Refractory Angina PectorisINROADNCT05174572
IMR Evaluation in Patients with Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation (INROAD Study)
A study testing IMR in people with Refractory Angina Pectoris, run by Consorzio Futuro in Ricerca at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The INROAD is an investigator-driven, prospective, study in which patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation (Reducer) for chronic refractory angina undergo evaluation of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at the time of implantation, and at 4 months follow-up Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Refractory Angina Pectoris
- What is being tested?
- IMR
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 3 Dec 2021to 11 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Chronic refractory angina refractory to medical and interventional therapies.
- At least one open coronary artery (excluded right coronary artery) where to performs IMR evaluation
- Ability to provide informed written consent
- Life expectancy ≥1 year
Who cannot join
- Recent (within 3 months) acute coronary syndrome
- Left ventricular ejection fraction of <30%
- Severe valvular heart disease
- Inability to perform IMR
- Technical contraindications to the implant ( A pacemaker electrode in the coronary sinus, Mean right atrial pressure >15mmHg, Anomalous coronary sinus anatomy)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara
Ferrara, Ferrara, 44124
About this study
Official title: Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Evaluation in Patients with Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina Pectoris, the INROAD Study
The INROAD is an investigator-driven, prospective, study in which patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation (Reducer) for chronic refractory angina undergo evaluation of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at the time of implantation, and at 4 months follow-up
Read the detailed description
Refractory angina (RA) is a chronic condition (present for at least 3 months) of moderate-severe symptoms (Canadian class Cardiovascular Society [CCS] II-IV) due to coronary artery disease which cannot be adequately controlled by the combination of optimal medical therapy and coronary revascularization. The clinical impact in terms of quality of life, re-hospitalization and socio-health costs is extremely negative. In this context, the therapeutic goals are primarily the management of the symptom and improvement the patient's quality of life. The unpaid therapeutic demand of these patients has brought out a large number of medical and interventional treatments, including the coronary sinus reduction system (REDUCER). Numerous clinical studies and registries have been carried out and they proved both the efficacy and safety in the use of REDUCER. The physiological mechanism that are supposed to be behind the antianginal effect of coronary sinus intervention are essentially two:
- Redistribution of coronary flow from the subepicardium to the subendocardium.
- Coronary neoangiogenesis In both cases, the primum movens of the Reducer's therapeutic mechanism is attributable to the increase in venous pressure due to narrowing of the coronary sinus. Nevertheless, this mechanism of action is theoretical and has never been objectively tested. The evaluation of microcirculatory resistance by IMR before and after REDUCER implantation could be the most effective way to confirm this hypothesis.
- Conditions
- Refractory Angina Pectoris
- Being tested
- IMR
- Keywords
- Angina, Microcirculation resistance, Coronary sinus Reducer
- Medical subject headings
- Angina Pectoris
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IMRProcedure or surgery
Patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation (Reducer) undergo evaluation of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at the time of implantation, and at 4 months follow-up.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IMR | Other | IMR evaluation before and after Reducer implantation Receives: Procedure: IMR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in IMR value
Significant Change (≥ 20%) in index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) value at 4 month follow-up as compared to baseline value (before Reducer implantation). The IMR is calculated by multiplying the distal coronary pressure by the mean transit time of a 3 ml bolus of saline at room temperature during coronary hyperaemia induced by intravenous adenosine. Normal values are usually reported as ≤25.
Measured: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in angina severity according to the Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Change in angina severity according to the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after Reducer implantation. The questionnaire is performed before the Reducer implantation and after 4 months. The scores on the SAQ angina frequency scale of 0-30 points indicate daily angina, 31-60 points indicate weekly angina, 61-99 points indicate monthly angina, and 100 points indicate no angina. Zero at SAQ indicate a worst clinical situation.
Measured: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class a
Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class by two or more classes after Reducer implantation. The CCS evaluation is performed before the Reducer implantation and after 4 months. A CCS angina class I: ordinary activity such as walking or climbing stairs does not precipitate angina. CCS II : angina precipitated by emnotion, cold weather or meals and by walking up stairs-. CCS III: marked limitation of ordinary physical activity. CCS III indicate a worst clinical situation.
Measured: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in Beck depression inventory
Change in Beck depression inventory (BDI) scale after Reducer Implantation. The questionnaire is performed before the Reducer implantation and after 4 months. A BDI scores from 0 through 9 indicate no or minimal depression; scores from 10 through 18 indicate mild to moderate depression; scores from 19 through 29 indicate moderate to severe depression; and scores from 30 through 63 indicate severe depression.A BDI of 63 indicate a worst clinical situation.
Measured: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in CFR (coronary flow reserve)
Change in CFR (coronary flow reserve) value after Reducer Implantation. The CFR is performed before the Reducer implantation and after 4 month. CFR is defined as hyperemic coronary flow divided by resting flow and can be measured invasively in the catheterization laboratory with a cut-off of normality ≥ 2.0.
Measured: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in RRR (resistive reserve ratio) value
Change in RRR (resistive reserve ratio) value after Reducer implantation. The RRR is performed before Reducer implantation and after 4 month. RRR was calculated as the ratio between resting and hyperemic distal coronary pressure ([resting Tmn/hyperemic Tmn] × [resting Pd/ hyperemic Pd]); which can therefore be simplified as the relationship between CFR x [resting Pd/ hyperemic Pd]. Cut-off values of normality is > 3.5.
Measured: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in LVEDP (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure)
Change in LVEDP (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure) after Reducer implantation. LVEDP is performed before Reducer implantation and after 4 month. The LVEDP is measure 50 ms after the beginning of the QRS complex, usually coinciding with the R wave. The normal LVEDP cut-off is 15 mmHg.
Measured: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) value
Change in Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) value after Reducer implantation
Measured: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2021
- Study start3 Dec 2021
- Primary completion31 Mar 2023
- Study completion11 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Refractory Angina PectorisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Consorzio Futuro in Ricerca
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05174572
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021
- Acronym
- INROAD
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Tebaldi M, Campo G, Ugo F, Guarracini S, Marrone A, Clo S, Abdirashid M, Di Mauro M, Rametta F, Di Marco M, Cocco M, Marchini F, Penzo C, Erriquez A, Banai S, Biscaglia S. Coronary Sinus Narrowing Improves Coronary Microcirculation Function in Patients With Refractory Angina: A Multicenter Prospective INROAD Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;17(1):e013481. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013481. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
PubMed 38227697
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Evaluation in Patients with Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina Pectoris, the INROAD Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05174572
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INROAD / 2021
- Conditions
- Refractory Angina Pectoris
- Keywords
- Angina, Microcirculation resistance, Coronary sinus Reducer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Consorzio Futuro in RicercaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The INROAD is an investigator-driven, prospective, study in which patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation (Reducer) for chronic refractory angina undergo evaluation of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at the time of implantation, and at 4 months follow-up
Detailed description
Refractory angina (RA) is a chronic condition (present for at least 3 months) of moderate-severe symptoms (Canadian class Cardiovascular Society [CCS] II-IV) due to coronary artery disease which cannot be adequately controlled by the combination of optimal medical therapy and coronary revascularization. The clinical impact in terms of quality of life, re-hospitalization and socio-health costs is extremely negative. In this context, the therapeutic goals are primarily the management of the symptom and improvement the patient's quality of life. The unpaid therapeutic demand of these patients has brought out a large number of medical and interventional treatments, including the coronary sinus reduction system (REDUCER). Numerous clinical studies and registries have been carried out and they proved both the efficacy and safety in the use of REDUCER. The physiological mechanism that are supposed to be behind the antianginal effect of coronary sinus intervention are essentially two:
- Redistribution of coronary flow from the subepicardium to the subendocardium.
- Coronary neoangiogenesis In both cases, the primum movens of the Reducer's therapeutic mechanism is attributable to the increase in venous pressure due to narrowing of the coronary sinus. Nevertheless, this mechanism of action is theoretical and has never been objectively tested. The evaluation of microcirculatory resistance by IMR before and after REDUCER implantation could be the most effective way to confirm this hypothesis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IMR | Other | Procedure: IMRIMR evaluation before and after Reducer implantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Chronic refractory angina refractory to medical and interventional therapies.
- At least one open coronary artery (excluded right coronary artery) where to performs IMR evaluation
- Ability to provide informed written consent
- Life expectancy ≥1 year
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Recent (within 3 months) acute coronary syndrome
- Left ventricular ejection fraction of <30%
- Severe valvular heart disease
- Inability to perform IMR
- Technical contraindications to the implant ( A pacemaker electrode in the coronary sinus, Mean right atrial pressure >15mmHg, Anomalous coronary sinus anatomy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IMRPatients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation (Reducer) undergo evaluation of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at the time of implantation, and at 4 months follow-up. | Procedure or surgery | IMR |
Primary outcome
Change in IMR value
Time frame: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Significant Change (≥ 20%) in index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) value at 4 month follow-up as compared to baseline value (before Reducer implantation). The IMR is calculated by multiplying the distal coronary pressure by the mean transit time of a 3 ml bolus of saline at room temperature during coronary hyperaemia induced by intravenous adenosine. Normal values are usually reported as ≤25.
7 secondary outcomes
Change in angina severity according to the Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time frame: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class a
Time frame: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in Beck depression inventory
Time frame: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in CFR (coronary flow reserve)
Time frame: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in RRR (resistive reserve ratio) value
Time frame: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in LVEDP (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure)
Time frame: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Change in Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) value
Time frame: 4 month after Reducer implantation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38227697Tebaldi M, Campo G, Ugo F, Guarracini S, Marrone A, Clo S, Abdirashid M, Di Mauro M, Rametta F, Di Marco M, Cocco M, Marchini F, Penzo C, Erriquez A, Banai S, Biscaglia S. Coronary Sinus Narrowing Improves Coronary Microcirculation Function in Patients With Refractory Angina: A Multicenter Prospective INROAD Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;17(1):e013481. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013481. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Refractory Angina Pectoris
Active, not recruitingObservational study
REDUCER-I: An Observational Study of the Neovasc Reducer™ System
Angina Pectoris, Angina Pectoris, Stable
Recruiting
Efficacy of the COronary SInus Reducer in Patients With Refractory Angina II
Refractory Angina
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigational Trial to Evaluate XC001 Delivered Via an Cardiac Catheter in Subjects With Chronic Angina.
Refractory Angina, Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruiting
Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation in Patients With Ischaemia and Non-obstructed Coronary Arteries and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.
Refractory Angina, Microvascular Angina
Not yet recruiting
Coronary Sinus Reducer Therapy for Persisting Angina
Coronary Artery Disease, Angina (Stable)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing IMR in people with Refractory Angina Pectoris, run by Consorzio Futuro in Ricerca at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in IMR value (time frame: 4 month after Reducer implantation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05174572, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2025.