Organ TransplantSherpaPakNCT05194514
Trial to Compare the SherpaPak™ Device vs Cold Storage
A study testing SherpaPak™ Device and Cold Storage in people with Organ Transplant, run by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The Investigator's are doing this study to see which method of organ preservation leads to better outcomes for donated hearts. There are two methods of organ preservation. The first method is the use of cold storage. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Organ Transplant
- What is being tested?
- SherpaPak™ Device and Cold Storage
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 May 2022to 31 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Any sex/gender, 18 years of age or older listed for primary heart transplant.
- Subjects must be willing and be capable of understanding the purpose and risks of the study and must sign a statement of informed consent OR consent of a legally authorized representative of a cognitively impaired individual will be obtained before the cognitively impaired individual may be included in research.
- Signed: 1) written informed consent document and 2) authorization to use and disclose protected health information
- Subjects must receive and accept a non-local donor offer (from Northern California, Arizona, Nevada or farther geographies)
Who cannot join
- Re-do heart transplant
- Multi-organ transplant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
About this study
Official title: Randomized Trial to Compare the SherpaPak™ Device vs Cold Storage of Donor Hearts in Transplantation: A Pilot Study
The Investigator's are doing this study to see which method of organ preservation leads to better outcomes for donated hearts.
There are two methods of organ preservation. The first method is the use of cold storage. With this method, the donor heart is stored in preservation fluid within bags that are then placed on ice and transported in a cooler. This is the usual method for transporting donor hearts. This is also known as "standard of care."
Read more
The second method is the use of the SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System. With this method, the donor heart is kept at a steady, consistent temperature throughout transportation. This method is not typically used for transporting donor hearts.
The study will include up to 20 people in total.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized study and has 2 study groups. Participants will be randomly assigned to a group in a 1:1 ratio.
- 50% chance of receiving a donor heart using the SherpaPak™ method, or
- 50% chance of receiving a donor heart using the cold storage method.
The research team will analyze data from the medical records from the heart transplant and clinic visits up to 30 days after the heart transplant. Participants will be in the study for about 30 days.
- Conditions
- Organ Transplant
- Being tested
- SherpaPak™ Device, Cold Storage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SherpaPak™ DeviceDevice
The SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System has been developed to provide a safe, consistent method for cold ischemic storage of donor hearts for transplantation. This device is FDA approved.
Cold StorageOther
FDA-approved method for organ procurement
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System | Other | When a matching donor heart from a non-local donor offer (from Northern California, Arizona, Nevada or farther geographies) becomes available the recipient will be assigned a subject identification number and randomized 1:1 to receive a heart transported using either standard of care cold storage or the SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System. Receives: Device: SherpaPak™ Device |
| Cold Storage | Other | When a matching donor heart from a non-local donor offer (from Northern California, Arizona, Nevada or farther geographies) becomes available the recipient will be assigned a subject identification number and randomized 1:1 to receive a heart transported using either standard of care cold storage or the SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System. Receives: Other: Cold Storage |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Absence of Moderate to Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction (Left or Right Ventricle)
Percentage of subjects without moderate to severe primary graft dysfunction (left or right ventricle)
Measured: 24 hours post-transplant
30-day Post-transplant Survival
Measured: 30 day post heart transplant (htx)
Freedom From 30-day Ischemic Reperfusion Injury
Measured: 30 day post htx
Freedom From 30-day Biopsy Proven Rejection
Measured: 30 day post htx
Freedom From 30-day Any-treated Rejection
Measured: 30 day post htx
Secondary outcomes (10)
Cardiac Index
Measured: 24 hours post-transplant
Cardiac Output
Measured: 24 hours post-transplant
Mean Arterial Pressure
Measured: 24 hours post-transplant
Pulmonary Arterial Pressure
Measured: 24 hours post-transplant
Vasoactive-Inotropic Score
Vasoactive inotropic scores (VIS) are used to measure the amount of cardiovascular support a patient is receiving at certain time point, for our study it was at 24hrs post transplant. Below is the calculation for the score.
VIS = dopamine (µg/kg/min) + dobutamine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × epinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × norepinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 10 × milrinone (µg/kg/min) + 10,000 × vasopressin (units/kg/min) + 50 × levosimendan (µg/kg/min).
The minimum score is 0 if the patient does not require any support but there really isn't a maximum score as theoretically patients can be on any range of support. Higher values indicates that a patient is requiring a higher cardiovascular support at 24 hrs.
VIS = dopamine (µg/kg/min) + dobutamine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × epinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × norepinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 10 × milrinone (µg/kg/min) + 10,000 × vasopressin (units/kg/min) + 50 × levosimendan (µg/kg/min)
Measured: 24 hours post-transplant
Hospital Length of Stay
Hospital Length of Stay
Measured: within 30 days
Acute Cellular Rejection
Measured: 30 days
1R
1R is the rejection grade that referring to mild cellular rejection based on pathological assessment that is standardized by ISHLT. Generally, pathologist look for signs of mild cellular mediated damage (interstitial/perivascular inflammation) using special stains. Only participants with acute cellular rejection were assessed for this Outcome Measure
Measured: 30 days
Antibody Mediated Rejection
Measured: 30 days
pAMR 1
pAMR1 is the rejection grade that referring to mild antibody rejection based on pathological assessment that is standardized by ISHLT. Generally, pathologist look for signs of mild antibody-mediated damage using special stains to detect the presence of immune complexes.
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2022
- Study start11 May 2022
- Primary completion31 Aug 2023
- Study completion31 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Organ TransplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fardad Esmailian, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Investigators
- Fardad Esmailian, Principal investigator, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05194514
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00001753
- Acronym
- SherpaPak
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 23 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data that underlies the results reported in this article, after deidentification.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Trial to Compare the SherpaPak™ Device vs Cold Storage of Donor Hearts in Transplantation: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05194514
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SherpaPak / STUDY00001753
- Conditions
- Organ Transplant
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Investigator's are doing this study to see which method of organ preservation leads to better outcomes for donated hearts.
There are two methods of organ preservation. The first method is the use of cold storage. With this method, the donor heart is stored in preservation fluid within bags that are then placed on ice and transported in a cooler. This is the usual method for transporting donor hearts. This is also known as "standard of care."
The second method is the use of the SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System. With this method, the donor heart is kept at a steady, consistent temperature throughout transportation. This method is not typically used for transporting donor hearts.
The study will include up to 20 people in total.
Detailed description
This is a randomized study and has 2 study groups. Participants will be randomly assigned to a group in a 1:1 ratio.
- 50% chance of receiving a donor heart using the SherpaPak™ method, or
- 50% chance of receiving a donor heart using the cold storage method.
The research team will analyze data from the medical records from the heart transplant and clinic visits up to 30 days after the heart transplant. Participants will be in the study for about 30 days.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System | Other | Device: SherpaPak™ DeviceWhen a matching donor heart from a non-local donor offer (from Northern California, Arizona, Nevada or farther geographies) becomes available the recipient will be assigned a subject identification number and randomized 1:1 to receive a heart transported using either standard of care cold storage or the SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System. |
| Cold Storage | Other | Other: Cold StorageWhen a matching donor heart from a non-local donor offer (from Northern California, Arizona, Nevada or farther geographies) becomes available the recipient will be assigned a subject identification number and randomized 1:1 to receive a heart transported using either standard of care cold storage or the SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Any sex/gender, 18 years of age or older listed for primary heart transplant.
- Subjects must be willing and be capable of understanding the purpose and risks of the study and must sign a statement of informed consent OR consent of a legally authorized representative of a cognitively impaired individual will be obtained before the cognitively impaired individual may be included in research.
- Signed: 1) written informed consent document and 2) authorization to use and disclose protected health information
- Subjects must receive and accept a non-local donor offer (from Northern California, Arizona, Nevada or farther geographies)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Re-do heart transplant
- Multi-organ transplant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SherpaPak™ DeviceThe SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System has been developed to provide a safe, consistent method for cold ischemic storage of donor hearts for transplantation. This device is FDA approved. | Device | SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System |
| Cold StorageFDA-approved method for organ procurement | Other | Cold Storage |
Primary outcome
Absence of Moderate to Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction (Left or Right Ventricle)
Time frame: 24 hours post-transplant
Percentage of subjects without moderate to severe primary graft dysfunction (left or right ventricle)
30-day Post-transplant Survival
Time frame: 30 day post heart transplant (htx)
Freedom From 30-day Ischemic Reperfusion Injury
Time frame: 30 day post htx
Freedom From 30-day Biopsy Proven Rejection
Time frame: 30 day post htx
Freedom From 30-day Any-treated Rejection
Time frame: 30 day post htx
10 secondary outcomes
Cardiac Index
Time frame: 24 hours post-transplant
Cardiac Output
Time frame: 24 hours post-transplant
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time frame: 24 hours post-transplant
Pulmonary Arterial Pressure
Time frame: 24 hours post-transplant
Vasoactive-Inotropic Score
Time frame: 24 hours post-transplant
Hospital Length of Stay
Time frame: within 30 days
Acute Cellular Rejection
Time frame: 30 days
1R
Time frame: 30 days
Antibody Mediated Rejection
Time frame: 30 days
pAMR 1
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data that underlies the results reported in this article, after deidentification.
Related trials for Organ Transplant
Recruiting
In-situ vs Ex-situ Liver Preservation
Liver Disease (Alcoholic or Not), Transplantation
RecruitingPhase 1
225Ac-DOTA-Anti-CD38 Daratumumab Monoclonal Antibody With Fludarabine, Melphalan and Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation as Conditioning Treatment for Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruiting
Improving Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation Using the Donation Advisor Clinical Decision Support Tool
Organ Donation After Circulatory Death, Organ Donation
Recruiting
Avoiding Recooling After Normothermic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation
Liver Transplantation (LT), Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
RecruitingPhase 2
High vs.Standard Dose Influenza Vaccine in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) Recipients
Immunization; Infection, Transplantation Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fardad Esmailian principal investigator
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SherpaPak™ Device and Cold Storage in people with Organ Transplant, run by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Absence of Moderate to Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction (Left or Right Ventricle) (time frame: 24 hours post-transplant). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2025.