Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaPhase 3NCT05197192
A Phase-3-trial of Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab & Venetoclax Compared to Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Patients With High Risk CLL
A Phase 3 study testing Obinutuzumab, Venetoclax and Acalabrutinib in people with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, run by German CLL Study Group at 30 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, superiority phase 3 study is designed to demonstrate that treatment with a triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GAVe) prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to treatment with the combination of obinutuzumab and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Obinutuzumab, Venetoclax and Acalabrutinib
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 202 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 19 Apr 2022to May 2028
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Documented CLL/SLL requiring treatment according to iwCLL criteria
- Age at least 18 years
- At least one of the following risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype (defined as defined as the presence of 3 or more chromosomal aberrations in 2 or more metaphases) or an unmutated IGHV gene status.
- Life expectancy ≥ six months
- Adequate bone marrow function indicated by a platelet count >30 x10^9/l
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 30ml/min
Show all 10Show fewer
- Adequate liver function as indicated by a total bilirubin ≤ 2 x, AST/ ALT ≤ 2.5 x the institutional ULN value, unless directly attributable to the patient's CLL or to Gilbert's Syndrome
- Negative testing for hepatitis B (HbsAg negative and anti-HBc negative; patients positive for anti-HBc may be included if PCR for HBV DNA is negative and HBV-DNA PCR is performed every month until 12 months after last treatment cycle),or hepatitis C (negative testing for hepatitis C RNA within 6 wee
- ks prior to registration for study screening (i.e. PCR only required when serology was positive))
- ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status) status 0-2
Who cannot join
- Any prior CLL-specific therapies (except corticosteroid treatment administered due to necessary immediate intervention; within the last 10 days before start of study treatment, only dose equivalents up to 20 mg prednisolone are permitted)
- Absence of high risk disease (17p-deletion, TP53-mutation complex karyotype
- An individual organ/system impairment score of 4 as assessed by the CIRS definition (e.g. advanced cardiac disease (NYHA class 3 or 4) limiting the ability to receive the study treatment or any other life-threatening illness, medical condition or organ system dysfunction that, in the investigator´s opinion, could compromise the patients safety or interfere with the absorption or metabolism of the study drugs (e.g. inability to swallow tablets or impaired resorption in the gastrointestinal tract)
- Transformation of CLL (Richter transformation)
- Malignancies other than CLL currently requiring systemic therapies
- Uncontrolled or active infection of HIV/PML or any other active infection
- Anticoagulant therapy with warfarin or phenoprocoumon
- Pregnant women and nursing mothers
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
30 sites in 1 country
Germany30 sites, 30 recruiting
- Recruiting
Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow
Bad Saarow, 15526
Daniel Schöndube
- Recruiting
DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick
Berlin, 12559
Christian Neumann
- Recruiting
Ev. Diakoniekrankenhaus
Bremen, 28239
Ralf Ulrich Trappe
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinik Köln
Cologne, 50937
Barbara Eichhorst
- Recruiting
St. Johannes Hospital
Dortmund, 44137
Ralf Meyer
- Recruiting
Marien Hospital Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40479
Stefanie Gröpper
- Recruiting
St. Antonius-Hospital
Eschweiler, 52249
Peter Staib
- Recruiting
Universitaetsklinikum Essen
Essen, 45147
Julia von Tresckow
- Recruiting
Katholisches Krankenhaus Hagen - St. Josefs Hospital
Hagen, 58097
Doris Kraemer
- Recruiting
Universitaetskliniken des Saarlandes
Homburg, 66424
Jörg Bittenbring
- Recruiting
Klinikum Idar-Oberstein SHG
Idar-Oberstein, 55743
Johannes Schneider
- Recruiting
Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
Karlsruhe, 76133
Henriette Huber
- Recruiting
Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel
Kiel, 24116
Matthias Ritgen
- Recruiting
Klinikum Landshut
Landshut, 84034
Christian Bogner
- Recruiting
Klinikum Lippe-Lemgo
Lemgo, 32657
Karin Heinisch
- Recruiting
St Vincenz Krankenhaus
Limburg, 65549
Thomas Neuhaus
- Recruiting
Universitaetsklinikum Magdeburg
Magdeburg, 39120
Ana Maria Waldleben
- Recruiting
Klinikum Hochsauerland - St. Walburga Krankenhaus
Meschede, 59872
Mohammad Wattad
- Recruiting
KH Kliniken Maria Hilf
Mönchengladbach, 41063
Ulrich Graeven
- Recruiting
Krankenhaus Muenchen-Schwabing
Munich, 80804
Clemens Wendtner
- Recruiting
Klinikum Rechts der Isar - Technische Universitaet Muenchen
Munich, 81675
Simon Heidegger
- Recruiting
Kliniken Ostalb, Stauferklinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd
Mutlangen, 73557
Holger Hebart
- Recruiting
Klinikum Oldenburg
Oldenburg, 26133
Andrea Renzelmann
- Recruiting
Brüderkrankenhaus St. Josef Paderborn
Paderborn, 33098
Tobias Gaska
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinik Rostock
Rostock, 18057
Sebastian Böttcher
- Recruiting
Caritas-Klinik St. Theresia
Saarbrücken, 66113
Michael Clemens
- Recruiting
Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böbingen
Sindelfingen, 71065
Markus Ritter
- Recruiting
Marienhospital Stuttgart
Stuttgart, 70199
Claudio Denzlinger
- Recruiting
Universitaetsklinik Tuebingen
Tübingen, 72076
Stefan Wirths
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinik Ulm
Ulm, 89081
Christof Schneider
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Open-label, Multicentre, Randomized, Phase-3-trial of Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax (GAVE) Compared to Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax (GVE) in Previously Untreated Patients With High Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, superiority phase 3 study is designed to demonstrate that treatment with a triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GAVe) prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to treatment with the combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GVe) in pa-tients with high risk CLL (defined as having at least one of the follow-ing risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype or an unmutated IGHV-gene status).
Read the detailed description
CLL is the most frequent leukemia in industrialized countries. International guidelines agree on diagnosis and management of this disease. The clinical course of CLL is highly variable and can be predicted by clinical staging (according to Rai and Binet) as well as genetic, serum markers and risk models. This study is designed for a randomized comparison of two different, non-chemotherapeutic and fixed-duration modalities for patients with high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and addresses a high medical need, since high risk-CLL represents a so far incurable, aggressive cancer. The high risk-group of CLL patients can be identified by molecular characteristics, allowing the inclusion of a clearly described group of patients: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation and/or complex karyotype.TP53 defects are the strongest prognostic factors for non-response to chemotherapy. Patients harboring TP53 defects should be treated with chemotherapy-free regimens. Complex karyotype (CKT), defined as the presence of three or more chromosomal aberrations in two or more metaphases is associated with a poorer outcome in various hematologic malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In CLL, CKT is one of several well established adverse prognostic factors, comparable to 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation or unmutated IGHV status. Depending on age and prior exposure to chemotherapy, 10-30% of patients with CLL exhibit CKT. A broad body of evidence has suggested a predictive prognostic value of CKT. Despite considerable advances with chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of frontline as well as relapsed/refractory (r/r) CLL, outcome of patients with CKT remains poor. To date, a randomized comparison to optimize the treatment of patients with high risk disease defined as either the presence of TP53 aberrations or CKT, by novel agents has not been performed. Patients with high risk CLL (TP53-defects and/or CKT) have a poor outcome with chemoimmunotherapy and do not benefit to the same extent from approved regimen such as continuous treatment of ibrutinib or 12 months treatment with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. Monotherapy with BTK-inhibitor is less effective in those patients as compared with patients without high risk disease. Venetoclax combined with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab offers a highly effective fixed-duration treatment option with a manageable toxicity profile. The recent results of the CLL14 study define a new standard of a fixed 12-months treatment with obinutuzumab and venetoclax in previously untreated patients yielding a major benefit also for patients with high risk disease as compared to chemoimmunotherapy. However, high risk patients appear to progress earlier than low risk patients and the therapy is not clearly curative so far. Acalabrutinib is a second generation, selective BTK inhibitor which has shown promising overall response rates in patients with relapsed CLL or patients intolerant to ibrutinib. The development of acalabrutinib focussed on minimization of off-target activity. Results of a three-arm study investigating the combination of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus acalabrutinib alone versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (NCT02475681) showed a substantial improvement of PFS for the combination arm and the monotherapy versus the standard chemoimmunotherapy regimen. The addition of a BTK-inhibitor, such as acalabrutinib to obinutuzumab and venetoclax has the potential to result in a better outcome, because synergistic effects have been reported between BTK inhibitors and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors or for BCL-2 inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Synergistic effects, which are expected to reduce early progressions or insufficient responses, are in particular important for this high risk population. The triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab (or rituximab) and venetoclax has been investigated in a phase 1 b- study and had a tolerable safety profile with minimal to no drug-drug interactions, results of a phase 2 trial studying the same combination showed that the triple combination was highly active with 78% undetectable MRD levels in the bone marrow . Currently, the GCLLSG conducts phase 2 studies, investigating a triple combination consisting of BTK- and Bcl2-inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies (CLL2GIVe: NCT02758665; CLL2BAAG: NCT03787264) and a large phase 3 trial with one experimental arm with a triple combination (CLL13, NCT02950051) but results are not yet published. Acalabrutinib, venetoclax and obinutuzumab is now being studied in a registrational phase 3 trial CL-311 (NCT03836261) against the current standard of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR), bendamustine/rituximab (BR) in patients without 17p-deletion or TP53-mutation. Acalabrutinib is indicated in Germany as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab for the treatment of adult patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
- Conditions
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- Being tested
- Obinutuzumab, Venetoclax, Acalabrutinib
- Keywords
- CLL, high risk, tp53 aberration, complex karyotype, unmutated IGHV gene status
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ObinutuzumabDrug
Also called Gazyva, Gazyvaro
Obinutuzumab i.v. infusion:
Cycle 1 Day 1: Obinutuzumab 100 mg i.v.
Cycle 1 Day 1 (or 2): Obinutuzumab 900 mg i.v.
Cycle 1 Day 8: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v.
Cycle 1 Day 15: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v.
Cycles 2-6: Day 1: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v.
VenetoclaxDrug
Also called Venclexta, Venclyxto
Venetoclax p.o.:
Cycle 1: Days 22-28: Venetoclax 20 mg (2 x 10 mg)
Cycle 2: Days 1-7: Venetoclax 50 mg (1 x 50 mg)
Cycle 2:Days 8-14: Venetoclax 100 mg (1 x 100 mg)
Cycle 2:Days: 15-21: Venetoclax 200 mg (2 x 100 mg)
Cycle 2:Days: 22-28: Venetoclax 400 mg (4 x 100 mg)
Cycles 3-12: Days 1-28: Venetoclax 400 mg (4 x 100 mg)
AcalabrutinibDrug
Also called Calquence
Cycles 15-24: Days 1-28:
100 mg acalabrutinib twice daily p.o. approx. every 12 hrs (corresponding to a total daily dose of 200 mg).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GAVe-Arm | Experimental | Acalabrutinib plus Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab plus (GAVe) Receives: Drug: Obinutuzumab; Drug: Venetoclax; Drug: Acalabrutinib |
| GVe-Arm | Experimental | Obinutuzumab plus Venetoclax (GVe) Receives: Drug: Obinutuzumab; Drug: Venetoclax |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free survival (PFS)
The study is designed to demonstrate that 14 cycles of treatment with GAVe followed by up to 10 cycles maintenance with acalabrutinib for patients with detectable MRD at cycle 14 day 14 prolong PFS as compared to 12 cycles of treatment with GVe in patients with high risk CLL (defined as hav-ing at least one of the following risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53- mutation or complex karyotype).
Measured: 50 months after FPI
Secondary outcomes (8)
Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels
Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in the peripheral blood (PB) and in the bone marrow (BM) at final restaging ((Staging 5) cycle 15 day 1 for patients in GVe study arm, cycle 14 day 14 for patients in GAVe study arm)
Measured: 50 months after FPI
MRD in PB at cycle 27 day 1
MRD in PB at cycle 27 day 1 for all patients (end of maintenance for patients in GAVe study arm, who had detectable MRD levels after 14 cycles of GAVe-treatment)
Measured: 50 months after FPI
Overall response rate
Overall response rate (ORR; as per iwCLL guidelines) at cycle 15
Measured: 50 months after FPI
Complete response rate
Complete response rate (CRR; as per iwCLL guidelines) at cycle 15
Measured: 50 months after FPI
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS)
Measured: 50 months after FPI
Event-free survival (EFS)
Event-free survival (EFS)
Measured: 50 months after FPI
Duration of response (DOR)
Duration of response (DOR)
Measured: 50 months after FPI
Time to next treatment (TTNT)
Time to next treatment (TTNT)
Measured: 50 months after FPI
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2022
- Study start19 Apr 2022
- Primary completionMay 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 202 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- German CLL Study Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Barbara Eichhorst, MD, Prof., Principal investigator, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05197192
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLL16
- Other IDs
- 2023-506414-46-00, 2023
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Open-label, Multicentre, Randomized, Phase-3-trial of Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax (GAVE) Compared to Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax (GVE) in Previously Untreated Patients With High Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05197192
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLL16
- Conditions
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- Keywords
- CLL, high risk, tp53 aberration, complex karyotype, unmutated IGHV gene status
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 202 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- German CLL Study GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
- Study start
- 19 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, superiority phase 3 study is designed to demonstrate that treatment with a triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GAVe) prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to treatment with the combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GVe) in pa-tients with high risk CLL (defined as having at least one of the follow-ing risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype or an unmutated IGHV-gene status).
Detailed description
CLL is the most frequent leukemia in industrialized countries. International guidelines agree on diagnosis and management of this disease. The clinical course of CLL is highly variable and can be predicted by clinical staging (according to Rai and Binet) as well as genetic, serum markers and risk models. This study is designed for a randomized comparison of two different, non-chemotherapeutic and fixed-duration modalities for patients with high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and addresses a high medical need, since high risk-CLL represents a so far incurable, aggressive cancer. The high risk-group of CLL patients can be identified by molecular characteristics, allowing the inclusion of a clearly described group of patients: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation and/or complex karyotype.TP53 defects are the strongest prognostic factors for non-response to chemotherapy. Patients harboring TP53 defects should be treated with chemotherapy-free regimens. Complex karyotype (CKT), defined as the presence of three or more chromosomal aberrations in two or more metaphases is associated with a poorer outcome in various hematologic malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In CLL, CKT is one of several well established adverse prognostic factors, comparable to 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation or unmutated IGHV status. Depending on age and prior exposure to chemotherapy, 10-30% of patients with CLL exhibit CKT. A broad body of evidence has suggested a predictive prognostic value of CKT. Despite considerable advances with chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of frontline as well as relapsed/refractory (r/r) CLL, outcome of patients with CKT remains poor. To date, a randomized comparison to optimize the treatment of patients with high risk disease defined as either the presence of TP53 aberrations or CKT, by novel agents has not been performed. Patients with high risk CLL (TP53-defects and/or CKT) have a poor outcome with chemoimmunotherapy and do not benefit to the same extent from approved regimen such as continuous treatment of ibrutinib or 12 months treatment with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. Monotherapy with BTK-inhibitor is less effective in those patients as compared with patients without high risk disease. Venetoclax combined with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab offers a highly effective fixed-duration treatment option with a manageable toxicity profile. The recent results of the CLL14 study define a new standard of a fixed 12-months treatment with obinutuzumab and venetoclax in previously untreated patients yielding a major benefit also for patients with high risk disease as compared to chemoimmunotherapy. However, high risk patients appear to progress earlier than low risk patients and the therapy is not clearly curative so far. Acalabrutinib is a second generation, selective BTK inhibitor which has shown promising overall response rates in patients with relapsed CLL or patients intolerant to ibrutinib. The development of acalabrutinib focussed on minimization of off-target activity. Results of a three-arm study investigating the combination of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus acalabrutinib alone versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (NCT02475681) showed a substantial improvement of PFS for the combination arm and the monotherapy versus the standard chemoimmunotherapy regimen. The addition of a BTK-inhibitor, such as acalabrutinib to obinutuzumab and venetoclax has the potential to result in a better outcome, because synergistic effects have been reported between BTK inhibitors and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors or for BCL-2 inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Synergistic effects, which are expected to reduce early progressions or insufficient responses, are in particular important for this high risk population. The triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab (or rituximab) and venetoclax has been investigated in a phase 1 b- study and had a tolerable safety profile with minimal to no drug-drug interactions, results of a phase 2 trial studying the same combination showed that the triple combination was highly active with 78% undetectable MRD levels in the bone marrow . Currently, the GCLLSG conducts phase 2 studies, investigating a triple combination consisting of BTK- and Bcl2-inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies (CLL2GIVe: NCT02758665; CLL2BAAG: NCT03787264) and a large phase 3 trial with one experimental arm with a triple combination (CLL13, NCT02950051) but results are not yet published. Acalabrutinib, venetoclax and obinutuzumab is now being studied in a registrational phase 3 trial CL-311 (NCT03836261) against the current standard of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR), bendamustine/rituximab (BR) in patients without 17p-deletion or TP53-mutation. Acalabrutinib is indicated in Germany as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab for the treatment of adult patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GAVe-Arm | Experimental | Drug: Obinutuzumab, Drug: Venetoclax, Drug: AcalabrutinibAcalabrutinib plus Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab plus (GAVe) |
| GVe-Arm | Experimental | Drug: Obinutuzumab, Drug: VenetoclaxObinutuzumab plus Venetoclax (GVe) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Documented CLL/SLL requiring treatment according to iwCLL criteria
- Age at least 18 years
- At least one of the following risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype (defined as defined as the presence of 3 or more chromosomal aberrations in 2 or more metaphases) or an unmutated IGHV gene status.
- Life expectancy ≥ six months
- Adequate bone marrow function indicated by a platelet count >30 x10^9/l
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Any prior CLL-specific therapies (except corticosteroid treatment administered due to necessary immediate intervention; within the last 10 days before start of study treatment, only dose equivalents up to 20 mg prednisolone are permitted)
- Absence of high risk disease (17p-deletion, TP53-mutation complex karyotype
- An individual organ/system impairment score of 4 as assessed by the CIRS definition (e.g. advanced cardiac disease (NYHA class 3 or 4) limiting the ability to receive the study treatment or any other life-threatening illness, medical condition or organ system dysfunction that, in the investigator´s opinion, could compromise the patients safety or interfere with the absorption or metabolism of the study drugs (e.g. inability to swallow tablets or impaired resorption in the gastrointestinal tract)
- Transformation of CLL (Richter transformation)
- Malignancies other than CLL currently requiring systemic therapies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ObinutuzumabAlso: Gazyva, GazyvaroObinutuzumab i.v. infusion: Cycle 1 Day 1: Obinutuzumab 100 mg i.v. Cycle 1 Day 1 (or 2): Obinutuzumab 900 mg i.v. Cycle 1 Day 8: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v. Cycle 1 Day 15: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v. Cycles 2-6: Day 1: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v. | Drug | GAVe-Arm, GVe-Arm |
| VenetoclaxAlso: Venclexta, VenclyxtoVenetoclax p.o.: Cycle 1: Days 22-28: Venetoclax 20 mg (2 x 10 mg) Cycle 2: Days 1-7: Venetoclax 50 mg (1 x 50 mg) Cycle 2:Days 8-14: Venetoclax 100 mg (1 x 100 mg) Cycle 2:Days: 15-21: Venetoclax 200 mg (2 x 100 mg) Cycle 2:Days: 22-28: Venetoclax 400 mg (4 x 100 mg) Cycles 3-12: Days 1-28: Venetoclax 400 mg (4 x 100 mg) | Drug | GAVe-Arm, GVe-Arm |
| AcalabrutinibAlso: CalquenceCycles 15-24: Days 1-28: 100 mg acalabrutinib twice daily p.o. approx. every 12 hrs (corresponding to a total daily dose of 200 mg). | Drug | GAVe-Arm |
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
The study is designed to demonstrate that 14 cycles of treatment with GAVe followed by up to 10 cycles maintenance with acalabrutinib for patients with detectable MRD at cycle 14 day 14 prolong PFS as compared to 12 cycles of treatment with GVe in patients with high risk CLL (defined as hav-ing at least one of the following risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53- mutation or complex karyotype).
8 secondary outcomes
Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
MRD in PB at cycle 27 day 1
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Overall response rate
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Complete response rate
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Duration of response (DOR)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Time to next treatment (TTNT)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2026.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL) Refractory to Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or Pirtobrutinib and Previously Treated With a BCL2 Inhibitor
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study of Monoclonal B Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL), Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM), and Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL)
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Nemtabrutinib Plus Venetoclax vs Venetoclax + Rituximab (VR) in Second-line (2L) + Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL) (MK-1026-010/BELLWAVE-010).
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Barbara Eichhorst, MD, Prof. principal investigator
Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne
30 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Obinutuzumab, Venetoclax and Acalabrutinib in people with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, run by German CLL Study Group at 30 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Barbara Eichhorst, MD, Prof. (+4922147888220, barbara.eichhorst@uk-koeln.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free survival (PFS) (time frame: 50 months after FPI). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026.