Educational ProblemsNCT05139407
Experimental Intervention on the Influence of Six Weeks' Content Knowledge on Students' Written Test Achievement
A study testing Teaching intervention in people with Educational Problems and Student Burnout, run by Universiti Putra Malaysia at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Brief Summary . This experiment aims to use two different teaching methods to intervene in students' learning and find out which teaching method is more conducive to improving students' written test achievement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 23 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Educational Problems, Student Burnout
- What is being tested?
- Teaching intervention
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 26 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2021to 10 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 23 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
- Inclusion Criteria:
- Students whose age meets the requirements.
- Students majoring in physical education in Ningxia University.
- Students who voluntarily participate and pass the qualification assessment.
- Students who can complete the experimental intervention plan.
- Students who have not participated in the examination and training.
- Exclusion Criteria:
- Excluded because age of not meeting inclusion criteria
- Drop out be absent with leave、refuse to participate;
- Students who are often absent from school and late.
- Students who have already taken the exam.
- Not a college student in Ningxia University.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Six Weeks Content Knowledge Workshop on Written Test Performance Among Physical Education Students in China
Brief Summary .
This experiment aims to use two different teaching methods to intervene in students' learning and find out which teaching method is more conducive to improving students' written test achievement. The experiment will use a 6-the investigator seek workshop intervention to enhance students' written test achievement. The investigation is divided into workshop groups and standard teaching groups. The most significant difference better investigators the two groups are that the workshop group has oral links and guarantees. The similarities between investigators in the two groups are teacher qualifications, intervention time, content, and research objects.
Read more
Based on content knowledge learning, content knowledge is divided into six categories for detailed intervention. First, the investigators will do a 6-the investigator seek intervention for two groups (workshop style and standard teaching style). The difference better investigators two is whether there is a video teaching link, and the same is that there are oral links. The entire experiment was carried out in the classroom with the school's consent. Use written exams to check student scores. Students have special teachers responsible for teaching specific content knowledge during class, standard learning after class does not require special care, and the experiment is not risky.
Hypothesis including as follow:1 ) General Hypothesis. There is no significant difference in the written test results of the prior theoretical knowledge 、health promotion knowledge、 physical exercise knowledge control group, with experimental group performance among PE students in China. 2) Specific Hypothesis. The specific hypothesis of this study is to investigate the effect of a 6-weeks content knowledge workshop on written test performance among PE students in China. The detailed hypothesis is: There is no significant difference between the control and experimental groups in the sports training design、the teaching design 、the muscle function system、the exercise physiology、the competition venue planning、the referee rules written test performance among PE students in China.
Read the detailed description
Detailed Description
Location.The University of China. In terms of students, the proportion of people who choose to work is high, while the proportion of people who choose to continue their postgraduate entrance tests is negligible. Sports graduates account for 70% of a Province, and students have not participated in workshop study. On the school side, the school has perfect teaching equipment to meet the experimental requirements, conducive to better completion.
The analysis of intervention Plan-same characteristics mainly includes two parts: Teacher qualification and student qualifications. In the first part, workshop group and standard teaching group, teacher Qualification, same qualification and titles, both have one same teacher majors: physical education, similar experience: minimum more than ten years.No students have received this courses before the study. The second part is the age, major and educational background of students. For example, students with similar educational backgrounds, aged 19 and 25, are all majors in physical education.No students have received these courses before the study.
This part discusses the details of the 6-the investigator seeks workshop and standard teaching intervention. First and foremost, CK includes three categories. Then, the deeper level is divided into six parts: methods and plans, class hour teaching plan, muscle exercise, energy supply, breathing and exercise circulation and exercise, athletic and basketball venue, basketball, and football rules. On the other hand, there are two lessons; each class is 1.5 hours.
This is a one-class training plan, mainly divided into other structures. A training session explicitly includes three parts.
To start with, the intervention content includes step 1-An, an overview, and introduction, step 2-Students formed groups, step 3-Oral test assessment. The first part includes: The teacher introduced the purpose of the study, expectations, and discussion of the principles of sports training design. Next, the investigators learn to design, muscle function, and exercise physiology system-rest time.
The second part includes introducing the purpose of the study, expectations, and discussion of the principles of sports training design. They the investigators learn content related to design and muscle function and exercise physiology systems. Rest time Divided into three groups and rotated roles of teacher, students, 8 / group. They the investigators learn by the reciprocal peer learning instructional model.
The third part includes introducing the purpose of the study, expectations, and discussion of the principles of sports training design. They the investigators learn content related to design and muscle function and exercise physiology systems. Rest time Divided into three groups and rotated roles of teacher, students, 8 / group. They the investigators learn by the reciprocal peer learning instructional model. Students the investigators prompted to switch teacher roles, student every 10 min-evaluation through check sheets and oral test ( 90% or better correct and the investigators ).
- Conditions
- Educational Problems, Student Burnout
- Being tested
- Teaching intervention
- Keywords
- Content knowledge, Written test perfofmance, Students
- Medical subject headings
- Burnout, Psychological
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Teaching interventionDiagnostic test
Different teaching methods are used to teach the experimental group and the control array in the classroom.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Workshop | Experimental | The workshop is to discuss methods in various fields through activities, discussions, and lectures. It is an academic way to encourage participation, innovation, and predict solutions, suitable for people from different positions and ethnic groups to think, discuss, and communicate.
Each Intervention includes information relevant to how the Intervention was administered to participants in the associated Arm.
Workshop intervention for students: basketball training plan, basketball lesson plan, energy supply in muscle exercise, exercise prescription, track, and field mapping, basketball rules. All patients were intervened according to the frequency of 3 hours/once a week. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Teaching intervention |
| Oral examination | Experimental | The oral examination is a way of examination, which requires the examination to answer questions orally. Content intervention includes the comment, teacher's question and answer, proposition explanation, and proposition debate. In addition, each Intervention provides information relevant to how the Intervention was administered to students in the associated Arm.
Specific interventions for students: basketball training plan, basketball lesson plan, energy supply system, exercise prescription formulation, track and field venue planning, basketball game rules. All oral examinations take 90 minutes/once/week. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Teaching intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Students' written test achievements
Primary outcome measure information: students' content knowledge, the higher the students' written test achievement, the more significant the intervention.
Title: Name of the specific primary outcome measure-written test. Description: Overview of Six parts content measurement. i.Measurement before Ist week and Measurement after the sixth week ii. Overall sample was written test achievements written test is 100, and the time of each test is 2 hours.
Time Frame,1-6 weeks, Used in the written test achievement Calculation for each primary outcome measure Including one basketball lesson training plan in the first week, one basketball lesson plan in the second week, Energy supply in muscle exercise in the third week, Exercise prescription in the fourth week, The fifth week of Track and field venue planning and the sixth week of Track Meet rules. Each content knowledge measurement includes oral examination performance must be over 95, and each measurement time is 90 minutes.
Measured: 1 week -7 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Dec 2021
- Study start10 Feb 2021
- Primary completion10 Jun 2021
- Study completion10 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Educational ProblemsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universiti Putra Malaysia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yongqi Gao, Universiti Putra Malaysia
- Investigators
- YONGQI GAO, Principal investigator, Universiti Putra Malaysia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05139407
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Yongqi Gao
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: This research belongs to the need of personal doctoral thesis experiment and cannot be shared before publication.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Six Weeks Content Knowledge Workshop on Written Test Performance Among Physical Education Students in China
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05139407
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Yongqi Gao
- Conditions
- Educational Problems, Student Burnout
- Keywords
- Content knowledge, Written test perfofmance, Students
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universiti Putra MalaysiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Brief Summary .
This experiment aims to use two different teaching methods to intervene in students' learning and find out which teaching method is more conducive to improving students' written test achievement. The experiment will use a 6-the investigator seek workshop intervention to enhance students' written test achievement. The investigation is divided into workshop groups and standard teaching groups. The most significant difference better investigators the two groups are that the workshop group has oral links and guarantees. The similarities between investigators in the two groups are teacher qualifications, intervention time, content, and research objects.
Based on content knowledge learning, content knowledge is divided into six categories for detailed intervention. First, the investigators will do a 6-the investigator seek intervention for two groups (workshop style and standard teaching style). The difference better investigators two is whether there is a video teaching link, and the same is that there are oral links. The entire experiment was carried out in the classroom with the school's consent. Use written exams to check student scores. Students have special teachers responsible for teaching specific content knowledge during class, standard learning after class does not require special care, and the experiment is not risky.
Hypothesis including as follow:1 ) General Hypothesis. There is no significant difference in the written test results of the prior theoretical knowledge 、health promotion knowledge、 physical exercise knowledge control group, with experimental group performance among PE students in China. 2) Specific Hypothesis. The specific hypothesis of this study is to investigate the effect of a 6-weeks content knowledge workshop on written test performance among PE students in China. The detailed hypothesis is: There is no significant difference between the control and experimental groups in the sports training design、the teaching design 、the muscle function system、the exercise physiology、the competition venue planning、the referee rules written test performance among PE students in China.
Detailed description
Detailed Description
Location.The University of China. In terms of students, the proportion of people who choose to work is high, while the proportion of people who choose to continue their postgraduate entrance tests is negligible. Sports graduates account for 70% of a Province, and students have not participated in workshop study. On the school side, the school has perfect teaching equipment to meet the experimental requirements, conducive to better completion.
The analysis of intervention Plan-same characteristics mainly includes two parts: Teacher qualification and student qualifications. In the first part, workshop group and standard teaching group, teacher Qualification, same qualification and titles, both have one same teacher majors: physical education, similar experience: minimum more than ten years.No students have received this courses before the study. The second part is the age, major and educational background of students. For example, students with similar educational backgrounds, aged 19 and 25, are all majors in physical education.No students have received these courses before the study.
This part discusses the details of the 6-the investigator seeks workshop and standard teaching intervention. First and foremost, CK includes three categories. Then, the deeper level is divided into six parts: methods and plans, class hour teaching plan, muscle exercise, energy supply, breathing and exercise circulation and exercise, athletic and basketball venue, basketball, and football rules. On the other hand, there are two lessons; each class is 1.5 hours.
This is a one-class training plan, mainly divided into other structures. A training session explicitly includes three parts.
To start with, the intervention content includes step 1-An, an overview, and introduction, step 2-Students formed groups, step 3-Oral test assessment. The first part includes: The teacher introduced the purpose of the study, expectations, and discussion of the principles of sports training design. Next, the investigators learn to design, muscle function, and exercise physiology system-rest time.
The second part includes introducing the purpose of the study, expectations, and discussion of the principles of sports training design. They the investigators learn content related to design and muscle function and exercise physiology systems. Rest time Divided into three groups and rotated roles of teacher, students, 8 / group. They the investigators learn by the reciprocal peer learning instructional model.
The third part includes introducing the purpose of the study, expectations, and discussion of the principles of sports training design. They the investigators learn content related to design and muscle function and exercise physiology systems. Rest time Divided into three groups and rotated roles of teacher, students, 8 / group. They the investigators learn by the reciprocal peer learning instructional model. Students the investigators prompted to switch teacher roles, student every 10 min-evaluation through check sheets and oral test ( 90% or better correct and the investigators ).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Workshop | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Teaching interventionThe workshop is to discuss methods in various fields through activities, discussions, and lectures. It is an academic way to encourage participation, innovation, and predict solutions, suitable for people from different positions and ethnic groups to think, discuss, and communicate. Each Intervention includes information relevant to how the Intervention was administered to participants in the associated Arm. Workshop intervention for students: basketball training plan, basketball lesson plan, energy supply in muscle exercise, exercise prescription, track, and field mapping, basketball rules. All patients were intervened according to the frequency of 3 hours/once a week. |
| Oral examination | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Teaching interventionThe oral examination is a way of examination, which requires the examination to answer questions orally. Content intervention includes the comment, teacher's question and answer, proposition explanation, and proposition debate. In addition, each Intervention provides information relevant to how the Intervention was administered to students in the associated Arm. Specific interventions for students: basketball training plan, basketball lesson plan, energy supply system, exercise prescription formulation, track and field venue planning, basketball game rules. All oral examinations take 90 minutes/once/week. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 23 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Teaching interventionDifferent teaching methods are used to teach the experimental group and the control array in the classroom. | Diagnostic test | Oral examination, Workshop |
Primary outcome
Students' written test achievements
Time frame: 1 week -7 weeks
Primary outcome measure information: students' content knowledge, the higher the students' written test achievement, the more significant the intervention. Title: Name of the specific primary outcome measure-written test. Description: Overview of Six parts content measurement. i.Measurement before Ist week and Measurement after the sixth week ii. Overall sample was written test achievements written test is 100, and the time of each test is 2 hours. Time Frame,1-6 weeks, Used in the written test achievement Calculation for each primary outcome measure Including one basketball lesson training plan in the first week, one basketball lesson plan in the second week, Energy supply in muscle exercise in the third week, Exercise prescription in the fourth week, The fifth week of Track and field venue planning and the sixth week of Track Meet rules. Each content knowledge measurement includes oral examination performance must be over 95, and each measurement time is 90 minutes.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Dec 2021.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. This research belongs to the need of personal doctoral thesis experiment and cannot be shared before publication.
Related trials for Educational Problems
Not yet recruiting
Standardized Educational Videos of Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries
Educational Problems, Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Surgical Coaching on Resident ObGyn Laparoscopic Skills
Educational Problems
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of a Couple-based Psycho-socio-educational Intervention Using WeChat/WhatsApp on Dyadic Psychological and Sleep Outcomes
Sleep Problems, Psychological
Active, not recruiting
Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: An RCT
Child Abuse, Child Neglect
Recruiting
Health Equity and Rural Education (HERE!) Clinical Trial
Behavioral Symptoms, Community Health Workers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
YONGQI GAO principal investigator
Universiti Putra Malaysia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Teaching intervention in people with Educational Problems and Student Burnout, run by Universiti Putra Malaysia at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Students' written test achievements (time frame: 1 week -7 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Dec 2021.