Walking in a circular pathway targets at challenging the coordination of people with CA as walking in a circle requires constant change in directions and correction after feedback (Goodworth et al., 2012). Moreover, walking in a circle is more difficult for patients with CA as it increases the role of the cerebellum for trunk and foot control during curvilinear locomotion (Goodworth et al., 2012). Therefore, it is speculated that the cTUG will have better accuracy in predicting the balance and falls risk among people with CA.
Objectives and hypothesis The overall aim of this study is to develop and test the psychometric properties of the cTUG in assessing balance and falls risk prediction among individuals with cerebellar ataxia and age-matched healthy volunteers. To address this objective, we have the following specific objectives.
- Develop the cTUG and record the normative scores of the newly developed scale among healthy volunteers and mean scores among individuals with cerebellar ataxia.
- Examine the test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the cTUG among healthy volunteers and individuals with cerebellar ataxia.
- Examine the concurrent validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and external validity of the cTUG among individuals with cerebellar ataxia.
For validity, concurrent validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and external validity will be assessed. Based on the findings of a previous study that reported a moderate negative correlation (-0.62) between standard TUG and Berg Balance scale (BBS) (Cattaneo et al., 2006), we hypothesize a moderate to strong negative correlation between cTUG and BBS.
Moreover, based on the findings of a previous study that reported a moderate positive correlation (0.584) between standard TUG and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) (Choi et al., 2018), we hypothesize a moderate to strong positive correlation between cTUG and the balance component SARA.
In addition, based on the findings of a previous study that reported a positive correlation between TUG and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance (m-CTSIB) and a negative correlation between TUG and Limit of Stability (LOS) (Dawson et al., 2018), we hypothesize a positive correlation between cTUG and Sensory Organization Test (SOT), and a negative correlation between cTUG and LOS.
Besides, based on the findings of a previous study that reported a moderate negative correlation (-0.78) between standard TUG and Barthel Index (BI) (Podsiadlo \& Richardson, 1991b), we hypothesize a moderate negative correlation between cTUG and BI.
For reliability, intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability will be assessed. Repeat assessment by the same investigator will be used to estimate intra-rater reliability and repeat assessments by 2 different investigators will be used to estimate inter-rater reliability. All the assessments will be completed on the same day with each assessment conducted with 1 hour rest period.
Ethics will be obtained through the Human Subjects Ethics Sub-committee of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University and trial registration will be done through the Clinical Trials Registry. Participants with a confirmed diagnosis of CA of any or unknown cause will be recruited through the Hong Kong Spinocerebellar Ataxia Association (HKSCAA) and one group of age-matched healthy volunteers will be recruited from the Hong Kong PolyU campus. We will post advertisement flyers at the HK PolyU campus and at the HKSCAA for recruiting potential participants. In addition, for recruiting participants with cerebellar ataxia, an advertisement flyer will be posted on the monthly newsletter of the HKSCAA. The specific criteria for recruitment are reported elsewhere.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cerebellar ataxia and Healthy adults | – | –We will not administer any intervention to the patients in this study |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cerebellar ataxia secondary to sporadic, degenerative or acquired cause will be considered. Healthy adults are those who are ambulant with or without the use of a walking assistive device.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- CA patients (hereditary, degenerative or acquired underlying cause)
- ambulatory
- age 18-65
- able to walk independently with or without assistive walking device for at least 10m
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- CA patients who require hand held support during walking
- CA patients with severe visual impairment
- Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score >6.5
- Refuse to reveal personal information
- CA patients with other associated neurological conditions that does not result in ataxia features
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Change in Circular TUG (cTUG)
Time frame: Baseline (T1), Day 1 (T2) and Day 1 (T3)
Circular TUG (cTUG) is a modified version of the standard TUG. cTUG is an equilibrium test that challenges subjects' ability to maintain balance in response to constant change in direction of walking. In standard TUG, the person gets up from an armchair, walks three meters in a straight pathway, then turn 180 degrees and walks back to the chair to sit down (Podsiadlo \& Richardson, 1991b). However, in cTUG, the subject walks a semi-circular pathway instead of a straight line.
6 secondary outcomes
Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Time frame: Assessment 1 day 1
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time frame: Assessment 1 day 1
The timed up and go test
Time frame: Assessment 1 on Day 1, Assessment 2 on day 1 and Assessment 3 on day 2
Sensory organization test (SOT)
Time frame: Assessment 1 day 1
Limit of Stability (LOS)
Time frame: Assessment 1 day 1
Barthel Index
Time frame: Assessment 1 day 1
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Nov 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The patients' personnel identification will be masked. the scores will be made available for the publisher using an anonymous ID for each participant. Personnel identifiers such as photos or names will be identified in public forums including conference presentations.
Related trials for Cerebellar Ataxia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Natural History of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 (SCA7)
Spinocerebellar Ataxia
Not yet recruiting
Cerebellar DBS in SCA1 and SCA3 Study
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 1, Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 3
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
An Open-Label Study of CTI-1601 in Subjects With Friedreich's Ataxia
Friedreich Ataxia
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Registry Database for Movement Disorders in Southern Anhui Province
Motor Neuron Diseases, Spinocerebellar Ataxias
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stanley J Winser, PhD principal investigator
The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universit
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cerebellar Ataxia and Healthy Adults, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Stanley J Winser, PhD (27666746 ext. 6746, stanley.j.winser@polyu.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Circular TUG (cTUG) (time frame: Baseline (T1), Day 1 (T2) and Day 1 (T3)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2021.