AzTrials
AzTrials

Gut FeelingsEGFGPNCT05175157

Assessment of "Gut Feelings" Accuracy Regarding the Effect of Professional Experience in General Practitioners in Clinical Decision Making

An observational study of Gut Feelings, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Knowledge, experience and professional development limit the risk of diagnostic error for the clinician in daily practice. However, research has shown that other non-analytical factors are involved in clinical decision making. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gut Feelings
What is being tested?
Gut Fellings questionnaire
How many people
260 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
28 Apr 2022to Apr 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: * General practitioners established for more than 3 years * Interns in the first year of the third cycle of the diploma of specialized studies in general medicine of the Universities of Brest and Rouen

Who may be able to join

  • GP population: General practitioners established for more than 3 years
  • Intern population: Interns in general medicine in the first year of the third cycle of the diploma of specialized studies in general medicine

Who cannot join

  • For the 2 populations: Refusal to participate
  • Intern population: Interns in the second and third year of the diploma of specialized studies in general medicine

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Dr Marie BARAIS

    Brest

    Marie BARAIS, Dr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Knowledge, experience and professional development limit the risk of diagnostic error for the clinician in daily practice. However, research has shown that other non-analytical factors are involved in clinical decision making. Intuition (or "gut feelings") is a subjective element involved in medical decision-making, and its place and relevance are being explored. The concept of "gut feelings" comes from General Practitioners (GPs) themselves and their description of their own practice. Several studies have shown its place in medical decision-making models, particularly in the face of diagnostic uncertainty.

A questionnaire used as a standardized measurement tool for gut feelings was created to address this issue. The Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been translated into French, German and Polish during a standardized linguistic validation procedure. It is currently validated and available in five languages. The QGF has been tested and validated in clinical practice by Belgian, French and Dutch physicians. Its feasibility has been evaluated in these three health systems.

The Gut Feelings Questionnaire was used in a prospective study to determine the accuracy of the sense of alarm in patients consulting their GP for chest pain and/or dyspnea. But the role of the practitioner's experience has not been studied: is the gut feeling more accurate in experienced GPs than in first semester interns in general practice?

Conditions
Gut Feelings
Being tested
Gut Fellings questionnaire

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Gut Fellings questionnaireOther

    Answer the Gut Fellings questionnaire

Study groups in NCT05175157
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
General practitionerAnswer the Gut Fellings questionnaire
Receives: Other: Gut Fellings questionnaire
InternalAnswer the Gut Fellings questionnaire
Receives: Other: Gut Fellings questionnaire

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Error assessment

    Gut Feelings Questionnaire response score comparaison for each of 12 clinical vignettes. Gut Feelings Questionnaire is a 10-item questionnaire based on the definitions of the sense of alarm and the sense of reassurance. The purpose of the Gut Feelings Questionnaire is to determine the presence or absence of gut feelings in the diagnostic reasoning. These gut feelings are defined as a 'sense of alarm' and a 'sense of reassurance'. A 'sense of alarm' implies that a GP worries about a patient's health status, even though he/she has found no specific indications yet; it is a sense that 'there's something wrong here'. A 'sense of reassurance' means that a GP feels secure about the further management and course of a patient's problem, even though he/she may not be certain about the diagnosis: everything fits in.

    Measured: Day 1

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Types of professional activity of installed GPs

    To study the relationship between professional variables and GFQ response score errors in the GP population. Professional variables are be : University training supervisor (yes/no); type of activity (group of physicians, alone, multiprofessional group); place of practice (town of <2000 inhabitants, between 2000 and 5000, over 5000); number of years of practice in general medicine.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Type of care

    Care proposed at the end of each clinical vignette (answers to question n°11 of the questionnaire)

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Practitioner's orientation

    Items highlighted by each participant within the clinical vignette that contributed to the practitioner's orientation (identification of a sense of alarm or a sense of reassurance) to complete the Gut Fellings Questionnaire.

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jan 2022
  2. Study start28 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completionApr 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
260 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05175157
Sponsor's protocol ID
29BRC21.0359 (EGFGP)
Acronym
EGFGP
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
14 Dec 2021
Last updated
3 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All collected data that underlie results in a publication

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gut Feelings, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Marie Barais (06 98 18 96 81, marie.barais@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Error assessment (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in