Meibomian Gland DysfunctionNCT05162261
to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® , VS LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
A study testing Tixel C and LipiFlow in people with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Dry Eye Syndromes, run by Novoxel Ltd. at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
A Randomized, Masked (Evaluator), Controlled, Prospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® Medical Device, Versus LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Syndromes, Dry Eye
- What is being tested?
- Tixel C and LipiFlow
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 109 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Sep 2022to 28 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Main Study (Stage1) Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 22 years and older of any gender or race.
- Provision of written informed consent prior to study participation.
- Willingness and ability to return for all study visits.
- Reports dry eye symptoms for three months prior to the study.
- Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score between 23-79.
- Tear break-up time (TBUT) <10 seconds in both eyes.
- Agreement/ability to abstain from dry eye/MGD medications for the time between the treatment visit/s and the final study visit. Ocular lubricants are allowed if no changes are made during the study.
- Reports having to use artificial tears or lubricants regulatory over the past month to relieve dry eye symptoms.
- Meibomian gland obstruction in both eyes based on a total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score ≤12 in each eye.
- At least 15 glands in each lower eyelid should be expressible, with a sterile cotton swab, at the slit lamp.
Main Study (Stage1) Exclusion Criteria:
- History of ocular surgery including intraocular, oculo-plastic, corneal or refractive surgery within 6 months.
- Patient with giant papillary conjunctivitis.
- Patient with punctal plugs or who have had punctal cautery.
- Ocular injury or trauma, chemical burns, or limbal stem cell deficiency within 3 months of the baseline examination.
- Active ocular herpes zoster or simplex of eye or eyelid or a history of these any time.
- Patient who are aphakic.
- Cicatricial lid margin disease identified via slit lamp examination, including pemphigoid, symblepharon, etc.
- Active ocular infection (e.g., viral, bacterial, mycobacterial, protozoan, or fungal infection of the cornea, conjunctiva, lacrimal gland, lacrimal sac, or eyelids including a hordeolum or stye).
- Active ocular inflammation or history of chronic, recurrent ocular inflammation within prior 3 months (e.g., retinitis, macular inflammation, choroiditis, uveitis, iritis, scleritis, episcleritis, keratitis).
- Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise corneal integrity (e.g., prior chemical burn, recurrent corneal erosion, corneal epithelial defect, Grade 3 corneal fluorescein staining, or map dot fingerprint dystrophy).
- Lid surface abnormalities (e.g., entropion, ectropion, tumor, edema, blepharospasm, lagophthalmos, severe trichiasis, severe ptosis) that affect lid function in either eye.
- Anterior blepharitis (staphylococcal, demodex or seborrheic grade 3 or 4).
- Systemic disease conditions that cause dry eye (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome, vitamin A deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, Wegener's granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, leukemia, Riley-Day syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren's syndrome).
- Use of any of the following medications:
- Systemic medication(s) that is known to cause ocular dryness (e.g. antihistamine, diuretics, anti-hypertensives, anti-depressants, hormone therapy) whose dose of this medication(s) has not been stable within 30 days prior to enrolment. There must be no anticipated adjustments to the dose of these medications for the duration of the trial;
- Oral tetracyclines or azithromycin within 30 days prior to enrolment; or
- Topical anti-glaucoma medications within 30 days prior to enrolment.
- Any other systemic medication as per to the Investigator's discretion.
- Women in childbearing age who are pregnant, nursing, or not utilizing adequate birth control measures.
- Individuals using isotretinoin (Accutane) within 1 year, cyclosporine-A (Restasis) or lifitegrast ophthalmic solution (Xiidra) within 45 days prior to study treatment (day 0), or any other dry eye or MGD medications (antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids) for at least 2 weeks and to maintain abstinence throughout the duration of the study (ocular lubricants are allowed if no changes are made during the study).
- Individuals wearing contact lenses 1 month prior study treatment (day 0), and at any point during the study.
- Current skin cancer, malignant sites and/or advanced premalignant lesions or moles in the treatment area.
- An impaired immune system condition or use of immunosuppressive medication.
- Collagen disorders, keloid formation and/or abnormal wound healing.
- Previous invasive/ablative procedures in the areas to be treated within 3 months prior to initial treatment or plans for such treatment during the course treatment, or before complete healing of such treatments has occurred.
- Any patient who takes or has taken any oral or topical medications, such as but not limited to topical retinoid (e.g., Retin-A), chemical peels, Latisse, Lash Boost which may cause fragile skin or impaired skin healing in the treatment area during the last 3 months and in the entire study period.
- Any patient who has a history of bleeding coagulopathies.
- Any patient who has tattoos or permanent makeup in the treated area.
- Any patient who has burned, blistered, irritated, or sensitive skin in any of the areas to be treated.
- Individuals using another ophthalmic investigational device or agent within 30 days of study participation.
- Any of the following dry eye treatments:
- Office-based dry eye treatment (e.g. IPL, LipiFlow, iLux, TearCare, Tixel, etc.) within 12 months prior to enrolment;
- Meibomian gland expression within 6 months prior to enrolment;
- Blephex or debridement within 3 months prior to enrollment is an exclusion;
- Punctal occlusion or punctal plug placement within 30 days prior to enrolment;
- Use of iTear or TrueTear device within the past 2 weeks. (Subjects must refrain from using these devices for the duration of the study.); or
- Any history of meibomian gland probing
- Use of at-home warm compresses or lid hygiene products while participating in study.
- IOP higher than 19 mmHg.
- Use of Botulinum-Toxin in the last 6 months prior to the treatment in the treatment area.
- Any co-existing condition, either ocular or non-ocular that, in the judgement of the investigator, could affect the safety or effectiveness of treatment or the compliance of the subject to the protocol.
Study Extension (Stage 2)- Inclusion Criteria
- Subjects who have completed the main study CLN 0858 (stage 1) in the Tixel arm.
- TBUT -change from baseline in 1-month FU or 3-months FU was 2.5 seconds or above at least in one eye in the main study.
- Provision of written informed consent for stage 2.
- Agreement/ability to abstain from dry eye/MGD medications for the time in the extension study. Ocular lubricants are allowed if no changes are made during the study.
Study Extension (Stage 2)-Exclusion Criteria
- Same as in the main study (stage 1).
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Moyes Eye Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64154
Gordon Schanzlin New Vision Institute
La Jolla, California, 92037
Visionary Research Institute
Newport Beach, California, 92663
Ophthalmology Associates
St Louis, Missouri, 63131
PNV Clinical Research, LLC
Texas City, Texas, 78229
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Masked (Evaluator), Controlled, Prospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® Medical Device, Versus LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
A Randomized, Masked (Evaluator), Controlled, Prospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® Medical Device, Versus LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Read the detailed description
Randomized, open-label study comparing the Tixel device to LipiFlow System. Up to 110 patients (220 eyes) to be randomized in up to 5 clinical sites in the United States.
Evaluators will be masked as to the randomization assignments. Both eyes will receive the same randomized assignment and both eyes of each patient will be evaluated at all time points.
Data from both eyes will be using in the statistical analysis. The random-effects model adjusts the standard error (SE) and the confidence interval (CI) for within-person correlation between eyes.
Protocol Rev. 7.0 update: Addition of protocol extension to the current protocol: stage 1- main protocol for all patients and stage 2- extension protocol to a sub-group of patients only in the Tixel arm for additional follow-up visit 6 months post last treatment.
- Conditions
- Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Syndromes, Dry Eye
- Being tested
- Tixel C, LipiFlow
- Medical subject headings
- Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tixel CDevice
Tixel C by Novoxel®, Israel is a thermomechanical system developed for fractional treatment. The system is designed for the treatment of soft tissue by direct conduction of heat, enabling tissue coagulation combined with micro ablation with low thermal damage to the surrounding tissue.
LipiFlowDevice
Thermal pulsation (LipiFlow) consists of the localized application of heat and therapeutic pressure on the four eyelids (upper and lower) with the aim of improving drainage of the Meibomian glands.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tixel Group | Experimental | Screening and baseline visits, Treatment- 3 treatment sessions, followed by 2 Follow up sessions, 1and 3 months after the last treatment visit. Subject will be questioned about Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (self-assessed) and OSDI questionnaire. Receives: Device: Tixel C |
| LipiFlow | Active comparator | LipiFlow: Screening and baseline visits,Treatment session, followed by 2 Follow up sessions, 1and 3 months after the last treatment visit. Subject will be questioned about Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (self-assessed) and OSDI questionnaire. Receives: Device: LipiFlow |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 4-weeks Follow-up Exam
Change from baseline to the 4-weeks follow-up exam in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT), as assessed by a masked rater.
TBUT - Tear Break-Up Time, is a clinical test used to evaluate the stability of the tear film on the surface of the eye. It measures the time it takes for dry spots to appear on the cornea after a blink. A shorter TBUT indicates a more unstable tear film, which can be a sign of dry eye disease or other ocular surface disorders.
Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) is typically scored by the time (in seconds). The general interpretation of TBUT scores is as follows:
Normal TBUT: More than 10 seconds Borderline TBUT: 5 to 10 seconds Abnormal/Low TBUT: Less than 5 seconds
Measured: Tixel arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after last treatment (8 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after treatment (4 weeks post baseline).
Comparison of the Incidence of Device-related Ocular Adverse Events
Comparison of the incidence of device-related Ocular adverse events for the two treatment arms
Measured: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Secondary outcomes (7)
Changes in Patient OSDI
Change from baseline in patient symptoms using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at 4-weeks and 12-weeks follow-up exam.
The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of dry eye disease.
OSDI Questionnaire
The questionnaire consists of 12 questions divided into three subscales:
Ocular Symptoms Visual Functioning Environmental Triggers
Scoring System
The scoring for the OSDI is based on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Each question is scored as follows:
0: None of the time
- Some of the time
- Half of the time
- Most of the time
- All of the time
Interpretation of OSDI Scores
The OSDI scores are generally interpreted as follows:
0-12: Normal or no dry eye 13-22: Mild dry eye 23-32: Moderate dry eye 33-100: Severe dry eye
Measured: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Changes in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 12-weeks Follow-up Exam
Changes from baseline to the 12-weeks follow-up exam in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT), as assessed by a masked rater.
BUT - Tear Break-Up Time, is a clinical test used to evaluate the stability of the tear film on the surface of the eye. It measures the time it takes for dry spots to appear on the cornea after a blink. A shorter TBUT indicates a more unstable tear film, which can be a sign of dry eye disease or other ocular surface disorders.
Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) is typically scored by the time (in seconds). The general interpretation of TBUT scores is as follows:
Normal TBUT: More than 10 seconds Borderline TBUT: 5 to 10 seconds Abnormal/Low TBUT: Less than 5 seconds
Measured: Tixel arm: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline and 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Changes in MGS to 4-weeks and 12-weeks Follow-up Exam
score on a scale at baseline, 4-weeks and 12-weeks follow-up exam in Meibomian Gland (MGS), as assessed by a masked rater.
The Meibomian Gland Score (MGS) is a clinical tool used to evaluate the function of the meibomian glands.
Scoring Criteria
Each gland is assessed and scored based on the quality of the expressed secretion:
0: No secretion
- Inspissated
- Cloudy
- Clear liquid
Interpretation of MGS Minimal MGS score = 0 in each eye (15 glands evaluated in each eye) Maximal MGS score = 45 in each eye (15 glands evaluated in each eye) Low MGS: (below 12) Indicates poor function or obstruction of the meibomian glands, suggesting MGD.
Measured: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Score on a Scale During Treatment Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (Each Self-assessed by VAS)
Discomfort and Pain from the treatment (Tixel or LipiFlow) using the questionnaires assessed by the subject. These are visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires using a scale from 0-10 to assess eye discomfort and pain. Both questionnaires are to be self-assessed by the patient immediately following treatment.
Interpetation for the assessment:
score 0- no discomfort / pain score 5 - moderate discomfort / pain score 10 - worst possible discomfort / pain
Measured: Tixel arm: 4 weeks (treatment 1- day 0, treatment 2- 2 weeks, treatment 3- 4 weeks). LipiFlow arm: On treatment day - day 0 (only one treatment for this arm)
Corneal Fluorescein Staining Slit Lamp Evaluation Scores and Change From Baseline
Changes from baseline following treatment for the test and control devices for the following assessments:
Ocular Surface Staining (to evaluate the integrity of the corneal epithelium by identifying areas of damage or staining)
Grading scale:
0 = Normal - No staining
- = Mild - Superficial stippling micropunctate staining
- = Moderate - Macropunctate staining with some coalescent areas
- = Severe - Numerous coalescent macropunctate areas and/or patches
5 regions (superior, temporal, central, nasal, and inferior) are graded for each eye. total score range from 0 -15.
Measured: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
The Mean Changes From Baseline in IOP for All Eyes on the Tixel and Lipiflow Arms
Changes from baseline following treatment for the test and control devices for:
Intraocular Pressure
Measured: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Ocular Surface Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining Changes From Baseline
Changes from baseline following treatment for the test and control devices for the following assessments:
Lissamine staining scores (to assess the health of the conjunctival and corneal epithelium, particularly in dry eye disease, by identifying areas of damaged or dead cells).
Grading scale:
0 = Normal - No staining
- = Mild - Superficial stippling micropunctate staining
- = Moderate - Macropunctate staining with some coalescent areas
- = Severe - Numerous coalescent macropunctate areas and/or patches
6 regions (nasal, superior nasal, inferior nasal, temporal, superior temporal, inferior temporal) are graded for each eye. The total score range for each eye is 0-18.
Measured: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2021
- Study start19 Sep 2022
- Primary completion26 Apr 2023
- Study completion28 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Meibomian Gland DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A Randomized, Masked (Evaluator), Controlled, Prospective, open label study.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 109 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novoxel Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gregg Berdy, MD, Principal investigator, Ophthalmology Associates 12990 Manchester Rd., Ste. 200 St. Louis, MO 63131 314-966-3377
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162261
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLN 0858
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Masked (Evaluator), Controlled, Prospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® Medical Device, Versus LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162261
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLN 0858
- Conditions
- Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Syndromes, Dry Eye
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 109 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novoxel Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 19 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 22 Jan 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A Randomized, Masked (Evaluator), Controlled, Prospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® Medical Device, Versus LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Detailed description
Randomized, open-label study comparing the Tixel device to LipiFlow System. Up to 110 patients (220 eyes) to be randomized in up to 5 clinical sites in the United States.
Evaluators will be masked as to the randomization assignments. Both eyes will receive the same randomized assignment and both eyes of each patient will be evaluated at all time points.
Data from both eyes will be using in the statistical analysis. The random-effects model adjusts the standard error (SE) and the confidence interval (CI) for within-person correlation between eyes.
Protocol Rev. 7.0 update: Addition of protocol extension to the current protocol: stage 1- main protocol for all patients and stage 2- extension protocol to a sub-group of patients only in the Tixel arm for additional follow-up visit 6 months post last treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A Randomized, Masked (Evaluator), Controlled, Prospective, open label study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tixel Group | Experimental | Device: Tixel CScreening and baseline visits, Treatment- 3 treatment sessions, followed by 2 Follow up sessions, 1and 3 months after the last treatment visit. Subject will be questioned about Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (self-assessed) and OSDI questionnaire. |
| LipiFlow | Active comparator | Device: LipiFlowLipiFlow: Screening and baseline visits,Treatment session, followed by 2 Follow up sessions, 1and 3 months after the last treatment visit. Subject will be questioned about Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (self-assessed) and OSDI questionnaire. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tixel CTixel C by Novoxel®, Israel is a thermomechanical system developed for fractional treatment. The system is designed for the treatment of soft tissue by direct conduction of heat, enabling tissue coagulation combined with micro ablation with low thermal damage to the surrounding tissue. | Device | Tixel Group |
| LipiFlowThermal pulsation (LipiFlow) consists of the localized application of heat and therapeutic pressure on the four eyelids (upper and lower) with the aim of improving drainage of the Meibomian glands. | Device | LipiFlow |
Primary outcome
Changes in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 4-weeks Follow-up Exam
Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after last treatment (8 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after treatment (4 weeks post baseline).
Change from baseline to the 4-weeks follow-up exam in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT), as assessed by a masked rater. TBUT - Tear Break-Up Time, is a clinical test used to evaluate the stability of the tear film on the surface of the eye. It measures the time it takes for dry spots to appear on the cornea after a blink. A shorter TBUT indicates a more unstable tear film, which can be a sign of dry eye disease or other ocular surface disorders. Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) is typically scored by the time (in seconds). The general interpretation of TBUT scores is as follows: Normal TBUT: More than 10 seconds Borderline TBUT: 5 to 10 seconds Abnormal/Low TBUT: Less than 5 seconds
Comparison of the Incidence of Device-related Ocular Adverse Events
Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Comparison of the incidence of device-related Ocular adverse events for the two treatment arms
7 secondary outcomes
Changes in Patient OSDI
Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Changes in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 12-weeks Follow-up Exam
Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline and 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Changes in MGS to 4-weeks and 12-weeks Follow-up Exam
Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Score on a Scale During Treatment Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (Each Self-assessed by VAS)
Time frame: Tixel arm: 4 weeks (treatment 1- day 0, treatment 2- 2 weeks, treatment 3- 4 weeks). LipiFlow arm: On treatment day - day 0 (only one treatment for this arm)
Corneal Fluorescein Staining Slit Lamp Evaluation Scores and Change From Baseline
Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
The Mean Changes From Baseline in IOP for All Eyes on the Tixel and Lipiflow Arms
Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Ocular Surface Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study Evaluating Nordlys™ SWT IPL for Dry Eye Disease (DED) Due to MGD
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Disease
Not yet recruiting
TearCare in Young Adults
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Disorder)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Autologous Serum Obtained by a Closed-Circuit Collection Device
GVHD, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ocular Surface Changes and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Rheumatologic Patients
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Syndromes
Enrolling by invitation
Microbiome-Focused Food Supplement for Evaporative Dry Eye Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Dry Eye, Evaporative Dry Eye Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gregg Berdy, MD principal investigator
Ophthalmology Associates 12990 Manchester Rd., Ste. 200 St. Louis, MO 63131 314-966-3377
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tixel C and LipiFlow in people with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Dry Eye Syndromes, run by Novoxel Ltd. at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jan 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 4-weeks Follow-up Exam (time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after last treatment (8 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after treatment (4 weeks post baseline).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2025.