AzTrials
AzTrials

Endometriosis; PeritoneumNCT05162794

Is Laparoscopic Excision for Peritoneal Endometriosis Helpful or Harmful?

A study testing Laparoscopy with excision, Laparoscopy without excision and Medical treatment-as-usual in people with Endometriosis; Peritoneum, run by University of Aarhus at 5 sites in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The trial seeks to test effect of laparoscopic excision of peritoneal endometriosis on pelvic pain. Data will also be gathered on quality of life and neuropathic pain. Patients will be randomized to one of three groups: 1) laparoscopy with excision of endometrial tissue, 2) laparoscopy without excision of endometrial… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Endometriosis; Peritoneum
What is being tested?
Laparoscopy with excision, Laparoscopy without excision and Medical treatment-as-usual
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
5 sitesDenmark
Study dates
31 Jan 2022to 1 Jul 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult (≥ 18 years) with suspected peritoneal endometriosis undergoing elective surgery for pain relief
  • Pain intensity ≥ 5 on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the four weeks prior to giving consent

Who cannot join

  • Other known conditions/diseases that may cause pelvic pain
  • Diagnosed personality disorder, schizophrenia or treatment with anti-psychotics
  • Planned pregnancy during study period
  • Women who cannot read or speak Danish

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

Henrik Marschall, MSc contact

+4522394563

hmars@psy.au.dk

5 sites in 1 country

Denmark5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Aarhus N, DK-8200

    Recruiting
  • Regional Hospital Herning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Herning, DK-7400

    Recruiting
  • Regional Hospital Horsens, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Horsens, Central Jutland, DK-8700

    Recruiting
  • Regional Hospital Randers, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Randers, DK-8930

    Recruiting
  • Regional Hospital Viborg, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Viborg, DK-8800

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Is Laparoscopic Excision for Peritoneal Endometriosis Helpful or Harmful: A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled, Three-armed Surgical Trial.

The trial seeks to test effect of laparoscopic excision of peritoneal endometriosis on pelvic pain. Data will also be gathered on quality of life and neuropathic pain. Patients will be randomized to one of three groups: 1) laparoscopy with excision of endometrial tissue, 2) laparoscopy without excision of endometrial tissue and 3) waiting list control.

Being tested
Laparoscopy with excision, Laparoscopy without excision, Medical treatment-as-usual
Keywords
Pelvic pain, Quality of life, Post-surgical neuropathic pain, Endometriosis surgery
Medical subject headings
Endometriosis, Pelvic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laparoscopy with excisionOther

    Diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed to visually confirm endometriosis in the peritoneum. Then, the relevant tissue will be excised and a histology will be performed.

  • Laparoscopy without excisionOther

    Diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed to visually confirm endometriosis in the peritoneum. However, no tissue will be excised and histology will not be performed.

  • Medical treatment-as-usualOther

    Patients continue their hormonal and analgesic treatment-as-usual.

Study groups in NCT05162794
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active SurgeryOtherNot described
Receives: Other: Laparoscopy with excision; Other: Medical treatment-as-usual
Diagnostic SurgeryOtherNot described
Receives: Other: Laparoscopy without excision; Other: Medical treatment-as-usual
No-surgery controlOtherNot described
Receives: Other: Medical treatment-as-usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pelvic pain measured using NRS

    Pelvic pain intensity (sensory) and unpleasantness (affective) will be measured on 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain imaginable) weekly.

    Measured: Change from pre-randomization to 1, 3 and 6 months post-randomization.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Health-related Quality of Life measured using Endometriosis Health Profile-30

    Quality of Life will be measured using the validated and patient-generated, endometriosis-specific questionnaire "Endometriosis Health Profile 30", consisting of 30 questions rated on Likert scales.

    Measured: Change from pre-randomization to 1, 3 and 6 months post-randomization.

  2. Neuropathic pain symptoms (patient-reported) measured using painDETECT

    Neuropathic pain symptoms (patient-reported) is measured using the validated painDETECT questionnaire.

    Measured: Change from pre-randomization to 1, 3 and 6 months post-randomization.

  3. Neuropathic pain symptoms (assessed) measured using quantitative sensory testing

    Neuropathic pain symptoms (assessed) is measured using a quantitative sensory testing battery. Allodynia, pinprick and pressure pain thresholds are measured.

    Measured: Change from pre-randomization to 6 months post-randomization.

  4. Work ability measured using "Work Ability Index"

    Work ability is measured using the "Work Ability Index" short questionnaire.

    Measured: Change from pre-randomization to 1, 3 and 6 months post-randomization.

  5. Worst pelvic pain measured using NRS

    Worst pelvic pain intensity and unpleasantness will be measured on 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain imaginable) weekly.

    Measured: Change from pre-randomization to 1, 3 and 6 months post-randomization.

  6. Pain frequency measured using weekly count

    Pain frequency will be measured using a weekly count, ranging from 0 days of pain to 7 days of pain.

    Measured: Change from pre-randomization to 1, 3 and 6 months post-randomization.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2021
  2. Study start31 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05162794
Sponsor's protocol ID
LAPEX
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
17 Nov 2021
Last updated
15 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: When participant inclusion has ended, data can be shared in accordance with the ICJME guidelines, if relevant research objectives are provided. Data sharing will require approval from the Central Denmark Region and the Danish Data Protection Agency, and the requesting party shall cover any fees associated with data sharing. Requests for data can be addressed to af@clin.au.dk.

Publications

  • Marschall H, Forman A, Lunde SJ, Kesmodel US, Hansen KE, Vase L. Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 3;12(11):e062808. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062808.

    PubMed 36328387

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laparoscopy with excision, Laparoscopy without excision and Medical treatment-as-usual in people with Endometriosis; Peritoneum, run by University of Aarhus at 5 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Henrik Marschall, MSc (+4522394563, hmars@psy.au.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pelvic pain measured using NRS (time frame: Change from pre-randomization to 1, 3 and 6 months post-randomization.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05162794, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in