Virtual RealityNCT05169073
Virtual Reality Training for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
A study testing Virtual Reality training and Conventional training in people with Virtual Reality and Gallbladder, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Cholecystectomy is one the most frequent laparoscopic procedures worldwide. It is a safe and effective operation but intraoperative bile duct injury remains a relevant complication with serious consequences for the patient. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Virtual Reality, Gallbladder, Bile Duct Injury
- What is being tested?
- Virtual Reality training and Conventional training
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2021to 30 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Referred for elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis/chronic cholecystitis
- Early cholecystectomy after acute biliary pancreatitis
- Concomitant minor procedures (adhesiolysis, umbilical hernia repair, liver biopsy)
- Sufficient quality of MRCP
Who cannot join
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 4
- Previous major open upper abdominal surgery
- Suspicion for concomitant biliary disease (e.g. Mirizzi-Syndrome)
- Robotic cholecystectomy
- Planned open procedures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Centre for Gastrointesintal and Liver Disease
Basel, 4058
Christoph Kuemmerli, MD, +41616857548, christoph.kuemmerli@clarunis.ch
Sebastian Staubli, MD, +41616858585, sebastian.staubli@clarunis.ch
About this study
Official title: The Impact of 3D Virtual Reality MRCP Rendering on Surgical Performance During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Pilot Study
Cholecystectomy is one the most frequent laparoscopic procedures worldwide. It is a safe and effective operation but intraoperative bile duct injury remains a relevant complication with serious consequences for the patient. Most of the complications occur due to a lack of knowledge of the anatomy or misidentification of the cystic duct. Thus, the study of the anatomy is a cornerstone of a successful procedure and the preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a way to preoperatively determine relevant structures to avoid intraoperative incidents.
This trial has been designed to assess the effect of preoperative virtual reality training based on MRCP on intraoperative performance and outcome.
- Conditions
- Virtual Reality, Gallbladder, Bile Duct Injury, Medical Education, Laparoscopy
- Being tested
- Virtual Reality training, Conventional training
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual Reality trainingProcedure or surgery
In the Virtual Reality (VR) study arm, a VR software (Specto VRTM, version 4.0, Diffuse Ltd, Heimberg, Switzerland) will be used to display volumetric MRCP data using a tethered head-mounted display (HMD) prior to the operation. Specto uses volume rendering at 180 frames/sec to visualize the medical data in an immersive fashion in the VR environment and allows for viewing of the 3D reconstructed 3D imaging with 360° free movement. Each participant will perform a procedure with VR training and one with conventional preparation (MRCP).
Conventional trainingProcedure or surgery
In the conventional study arm, the participants will view the preoperative MRCP.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality MRCP | Experimental | The MRCP images will be transferred into a 3D VR rendering software (Specto VR TM) for each patient. Residents will have the opportunity to use the virtual reality environment the day before surgery until a sufficient understanding of the anatomy is achieved. Receives: Procedure: Virtual Reality training |
| Conventional MRCP | Active comparator | Controls will have regular access to the conventional MRCP images. Receives: Procedure: Conventional training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Global Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score assessed by assisting surgeon
For the global assessment of laparoscopic skills, the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) will be used. Evaluation will be performed by the attending surgeon. The GOALS is a 5 item rating scale and the items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale where "1" represents the lowest level of performance, and "5" is considered ideal performance. The total score for the global rating scale is the sum of the scores for each of the 5 items for a maximum total score of 25.
Measured: On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Global Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score assessed by resident
For the global assessment of laparoscopic skills, the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) will be used. Evaluation will be performed by the resident (self-assessment).
Measured: On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)
Critical View of Safety
The "Sanford-Strasberg' Critical-view-of-safety (CVS)" is a method for judging the CVS objectively through intraoperative photographs. It evaluates the CVS captured by anterior and posterior ("doublet") views. The minimum score is 0, and the maximum is 6. The higher the score, the more satisfactory is the CVS. The "Sanford-Strasberg' CVS Score" is useful in evaluating the CVS in video records and the CVS has been recognized as an essential and effective security method to reduce the risk of bile duct injury.
Measured: Postoperative within 30 days (Video-Analysis)
Time to critical view of safety
Time required to achieve the CVS or i.e. until the clips are placed during the operation.
Measured: Postoperative within 30 days (Video-Analysis)
Efficiency improvement
Discrepancy between actual and planned operative time
Measured: On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)
Self-confidence
The self-confidence scale is a psychometrically valid tool to measure residents' self-confidence during surgical learning. Self-rating will be performed by selection of 6 items, each on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. The maximum score attainable is 30 and the higher the score, the higher the self-confidence.
Measured: On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)
Operative time
Time from incision to wound closure
Measured: During surgery
Intraoperative interventions by assisting surgeon
Any intervention necessary to guide to resident. I.e. whenever the assisting surgeon takes over the position of the operating surgeon.
Measured: During surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2021
- Study start1 Nov 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Virtual RealityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- The order in which the operations will be performed by each resident is random.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Basel
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sebastian Staubli, MD, Principal investigator, Clarunis - University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05169073
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CU621
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nassar AHM, Ashkar KA, Mohamed AY, Hafiz AA. Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy possible without video technology? Minimally Invasive Therapy. 1995; 4:2 63-65
Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondre K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004.
PubMed 15972181Sanford DE, Strasberg SM. A simple effective method for generation of a permanent record of the Critical View of Safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by intraoperative "doublet" photography. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Feb;218(2):170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
PubMed 24440064Geoffrion R, Lee T, Singer J. Validating a self-confidence scale for surgical trainees. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Apr;35(4):355-361. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30964-6.
PubMed 23660044
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Impact of 3D Virtual Reality MRCP Rendering on Surgical Performance During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05169073
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CU621
- Conditions
- Virtual Reality, Gallbladder, Bile Duct Injury, Medical Education, Laparoscopy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Basel
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cholecystectomy is one the most frequent laparoscopic procedures worldwide. It is a safe and effective operation but intraoperative bile duct injury remains a relevant complication with serious consequences for the patient. Most of the complications occur due to a lack of knowledge of the anatomy or misidentification of the cystic duct. Thus, the study of the anatomy is a cornerstone of a successful procedure and the preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a way to preoperatively determine relevant structures to avoid intraoperative incidents.
This trial has been designed to assess the effect of preoperative virtual reality training based on MRCP on intraoperative performance and outcome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The order in which the operations will be performed by each resident is random.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality MRCP | Experimental | Procedure: Virtual Reality trainingThe MRCP images will be transferred into a 3D VR rendering software (Specto VR TM) for each patient. Residents will have the opportunity to use the virtual reality environment the day before surgery until a sufficient understanding of the anatomy is achieved. |
| Conventional MRCP | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional trainingControls will have regular access to the conventional MRCP images. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Referred for elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis/chronic cholecystitis
- Early cholecystectomy after acute biliary pancreatitis
- Concomitant minor procedures (adhesiolysis, umbilical hernia repair, liver biopsy)
- Sufficient quality of MRCP
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 4
- Previous major open upper abdominal surgery
- Suspicion for concomitant biliary disease (e.g. Mirizzi-Syndrome)
- Robotic cholecystectomy
- Planned open procedures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality trainingIn the Virtual Reality (VR) study arm, a VR software (Specto VRTM, version 4.0, Diffuse Ltd, Heimberg, Switzerland) will be used to display volumetric MRCP data using a tethered head-mounted display (HMD) prior to the operation. Specto uses volume rendering at 180 frames/sec to visualize the medical data in an immersive fashion in the VR environment and allows for viewing of the 3D reconstructed 3D imaging with 360° free movement. Each participant will perform a procedure with VR training and one with conventional preparation (MRCP). | Procedure or surgery | Virtual Reality MRCP |
| Conventional trainingIn the conventional study arm, the participants will view the preoperative MRCP. | Procedure or surgery | Conventional MRCP |
Primary outcome
Global Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score assessed by assisting surgeon
Time frame: On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)
For the global assessment of laparoscopic skills, the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) will be used. Evaluation will be performed by the attending surgeon. The GOALS is a 5 item rating scale and the items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale where "1" represents the lowest level of performance, and "5" is considered ideal performance. The total score for the global rating scale is the sum of the scores for each of the 5 items for a maximum total score of 25.
7 secondary outcomes
Global Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score assessed by resident
Time frame: On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)
Critical View of Safety
Time frame: Postoperative within 30 days (Video-Analysis)
Time to critical view of safety
Time frame: Postoperative within 30 days (Video-Analysis)
Efficiency improvement
Time frame: On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)
Self-confidence
Time frame: On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)
Operative time
Time frame: During surgery
Intraoperative interventions by assisting surgeon
Time frame: During surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2025.
- BackgroundNassar AHM, Ashkar KA, Mohamed AY, Hafiz AA. Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy possible without video technology? Minimally Invasive Therapy. 1995; 4:2 63-65
- Background: PubMed 15972181Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondre K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004.
- Background: PubMed 24440064Sanford DE, Strasberg SM. A simple effective method for generation of a permanent record of the Critical View of Safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by intraoperative "doublet" photography. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Feb;218(2):170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 23660044Geoffrion R, Lee T, Singer J. Validating a self-confidence scale for surgical trainees. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Apr;35(4):355-361. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30964-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Virtual Reality
Recruiting
Multisensory Processing of Alcohol Cues in Young Adult Binge Drinkers
Drinking, Binge
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality Intervention to Improve Comfort in Hospitalized Hematology Patients.
Hematologic Cancer
Recruiting
Virtual Reality Intervention (VR-GINSO) for Reducing Aggression in Young Offenders
Aggression
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality and Point-of-View Video Modeling for Dental Anxiety in Children
Dental Anxiety in Children
Recruiting
The Efficacy of an IADL-based Non-immersive Virtual Reality Training Program to Enhance ADL Performance and Cognitive Function for Persons at Risk of Dementia
Cognitive Enhancement, Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Sebastian Staubli, MD principal investigator
Clarunis - University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual Reality training and Conventional training in people with Virtual Reality and Gallbladder, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Christoph Kuemmerli, MD (+41616857548, christoph.kuemmerli@clarunis.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Global Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score assessed by assisting surgeon (time frame: On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05169073, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2025.